Permalink
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Find file
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
1 lines (1 sloc) 142 KB
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1d1 20130915//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd"><article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">eLife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">01637</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Cell biology</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Neuroscience</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> microtubule minus-end binding homolog PTRN-1 stabilizes synapses and neurites</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-7886"><name><surname>Marcette</surname><given-names>Jana Dorfman</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-8270"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Jessica Jie</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-8151"><name><surname>Nonet</surname><given-names>Michael L</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor2">*</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="par-1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology</institution>, <institution>Washington University School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line><named-content content-type="city">St. Louis</named-content></addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Hobert</surname><given-names>Oliver</given-names></name><role>Reviewing editor</role><aff><institution>Columbia University</institution>, <country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label>*</label>For correspondence: <email>marcette@pcg2.wustl.edu</email> (JDM);</corresp><corresp id="cor2"><label>*</label>For correspondence: <email>nonetm@pcg2.wustl.edu</email> (MLN)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic"><day>25</day><month>02</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><elocation-id>e01637</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>03</day><month>10</month><year>2013</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>01</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2014, Marcette et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Marcette et al</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife01637.pdf"/><related-article ext-link-type="doi" id="ra1" related-article-type="article-reference" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01498"/><abstract><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.001</object-id><p>Microtubule dynamics facilitate neurite growth and establish morphology, but the role of minus-end binding proteins in these processes is largely unexplored. CAMSAP homologs associate with microtubule minus-ends, and are important for the stability of epithelial cell adhesions. In this study, we report morphological defects in neurons and neuromuscular defects in mutants of the <italic>C. elegans</italic> CAMSAP, <italic>ptrn-1</italic>. Mechanosensory neurons initially extend wild-type neurites, and subsequently remodel by overextending neurites and retracting synaptic branches and presynaptic varicosities. This neuronal remodeling can be activated by mutations known to alter microtubules, and depends on a functioning DLK-1 MAP kinase pathway. We found that PTRN-1 localizes to both neurites and synapses, and our results suggest that alterations of microtubule structures caused by loss of PTRN-1 function activates a remodeling program leading to changes in neurite morphology. We propose a model whereby minus-end microtubule stabilization mediated by a functional PTRN-1 is necessary for morphological maintenance of neurons.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.001">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.001</ext-link></p></abstract><abstract abstract-type="executive-summary"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.002</object-id><title>eLife digest</title><p>Microtubules are tiny tubular structures made from many copies of proteins called tubulins. Microtubules have a number of important roles inside cells: they are part of the cytoskeleton that provides structural support for the cell; they help to pull chromosomes apart during cell division; and they guide the trafficking of proteins and molecules around inside the cell. Most microtubules are relatively unstable, undergoing continuous dis-assembly and re-assembly in response to the needs of the cell. The microtubules in the branches of nerve cells are an exception, remaining relatively stable over time. Now Marcette et al. and, independently, Richardson et al., have shown that a protein called PTRN-1 has an important role in stabilizing the microtubules in the nerve cells of nematode worms.</p><p>Marcette et al. became interested in the PTRN-1 protein after conducting a screen of randomly mutated worms to look for those with abnormally developed nerve cells. Although worms with a mutation in the gene encoding the PTRN-1 protein could form nerve cells that looked normal during early development, the pattern of branches on the nerve cells went awry later on. Moreover, the mutant worms lost the swellings that are normally found at the junctions between nerve cells, and they also moved their bodies in an odd way.</p><p>Engineering the mutant worms to produce the PTRN-1 protein in their nerve cells, but nowhere else, restored normal movement, and experiments with fluorescently tagged PTRN-1 proteins revealed that they are found on the microtubules within the nerve cells. Marcette et al. suggest that the microtubules become less stable when this protein is not present, and that this switches on a repair mechanism that remodels the nerve cells, providing that the active form of a protein called DLK-1 is present. Other mutations that reduce the stability of microtubules also triggered the same remodeling process. Future work will be necessary to uncover exactly what triggers the remodeling process, and to identify the other proteins that are involved in repairing the nerve cells.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.002">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.002</ext-link></p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><title>Author keywords</title><kwd>PTRN-1</kwd><kwd>microtubule minus-end</kwd><kwd>neuron morphology</kwd><kwd>regeneration</kwd><kwd>DLK-1</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd><italic>C. elegans</italic></kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="par-1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution>National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>NS040094</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Nonet</surname><given-names>Michael L</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funder had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>elife-xml-version</meta-name><meta-value>2</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>The minus-ends of microtubules have been implicated as part of a damage sensor to initiate remodeling of nerve cells.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>In animals, stable neuronal morphology is necessary to maintain synaptic architecture. However, morphological alterations are also critical for plastic changes in synaptic strength, pruning of synaptic connections, and occasional responses to injury or other cues. Morphological reorganization of neurons is known to occur as a compensatory mechanism in cases of sight or hearing deprivation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Karlen et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Barone et al., 2013</xref>), and medium spiny neurons are reported to experience reversible morphology changes in response to mild stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Bessa et al., 2013</xref>). Neurons in <italic>D. melanogaster</italic> and <italic>C. elegans</italic>, as well as many mammalian peripheral neurons respond to injuries by remodeling their morphology including the growth of neurites, elimination of existing synapses, and establishment of new synapses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Hilliard, 2009</xref>).</p><p>The study of neuronal remodeling after injury in model organisms has elucidated cellular pathways responsible for morphological changes, however, little is known about the molecular cues that initiate these cascades. The conserved mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinase kinase DLK-1 functions to transmit regenerative signals in <italic>C. elegans</italic>, and is a component of regenerative signaling in organisms with more complex nervous systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Hammarlund et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Xiong et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Shin et al., 2012</xref>). While there is a wealth of information about conserved down-stream signals affected by DLK-1 activity, very little information exits about how DLK-1 itself is activated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Tedeschi and Bradke, 2013</xref>). Recently, calcium spikes were shown to activate <italic>C. elegans</italic> DLK-1, but fly and mammalian homologs lack this calcium-binding domain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Yan and Jin, 2012</xref>). It is known that the conserved E3 ubiquitin ligase RPM-1 (PHR, PAM, HIGHWIRE) keeps levels of DLK-1 low (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Nakata et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Xiong et al., 2010</xref>). Axonal injury is reported to cause microtubule disassembly and disorganization of higher-order microtubule structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Erturk et al., 2007</xref>). Microtubule depolymerization was recently found to activate DLK-1 signaling. However, this study did not investigate in what context (development, regeneration, or degeneration) this microtubule-based mechanism might be functioning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bounoutas et al., 2011</xref>).</p><p>Neurons contain both very stable and dynamic microtubule structures. These populations are maintained by the activities of cytoskeletal-associated proteins and by post-translational modifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Conde and Caceres, 2009</xref>). Proteins known to be involved in stabilizing and organizing microtubule structures include molecular motors, and cross-linkers, as well as microtubule nucleating and severing proteins, and proteins involved in regulating plus-end dynamics (reviewed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Subramanian and Kapoor, 2012</xref>). Post-translational modifications to microtubules include acetylation, tyrosination, glutamylation, glycylation, and phosphorylation. These modifications affect the recruitment of microtubule-associated proteins and denote subcellular populations of microtubule structures such as the tyrosinated microtubules of dynamic growth cones or the acetylated microtubules of stable neurites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Baas and Black, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">Brown et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Janke and Bulinski, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Garnham and Roll-Mecak, 2012</xref>). In <italic>C. elegans,</italic> microtubule acetylation mutants display short microtubules, alterations in microtubule protofilament number, and association of filaments into higher-order structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Cueva et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Topalidou et al., 2012</xref>). Furthermore, microtubule de-acetylation was recently shown to be an early signal for the development of growth-cones in neuronal remodeling associated with regeneration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">Cho and Cavalli, 2012</xref>). It is currently unclear how destabilizing modifications or depolymerization of microtubule structures could activate neuronal remodeling. Depolymerization events that occur in dynamic microtubule populations clearly do not cause neurite remodeling in healthy neurons, so it is not likely that depolymerization itself or free microtubule monomers are the remodeling signal.</p><p>One possibility is that the normally stable minus-ends of microtubules initiate remodeling signals. In this study, we report that genetic lesions in <italic>ptrn-1</italic>, the <italic>C. elegans</italic> homolog of the microtubule minus-end binding calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated (CAMSAP) family cause neurite remodeling including overextension of neurites and retraction of collateral presynaptic varicosities and branches. These remodeling events require DLK-1, a known player in morphology changes associated with degenerative and regenerative signaling in neurons. This is the first report of a CAMSAP family member being involved in remodeling of neurite morphology. Members of the CAMSAP family are known to associate with microtubule minus ends and stabilize microtubule structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Goshima et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Meng et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Baines et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Goodwin and Vale, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Tanaka et al., 2012</xref>). CAMSAPs are found in mammalian neuronal tissue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Baines et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Guo et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Yamamoto et al., 2009</xref>), and genetic variants of human CAMSAP1L1 were recently shown to confer susceptibility to epilepsy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Guo et al., 2012</xref>). Thus understanding the neuronal consequences of disruptions to CAMSAP function may begin to inform our understanding of disease mechanisms.</p><p>We found that disruptions in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> cause alterations to neuronal morphology, and these changes occur via a DLK-1 neuronal remodeling program. We were able to mimic and enhance <italic>ptrn-1</italic> loss-of-function phenotypes with genetic and pharmacological alterations of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Furthermore, mutation of <italic>dlk-1</italic> suppressed a microtubule acetylation mutant supporting the idea that altering microtubule structures is an upstream signal for DLK-1 activation. PTRN-1 is present in neurites and at sites of synaptic connectivity, suggesting local microtubule minus-end regulation may affect these mechanisms. In addition to identifying a novel function for CAMSAPs in the maintenance of neuron morphology, our results suggest that alterations to microtubule structures caused by loss of CAMSAP function activates a neuronal remodeling program. We propose a model whereby local minus-end microtubule stabilization mediated by CAMSAPs is necessary for the stabilization of mature neurite morphology.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Identification of the <italic>C. elegans</italic> CAMSAP family homolog <italic>ptrn-1</italic> in a screen for altered neuronal morphology</title><p>We use <italic>C. elegans</italic> touch receptor neurons (TRNs) to study establishment and maintenance of neuronal morphology. The laterally positioned TRN neurons each extend a neurite in which touch receptors are distributed at regular intervals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib67">Zhang et al., 2004</xref>). Together PLM and ALM lateral neurites cover the length of the animal, but they do not overlap (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). ALM and PLM chemical synapses are on collateral branches that terminate in presynaptic varicosities. Each PLM mechanosensory neuron forms a single presynaptic varicosity in the ventral nerve cord just posterior to the vulva (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>). Thus, the lateral TRNs have a highly stereotyped morphology that allows visualization of individual neurons in living animals.<fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.003</object-id><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title><italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutant neurite overextension and collateral branch retraction phenotypes.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic diagram of an L4 <italic>C. elegans</italic> hermaphrodite showing the morphology of the touch receptor neurons. Neurons on the left side are in black, and those on the right side are in gray. (<bold>B</bold>) Morphology of mechanosensory neurons in wild-type and <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants, as seen by expression of mRFP under the control of the <italic>mec-7</italic> promoter. Defects in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> animals include PLM neurite overextension and ectopic formation of presynaptic varicosities (*), retraction of PLM collateral presynaptic varicosities and branches (**). Scale bar = 10 µm. Additional examples and variance in Ptrn-1 phenotypes are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1</xref>. (<bold>C</bold>) Quantification of the PLM neurite overextension phenotype at 22°C. Both <italic>ptrn-1</italic> alleles (<italic>js1286</italic> and <italic>tm5597</italic>) show similar defects, as do trans-heterozygotes. Also shown is the rescue of the PLM neurite overextension phenotype by expression of PTRN-1a-mCherry under a native promoter and in neurons under a <italic>rab-3</italic> promoter, but not under a <italic>myo-3</italic> promoter. Non-transgenic siblings were identified as individuals from mothers segregating the transgene, but that lacked detectable mCherry fluorescence. n = 50–60; error bars = SEP. (<bold>D</bold>) Aberrant formation and extension of neurites (*) was found in D-type motor neurons. Quantification is in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2</xref>. (<bold>E</bold>) Aberrant formation and extension of neurites (*) was found in command interneurons. Quantification is in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2</xref>. (<bold>F</bold>) Quantification of locomotory defects using L4 animals. Error bars represent standard deviation. N = 6.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.003">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.003</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637f001"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.004</object-id><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Variance in the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutant TRN phenotypes.</title><p>Midbody of wild-type and mutant L4 animals expressing mRFP in TRNs under the <italic>mec-7</italic> promoter (<italic>jsIs973</italic>) showing the wild-type and <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutant morphology of PLM and PVM, as well as the ALM soma. Scale bar = 10 µm. (<bold>A</bold>) The wild type. (<bold>B</bold>) <italic>ptrn-1</italic>(<italic>js1286</italic>) animals showing PLM neurite overextensions (*), ectopic synaptic varicosities (^), loss of collateral branches and associated PLM synaptic varicosities (**), and secondary posterior-directed ALM processes (double arrows) are noted. (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>ptrn-1</italic>(<italic>tm5597</italic>) animals. (<bold>D</bold>) Temperature-dependence of PLM overextension in <italic>ptrn-</italic>1 mutants. n = 60–80 animals. Error-bars = SEP. (<bold>E</bold>) Variance in penetrance of the overextension defect is less than 10% in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants. n=71–94, error bars = SEP.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.004">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.004</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637fs001"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.005</object-id><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Quantification of other morphology phenotypes in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Quantification of D-type motor neuron defects visualized using an <italic>oxIs12</italic> [Punc-47::GFP] transgene. Error bars represent SEP. N=60. (<bold>B</bold>) Quantification of command interneuron defects visualized using <italic>nuIs25</italic> [Pglr-1::GFP] transgene. Error bars represent SEP. N = 65–68.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.005">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.005</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637fs002"/></fig></fig-group></p><p>We screened 1134 haploid genomes looking for maintenance defects in the presynaptic varicosities of PLM mechanosensory neurons. Three candidates from this screen remain uncharacterized, the fourth, <italic>js1286</italic>, is the focus of this work. We identified <italic>js1286</italic> as a nonsense mutation in the <italic>C. elegans</italic> CAMSAP, <italic>ptrn-1</italic>, that caused a range of partially penetrant phenotypes in PLM and ALM neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A,B</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1</xref>). Defects seen in PLM neurons included loss of collateral branches and presynaptic varicosities, as well as overextended neurites that exited the lateral cord and formed ectopic presynaptic varicosities in the ventral nerve cord anterior to the vulva (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B,C</xref>). We observed the same phenotypes in an independently generated deletion allele, <italic>ptrn-1 (tm5597)</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2 fig1">Figure 2A, 1C</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1</xref>), indicating the observed defects in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> are representative of the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> null phenotype. We also observed morphological defects in motor neurons and command interneurons, and behavioral defects in locomotion indicating that PTRN-1 functions broadly in the nervous system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D,E</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2</xref>).<fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.006</object-id><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Gene and protein structure of <italic>C. elegans ptrn-1</italic>.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Exon (thick regions) and intron (thin regions) organization of the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> locus. The position of structural domains is demarcated above and the position of the genetic lesion for each of the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> alleles is shown below. <italic>ptrn-1b</italic> differs from <italic>ptrn-1a</italic> by the inclusion of 6 bp (2 amino acids) at the exon 10–11 boundary (*). Nucleotide sequences for <italic>ptrn-1a</italic> and <italic>ptrn-1b</italic> are listed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1 fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplements 1 and 2</xref>, respectively. Omitted from the figure is a distinct <italic>ptrn-1</italic> isoform lacking the C-terminal half of the protein, which is not represented in RNA-seq data for which the sole support is a single compound EST yk1268c03. (<bold>B</bold>) The CAMSAP protein family consists of a calponin-homology domain followed by one or two 30–40 amino acid coiled-coil regions, a 70–85 amino acid coiled-coil region and a CKK microtubule-binding domain. CAMSAP sequences from <italic>C. elegans</italic> (this paper), <italic>D. melanogaster</italic> (AAO41362.1), <italic>D. rerio</italic> (NP_001159727.1), and <italic>H. sapiens</italic> (AAI25231.1) were used for homology analysis. Domains were annotated by running sequences through the NCBI Conserved Domain Database. Coiled-coil regions were defined as those predicted by both the Paircoil2 and COILS programs.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.006">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.006</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637f002"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.007</object-id><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Nucleotide sequence of <italic>ptrn-1a</italic>.</title><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.007">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.007</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637fs003"/></fig><fig id="fig2s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.008</object-id><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Nucleotide sequence of <italic>ptrn-1b</italic>.</title><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.008">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.008</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637fs004"/></fig></fig-group></p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>PTRN-1 functions in neurons</title><p>Changes in neuronal morphology could be caused by cell autonomous alterations or by changes in surrounding tissues. We noticed that <italic>ptrn-1</italic> animals have uncoordinated locomotion and body positioning, a characteristic shared by mutants with defects in either neurons or muscles. Prior work has focused mostly on the role of CAMSAPs in epithelial tissue; however by expressing a <italic>ptrn-1</italic> transcriptional reporter construct, we found that <italic>ptrn-1</italic> is broadly expressed in the nervous system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Driving <italic>ptrn-1:mcherry</italic> under the pan-neuronal (<italic>rab-3)</italic> promoter, but not the pan-muscle (<italic>myo-3)</italic> promoter rescued PLM morphology defects indicating that PTRN-1 functions in neurons to regulate PLM morphology (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>).<fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.009</object-id><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title><italic>C .elegans ptrn-1</italic> is broadly expressed in neuronal tissue.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ptrn-1</italic> expression pattern from a transcriptional fusion between mCherry and a <italic>ptrn-1</italic> promoter segment sufficient to rescue Ptrn-1 TRN cellular phenotypes (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref> for rescue). 0.8 kb was chosen as the promoter fragment because of the presence of a 1.2 kb Mariner transposable element at this position 5′ of the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> ATG. Scale bars = 10 µm. (<bold>B</bold>–<bold>D</bold>) Views at higher magnification of the head neuronal ganglion (<bold>B</bold>), ventral nerve cord (<bold>C</bold>), and pre-anal and lumbar neuronal ganglia (<bold>D</bold>). mCherry is primarily nuclear localized.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.009">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.009</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637f003"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.010</object-id><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Close-up view of the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> expression pattern.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) <italic>ptrn-1</italic> expression pattern from a transcriptional fusion between mCherry and a <italic>ptrn-1</italic> promoter segment sufficient to rescue Ptrn-1 TRN cellular phenotypes (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref> for rescue). View of the head neuronal ganglion. (<bold>B</bold>–<bold>E</bold>) High-magnification views of individual neuronal cell bodies showing expression of the mCherry reporter construct. Scale bars = 10 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.010">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.010</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637fs005"/></fig></fig-group></p><p>The <italic>ptrn-1</italic> gene represents the only <italic>C. elegans</italic> ortholog of the CAMSAP family. The domain structure for CAMSAPs consists of an N-terminal calponin-homology domain, a C-terminal microtubule-binding domain and an intervening region of predicted coiled-coil domains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>). CAMSAPs regulate microtubule minus-end depolymerization, and are important for the stability of epithelial cell adhesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Goodwin and Vale, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Meng et al., 2008</xref>). CAMSAPs localize to microtubule minus ends, and in puncta distributed along higher-order microtubule structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Baines et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Goodwin and Vale, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Meng et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Tanaka et al., 2012</xref>). Consistent with these findings, we see that both PTRN-1-cherry and GFP-PTRN-1 constructs exhibit a punctate distribution along neurites and at sites of high synaptic connectivity including the nerve-ring and ventral nerve cord (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). In neuronal cell bodies, PTRN-1-mcherry and GFP-PTRN-1 could be found in one or two puncta (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A–C,E–G</xref>), and colocalization of GFP-PTRN-1 with the mechanosensory-specific ß-tubulin MEC-7 was found (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4H–I</xref>). These results are consistent with <italic>C. elegans</italic> PTRN-1 functioning in neurons.<fig id="fig4" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.011</object-id><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>PTRN-1-localization pattern.</title><p>Expression of PTRN-1-mcherry under a <italic>ptrn-1</italic> 0.8 kb promoter segment sufficient to rescue Ptrn-1 TRN cellular phenotypes (<bold>A</bold>–<bold>C</bold>) (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref> for rescue data). Enlarged views of neurites (<bold>A1</bold>), a head ganglion cell body (<bold>A2</bold>), and a tail neuron with isolated morphology (<bold>C1</bold>) are shown. Puncta (arrows), nuclear exclusion (*), and neurite (double arrow) are noted. Single-cell resolution showing a N-terminal GFP-PTRN-1 fusion protein under the control of the TRN <italic>mec-7</italic> promoter in ALM and PLM neurons (<bold>D</bold>–<bold>G</bold>). Puncta (arrows) and neurites (double arrows) are noted. Scale bars = 10 µm. Whole-mount immunofluorescent staining with anti-GFP (<bold>H</bold>) and anti-MEC-7 (<bold>I</bold>) antibodies. Co-localization of GFP-PTRN-1 with MEC-7 in mechanosensory neurons is shown.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.011">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.011</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637f004"/></fig></p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title><italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants fail to maintain wild-type neuronal morphology</title><p>We wanted to distinguish between defects that arise during development, and those that are a result of a failure to maintain or stabilize normally patterned neurons. Although ALM neurites extend during embryonic development, the development of PLM neurons occurs in several distinct steps some of which occur during the L1 larval stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>). After extending lateral neurites in the embryo, PLMs form collateral branches early in the L1 larval stage, and subsequently active zone synaptic machinery, vesicles, and mitochondria are recruited successively to nascent collateral presynaptic varicosities. The overall morphological pattern is maintained as the animal quadruples its body length from the L1 to L4 larval stage, with the only substantive change being a ten-fold increase in the size of presynaptic varicosity. In <italic>ptrn-1</italic> animals, we noticed that wild-type morphology is lost after the initial L1 patterning, with animals missing presynaptic varicosities and overextending neurites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>). A small fraction of <italic>ptrn-1</italic> animals had overextended neurites and/or missing presynaptic varicosities at the L1 stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>); however from this data set, we are unable to determine if these animals originally formed morphologically normal neurites and experienced early retraction/overextension defects prior to the L1 time-point or if they represent a partially penetrant role for <italic>ptrn-1</italic> in initial L1 patterning. We also examined individual animals at both the L1 and L4 larval stages to confirm that aberrant morphology phenotypes do occur subsequent to L1 developmental patterning (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5C</xref>). Ectopic presynaptic varicosities that formed at the terminus of overextended neurites in L1 larva were also subject to retracting; further supporting the idea that <italic>ptrn-1</italic> is required for maintenance, rather than initial establishment of neurite morphology.<fig id="fig5" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.012</object-id><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title><italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants fail to stabilize mature PLM morphology and synaptic contacts.