Update DDF for battery bindings for Aubess/Tuya temperature and humidity sensors

[Finne75]

Set longer read intervals, inspired by this comment in #6697. Remove deprecated file for Aubess multisensor TZ3000.

[BabaIsYou]

Hi @Finne75, what do you think about changing "swversion" "refresh.interval" in snzb-02 DDF accordingly to 86400 like other DDF in this list ? ;-)

[Finne75]

Hi @Finne75, what do you think about changing "swversion" "refresh.interval" in snzb-02 DDF accordingly to 86400 like other DDF in this list ? ;-)

Sounds like a great idea :)

[BabaIsYou]

Changes for SNBZ-02 are already included in PR #6699 that add support for another device. Then I suggest you to drop this file off this PR. Sorry about that

[SwoopX]

I'd prefer not to make those changes to battery reporting, as this results in just a single report per 24h. Then you got other people complaining that the devices do not work properly anymore and they want to have more reports...

[BabaIsYou]

I'd prefer not to make those changes to battery reporting, as this results in just a single report per 24h.

          "at": "0x0021",
          "dt": "0x20",
          "min": 3600,
          "max": 84600,
          "change": "0x00000002"

means for me minimum 1 hour, maximum 1 day, or any change of 2 degree ... Am I wrong ?

[Finne75]

Changes for SNBZ-02 are already included in PR #6699 that add support for another device. Then I suggest you to drop this file off this PR. Sorry about that

No problem. How do I do this, should I make a commit with the original version before your PR?

[Finne75]

I'd prefer not to make those changes to battery reporting, as this results in just a single report per 24h.

          "at": "0x0021",
          "dt": "0x20",
          "min": 3600,
          "max": 84600,
          "change": "0x00000002"

means for me minimum 1 hour, maximum 1 day, or any change of 2 degree ... Am I wrong ?

How about maximum half (42300) a day as a compromise?

[BabaIsYou]

How about maximum half (42300) a day as a compromise?

With a "refresh.interval": 3600, on the battery resource I don't see why we should change this binding.