Fix access policies on DELETE of a UNION type #4337
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The problem was that we looked only at descendents and not union elements. Similarly fix access policies for UPDATE of UNION, probably, except that is still broken too much.
elprans
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
elprans
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 15, 2022
The problem was that we looked only at descendents and not union elements. Similarly fix access policies for UPDATE of UNION, probably, except that is still broken too much.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The problem was that we looked only at descendents and not union
elements.
Similarly fix access policies for UPDATE of UNION, probably, except
that is still broken too much.