Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

{data}[gfbf/2022b] scikit-learn v1.2.1 w/ Python 3.10.8 #17456

Merged

Conversation

VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor

@VRehnberg VRehnberg commented Mar 2, 2023

@VRehnberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note that I've removed the sklearn==0.0 extension that was there in previous versions as I didn't see a reason for having that.

@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Mar 2, 2023

Note that I've removed the sklearn==0.0 extension that was there in previous versions as I didn't see a reason for having that.

Please restore that, see #15613 for motivation

@boegel boegel added the update label Mar 2, 2023
@boegel boegel added this to the 4.x milestone Mar 2, 2023
@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Test report by @branfosj
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03a.bear.cluster - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/d1b5eb97c19166eeb1e86515666475be for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ generoso

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=17456 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_17456 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 10422

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1463875296 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@schiotz
Copy link
Contributor

schiotz commented Mar 10, 2023

Test report by @schiotz
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
slid.fysik.dtu.dk - Linux CentOS Linux 7.9.2009, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v4 @ 2.20GHz, Python 2.7.5
See https://gist.github.com/e5c35af3a6e79458e1b0117f437db30b for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cns1 - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2667 v3 @ 3.20GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/fde0d05483ad2c467bc4d9fb17359d7b for a full test report.

@branfosj
Copy link
Member

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen2

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@branfosj: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen2l1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster

PR test command 'EB_PR=17456 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --mem-per-cpu=4000M --job-name test_PR_17456 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen2.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 2315

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 1463889931 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen2c1.int.jsc-zen2.easybuild-test.cluster - Linux Rocky Linux 8.5, x86_64, AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor (zen2), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/841e17601ab234dceeaae0788cd0bb19 for a full test report.

@branfosj branfosj modified the milestones: 4.x, next release (4.7.1) Mar 10, 2023
@branfosj
Copy link
Member

Going in, thanks @VRehnberg!

@branfosj branfosj merged commit e4dc159 into easybuilders:develop Mar 10, 2023
10 checks passed
@VRehnberg VRehnberg deleted the 20230302154803_new_pr_scikit-learn121 branch March 10, 2023 14:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants