Skip to content

Conversation

@qcorporation
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed commit message

  • parsed the priority field introduced within some CX switches log messages
  • extracted prod_id into it's own pattern_definition for readability
  • Note: marking it as an enhancement rather than a bugfix

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.
  • I have verified that any added dashboard complies with Kibana's Dashboard good practices

How to test this PR locally

  • validated that for 1 that the priority field is being parsed out. Note the "count" value after the angle bracket is not being parsed to a field
  • validated that all pipeline test pass

… in procid fields

- parsed the priority field introduced within some CX switches
- extracted prod_id into it's own pattern_definition for readability

Test Cases:
- validated that for <xxx>1 that the priority field is being parsed out. Note the "count" value after the angle bracket is not being parsed to a field
- validated that all pipeline test pass
@qcorporation qcorporation requested a review from a team November 14, 2025 14:27
@qcorporation qcorporation self-assigned this Nov 14, 2025
@qcorporation qcorporation added the Team:Integration-Experience Security Integrations Integration Experience [elastic/integration-experience] label Nov 14, 2025
@qcorporation qcorporation marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2025 14:32
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Pinging @elastic/integration-experience (Team:Integration-Experience)

@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod

🚀 Benchmarks report

To see the full report comment with /test benchmark fullreport

@elasticmachine
Copy link

💚 Build Succeeded

cc @qcorporation

Copy link
Contributor

@robester0403 robester0403 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@qcorporation qcorporation merged commit 292cef3 into main Nov 14, 2025
7 checks passed
@qcorporation qcorporation deleted the sdh-beats-6629 branch November 14, 2025 17:00
@andrewkroh andrewkroh added Integration:hpe_aruba_cx HPE Aruba CX documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. Applied to PRs that modify *.md files. labels Nov 14, 2025
@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod

Package hpe_aruba_cx - 0.3.0 containing this change is available at https://epr.elastic.co/package/hpe_aruba_cx/0.3.0/

tehbooom pushed a commit to tehbooom/integrations that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2025
…od_id format variations (elastic#15985)

* Update aruba to handle optional syslog priority and format variations in procid fields
- parsed the priority field introduced within some CX switches
- extracted prod_id into it's own pattern_definition for readability

Test Cases:
- validated that for <xxx>1 that the priority field is being parsed out. Note the "count" value after the angle bracket is not being parsed to a field
- validated that all pipeline test pass
@andrewkroh andrewkroh added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation. Applied to PRs that modify *.md files. enhancement New feature or request Integration:hpe_aruba_cx HPE Aruba CX Team:Integration-Experience Security Integrations Integration Experience [elastic/integration-experience]

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants