Skip to content

Conversation

@tveasey
Copy link
Contributor

@tveasey tveasey commented Jul 17, 2020

Change #1391 introduced a subtle error: when computing the likelihood of no change we should use a reference to the current time series trend model, not the copy of the model which assumes a change is occurring. This has not yet been released so I've marked this as a non-issue.

Copy link

@droberts195 droberts195 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tveasey
Copy link
Contributor Author

tveasey commented Jul 17, 2020

We'd like this to make 7.8.1. Linux failed to download the docker image and we don't support aarch yet so I'm going to go ahead and merge this.

@tveasey tveasey merged commit c69873f into elastic:master Jul 17, 2020
@tveasey tveasey deleted the changepoint-bug branch July 17, 2020 07:47
tveasey added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2020
Change #1391 introduced a subtle error: when computing the likelihood of no change
we should use a reference to the current time series trend model, not the copy of the
model which assumes a change is occurring.

Backport #1415.
@droberts195 droberts195 added v7.8.1 and removed v7.8.2 labels Jul 17, 2020
tveasey added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2020
Change #1391 introduced a subtle error: when computing the likelihood of no change
we should use a reference to the current time series trend model, not the copy of the
model which assumes a change is occurring.

Backport #1415.
tveasey added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2020
Change #1391 introduced a subtle error: when computing the likelihood of no change
we should use a reference to the current time series trend model, not the copy of the
model which assumes a change is occurring.

Backport #1415.
tveasey added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2020
Change #1391 introduced a subtle error: when computing the likelihood of no change
we should use a reference to the current time series trend model, not the copy of the
model which assumes a change is occurring.

Backport #1415.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants