diff --git a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/attributes/test_prohibited_words.rst b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/attributes/test_prohibited_words.rst
index 4a470ecaf..506bad566 100644
--- a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/attributes/test_prohibited_words.rst
+++ b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/attributes/test_prohibited_words.rst
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 
 
 .. Title contains no stop word
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_req__test__title_good: contains a weak word: `must` in option: `title`. Please revise the wording.
+#EXPECT-NOT: title
 
 .. feat_req:: This is a test
    :id: feat_req__test__title_good
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: stkh_req__test_title_good: contains a weak word: `must` in option: `title`. Please revise the wording.
+#EXPECT-NOT: title
 
 .. stkh_req:: This is a test
    :id: stkh_req__test_title_good
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
 
 
 .. Description of architecture view of type feat_arc_sta is not checked for weak words
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_arc_sta_desc_good: contains a weak word: `really` in option: `content`. Please revise the wording.
+#EXPECT-NOT: content
 
 .. feat_arc_sta:: This is a test
    :id: feat_arc_sta_desc_good
diff --git a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/graph/test_metamodel_graph.rst b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/graph/test_metamodel_graph.rst
index b93561e0e..3f44a28a2 100644
--- a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/graph/test_metamodel_graph.rst
+++ b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/graph/test_metamodel_graph.rst
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 
 
 .. Positive Test: Child requirement QM. Parent requirement has the correct related safety level. Parent requirement is `QM`.
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_req__child__1: Parent need `feat_req__parent__QM` does not fulfill condition `safety == QM`. Explanation: An ASIL requirement must link at least one parent/upstream ASIL requirement for correct decomposition. Please ensure the parent’s safety level is QM and its status is valid.
+#EXPECT-NOT: safety
 
 .. feat_req:: Child requirement 1
    :id: feat_req__child__1
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
 
 
 .. Positive Test: Child requirement ASIL B. Parent requirement has the correct related safety level. Parent requirement is `QM`.
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_req__child__2: Parent need `feat_req__parent__ASIL_B` does not fulfill condition `safety == QM`. Explanation: An ASIL requirement must link at least one parent/upstream ASIL requirement for correct decomposition. Please ensure the parent’s safety level is QM and its status is valid.
+#EXPECT-NOT: safety
 
 .. feat_req:: Child requirement 2
    :id: feat_req__child__2
@@ -62,17 +62,6 @@
 
 
 
-.. Parent requirement does not exist
-#EXPECT: unknown outgoing link
-
-.. feat_req:: Child requirement 4
-   :id: feat_req__linking_to_unknown_parent
-   :safety: ASIL_B
-   :status: valid
-   :satisfies: feat_req__parent0__abcd
-
-
-
 .. Mitigation of Safety Analysis (FMEA and DFA) shall be checked. Mitigation shall have the same or higher safety level than the analysed item.
 .. Negative Test: Linked to a mitigation that is lower than the safety level of the analysed item.
 #EXPECT: feat_saf_dfa__child__5: Parent need `feat_req__parent__QM` does not fulfill condition `safety != QM`. Explanation: An ASIL_B safety requirement must link to a ASIL_B requirement. Please ensure that the linked requirements safety level is not QM and it's status is valid.
@@ -85,7 +74,7 @@
 
 
 .. Positive Test: Linked to a mitigation that is equal to the safety level of the analysed item.
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_dfa__child__6: Parent need `feat_req__parent__ASIL_B` does not fulfill condition `safety != QM`. Explanation: An ASIL_B safety requirement must link to a ASIL_B requirement. Please ensure that the linked requirements safety level is not QM and it's status is valid.
+#EXPECT-NOT: safety
 
 .. feat_saf_dfa:: Child requirement 6
    :id: feat_saf_dfa__child__6
@@ -106,7 +95,7 @@
 
 
 .. Positive Test: Linked to a mitigation that is equal to the safety level of the analysed item.
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_saf_dfa__child__8: Parent need `feat_req__parent__ASIL_B` does not fulfill condition `safety != QM`. Explanation: An ASIL_B safety requirement must link to a ASIL_B requirement. Please ensure that the linked requirements safety level is not QM and it's status is valid.
+#EXPECT-NOT: safety
 
 .. comp_saf_dfa:: Child requirement 8
    :id: comp_saf_dfa__child__8
@@ -127,7 +116,7 @@
 
