Iteration 2 #20

Open
dominictarr opened this Issue Jan 13, 2014 · 38 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
10 participants
@dominictarr
Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 13, 2014

Okay, I wont know what is actually going in this until users have seen the result of iteration 1.
I'm only creating this to test the code that detects iteration states.

progress bar

to fund: 18oBEV9hFdDMEct9Ys2bSAuEY4bi2KSMHi

  • #40 (spending from mobile is more convienent for hot wallets)
  • cache properly #46 (make the github api client code more intelligent, storing stuff locally, and requesting individual issues to confirm their state)
  • decouple payment confirmation, to make it easy to use alternative currencies, such as DOGE or maybe even usd (#9 (comment))
  • UI changes to badge #33
  • UI changes to summary page: #41
  • put target on badge: #48
  • correct progress on iteration page: #49

anything else?

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Jan 24, 2014

Owner

linked to issues for next iteration.

Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 24, 2014

linked to issues for next iteration.

@Raynos

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@Raynos

Raynos Jan 24, 2014

The iteration 2 badge is showing 5 ticks for 5 OPEN issues. I think thats a bug.

Raynos commented Jan 24, 2014

The iteration 2 badge is showing 5 ticks for 5 OPEN issues. I think thats a bug.

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Jan 24, 2014

Owner

yes.

Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 24, 2014

yes.

@Raynos

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@Raynos

Raynos Jan 25, 2014

can you update the badge on this readme so its a clickable link ?

Raynos commented Jan 25, 2014

can you update the badge on this readme so its a clickable link ?

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Jan 25, 2014

Owner

@Raynos it is now clickable.

Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 25, 2014

@Raynos it is now clickable.

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Jan 28, 2014

Owner

added: show target in badge

Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 28, 2014

added: show target in badge

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Jan 28, 2014

Owner

added "correct progress on iteration page"

Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 28, 2014

added "correct progress on iteration page"

@ralphtheninja

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@ralphtheninja

ralphtheninja Jan 28, 2014

Contributor

There seem to be some problems with the badge. It's not visible in this issue.

Contributor

ralphtheninja commented Jan 28, 2014

There seem to be some problems with the badge. It's not visible in this issue.

@Raynos

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@Raynos

Raynos Jan 28, 2014

If you go to the badge directly it works, it looks like githubs https cache failed :/

Raynos commented Jan 28, 2014

If you go to the badge directly it works, it looks like githubs https cache failed :/

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Jan 29, 2014

Owner

github changed how images work :(

Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 29, 2014

github changed how images work :(

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Jan 29, 2014

Owner

okay, I've fixed the headers... and changed the url, but it's not working for some reason.
I've opened an issue here: atmos/camo#37

Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 29, 2014

okay, I've fixed the headers... and changed the url, but it's not working for some reason.
I've opened an issue here: atmos/camo#37

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Jan 30, 2014

Owner

the badge is working again. the problem was that I didn't know to provide the cert chain to the server. it's that is not in the node https docs!

Owner

dominictarr commented Jan 30, 2014

the badge is working again. the problem was that I didn't know to provide the cert chain to the server. it's that is not in the node https docs!

@Raynos

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@Raynos

Raynos Jan 30, 2014

:)

Raynos commented Jan 30, 2014

:)

@joates

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@joates

joates Jan 31, 2014

Contributor

fyi: i'm going to a btc meetup in London on Feb 3rd, gonna buy some coin 4 ca$h because i wanna help fund this 1 ( plus i can get on the funders wall of fame !!) \o/ yay

Contributor

joates commented Jan 31, 2014

fyi: i'm going to a btc meetup in London on Feb 3rd, gonna buy some coin 4 ca$h because i wanna help fund this 1 ( plus i can get on the funders wall of fame !!) \o/ yay

@ralphtheninja

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@ralphtheninja

ralphtheninja Jan 31, 2014

Contributor

@joates Cool! Is that the meetup that @aantonop is attending?

Contributor

ralphtheninja commented Jan 31, 2014

@joates Cool! Is that the meetup that @aantonop is attending?

@joates

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@joates

joates Jan 31, 2014

Contributor

@ralphtheninja yes, he is scheduled, also Dr Gavin Wood (Ethereum core developer) probably 50% of the info will go way over my head, the other half will go way way over !! ;-) but i got to start learning this stuff at some point, might as well be now :))

Contributor

joates commented Jan 31, 2014

@ralphtheninja yes, he is scheduled, also Dr Gavin Wood (Ethereum core developer) probably 50% of the info will go way over my head, the other half will go way way over !! ;-) but i got to start learning this stuff at some point, might as well be now :))

@joates

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@joates

joates Feb 2, 2014

Contributor

anything else?

@dominictarr this is way off-topic but..

the prospect of Ethereum script (p̶y̶t̶h̶o̶n̶ ̶d̶e̶r̶i̶v̶a̶t̶i̶v̶e̶ [edit]it's actually a turing complete VM, so not limited to python![/edit]) making it possible to actually embed the application into the blockchain transaction has completely blown my mind these past few days.

this is a rapidly evolving technology & i think we just need to be aware of whats on the horizon and consider how it might affect this initiative as it emerges. ( IMO ethereum will be very well funded --when it launches-- and be very quick to get the product into the marketplace, there is already a c++ client but i guess it's pre-beta ).

Contributor

joates commented Feb 2, 2014

anything else?

@dominictarr this is way off-topic but..

the prospect of Ethereum script (p̶y̶t̶h̶o̶n̶ ̶d̶e̶r̶i̶v̶a̶t̶i̶v̶e̶ [edit]it's actually a turing complete VM, so not limited to python![/edit]) making it possible to actually embed the application into the blockchain transaction has completely blown my mind these past few days.

this is a rapidly evolving technology & i think we just need to be aware of whats on the horizon and consider how it might affect this initiative as it emerges. ( IMO ethereum will be very well funded --when it launches-- and be very quick to get the product into the marketplace, there is already a c++ client but i guess it's pre-beta ).

@joates

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@joates

joates Feb 14, 2014

Contributor

stalled ?
@dominictarr have you considered lowering the target to 1.0btc ?
alternatively..
how do we attract the additional 0.2btc funding ?

Contributor

joates commented Feb 14, 2014

stalled ?
@dominictarr have you considered lowering the target to 1.0btc ?
alternatively..
how do we attract the additional 0.2btc funding ?

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Feb 14, 2014

Owner

oh, I meant to post this update:
I am gonna just start this anyway soon,
I've just gotta finish up with some other stuff I have going on.

Owner

dominictarr commented Feb 14, 2014

oh, I meant to post this update:
I am gonna just start this anyway soon,
I've just gotta finish up with some other stuff I have going on.

@joates

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@joates

joates Mar 3, 2014

Contributor

bd408bf50da0c1f62715579e71450a5116c4ad02d150c722a0b60778cec84565

Contributor

joates commented Mar 3, 2014

bd408bf50da0c1f62715579e71450a5116c4ad02d150c722a0b60778cec84565

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Mar 6, 2014

Owner

okay, planning to start on this next week...

Owner

dominictarr commented Mar 6, 2014

okay, planning to start on this next week...

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Mar 12, 2014

Owner

okay, most of the UI stuff here is fixed (except that the badge looks wrong), next is the caching stuff, which is more complex, and will fix the badge.

Owner

dominictarr commented Mar 12, 2014

okay, most of the UI stuff here is fixed (except that the badge looks wrong), next is the caching stuff, which is more complex, and will fix the badge.

@joates

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@joates

joates Mar 26, 2014

Contributor

i've put quite a bit of effort into supporting this project, but it is unusable in its current state, i am now exclusively using bitcore as my primary app dependency, @dominictarr would you please consider refunding my BTC from this iteration ?
[edited to remove refund request, although @dominictarr offered the full refund without hesitation]

Contributor

joates commented Mar 26, 2014

i've put quite a bit of effort into supporting this project, but it is unusable in its current state, i am now exclusively using bitcore as my primary app dependency, @dominictarr would you please consider refunding my BTC from this iteration ?
[edited to remove refund request, although @dominictarr offered the full refund without hesitation]

@NHQ

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@NHQ

NHQ Mar 26, 2014

Collaborator

@joates 👎

Collaborator

NHQ commented Mar 26, 2014

@joates 👎

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Mar 27, 2014

Owner

@joates, I'm sorry to hear that - but I'll do that.

Owner

dominictarr commented Mar 27, 2014

@joates, I'm sorry to hear that - but I'll do that.

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Mar 27, 2014

Owner

by the way, I've picked the low hanging fruit for this iteration - next is just dealing with the caching - since I need something very like that for npmd, I've been working on https://github.com/dominictarr/level-content-cache which I'm also using https://github.com/dominictarr/npmd-cache. So, I should be finishing off this iteration soon.

Owner

dominictarr commented Mar 27, 2014

by the way, I've picked the low hanging fruit for this iteration - next is just dealing with the caching - since I need something very like that for npmd, I've been working on https://github.com/dominictarr/level-content-cache which I'm also using https://github.com/dominictarr/npmd-cache. So, I should be finishing off this iteration soon.

@joates

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@joates

joates Mar 27, 2014

Contributor

i want to revise my previous comment..
although i have decided to implement an alternative payment solution for my projects that doesn't change the fact that i also want to continue to support this project.
i was just venting some frustration, please accept my sincere apologies @dominictarr

Contributor

joates commented Mar 27, 2014

i want to revise my previous comment..
although i have decided to implement an alternative payment solution for my projects that doesn't change the fact that i also want to continue to support this project.
i was just venting some frustration, please accept my sincere apologies @dominictarr

@NHQ

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@NHQ

NHQ Mar 27, 2014

Collaborator

@joates 👍

Bitcore looks nice. I can see the potential for its use in FeedOpenSource, and obviously elsewares. What are your thoughts on it @dominictarr?

We gotta give FOS a breathing chance tho. Ugly as it is currently, and struggling with the very problem it seeks to resolve.

The speed at which BTC protocol based apps and systems are being built makes me wonder if FOS should focus more on the iterations, feedback, and general "crowd" related things, etc, instead of the BTC details. Crowdsourcing is getting crowded, in a good way. It will be nice to get FOS up to the level of, say, crowdtilt or like. I got some FOSS I wanna get funded!

To prove I'm serious, imma close this round funding.

point1
point2

<3

Collaborator

NHQ commented Mar 27, 2014

@joates 👍

Bitcore looks nice. I can see the potential for its use in FeedOpenSource, and obviously elsewares. What are your thoughts on it @dominictarr?

We gotta give FOS a breathing chance tho. Ugly as it is currently, and struggling with the very problem it seeks to resolve.

The speed at which BTC protocol based apps and systems are being built makes me wonder if FOS should focus more on the iterations, feedback, and general "crowd" related things, etc, instead of the BTC details. Crowdsourcing is getting crowded, in a good way. It will be nice to get FOS up to the level of, say, crowdtilt or like. I got some FOSS I wanna get funded!

To prove I'm serious, imma close this round funding.

point1
point2

<3

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Mar 29, 2014

Owner

Awesome! Thanks, I'm hopefully gonna get on this next few days - have 50% of the stuff ready.

Owner

dominictarr commented Mar 29, 2014

Awesome! Thanks, I'm hopefully gonna get on this next few days - have 50% of the stuff ready.

@dominictarr

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@dominictarr

dominictarr Mar 31, 2014

Owner

just 2 to go. the hardest will be the caching, but it might not be that hard.
hmm - since these urls are very mutable, it will pretty much have to request them everytime,
however, if we use caching headers correctly, they do not count against github's rate limit, so they we'll be able hit them more often.

Owner

dominictarr commented Mar 31, 2014

just 2 to go. the hardest will be the caching, but it might not be that hard.
hmm - since these urls are very mutable, it will pretty much have to request them everytime,
however, if we use caching headers correctly, they do not count against github's rate limit, so they we'll be able hit them more often.

@skddc

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@skddc

skddc Sep 3, 2014

Any progress on this iteration since April?

skddc commented Sep 3, 2014

Any progress on this iteration since April?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment