From 11bd7983cdd7fa17d700be0821f8c05c0723cb80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Vernum Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 10:59:00 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] Fix wording on node roles In the 8.17 docs there is a statement that intends to say that nodes without roles are coordinating-only nodes. However, the wording was misleading because it referred to leaving the setting _unset_ rather than explictly setting it to _empty_. --- docs/reference/modules/node.asciidoc | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/reference/modules/node.asciidoc b/docs/reference/modules/node.asciidoc index f0cb3eecdf390..a8b6b3c535c74 100644 --- a/docs/reference/modules/node.asciidoc +++ b/docs/reference/modules/node.asciidoc @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ The following additional roles are available: * `voting_only` -[[coordinating-only-node]]If you leave `node.roles` unset, then the node is considered to be a <>. +[[coordinating-only-node]]If you set `node.roles` to an empty array (`node.roles: [ ]`), +then the node is considered to be a <>. [IMPORTANT] ==== @@ -155,4 +156,4 @@ including: * <> * <> -* <> \ No newline at end of file +* <>