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Schematic diagram illustrating wild-type PLM neuron developmental changes during the L1 larva from 0 to 12 hr after hatching, as well as the structure of PLM neurons in L4 larva—note that the figure is not drawn to scale. PLM neurons maintain their relative position within the animal from L1 to L4, but L4 are approximately four times longer than L1 animals. (<bold>B</bold>) Changes observed in PLM neuronal morphology in wild-type and <italic>ptrn-1</italic> (<italic>js1286</italic>) mutants from a synchronized population of animals analyzed at L1 (10 hr) and L4 (36 hr) stages. Animals were grown at 22°C. PLM neurons show both overextension and ventral targeting of the anterior neurite in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants, but rarely in wild type. The ventral targeting posterior neurites display variable sized varicosities that are labeled with presynaptic components. <italic>ptrn-1</italic> animals also often exhibit loss of collateral branch and associated presynaptic structures. N = 90–98 neurites. (<bold>C</bold>) Retraction of collateral branch synaptic varicosities and overextended ectopic ventral neurite targeted varicosities in animals imaged as both L1 and L4 larva. N = 11 and 68 neurites. (<bold>B</bold> and <bold>C</bold>) Black lines and circles represent neurites and presynaptic varicosities respectively. Gray lines and open circles represent variability in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> animals.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.012">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.012</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637f005"/></fig></p><p>The average size of presynaptic varicosities that persist in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> animals not significantly different from wt (10 ± 3 μM<sup>2</sup> for <italic>ptrn-1</italic> compared to 12 ± 3 μM<sup>2</sup> for wild-type N = 20; p=0.06). While presynaptic varicosity retraction is partially penetrant, once initiated, retraction goes to completion. Thus, maintenance of presynaptic varicosities seems to be subject to a binary switch, and this suggested to us that loss of <italic>ptrn-1</italic> might result in initiation or transmission of a retraction signal.</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>PTRN-1 acts upstream of the DLK-1 neuronal remodeling pathway</title><p>The Ptrn-1 phenotypes of neurite overextension and the absence of collateral presynaptic varicosities are reminiscent of defects in <italic>C. elegans</italic> caused by loss of function mutations in the ubiquitin ligase <italic>rpm-1</italic>, a known regulator of neurite remodeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Schaefer et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib69">Zhen et al., 2000</xref>). Loss of <italic>rpm-1</italic> results in activation of the DLK-1 MAP kinase pathway and <italic>rpm-1</italic> phenotypes are DLK-1 dependent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Nakata et al., 2005</xref>). Because of the phenotypic similarities between <italic>rpm-1</italic> and <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants, we wondered if <italic>dlk-1</italic> is required for the remodeling events in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants. We found that both <italic>rpm-1</italic> and <italic>ptrn-1</italic> L4 animals have similar PLM morphological defects, including neurite overextensions that target the ventral nerve cord, and the absence of collateral presynaptic varicosities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A,B</xref>). By contrast, <italic>dlk-1</italic> loss-of-function mutants exhibit grossly normal PLM morphology. Furthermore, like <italic>rpm-1</italic>, we found that <italic>ptrn-1</italic> presynaptic varicosity retraction and overextension defects are suppressed by loss of <italic>dlk-1</italic>, as well as in a triple-mutant background (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A,B</xref>). However, we noticed that in double and triple mutants usually one or both of the varicosities were smaller and elongated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6B</xref>), indicating additive roles for <italic>dlk-1</italic>, <italic>ptrn-1</italic> and <italic>rpm-1</italic> in shaping the synapse. Our data show that <italic>ptrn-1</italic> functions upstream of <italic>dlk-1</italic>, and indicates that loss of PTRN-1 activates a <italic>C. elegans</italic> neuronal remodeling program.<fig id="fig6" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.013</object-id><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title><italic>dlk-1</italic> MAP kinase mutants suppress Ptrn-1 overextension phenotypes.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Single, double, and triple mutant combinations of <italic>ptrn-1</italic>(<italic>tm5597</italic>), <italic>dlk-1</italic>(<italic>km12</italic>) and <italic>rpm-1</italic>(<italic>ok364</italic>) were grown at 22°C, scored as L4 larvae for PLM neurite morphology defects using <italic>jsIs973</italic>(<italic>Pmec-7</italic>:mRFP), and for the presence of collateral branch presynaptic varicosities using <italic>jsIs821</italic>(P<italic>mec-7</italic>::GFP-RAB-3). Since PVM forms small GFP puncta in the ventral nerve cord (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A,B</xref>), PLM collateral varicosities which retained a small GFP-RAB-3 puncta in the ventral nerve cord cannot be unambiguously distinguished from PLM collaterals completely lacking presynaptic components. n = 200 PLM cells from 100 animals. (<bold>B</bold>) Midbody of L4 animals expressing mRFP in TRNs under P<italic>mec-7</italic> (<italic>jsIs973</italic>) showing the wild-type and mutant PLM morphology associated with <italic>ptrn-1</italic> and <italic>dlk-1</italic>. Elongated varicosity in <italic>ptrn-1</italic>, <italic>rpm-1</italic>, <italic>dlk-1</italic> triple mutant identified with double arrows. Scale bar = 10 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.013">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.013</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637f006"/></fig></p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>CAMSAPs likely function via microtubule regulation In neurons</title><p>Remodeling pathways may be activated through a microtubule-based mechanism in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants. Recently, microtubule depolymerization was reported to activate DLK-1, and ß-tubulin mutants have a reduced capacity to regenerate despite the fact that neurite extension appears wild type in these animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bounoutas et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Kirszenblat et al., 2013</xref>). PTRN-1 homologs have been shown to associate with microtubule minus ends and to regulate microtubule dynamics in ex vivo and in vitro model systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Baines et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Goodwin and Vale, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Goshima et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Meng et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Tanaka et al., 2012</xref>). It is therefore possible that loss of <italic>ptrn-1</italic> alters microtubule structures, initiating a DLK-1-based remodeling program. Because investigating neuronal microtubule dynamics in <italic>C. elegans</italic> neurons in vivo is technically difficult, we explored a link with microtubule structures by looking for Ptrn-1 phenotypes using known genetic and pharmacological manipulations that perturb the microtubule cytoskeleton.</p><p>We monitored PLM neurite overextension after exposing worms to the microtubule-poisoning drug colchicine. Colchicine is known to destabilize microtubules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Gigant et al., 2009</xref>), and while colchicine treatment did not cause regenerative phenotypes in wild-type worms, it caused these phenotypes to be more penetrant in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7A</xref>). Because the effects of colchicine treatment were additive in combination with <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants, it is possible that loss of PTRN-1 affects microtubule structures, similar to CAMSAPS in other systems. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that although <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants are more susceptible to sub-threshold amounts of colchicine-induced perturbation, the effect is independent of direct <italic>ptrn-1</italic> alterations in microtubule structures.<fig id="fig7" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.014</object-id><label>Figure 7.</label><caption><title>Manipulating the microtubule cytoskeleton leads to terminal neurite extension and ventral nerve cord targeting.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Wild-type and <italic>ptrn-1</italic>(<italic>js1286</italic>) mutants were grown for two generations on plates containing 1 mM colchicine and scored for PLM neurite overextension (n = 80). Error bars represent SEP. (<bold>B</bold>) Wild-type, <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants and mutants with lesions in microtubule acetylases (paralogs <italic>mec-17</italic> and <italic>atat-2</italic>) were scored for PLM neurite overgrowth defects at various temperatures (n = 55-60). Error bars represent SEP. (<bold>C</bold>) <italic>dlk-1</italic> suppresses the PLM neurite overextension phenotypes of <italic>mec-17</italic> (n = 50). Error bars represent SEP.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.014">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.014</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xlink:href="elife01637f007"/></fig></p><p>We also found that colchicine treatment suppressed the formation of ALM posterior neurites (data not shown), as has been reported when these structures have occurred in other mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Kirszenblat et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Topalidou et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">van Zundert et al., 2002</xref>). While abnormal lateral extension of ALM and PLM neurites occurs in a variety of mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Kirszenblat et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Mohamed et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Topalidou et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">Tulgren et al., 2011</xref>), the Ptrn-1 PLM phenotype, where overextended neurites migrate to the ventral nerve cord just anterior to the vulva has only been found in mutants that undergo neurite remodeling. Microtubule acetylation mutants alter microtubules and are reported to have these ALM secondary posterior neurites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Cueva et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Topalidou et al., 2012</xref>). We asked if disruptions caused by altered microtubule acetylation would be sufficient to cause remodeling phenotypes. We found that the microtubule acetylation mutant <italic>mec-17</italic> caused PLM neurite overextension; furthermore, like <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants, this phenotype was suppressed by growing the worms in cooler temperatures, and in a <italic>mec-17</italic>, <italic>dlk-1</italic> double mutant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7B,C</xref>). These results indicate that altering the microtubule cytoskeleton can activate a DLK-1 remodeling program. We also saw absence of collateral presynaptic varicosities in <italic>mec-17</italic> mutant animals, however this phenotype was additive in <italic>mec-17</italic>, <italic>dlk-1</italic> double mutants indicating that <italic>mec-17</italic> and <italic>dlk-1</italic> have parallel presynaptic roles (data not shown).</p><p>Our work using genetic and pharmacological manipulations of the cytoskeleton supports the idea that altering microtubules activates neuronal remodeling programs, and suggests that the CAMSAP PTRN-1 acts in this pathway. Similar to the function of CAMSAPs in other systems, the neuronal function of CAMSAP proteins may involve the regulation of microtubules or microtubule structures.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><p>Alterations in neuronal morphology are associated with human developmental and neurodegenerative diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Newey et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Lin et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Liu, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Goellner and Aberle, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Yu and Lu, 2012</xref>) and it is therefore important to understand the cellular mechanisms that underlie these changes. The conserved DLK-1 kinase cascade promotes changes in morphology associated with neurite remodeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Hammarlund et al., 2009</xref>), but how this cascade is activated has remained elusive. Our data show that loss of the conserved CAMSAP PTRN-1 induces DLK-mediated remodeling phenotypes. Because CAMSAP family members are known to associate with microtubule minus ends and regulate microtubule structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Goodwin and Vale, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Meng et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Tanaka et al., 2012</xref>), we propose a model where microtubule structures act as upstream sensors to neuronal programs that lead to synapse elimination and growth of neurites.</p><p>How does loss of PTRN-1 initiate neuronal remodeling? PTRN-1 could itself be a part of the machinery that represses the DLK-1 pathway, or it could be acting indirectly through the sequestration of a remodeling sensor. Because we can enhance defects in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants with the microtubule-binding drug colchicine, and mimic Ptrn-1 phenotypes with microtubule acetylation mutants, PTRN-1 is not likely to be the signal itself. We favor a model where perturbations of the microtubule cytoskeleton are responsible for activation of remodeling in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants. Interestingly, recent findings indicate that at cooler temperatures, neuronal microtubules incorporate microtubule monomers that have been stabilized through post-translational modification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Song et al., 2013</xref>). It is possible that the rescue we see of Ptrn-1 defects by growing animals in cooler temperatures is due to this mechanism; by incorporating cold-stable monomers, microtubule structures may be less sensitive to cytoskeletal alterations caused by <italic>ptrn-1</italic> or acetylation mutants.</p><p>Altered association of microtubule filaments into networks may initiate neurite remodeling rather than disruption of individual microtubules. Separation of microtubule filaments from organized cytoskeletal networks has been reported in experiments that decrease expression of PTRN-1 homologs and in microtubule acetylation mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Goodwin and Vale, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Topalidou et al., 2012</xref>). Such alterations would cause the release of factors associated with tethering connections between microtubule filaments, as well as the appearance of free minus ends, either of which could be a signal that a remodeling response is needed.</p><p>In <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants, regenerative changes in neuron morphology occurred after developmental patterning of the nervous system. Potential explanations for this observation include that regenerative DLK-1 signaling pathways only become competent to respond to activating cues after development is complete or that the regenerative cue appears later, perhaps because CAMSAPs stabilize microtubule structures present only in mature neurons. One possibility is that CAMSAPs are involved in microtubule-based sequestration of a RPM-1 inhibitor. RPM-1 is known to keep levels of DLK-1 low by targeting it for degradation, and this mechanism must be surmounted in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants that have a functional <italic>rpm-1</italic> gene. Alternatively, if DLK-1 or a DLK-1 activator is being sequestered, then perhaps a build-up of these stores over time overwhelms the ability of RPM-1 to keep DLK-1 levels low.</p><p>Neurites contain overlapping microtubules that must be interconnected to fulfill their known functions in trafficking and morphological integrity. These higher-order cytoskeletal networks must be organized in a way that stabilizes microtubule minus ends, in addition to linking individual microtubules together. The minus-end of microtubules are both known for durability and are distributed at regular intervals throughout neurites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Baas and Black, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Kurachi et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Cueva et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Bellanger et al., 2012</xref>). We found PTRN-1 to be distributed in puncta along neurites, and these structures thus represent a potential reservoir for sensors that promote remodeling. Although these results indicate that neuronal CAMSAPs function similarly to epithelial CAMSAPs by stabilizing microtubule networks, additional work will be required to explore the link between <italic>ptrn-1</italic> disruption and specific changes to microtubule-based structures.</p><p>We also found evidence for PTRN-1 function outside of neuronal remodeling pathways, including roles in neurite polarity and in sculpting the shape of synapses. The appearance of ALM posterior neurites, seen in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants, is thought to be a neuron polarity defect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Hilliard and Bargmann, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Kirszenblat et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">Prasad and Clark, 2006</xref>), and the cell body puncta seen in animals expressing PTRN-1:mcherry may be microtubule organizing centers necessary for polarized neurite outgrowth. However, the composition of ectopic ALM posterior neurites is incompletely understood. These extensions are reported to occur due to hyper-stabilization of microtubules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Kirszenblat et al., 2013</xref>), but also appear in mutants where microtubules and cytoskeletal networks are disrupted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Topalidou et al., 2012</xref>). Mature neurons are known to have stable microtubule structures due to post-translational modifications and interactions with cytoskeletal associated proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Conde and Caceres, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Kawataki et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Song et al., 2013</xref>). The differential effects of colchicine that we see on ALM and PLM phenotypes in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants may occur because of the differences in microtubule-based structures present in ectopic (ALM) vs native (PLM) neurites. Future work will be necessary to probe the role of CAMSAPs in neuron polarity.</p><p>In <italic>ptrn-1</italic>, <italic>dlk-1</italic> double mutants, we observed small and sometimes elongated presynaptic varicosities. It was recently reported that the <italic>D. melanogaster</italic> homolog of DLK-1 has developmental roles in synaptic structure that are independent from roles in neuronal remodeling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Klinedinst et al., 2013</xref>), and our data support similar conclusions for presynaptic varicosities in <italic>C. elegans</italic>. Synapses are specialized cell adhesion sites, and proteins involved in cellular adhesions have been found to be involved in maintenance of synaptic structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Chang and Balice-Gordon, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Pielage et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib20">Geissler et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Pielarski et al., 2013</xref>). CAMSAPs mediate connections between microtubule minus ends and adhesion proteins at epithelial adherens junctions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Meng et al., 2008</xref>), and the synaptic-localized CAMSAPs we observed may play a similar bridging role at synaptic adhesion sites.</p><p>Our data represent the first characterization of CAMSAP function in an intact animal. In <italic>C. elegans</italic>, we detected CAMSAP expression primarily in neurons. Mammalian CAMSAPs have also been found in neuronal tissue, and CAMSAP1L1 is a genetic trait locus for epilepsy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Guo et al., 2012</xref>). Abnormal neuronal patterning and seizure-induced morphological remodeling are both thought to contribute to continuing seizures and the development of epilepsies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Houser et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">O’Dell et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib68">Zhao and Overstreet-Wadiche, 2008</xref>). We found that mutations in the <italic>C. elegans</italic> CAMSAP homolog, <italic>ptrn-1</italic> initiate remodeling programs that cause aberrant extension and morphological re-patterning of neurites. Our data indicate that cytoskeletal-based activation of regenerative programs may exist in the absence of external injury signals. We speculate that without the stabilizing function of CAMSAP proteins, neuronal remodeling may be more likely to occur, a phenomenon we observed in <italic>C. elegans ptrn-1</italic> mutants. We further speculate that the function of CAMSAPs in maintenance of neuronal morphology may be responsible for the association of CAMSAP1L1 with epilepsy.</p><p>This work represents the first evidence of a role for microtubule minus-ends in neuron remodeling pathways. It identifies CAMSAPs as regulators of neuronal morphology, positions both CAMSAPs and microtubule structures as early regulators of neuronal-remodeling programs, and suggests that CAMSAPS regulate microtubule organization in neurons. Additionally, we found evidence for CAMSAP function in establishing neuron polarity and stabilizing the morphology of the synapse. Future work will be necessary to uncover the specific nature of the regenerative signal activating DLK-1 pathways, and to identify the CAMSAP-interacting proteins that function in neurons.</p></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="materials|methods"><title>Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Strains and genetics</title><p>Strains were maintained at 22°C, unless otherwise specified, on Nematode Growth Medium (NGM) agar plates spotted with OP50 <italic>E. coli</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Brenner, 1974</xref>). Some strains were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). The <italic>tm5597</italic> deletion mutation was provided by the MITANI Lab through the National Bio-Resource Project of the MEXT, Japan.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Mutagenesis and screening</title><p>The <italic>ptrn-1</italic>(<italic>js1286</italic>) allele was isolated from an ENU-mutagenesis screen of animals carrying the <italic>jsIs973</italic> and <italic>jsIs1077</italic> transgenes. <italic>js1286</italic> was determined to be a recessive lesion mapping to the X chromosome during outcrossing and positioned to the right of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Ce6-1456 (X:+17) using standard SNP mapping using the HA-8 wild Hawaiian <italic>C. elegans</italic> strain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">Davis et al., 2005</xref>). Whole genome sequencing by Robert Barstead was performed at Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation and the data set was analyzed using Whole Genomes (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://seqreport.omrf.org/genome/">http://seqreport.omrf.org/genome/</ext-link>), a web-based alignment and analysis program. Approximately 30-fold coverage using 100 bp paired end reads revealed only 1 homozygous missense and 1 homozygous non-sense lesion in coding regions right of uCE6-1456. Fosmid rescue with a 38-kb genomic region (WRM0636bB07) containing F35B3.5a (<italic>ptrn-1</italic>; a.k.a. <italic>cspr-1</italic> and <italic>pqn-34</italic>) suggested the lesion in this gene was the causative lesion resulting in the axon overgrowth phenotype.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Plasmid construction</title><p>Oligonucleotides used in plasmid construction are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SD1-data">Supplementary file 1</xref>.</p><p>NM2498 pCFJ151 Prab-3. The <italic>rab-3</italic> promoter was amplified using oligonucleotides 4216 and 4217, digested with AflII and SbfI and inserted into pCFJ151 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Frokjaer-Jensen et al., 2008</xref>).</p><p>NM2703 pCFJ151 Prab-3::mCherry::MCS. mcherry was amplified from pCFJ104 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Frokjaer-Jensen et al., 2008</xref>) using 4218 and 4533, digested with XhoI and AvrII and inserted into similarly digested NM2498.</p><p>NM2704 pCFJ151 Prab-3::mCherry::MCS::unc-10 3’UTR. The 3’ UTR region of <italic>unc-10</italic> was amplified using oligonucleotides 4651 and 4652, digested with BsiWI and SgrAI and inserted into similarly digested NM2703.</p><p>NM2705 pCFJ151 Pmyo-3::mCherry::MCS::unc-10 3’UTR. The <italic>myo-3</italic> promoter was amplified from pCFJ104 with oligonucleotides 4220 and 4221, digested with SbfI and NotI and inserted into similarly digested NM2704 replacing the <italic>rab-3</italic> promoter.</p><p>NM2849 Prab-3::ptrn-1::mcherry. A full length <italic>ptrn-1a</italic> cDNA was amplified from first strand cDNA using oligonucleotides 4741 and 4742, digested with SbfI and NheI and inserted into NM2704.</p><p>NM2925 Pptrn1::ptrn-1::mcherry. The <italic>ptrn-1</italic> promoter was amplified using oligonucleotides 4828 and 4829, digested with SbfI and Not I, and inserted into NM2849 replacing the <italic>rab-3</italic> promoter.</p><p>NM2926 Pptrn-1::mcherry. The <italic>ptrn-1</italic> promoter was amplified using oligonucleotides 4828 and 4829 digested with SbfI and NotI and inserted into similarly digested NM2705.</p><p>NM2930 Pmyo-3::ptrn-1::mcherry. NM2705 and NM2849 were digested with NotI and SbfI and the <italic>myo-3</italic> promoter was ligated in place of the <italic>rab-3</italic> promoter.</p><p>NM2645 pCFJ355K <italic>mec-7p</italic> cherry gpd2/3 GFP-RAB-3. The <italic>mec-7</italic> promoter driving in mCherry and GFP-RAB-3 in an operon separated by the <italic>gpd-2/</italic>3 intergenic region in a neomycyin resistant derivative of the X-chromosome MosSCI integration plasmid pCFJ355 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Frøkjær-Jensen et al., 2012</xref>). This plasmid contains both <italic>Cbunc-119</italic> and neomycin selectable markers. An annotated version of the sequence of this plasmid is available at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://thalamus.wustl.edu/nonetlab/ResourcesF/seqinfo.html">http://thalamus.wustl.edu/nonetlab/ResourcesF/seqinfo.html</ext-link>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Transgenic animals</title><p><italic>jsIs1077</italic> was created by ballistic transformation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Praitis et al., 2001</xref>) of NM2041 pMec-7 GFP-ELKS-1 CbUNC-119 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Kural et al., 2009</xref>) into <italic>unc-119(ed3)</italic> and outcrossed into other genetic backgrounds. <italic>jsIs1269</italic> was created by MosSCI-mediated insertion of NM2645 into the <italic>ttTi14024</italic> Mos insertion site on the X chromosome using the direct integration protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Frøkjær-Jensen et al., 2012</xref>). The insertion was determined to be single copy by long range PCR and restriction digestion. <italic>jsEx1284</italic>, <italic>jsEx1292</italic>, <italic>jsEx1295</italic>, and j<italic>sEx1297</italic> were created by standard germline injections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Mello et al., 1991</xref>) of plasmids NM2849, NM2930, NM2925, and NM2926, respectively along with co-injection marker plasmids NM1090 (Prab-3::GFP) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Mahoney et al., 2006</xref>), pPD118.20 (Pmyo-3::GFP), pPD118.33(Pmyo-2::GFP) (Gifts of Andy Fire) as listed in the strain list. The plasmid of interest was injected at 30 ng/μl and co-markers at 5 ng/μl along with pBluescript KS(+) carrier DNA (150 ng/μl).</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Microscopy</title><p>Animals were anesthetized using either 10 mM sodium azide or immobilized using 0.1 micron microspheres and imaged on agarose pads (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Kim et al., 2013</xref>). Observations of fluorescent proteins were made using an Olympus B-MAX microscope with epifluorescence. 3-D images stacks were acquired using a Ziess Axioksop equipped an ASI piezo XYZ-motorized stage, Ludl high speed electronic filter wheels and shutters, and a Hamamatsu Orca-R2 cooled CCD camera all controlled by Volocity software. Typically, images were collected using a 40X Neofluar lens, and 1 μm steps. Stacks of images were flattened using a maximal projection to visualize neuronal structures that crossed multiple individual focal planes. For immunocytochemistry, animals were fixed in 2% formaldehyde and stained with antibodies directed against GFP (mouse monoclonal, Clonetech) and MEC-7 (kindly provided by M Chalfie; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43a">Mitani et al., 1993</xref>) as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Schaefer et al., 2000</xref>).</p><p>To quantify locomotion defects, L4 Animals were transferred to fresh unseeded NMG plates and imaged for 30 s using a Spot camera at 1 frame per second. The velocity of animals was quantified using worm tracker software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Ramot et al., 2008</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Developmental analysis</title><p>Synchronous populations were generated from eggs laid by adult hermaphrodites over a 30-min time interval. Animals were scored by imaging <italic>jsIs973</italic> and <italic>jsIs1077</italic> using epifluorescence. Some animals were rescued from the anesthetic by being placed in a drop of M9, isolated to individual plates containing <italic>E. coli</italic>, and re-imaged at a later stage of development.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Colchicine treatment</title><p>Worms were grown on NGM agar plates spotted with <italic>E. coli</italic> mixed with 1 mM of colchicine. L4 animals from the F2 generation were analyzed using fluorescence microscopy.</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title><italic>C. elegans</italic> strains</title><p><list list-type="simple"><list-item><p>The following transgenes were created for this analysis:</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>jsEx1284</italic> [Prab-3::ptrn-1:mcherry; Pmyo-2:GFP;Prab-3::GFP,Pmyo-3::GFP]</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>jsEx1292</italic> [Pmyo-3::ptrn-1:mcherry; Pmyo2::GFP]</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>jsEx1297</italic> [Pptrn-1::ptrn-1:mcherry; Pmyo-2:GFP;Prab-3::GFP,Pmyo-3::GFP],</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>jsEx1295</italic> [Pptrn-1::mcherry; Pmyo-2:GFP;Prab-3::GFP,Pmyo-3::GFP]</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>jsIs1077</italic> IV [Pmec-7::GFP::ELKS-1; Cbunc-119(+)]</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>jsIs1269</italic> X [Pmec-7::mcherry -gdp2/3 intergenic- GFP:RAB-3; Cbunc-119(+)]</p></list-item><list-item><p>Other transgenes used in this analysis include <italic>jsIs821 X [Pmec7::rab-3:GFP; unc-119(+)]</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Bounoutas et al., 2009</xref>)</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>jsIs973 III [Pmec7::RFP; unc-119(+)]</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib70">Zheng et al., 2011</xref>)</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>oxIs12 [Punc-47::GFP; lin-15(+)] aka osIn12</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">McIntire et al., 1997</xref>)<italic>, nuIs25 [Pglr-1::GFP; lin-15(+)]</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Rongo et al., 1998</xref>)</p></list-item><list-item><p>The following strains were used in this analysis:</p></list-item><list-item><p>EG4322 <italic>ttTi5605 II; unc-119(ed3)</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>FX5597 <italic>ptrn-1(tm5597) X</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4192 <italic>jsIs973; jsIs1077; ptrn-1(js1286)</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4406 <italic>jsIs973; jsIs1077; ptrn-1(tm5597)</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM3947 <italic>jsIs973; jsIs1077</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4353 <italic>atat-2(ok2415) jsIs1269</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4405 <italic>jsIs973; mec-17(ok2109)</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4354 <italic>mec-17(ok2109); atat-2(ok2415) jsIs1269</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4544 <italic>dlk-1(km12), jsIs973; mec-17(ok2109)</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4386 <italic>jsIs973; jsIs1077; ptrn-1(js1286); jsEx1284</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4450 <italic>jsIs973; ptrn-1(js1286); jsEx1292</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4490 dlk-1(km12); jsIs973; rpm-1(ok364); jsIs821 ptrn-1(tm5597)</p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4485 <italic>jsIs973; rpm-1(ok364); jsIs821 ptrn-1(tm5597)</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4483 <italic>dlk-1(km12); jsIs973; jsIs821 ptrn-1(tm5597)</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4482 <italic>jsIs973; jsIs821 ptrn-1(tm5597)</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4484 <italic>dlk-1(km12); jsIs973; rpm-1(ok364); jsIs821</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4480 <italic>rpm-1(ok364); jsIs973; jsIs821</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4481 <italic>dlk-1(km12); jsIs973; jsIs821</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM3361 <italic>jsIs973; jsIs821</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4470 <italic>jsIs973; ptrn-1(js1286); jsEx1297</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4476 <italic>jsEx1295; unc-119(ed3); ttTi5605</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4422 <italic>ptrn-1(tm5597); oxIs12</italic></p></list-item><list-item><p>NM4419 <italic>nuIs25; jsIs973; ptrn-1(tm5597)</italic></p></list-item></list></p></sec></sec></body><back><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We acknowledge the Mitani Lab and National Bioresource Project Japan for kindly providing the <italic>ptrn-1(tm5597)</italic> mutant nematode, Michael Crowder for the use of his worm tracker software setup and Robert Barstead for whole genome sequencing.</p></ack><sec sec-type="additional-information"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="conflict" id="conf1"><p>The authors declare that no competing interests exist.</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>JDM, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>JJC, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>MLN, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="SD1-data"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.015</object-id><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><title>Oligonucleotides used in this study.</title><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.01637.015">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01637.015</ext-link></p></caption><media mime-subtype="docx" mimetype="application" xlink:href="elife01637s001.docx"/></supplementary-material></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baas</surname><given-names>PW</given-names></name><name><surname>Black</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name></person-group><year>1990</year><article-title>Individual microtubules in the axon consist of domains that differ in both composition and stability</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>111</volume><fpage>495</fpage><lpage>509</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.111.2.495</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baines</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Bignone</surname><given-names>PA</given-names></name><name><surname>King</surname><given-names>MD</given-names></name><name><surname>Maggs</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bennett</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinder</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Phillips</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>The CKK domain (DUF1781) binds microtubules and defines the CAMSAP/ssp4 family of animal proteins</article-title><source>Molecular Biology and Evolution</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>2005</fpage><lpage>2014</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msp115</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Barone</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Lacassagne</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Kral</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>Reorganization of the connectivity of cortical field DZ in congenitally deaf cat</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>84</volume><fpage>e60093</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0060093</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bellanger</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Cueva</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Baran</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodman</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Debant</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>The doublecortin-related gene zyg-8 is a microtubule organizer in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> neurons</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>125</volume><fpage>5417</fpage><lpage>5427</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/jcs.108381</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bessa</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Morais</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Marques</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinto</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Palha</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Almeida</surname><given-names>OF</given-names></name><name><surname>Sousa</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>Stress-induced anhedonia is associated with hypertrophy of medium spiny neurons of the nucleus accumbens</article-title><source>Translational Psychiatry</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>e266</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/tp.2013.39</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bounoutas</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kratz</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Emtage</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Chalfie</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><article-title>Microtubule depolymerization in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> touch receptor neurons reduces gene expression through a p38 MAPK pathway</article-title><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</source><volume>108</volume><fpage>3982</fpage><lpage>3987</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1101360108</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bounoutas</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Nonet</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Chalfie</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>mec-15 Encodes an F-box protein required for touch receptor neuron Mechanosensation, synapse formation, and development</article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>183</volume><fpage>607</fpage><lpage>617</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.109.105726</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brenner</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year>1974</year><article-title>The genetics of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>77</volume><fpage>71</fpage><lpage>94</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Slaughter</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Black</surname><given-names>MM</given-names></name></person-group><year>1993</year><article-title>Composite microtubules of the axon: quantitative analysis of tyrosinated and acetylated tubulin along individual axonal microtubules</article-title><source>Journal of Cell Science</source><volume>104</volume><fpage>339</fpage><lpage>352</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Balice-Gordon</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name></person-group><year>2000</year><article-title>Highwire, rpm-1, and futsch: balancing synaptic growth and stability</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>287</fpage><lpage>290</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81161-7</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavalli</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>HDAC5 is a novel injury-regulated tubulin deacetylase controlling axon regeneration</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>31</volume><fpage>3063</fpage><lpage>3078</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/emboj.2012.160</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Conde</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Caceres</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Microtubule assembly, organization and dynamics in axons and dendrites</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Neuroscience</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>319</fpage><lpage>332</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrn2631</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cueva</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Hsin</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodman</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Posttranslational acetylation of alpha-tubulin constrains protofilament number in native microtubules</article-title><source>CurrentBiology: CB</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>1066</fpage><lpage>1074</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.012</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cueva</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Mulholland</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodman</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><article-title>Nanoscale organization of the MEC-4 DEG/ENaC sensory mechanotransduction channel in Caenorhabditis elegans touch receptor neurons</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>14089</fpage><lpage>14098</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4179-07.2007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Hammarlund</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Harrach</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Hullett</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Olsen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jorgensen</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><article-title>Rapid single nucleotide polymorphism mapping in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>BMC Genomics</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>118</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-6-118</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Erturk</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hellal</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Enes</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradke</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><article-title>Disorganized