New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Work with consultant to improve EQT policies #12

joereddington opened this Issue Jul 2, 2018 · 6 comments


2 participants
Copy link

joereddington commented Jul 2, 2018

From Comic Relief:

"So yes, as discussed we’ve given you an additional £3,500 to spend on consultancy to support the strengthening of your financial management and processes and your governance."


We want to have effective and up to date finantial management and governance. As a secondary goals we also want to be able to demonstrate to funders and auditors that:

  • We are a safe pair of hands
  • We have all our ducks in a row
  • We are 'sound'

Metaphors asside - we've been marked down by some funders recently on our govenance - Children in Need, Arts Council denied us funding on that basis and Comic Relief presumably don't give this money to people with all their ducks in a row. So it would be extremely good to know what these funders are ideally looking for when they do their due dilligence. That's NOT to say we intend to completely capitulate, but if we know what they want they we can highlight the relevent parts.

What we want the consultant to do.

Three phases:

  • Write a report with recommendations
  • Give us a few months to implement the recommendations
  • Come back, reassess and give us a testimonal we can put on the website that says "I, a proper clever person, think these guys are serious guys"

As a bonus 'getting started' deliverable, we'd like the consultant to give us a model answer to a couple of questions we've had to funders - as discussed above, we can either work to make everything in the model answer true, or we can use is as a starting point.

The report

We expect four sections in the report. The first two are should/musts for our organisation and they should make up the main proportion of the work. Items 3 and 4 are much smaller. We recognise that all sections are somewhat subjective, particularly 3 and 4 and we would be happy to see the consultant 'get into character' for 3 and 4.

  1. We'd like a list of things that the charity should/must be doing at it's current size,
  2. We'd like a list of things that the charity should/must be doing when it reaches, for the sake of the argument, a £250,000 turnover.
  3. We'd also like to consider Thora Masoud. Thora does due dilligence for a large UK funder and will assess us for a £400,000 grant sometime in the next five years. We'd like to know what she needs to see give us a clear bill of health. We might NOT do any of them, but we want to know what they are.
  4. Lastly we'd like to consider Argiñe Trafford. She is serious person in central government and she happens to be browsing our website because she is interested in one of our projects. We'd like to know what should be on our website in terms of finance and govenance to make Argiñe take us seriously.

How are we going to do this?

  • Weekly meetings, where we supply him with any information he requires.
  • Deadline date for report.
  • Share this issue with them, encourage them to use it.


  • Recruit Consulant
    • get recommendations from Comic Relief
    • get recommendations from MySociety (the organisation we'd like to grow up into)
    • get term of reference from two consultances
    • choose
  • argree milestones and regular meeting time.
  • Get report
  • work on report in seperate issues
  • Get updated checks.

@joereddington joereddington created this issue from a note in Public Tasks (A named person needs this, but there isn't a deadline) Jul 2, 2018


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

joereddington commented Sep 6, 2018

One consultant asked for the Arts Council Feedback export.pdf

Interestingly we met the finance requirement on a previous application.
export (1).pdf


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

joereddington commented Oct 2, 2018

We've picked a consultant and we're going with them. They've asked for the following.

  • All relevant financial management policies, procedures and templates including procurement
  • Delegated authority document (e.g. document which shows who can approve what)
  • Other key policies in place e.g. anti-fraud and corruption and whistleblowing

All approved policies are in the policies section of with the exception of this general prodedure for approving expenses:

  • Chart of Accounts - codes and structure

We do NOT have one of these.

  • The 2018/19 approved organisational budget

We do NOT have one of these.

  • A recent donor funding proposal and budget, plus recent rejected donor budgets and proposals e.g. Arts Council/Children in Need/Comic relief

Some useful links:

  • Latest set of management accounts

There's a set in preperation, all other management accounts are in the 'Accounts' section of

  • A recent project financial report (for internal monitoring not for donor reporting)


  • Most recent donor reports - both financial and narrative


  • Draft financial statements for 2017/18 if available for year ending 31 August 2018

I might need clarification on this one.

  • Any recent audit reports (internal, external and/or donor)

eQuality Time hasn't been audited.

  • Organogram

We do not have one.

  • Latest Board meeting minutes where discussing the financial review/progress/forecasting/budget

All minutes are in the 'Minutes' section of

  • Strategic plan and financing strategy

We are due to aggree one I believe on Saturday. (The last one ran out recently)


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

joereddington commented Oct 8, 2018

Phone call with Rob,

List of Topics

  1. model answers and ordering

Aggreed to start with a 'model answer search' along the lines of 'couple of hours reading up, couple of hours writing' for either (or both) of the managument sections of the arts council or Children in need funding streams.

  1. Interviews

Trustees are availible to interview. JR to send email address.

  1. Instant reaction to state of docuemnts



This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

joereddington commented Nov 26, 2018

We now have the report from Rob. It's here:
eQuality Time Financial Management and Financial Governance Review - final 21 Nov.pdf

It's a little bruising, but it's also correct (and if your feedback isn't bruising...). We'll be working on it in various forms over the next couple of months.


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

joereddington commented Nov 26, 2018

The action points are sorted in this excel file:
Consultant Recommendations.xlsx

@joereddington joereddington referenced this issue Dec 6, 2018


Import all Bank Transactions into Quickbooks #61

3 of 7 tasks complete

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

joereddington-public commented Jan 15, 2019

Reviewing document - we've ticked some actions off. The new document is here:

Next Action points are:

  • There is a policy detailing who can authorise purchases of different types or value.

eQuality Time should introduce formal delegated authority (within a delegated authority document) that clarifies who has the authority for making financial decisions, such as limits for committing, approving and authorising expenditure, as well as signing other legal documents such as income agreements. Proof of compliance with the delegated authority would be required, for example if two people were required to authorise a specific expenditure (eg on a purchase order).

  • There is a go/no go process which consider both programmatic and financial elements in decisions to proceed with funding for projects.
  • The delegated authority document should include formal authorisation limits for signing income agreements.
  • Train staff
  • Monthly bank reconciliations should be undertaken and reviewed by someone who did not prepare them.


eQuality Time - delegated Authority Policy.docx

Next actions: send to trustees and make this post a seperate issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment