GDPR dialogs have to accepted on Sanoma Corporation sites (issues with embedded content) #12806
Comments
peace2000
changed the title
|
|
|
Later, I'm going to make selective blocking rules for uBO on these sites but I'm still working on with that. (Only hide GDPR dialog if the page doesn't have embedded stuff). But anyway, GDPR requests must be allowed on these pages and dialogs must be dealt with by using cosmetic filters (and |
Lol, even with games... :D But yeah, seems so: That is Sanoma owned site also... affected by |
|
How about this. we remove sp-prod.net and replace it with: (Care of Adguard)
|
|
EDIT; check my latest message, not this. I would not completely remove This picture is from
There are still other connections to that address. Concerning these Sanoma Corporation domains, that connection is required of course (can't be blocked), but if it's ok for the page to block the dialog, blocking just |
|
Yeah, imo there should be filter for blocking all requests if the site has no issues. |
|
No wait, I think I was wrong after all. When I just disabled |
|
Related: #12822 |
List the website(s) you're having issues:
aamulehti.fietlehti.figloria.fihs.fihyvaterveys.fiis.fijamsanseutu.fijanakkalansanomat.fikankaanpaanseutu.fikmvlehti.fikodinkuvalehti.fimerikarvialehti.finokianuutiset.firakennuslehti.firannikkoseutu.fisatakunnankansa.fisoppa365.fisuurkeuruu.fisydansatakunta.fitiede.fityrvaansanomat.fivalkeakoskensanomat.fivauva.fiSome sample links:
https://www.is.fi/politiikka/art-2000008974427.htmlhttps://www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000008983457.htmlhttps://www.jamsanseutu.fi/uutiset/art-2000008830345.htmlhttps://www.aamulehti.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000008983458.htmlhttps://www.vauva.fi/comment/42579908#comment-42579908https://www.tiede.fi/artikkeli/uutiset/halvaantunut-pystyi-kirjoittamaan-ajatuksen-voimallaWhat happens?
GDPR dialog can't be blocked without causing issues with embedded content. It must be allowed.
List Subscriptions you're using:
Easylist Cookie
Your settings
Other details:
Issues are caused by this rule:
||sp-prod.net^$third-party,domain=~11freunde.de|~autobild.de|~bike-bild.de|~bild.de|~bitcoinmagazine.com|~boerse-online.de|~bold.dk|~businessinsider.de|~businessinsider.fr|~bz-berlin.de|~caramia.de|~clever-tanken.de|~computerbild.de|~dengarden.com|~djbooth.net|~edelblech.de|~f4wonline.com|~fashionista.com|~faz.net|~finanzen.at|~finanzen.ch|~finanzen.net|~fitbook.de|~gentside.com|~gofeminin.de|~hobbylark.com|~holidappy.com|~hubpages.com|~idealo.at|~idealo.co.uk|~idealo.de|~idealo.es|~idealo.fr|~idealo.it|~immonet.de|~insider.com|~kombi.de|~levelskip.com|~maxisciences.com|~meinestadt.de|~metal-hammer.de|~mixedmartialarts.com|~mtonews.com|~musikexpress.de|~myhomebook.de|~n24.de|~noizz.de|~onmeda.de|~owlcation.com|~pairedlife.com|~politico.eu|~psmag.com|~reelrundown.com|~rollingstone.de|~spinditty.com|~sportbild.de|~stylebook.de|~t3n.de|~techbook.de|~testbild.de|~thestreet.com|~toughnickel.com|~transfermarkt.at|~transfermarkt.ch|~transfermarkt.co.uk|~transfermarkt.com|~transfermarkt.com.tr|~transfermarkt.de|~transfermarkt.fr|~transfermarkt.it|~transfermarkt.nl|~transfermarkt.pl|~transfermarkt.pt|~transfermarkt.us|~travelbook.de|~turbofuture.com|~tvspielfilm.de|~vip.de|~welt.de|~wieistmeineip.at|~wieistmeineip.ch|~wieistmeineip.de|~writersdigest.com|~zuio.tvBut frankly, shouldn't that rule be removed instead and use
||sp-prod.net^$third-partyonly as a specific rule? A blocking rule shouldn't cause issues with that many domains...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: