Doxygen 1.8.13 [Linux ARM64] producing poor output

[mnguyenpdftron]

Doxygen 1.8.13 produces poor output compared to Doxygen 1.8.5.
I attached the two outputs for comparison. I used "GENERATE_HTMLHELP=NO" in both cases. The reason I used Doxygen 1.8.13 because it's for Linux arm64 openjdk:8-jdk-slim-buster.
Any recommendation on how to fix it?
Thanks
Linux_ARM64_Doxygen1.8.13.zip
Linux_x86_64_Doxygen1.8.5.zip

[doxygen]

@mnguyenpdftron without being able to reproduce the problem (since you only provided output and not a way to generated said output), it looks like your project uses a custom HTML header and/or footer which is tailored for 1.8.5, but is no longer compatible with 1.8.13.

Please check your Doxyfile and clear the HTML_HEADER, HTML_FOOTER, and HTML_STYLESHEET options and then try again. If the output works ok, you can try to upgrade the customization.
You can use doxygen -w html header.html footer.html doxygen.sty to generate the defaults file that match your doxygen version and then customize them to match the desired style.

[mnguyenpdftron]

Thank you very much for your prompt reply. It looks like this is the information that I'm looking for.

[mnguyenpdftron]

If we'd like to build doxygen 1.8.5 in the arm64 docker (to keep using our current custom header and foot and css), do you think it's feasible?

[albert-github]

It might be feasible, but the 1.8.5 is build with the qmake tool and not with cmake furthermore it is very old (August 23, 2013). The 1.8.13 is also very old (December 29, 2016) but build with cmake.
The current doxygen version is 1.9.4, so my advise would be invest a little bit of time in updating the header and footer files to the current version (probably best start from scratch with these 2 files and see what you want to change / add).

[mnguyenpdftron]

Thank you for the feedback!

[mnguyenpdftron]

FYI, I was able to build Linux ARM64 executable for 1.8.5.