Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sorting: Nested filter with nested sorting doesn't use missing value. #3020

Closed
martijnvg opened this Issue May 10, 2013 · 0 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@martijnvg
Copy link
Member

martijnvg commented May 10, 2013

Reuse the missing support for fields (number based fields) inside nested object when nested_filter doesn't match a inner object.

martijnvg added a commit to martijnvg/elasticsearch that referenced this issue May 15, 2013

If matching root doc's inner objects don't match the `nested_filter` …
…then the `missing` value should be used to sort the root doc.

Closes elastic#3020

@martijnvg martijnvg closed this in 42d5bdd May 16, 2013

martijnvg added a commit that referenced this issue May 16, 2013

If matching root doc's inner objects don't match the `nested_filter` …
…then the `missing` value should be used to sort the root doc.

Closes #3020

mute pushed a commit to mute/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2015

If matching root doc's inner objects don't match the `nested_filter` …
…then the `missing` value should be used to sort the root doc.

Closes elastic#3020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.