New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Meta tag generator for HTML output (Origin: bugzilla #683976) #4886

Open
doxygen opened this Issue Jul 2, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@doxygen
Owner

doxygen commented Jul 2, 2018

status REOPENED severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.8.1.2-SVN on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch

Original attachment names and IDs:

On 2012-09-13 17:13:47 +0000, albert wrote:

HTML has the possibility to have metadata information tags. In Firefox this can be viewed with "View Page info" (right mouse button).
It would be nice that Doxygen would show itself with its name and version number.

On 2012-09-13 17:17:03 +0000, albert wrote:

Created attachment 224247
PATCH: added matadat with doxygen name and version

This patch shows in the generated pages the metadata with name generator signaling that the page has been generated by Doxygen and it also gives the Doxygen version.

On 2012-09-16 08:33:19 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

Thanks, I'll include the patch in the next update.

On 2012-10-07 16:23:58 +0000, albert wrote:

The problem is the same as with the implantation with the implementation of bug 683718, the version written to the html header file should be the version that generated the html header file and not the current version of Doxygen. For the searchindex.xcpp the implementation is correct as here the versionString of the creating version is used.

On 2012-12-26 16:09:28 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:

This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.8.3. Please verify if this is indeed the case. Reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed and please include any additional information
that you think can be relevant.

On 2013-01-06 10:31:33 +0000, albert wrote:

See comment 3.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment