feat: add definition of Rule to schemas #188
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
juliapampus
changed the title
arnoweiss
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2025
mkollenstart
approved these changes
Jun 16, 2025
mkollenstart
merged commit e7dc485
into
eclipse-dataspace-protocol-base:main
5 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR changes/adds
Adds definition of prohibition to schemas. Unifies
permissionandprohibitiontoRule.Why it does that
Prohibitions objects are not modelled in the JSON schemas, but are referenced as properties.
Further notes
--
Linked Issue(s)
Closes #162
Please be sure to take a look at the contributing guidelines and our etiquette for pull requests.