diff --git a/tech-talks/008_avx10.html b/tech-talks/008_avx10.html
index 86e9224d..79447736 100644
--- a/tech-talks/008_avx10.html
+++ b/tech-talks/008_avx10.html
@@ -12,17 +12,31 @@
       <header>
         <h1 align="center"><img align="center" alt="EasyBuild" src="../images/easybuild_logo_small.png"/></h1><br/>
         <h4 align="center" style="color:#cccccc">EasyBuild Tech Talks VIII</h4>
-        <h2 align="center" style="color:#ffffff">AVX10 for HPC, a reasonable solution to the folly of AVX-512</h2>
+        <h2 align="center" style="color:#ffffff">AVX10 for HPC: 
+A reasonable solution to the 7 levels of AVX-512 folly </h2>
         <h4 align="center" style="color:#cccccc">Felix LeClair - Fri 13 Oct 2023</h4>
       </header>
       <section>
             <em><h4>Talk description</h4></em>
             <p>
-            ...
+            HPC has been using Same Instruction, Multiple Data paradigms to increase the performance of machines, libraries and codes since the early Cray Vector processors. This talk provides a historical overview of x86 SIMD from the 90's to modern and unreleased processors in the form of AVX10, specifically its impact within High Performance Computing. 
+
+            Focusing on HPC, this talk is targeted on two primary demographics: Those in HPC packaging/system administration as well as those in HPC Compiler/Library optimization.  
+The end goal of this talk is to demystify AVX in all its forms, from the HPC focused AVX1, the general workload focused AVX2, and the 7 different, non-overlapping levels of AVX512, and a return to normality with AVX10. HPC stands to benefit from AVX10 not by having new instructions, but rather by setting a new common baseline that developers, administrators and users can universally target without having had to run their own assembly routines prior to moving from one cluster to another.    
             </p>
             <p>
             Outline of the talk:
             <ul>
+            In the beginning, there was x87, and we've universally agreed this was a bad idea
+            MMX: Look mum! I can do two things at once!
+            SSE1-2: Now I can do 4 things, and operate on real data types! 
+            SSE3-4.2: I can do 4 things, and now I can manipulate *how* I do them 
+            AVX1: 256 bits of floating point action, time for maths to fly 
+            AVX2: You get an integer! You get an interger! Everbody get's an integer
+            AVX512 Part 1: They were the best of times, they were the worst of times. 
+            AVX512 Part 2: *And then things went very, very wrong*
+            AVX512 Part 3: *Why yes, I too would like 5 more spec exantions without contiguous supersets*
+
                 <li>...</li>
             </ul>
             </p>