 
 .. Positive Test: Linked to a mitigation that is equal to the safety level of the analysed item.
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_dfa__child__10: Parent need `feat_req__parent__ASIL_B` does not fulfill condition `safety != QM`. Explanation: An ASIL_B safety requirement must link to a ASIL_B requirement. Please ensure that the linked requirements safety level is not QM and it's status is valid.
+#EXPECT-NOT: safety
 
 .. feat_saf_dfa:: Child requirement 10
    :id: feat_saf_dfa__child__10
@@ -148,7 +137,7 @@
 
 
 .. Positive Test: Linked to a mitigation that is equal to the safety level of the analysed item.
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_fmea__child__12: Parent need `feat_req__parent__ASIL_B` does not fulfill condition `safety != QM`. Explanation: An ASIL_B safety requirement must link to a ASIL_B requirement. Please ensure that the linked requirements safety level is not QM and it's status is valid.
+#EXPECT-NOT: safety
 
 .. feat_saf_fmea:: Child requirement 12
    :id: feat_saf_fmea__child__12
@@ -159,7 +148,7 @@
 
 
 .. Positive Test: Linked to a mitigation that is higher to the safety level of the analysed item.
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_fmea__child__13: Parent need `feat_req__parent__ASIL_B` does not fulfill condition `safety != QM`. Explanation: An ASIL_B safety requirement must link to a ASIL_B requirement. Please ensure that the linked requirements safety level is not QM and it's status is valid.
+#EXPECT-NOT: safety
 
 .. feat_saf_fmea:: Child requirement 13
    :id: feat_saf_fmea__child__13
@@ -179,8 +168,7 @@
 
 
 .. Positive Test: Linked to a mitigation that is equal to the safety level of the analysed item.
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_saf_fmea__child__15: Parent need `feat_req__parent__ASIL_B` does not fulfill condition `safety != QM`. Explanation: An ASIL_B safety requirement must link to a ASIL_B requirement. Please ensure that the linked requirements safety level is not QM and it's status is valid.
-
+#EXPECT-NOT: safety
 .. comp_saf_fmea:: Child requirement 15
    :id: comp_saf_fmea__child__15
    :safety: ASIL_B
diff --git a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/id_contains_feature/test_id_contains_feature.rst b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/id_contains_feature/test_id_contains_feature.rst
index 5b6aa74ad..b8ea0f11c 100644
--- a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/id_contains_feature/test_id_contains_feature.rst
+++ b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/id_contains_feature/test_id_contains_feature.rst
@@ -13,13 +13,6 @@
    # *******************************************************************************
 #CHECK: id_contains_feature
 
-.. Feature is deeper in the path of the RST file
-.. This is now explicitly allowed
-#EXPECT-NOT: std_wp__test__abcd.id (std_wp__test__abcd): Feature 'test' not in path
-
-.. std_wp:: This is a test
-   :id: std_wp__test__abcd
-
 .. Feature is in the path of the RST file
 #EXPECT-NOT: Feature 'id_contains_feature' not in path
 
diff --git a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/options/test_options_options.rst b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/options/test_options_options.rst
index fdad574c7..014e1e25d 100644
--- a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/options/test_options_options.rst
+++ b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/rst/options/test_options_options.rst
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
 
 
 .. All required options are present
-#EXPECT-NOT: std_wp__test__abcd: is missing required attribute
+#EXPECT-NOT: attribute
 
 .. std_wp:: This is a test
    :id: std_wp__test__abce
@@ -61,14 +61,14 @@
    :sufficient: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_fmea__test__good_2.sufficient (yes): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_saf_fmea:: This is a test
    :id: feat_saf_fmea__test__2
    :sufficient: yes
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_fmea__test__good_3.sufficient (no): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_saf_fmea:: This is a test
    :id: feat_saf_fmea__test__3
@@ -82,14 +82,14 @@
    :sufficient: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_saf_fmea__test__good_5.sufficient (yes): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_saf_fmea:: This is a test
    :id: comp_saf_fmea__test__5
    :sufficient: yes
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_saf_fmea__test__good_6.sufficient (no): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_saf_fmea:: This is a test
    :id: comp_saf_fmea__test__6
@@ -103,14 +103,14 @@
    :sufficient: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_dfa__test__good_8.sufficient (yes): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_saf_dfa:: This is a test
    :id: feat_saf_dfa__test__8
    :sufficient: yes
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_dfa__test__good_9.sufficient (no): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_saf_dfa:: This is a test
    :id: feat_saf_dfa__test__9
@@ -124,14 +124,14 @@
    :sufficient: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_dfa__test__good_11.sufficient (yes): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_saf_dfa:: This is a test
    :id: feat_saf_dfa__test__11
    :sufficient: yes
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_saf_dfa__test__good_12.sufficient (no): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_saf_dfa:: This is a test
    :id: feat_saf_dfa__test__12
@@ -145,14 +145,14 @@
    :sufficient: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_saf_dfa__test__good_14.sufficient (yes): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_saf_dfa:: This is a test
    :id: comp_saf_dfa__test__14
    :sufficient: yes
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_saf_dfa__test__good_15.sufficient (no): does not follow pattern `^(yes|no)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_saf_dfa:: This is a test
    :id: comp_saf_dfa__test__15
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
 
 
 .. Tests if the attribute `safety` follows the pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`
-#EXPECT-NOT: doc__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. document:: This is a test document
    :id: doc__test_good_1
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: doc__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. document:: This is a test document
    :id: doc__test_good_2
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: stkh_req__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. stkh_req:: This is a test
    :id: stkh_req__test_good_1
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: stkh_req__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. stkh_req:: This is a test
    :id: stkh_req__test_good_2
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_req__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_req:: This is a test
    :id: feat_req__test_good_1
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_req__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_req:: This is a test
    :id: feat_req__test_good_2
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_req__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_req:: This is a test
    :id: comp_req__test_good_1
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_req__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_req:: This is a test
    :id: comp_req__test_good_2
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: tool_req__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. tool_req:: This is a test
    :id: tool_req__test_good_1
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
 
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: tool_req__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. tool_req:: This is a test
    :id: tool_req__test_good_2
@@ -301,15 +301,14 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: aou_req__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
-
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 .. aou_req:: This is a test
    :id: aou_req__test_good_1
    :status: valid
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: aou_req__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. aou_req:: This is a test
    :id: aou_req__test_good_2
@@ -317,7 +316,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_arc_sta__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_arc_sta:: This is a test
    :id: feat_arc_sta__test_good_1
@@ -325,7 +324,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_arc_sta__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_arc_sta:: This is a test
    :id: feat_arc_sta__test_good_2
@@ -333,7 +332,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_arc_dyn__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_arc_dyn:: This is a test
    :id: feat_arc_dyn__test_good_1
@@ -342,7 +341,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
 
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: feat_arc_dyn__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. feat_arc_dyn:: This is a test
    :id: feat_arc_dyn__test_good_2
@@ -350,7 +349,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: logic_arc_int__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. logic_arc_int:: This is a test
    :id: logic_arc_int__test_good_1
@@ -359,7 +358,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
 
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: logic_arc_int__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. logic_arc_int:: This is a test
    :id: logic_arc_int__test_good_2
@@ -367,7 +366,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: logic_arc_int_op__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. logic_arc_int_op:: This is a test
    :id: logic_arc_int_op__test_good_1
@@ -375,7 +374,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: logic_arc_int_op__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. logic_arc_int_op:: This is a test
    :id: logic_arc_int_op__test_good_2
@@ -383,7 +382,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_arc_sta__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_arc_sta:: This is a test
    :id: comp_arc_sta__test_good_1
@@ -391,7 +390,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_arc_sta__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_arc_sta:: This is a test
    :id: comp_arc_sta__test_good_2
@@ -399,7 +398,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_arc_dyn__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_arc_dyn:: This is a test
    :id: comp_arc_dyn__test_good_1
@@ -407,7 +406,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: comp_arc_dyn__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. comp_arc_dyn:: This is a test
    :id: comp_arc_dyn__test_good_2
@@ -416,7 +415,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
 
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: real_arc_int__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. real_arc_int:: This is a test
    :id: real_arc_int__test_good_1
@@ -424,7 +423,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: real_arc_int__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. real_arc_int:: This is a test
    :id: real_arc_int__test_good_2
@@ -432,14 +431,14 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: real_arc_int_op__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. real_arc_int_op:: This is a test
    :id: real_arc_int_op__test_good_1
    :status: valid
    :safety: QM
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: real_arc_int_op__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. real_arc_int_op:: This is a test
    :id: real_arc_int_op__test_good_2
@@ -447,14 +446,14 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: dd_sta__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. dd_sta:: This is a test
    :id: dd_sta__test_good_1
    :status: valid
    :safety: QM
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: dd_sta__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. dd_sta:: This is a test
    :id: dd_sta__test_good_2
@@ -462,14 +461,14 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: dd_dyn__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. dd_dyn:: This is a test
    :id: dd_dyn__test_good_1
    :status: valid
    :safety: QM
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: dd_dyn__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. dd_dyn:: This is a test
    :id: dd_dyn__test_good_2
@@ -477,7 +476,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: ASIL_B
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: sw_unit__test_good_1.safety (QM): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. sw_unit:: This is a test
    :id: sw_unit__test_good_1
@@ -485,7 +484,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
    :safety: QM
 
 
-#EXPECT-NOT: sw_unit__test_good_2.safety (ASIL_B): does not follow pattern `^(QM|ASIL_B)$`.
+#EXPECT-NOT: pattern
 
 .. sw_unit:: This is a test
    :id: sw_unit__test_good_2
@@ -506,7 +505,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
 
 ..
    Ensuring that non empty content is detected correctly
-#EXPECT-NOT: stkh_req__test_content: is missing required attribute: `content`
+#EXPECT-NOT: attribute: `content`
 
 .. stkh_req:: This is a test
    :id: stkh_req__test_content
@@ -518,7 +517,7 @@ Expect no errors related to "violates" field. We need to be generic for expect-n
 
 ..
    This should not trigger, as 'std_wp' is not checked for content
-#EXPECT-NOT: std_wp__test_content: is missing required attribute: `content`
+#EXPECT-NOT: attribute: `content`
 
 .. std_wp:: This is a test
    :id: std_wp__test_content
diff --git a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/test_rules_file_based.py b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/test_rules_file_based.py
index 13d3ace5f..73a65962c 100644
--- a/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/test_rules_file_based.py
+++ b/src/extensions/score_metamodel/tests/test_rules_file_based.py
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 # *******************************************************************************
 
 import os
+import re
 import shutil
 from collections.abc import Callable
 from dataclasses import dataclass, field
@@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ def extract_test_data(rst_file: Path) -> RstData | None:
     # The function returns a list of WarningInfo objects
     # containing the line number and the expected and not expected warnings.
     # If no test data is found, it returns None.
-    rst_data = RstData(filename=rst_file.name)
+    rst_data = RstData(filename=str(rst_file.relative_to(RST_DIR)))
     with open(rst_file) as f:
         test_info: WarningInfo | None = None
         for no, line in enumerate(f, start=1):
@@ -150,10 +151,17 @@ def filter_warnings_by_position(
     warning_info: WarningInfo,
     warnings: list[str],
 ) -> list[str]:
+    """
+    Filtering only warnings that belong to this file & line. But also deleting the prefix.
+    Filter out the filepath:linenr prefix from warning. So that the 'expect-not' can be generic
+    Without having to pay attention to the filename for example 'EXPECT-NOT: test' then matching
+    a random warning because 'test' is in the filename of 'graph/test_graph_checks.rst'
+    """
+    prefix = f"{rst_data.filename}:{warning_info.lineno}: WARNING:"
     return [
-        warning
+        warning.removeprefix(prefix)
         for warning in warnings
-        if (f"{rst_data.filename}:{str(warning_info.lineno)}" in warning)
+        if warning.startswith(prefix)
     ]
 
 
@@ -165,12 +173,19 @@ def warning_matches(
 ) -> str | None:
     ### Checks if any element of the warning list is includes the given warning info.
     # It returns the matched warning or None if no match is found.
+
     for warning in filter_warnings_by_position(rst_data, warning_info, warnings):
         if expected_message in warning:
             return warning
     return None
 
 
+def strip_ansi_codes(text: str) -> str:
+    """Remove ANSI escape sequences from text"""
+    ansi_escape = re.compile(r"\x1b\[[0-9;]*m")
+    return ansi_escape.sub("", text)
+
+
 @pytest.mark.parametrize("rst_file", RST_FILES)
 def test_rst_files(
     rst_file: str, sphinx_app_setup: Callable[[Path], SphinxTestApp]
@@ -192,8 +207,13 @@ def test_rst_files(
     app.build()
 
     # Collect the warnings
-    warnings = app.warning.getvalue().splitlines()
-    print("\n".join(w for w in warnings if "score_metamodel" in w))
+    raw_warnings = app.warning.getvalue().splitlines()
+    warnings = [strip_ansi_codes(w) for w in raw_warnings if "score_metamodel" in w]
+
+    # Enable this if you need to see errors for debugging purposes
+    # print(
+    #     "\n".join(strip_ansi_codes(w) for w in raw_warnings if "score_metamodel" in w)
+    # )
 
     # Check if the expected warnings are present
     for warning_info in rst_data.warning_infos: