New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: useless gap #290

Closed
jeromenerf opened this Issue Nov 12, 2014 · 12 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
5 participants
@jeromenerf

jeromenerf commented Nov 12, 2014

Hey there,

I like having "useless gaps" around tiled windows, especially with mac drop shadows.
I have written a patch years ago (still using it today) for dwm (x11) explaining the idea: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/uselessgap

For now, I run my own spectacle hack but I would really love to see this feature upstream, with a configurable gap width.

@pnoguchi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pnoguchi

pnoguchi Nov 15, 2014

I agree with your thoughts. You mention using a patch on Spectacles to get this effect; can you elaborate?

pnoguchi commented Nov 15, 2014

I agree with your thoughts. You mention using a patch on Spectacles to get this effect; can you elaborate?

@jeromenerf

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jeromenerf

jeromenerf Nov 17, 2014

@pnoguchi terre is a patch attached to the issue :)
It uses hard coded gap width value and maybe not behave nicely with some
apps (Xcode for instance).

Patching spectacle to add gaps is trivial but I don't know anything about
Xcode and Mac apps dev to make the gap width configurable with a decent gui.

jeromenerf commented Nov 17, 2014

@pnoguchi terre is a patch attached to the issue :)
It uses hard coded gap width value and maybe not behave nicely with some
apps (Xcode for instance).

Patching spectacle to add gaps is trivial but I don't know anything about
Xcode and Mac apps dev to make the gap width configurable with a decent gui.

@eczarny

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@eczarny

eczarny Nov 19, 2014

Owner

This isn't a feature I would want to add, sorry.

Owner

eczarny commented Nov 19, 2014

This isn't a feature I would want to add, sorry.

@eczarny eczarny closed this Nov 19, 2014

@pnoguchi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pnoguchi

pnoguchi Nov 21, 2014

I am sorry too. How about, in addition to 1/3 width something a bit less than 1/2 width, maybe 5/8?

pnoguchi commented Nov 21, 2014

I am sorry too. How about, in addition to 1/3 width something a bit less than 1/2 width, maybe 5/8?

@jeromenerf

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jeromenerf

jeromenerf Nov 25, 2014

@eczarny Sad to hear that. I guess I will need to maintain my fork for a while then.
Anyway, thanks for spectacle!

jeromenerf commented Nov 25, 2014

@eczarny Sad to hear that. I guess I will need to maintain my fork for a while then.
Anyway, thanks for spectacle!

@pnoguchi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pnoguchi

pnoguchi Nov 26, 2014

I have been following this issue on the Spectacle github. I am not a
programmer, so I wonder if I could request a copy of the Patched
Spectacle. I agree with the concept of useless gaps, and like you have
used SizeUp with this feature in place. It add tremendously to me the
ability to clearly distinguish windows.

Best regards,

Phil Noguchi

Jérôme Andrieux mailto:notifications@github.com
November 25, 2014 at 6:33 PM

@eczarny https://github.com/eczarny Sad to hear that. I guess I will
need to maintain my fork for a while then.
Anyway, thanks for spectacle!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#290 (comment).

pnoguchi commented Nov 26, 2014

I have been following this issue on the Spectacle github. I am not a
programmer, so I wonder if I could request a copy of the Patched
Spectacle. I agree with the concept of useless gaps, and like you have
used SizeUp with this feature in place. It add tremendously to me the
ability to clearly distinguish windows.

Best regards,

Phil Noguchi

Jérôme Andrieux mailto:notifications@github.com
November 25, 2014 at 6:33 PM

@eczarny https://github.com/eczarny Sad to hear that. I guess I will
need to maintain my fork for a while then.
Anyway, thanks for spectacle!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#290 (comment).

@naggie

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@naggie

naggie Mar 17, 2015

I would also like to use the useless gaps fork. @jeromenerf do you still have/maintain it?

naggie commented Mar 17, 2015

I would also like to use the useless gaps fork. @jeromenerf do you still have/maintain it?

@jeromenerf

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jeromenerf

jeromenerf Jun 5, 2015

@naggie Well, I have my set of patches, my custom build I send to @pnoguchi sometimes.

If you have xcode & cocoapod installed, you can apply https://gist.github.com/jeromenerf/c7630ac1c74415f13338 and build your own I guess.

Not a brilliant patch but a working hack :/

jeromenerf commented Jun 5, 2015

@naggie Well, I have my set of patches, my custom build I send to @pnoguchi sometimes.

If you have xcode & cocoapod installed, you can apply https://gist.github.com/jeromenerf/c7630ac1c74415f13338 and build your own I guess.

Not a brilliant patch but a working hack :/

@pnoguchi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pnoguchi

pnoguchi Jun 22, 2016

Hello Jerome,

I see that Spectacle is up to 1.0.6 now. I wonder if you had any
experience with your patched spectacle with El Capitan 10.11.6b2? I am
back using Sizeup but have one machine still using the patched
Spectacle. The only problem with that is that it always seems to want to
update to the official build and I waste a minuscule amount of time
ticking the Not this time buttont, and with no apparent way to disable
it, and the developer still is totally against UG!.

I wonder if disabling the asking for updates could be patched as well as
UG? I would prefer to be able to use your patched Spectacle if possible.

my best regards,

Philip Noguchi

Jérôme Andrieux mailto:notifications@github.com
June 5, 2015 at 12:05 PM

@naggie https://github.com/naggie Well, I have my set of patches, my
custom build I send to @pnoguchi https://github.com/pnoguchi sometimes.

If you have xcode & cocoapod installed, you can apply
https://gist.github.com/jeromenerf/c7630ac1c74415f13338 and build your
own I guess.

Not a brilliant patch but a working hack :/


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#290 (comment).

Sent from Postbox
https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach

pnoguchi commented Jun 22, 2016

Hello Jerome,

I see that Spectacle is up to 1.0.6 now. I wonder if you had any
experience with your patched spectacle with El Capitan 10.11.6b2? I am
back using Sizeup but have one machine still using the patched
Spectacle. The only problem with that is that it always seems to want to
update to the official build and I waste a minuscule amount of time
ticking the Not this time buttont, and with no apparent way to disable
it, and the developer still is totally against UG!.

I wonder if disabling the asking for updates could be patched as well as
UG? I would prefer to be able to use your patched Spectacle if possible.

my best regards,

Philip Noguchi

Jérôme Andrieux mailto:notifications@github.com
June 5, 2015 at 12:05 PM

@naggie https://github.com/naggie Well, I have my set of patches, my
custom build I send to @pnoguchi https://github.com/pnoguchi sometimes.

If you have xcode & cocoapod installed, you can apply
https://gist.github.com/jeromenerf/c7630ac1c74415f13338 and build your
own I guess.

Not a brilliant patch but a working hack :/


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#290 (comment).

Sent from Postbox
https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach

@jeromenerf

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jeromenerf

jeromenerf Jun 22, 2016

jeromenerf commented Jun 22, 2016

@pnoguchi

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@pnoguchi

pnoguchi Jun 22, 2016

Jerome,

Thank you for your note. Every time I try Amethyst I get frustrated
trying to understand it.

Best regards,
Phil

Jérôme Andrieux mailto:notifications@github.com
June 22, 2016 at 5:09 AM
Linux/dwm is my primary environment. On macos, I switch to Amethyst, from
ianyh/Amethyst#298, since it features the same
dynamic approach.

My patch was a quick and dirty hack, sufficient for my use case but not
tested, without a gui config...
I am pretty sure the patch would no longer apply, but the binary might
still work on the latest macos versions.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#290 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AH63Koszi9wagVw6RBuFQOXxLow1p9Baks5qOPu2gaJpZM4C6Q4u.

Sent from Postbox
https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach

pnoguchi commented Jun 22, 2016

Jerome,

Thank you for your note. Every time I try Amethyst I get frustrated
trying to understand it.

Best regards,
Phil

Jérôme Andrieux mailto:notifications@github.com
June 22, 2016 at 5:09 AM
Linux/dwm is my primary environment. On macos, I switch to Amethyst, from
ianyh/Amethyst#298, since it features the same
dynamic approach.

My patch was a quick and dirty hack, sufficient for my use case but not
tested, without a gui config...
I am pretty sure the patch would no longer apply, but the binary might
still work on the latest macos versions.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#290 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AH63Koszi9wagVw6RBuFQOXxLow1p9Baks5qOPu2gaJpZM4C6Q4u.

Sent from Postbox
https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach

@mimiflynn

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@mimiflynn

mimiflynn Jan 19, 2017

With the large monitors available today, these useless gaps would be nice. I've been tinkering with i3-gaps on my home Ubuntu machine and its quite nice to be able to differentiate between various windows.

It would be nice to have this feature available with Spectacle when I use it with my large monitors at work. I know this is an old thread, but I think you should consider these useless gaps as a UX feature. Please refer to the i3-gaps screenshot as an example of what we mean.

mimiflynn commented Jan 19, 2017

With the large monitors available today, these useless gaps would be nice. I've been tinkering with i3-gaps on my home Ubuntu machine and its quite nice to be able to differentiate between various windows.

It would be nice to have this feature available with Spectacle when I use it with my large monitors at work. I know this is an old thread, but I think you should consider these useless gaps as a UX feature. Please refer to the i3-gaps screenshot as an example of what we mean.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment