Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

In 1.5.9 struct headings appear at top of page, but not in 1.7.0 (Origin: bugzilla #632946) #3990

doxygen opened this Issue Jul 2, 2018 · 0 comments


None yet
1 participant
Copy link

doxygen commented Jul 2, 2018

status NEW severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.7.0 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch

Original attachment names and IDs:

On 2010-10-22 23:43:05 +0000, John Harrington wrote:

Enclosed find a simple project.  If you run this project with doxygen 1.5.9
with the provided config file, the struct headings 6.1 and 6.2 in Chapter 6
appear at the top of the page.  Run the project again with 1.7.0, and the
same sections are concatenated, with the headings appearing
wherever...directly after the previous section.

I will leave it to you to decide whether this is a bug, an enhancement
request, user error or other.  But in whatever case, please advise.

This bug report comes from a Qualcomm user.

On 2010-10-22 23:59:57 +0000, John Harrington wrote:

Oh, I should explain that we would prefer that the headings appear at the
top of the page, as in 1.5.9, but we are using 1.7.0.

On 2010-10-23 12:29:26 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

Did you forget to attach the example?

On 2010-10-25 17:25:24 +0000, John Harrington wrote:

Created attachment 173190
A small header containing two structs to illustrate different latex output
wrt to struct headers

Apologies, here is the zip!

On 2010-10-25 21:52:48 +0000, John Harrington wrote:

Created attachment 173225
Same as laast attachment except added a couple modules to show the same
issue applies to module headings

It was pointed out to me that the same issue applies to module headings, so
I'm adding a second zip that has three different modules, to illustrate the

On 2010-12-08 22:07:16 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

*** Bug 636795 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.