Main loop: rework timer logic

[tobast]

This logic was over-complicated and caused multiple bugs. This hopefully remediates to this for good. Fixes #1196.

I finally took the time to look at the timer logic of the run function, check what was actually needed, and came up with this simplification. I tried to document it in the function, feedback welcome :)

This passes make test correctly:

$ make test
[…]
Total: 193 tests (84019 ticks, 0.084 sec), 2529 assertions
Pass: 193, fail: 0, skip: 0.

Issue #1196 is also fixed: I tried manually the scenarios I could think of (including the one mentioned in the issue) and could not get a Source ID xx was not found error.

Note for the future: replacing g_timeout_add with g_timeout_add_once would enhance robustness, in case a bug causes two timers to be running concurrently — which would double the number of invocations of run unnecessarily, until no notifications are shown for a time, and could exponentially blow-up if the bug occurs within the bug. However, this function was introduced in GLib 2.74, which is too recent for eg. Debian Bullseye.

[bynect]

Looks good to me. We have to wait for the ci to work again though

[fwsmit]

You could maybe use an #if to use the new glib function where available

[bynect]

You could maybe use an #if to use the new glib function where available

Wouldn't that be just redundant, given that currently this does the same thing?

[tobast]

In my opinion, using g_timeout_add_once adds a slight bit of robustness, but adding conditionals on the version of glib would decrease robustness -- eventually one of the branches of the preprocessor would be changed without the other being updated, etc., causing more opportunities for bugs than it remedies to.

[bynect]

Could you please rebase to master for the ci?

[codecov-commenter]

⚠️ Please install the to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 65.64%. Comparing base (bd5b333) to head (5702095).
Report is 89 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/dunst.c	0.00%	16 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1308      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.65%   65.64%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          50       50              
  Lines        8051     8052       +1     
  Branches      928      925       -3     
==========================================
  Hits         5286     5286              
- Misses       2765     2766       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	65.64% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[bynect]

Thanks @tobast

[tobast]

Whoops, sorry for not merging the review! I've been pretty busy…