microtubules underlie the formation of retraction bulbs and the failure of axonal regeneration</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>9169</fpage><lpage>9180</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0612-07.2007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frøkjær-Jensen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ailion</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jorgensen</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Improved Mos1-mediated transgenesis in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>9</volume><fpage>117</fpage><lpage>118</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.1865</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Frokjaer-Jensen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>MW</given-names></name><name><surname>Hopkins</surname><given-names>CE</given-names></name><name><surname>Newman</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Thummel</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Olesen</surname><given-names>SP</given-names></name><name><surname>Grunnet</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jorgensen</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><article-title>Single-copy insertion of transgenes in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>40</volume><fpage>1375</fpage><lpage>1383</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.248</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garnham</surname><given-names>CP</given-names></name><name><surname>Roll-Mecak</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>The chemical complexity of cellular microtubules: tubulin post-translational modification enzymes and their roles in tuning microtubule functions</article-title><source>Cytoskeleton</source><volume>69</volume><fpage>442</fpage><lpage>463</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/cm.21027</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Geissler</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gottschling</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Aguado</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Rauch</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Wetzel</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Hatt</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Faissner</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>Primary hippocampal neurons, which lack four crucial extracellular matrix molecules, display abnormalities of synaptic structure and function and severe deficits in perineuronal net formation</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>7742</fpage><lpage>7755</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3275-12.2013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gigant</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Cormier</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dorleans</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ravelli</surname><given-names>RB</given-names></name><name><surname>Knossow</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Microtubule-destabilizing agents: structural and mechanistic insights from the interaction of colchicine and vinblastine with tubulin</article-title><source>Topics in Current Chemistry</source><volume>286</volume><fpage>259</fpage><lpage>278</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/128_2008_11</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goellner</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Aberle</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>The synaptic cytoskeleton in development and disease</article-title><source>Developmental Neurobiology</source><volume>72</volume><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>125</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/dneu.20892</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goodwin</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Vale</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><article-title>Patronin regulates the microtubule network by protecting microtubule minus ends</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>143</volume><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>274</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.022</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Goshima</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Wollman</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodwin</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Scholey</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Vale</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Stuurman</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><article-title>Genes required for mitotic spindle assembly in Drosophila S2 cells</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>316</volume><fpage>417</fpage><lpage>421</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1141314</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Baum</surname><given-names>LW</given-names></name><name><surname>Sham</surname><given-names>PC</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Ng</surname><given-names>PW</given-names></name><name><surname>Lui</surname><given-names>CH</given-names></name><name><surname>Sin</surname><given-names>NC</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsoi</surname><given-names>TH</given-names></name><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwan</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Yip</surname><given-names>BH</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Thomas</surname><given-names>GN</given-names></name><name><surname>Lau</surname><given-names>YL</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Cherny</surname><given-names>SS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwan</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Two-stage genome-wide association study identifies variants in CAMSAP1L1 as susceptibility loci for epilepsy in Chinese</article-title><source>Human Molecular Genetics</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>1184</fpage><lpage>1189</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/ddr550</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hammarlund</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nix</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Hauth</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Jorgensen</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bastiani</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Axon regeneration requires a conserved MAP kinase pathway</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>323</volume><fpage>802</fpage><lpage>806</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1165527</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hilliard</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Axonal degeneration and regeneration: a mechanistic tug-of-war</article-title><source>Journal of Neurochemistry</source><volume>108</volume><fpage>23</fpage><lpage>32</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05754.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hilliard</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name><name><surname>Bargmann</surname><given-names>CI</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>Wnt signals and frizzled activity orient anterior-posterior axon outgrowth in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>379</fpage><lpage>390</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2006.01.013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Houser</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>Z</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Cetina</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Neuroanatomical clues to altered neuronal activity in epilepsy: from ultrastructure to signaling pathways of dentate granule cells</article-title><source>Epilepsia</source><volume>53</volume><supplement>Suppl 1</supplement><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>77</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03477.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Janke</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bulinski</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><article-title>Post-translational regulation of the microtubule cytoskeleton: mechanisms and functions</article-title><source>Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology</source><volume>12</volume><fpage>773</fpage><lpage>786</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrm3227</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karlen</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kahn</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Krubitzer</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>Early blindness results in abnormal corticocortical and thalamocortical connections</article-title><source>Neuroscience</source><volume>142</volume><fpage>843</fpage><lpage>858</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.06.055</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kawataki</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Osafune</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Suzuki</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Koike</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><article-title>Neuronal maturation-associated resistance of neurite degeneration caused by trophic factor deprivation or microtubule-disrupting agents</article-title><source>Brain Research</source><volume>1230</volume><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>49</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.075</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gabel</surname><given-names>CV</given-names></name><name><surname>Fang-Yen</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>Long-term imaging of <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> using nanoparticle-mediated immobilization</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>e53419</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0053419</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kirszenblat</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Neumann</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Coakley</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hilliard</surname><given-names>MA</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>A dominant mutation in mec-7/beta-tubulin affects axon development and regeneration in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> neurons</article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>285</fpage><lpage>296</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.E12-06-0441</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Klinedinst</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Xiong</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Haenfler</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Collins</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>Independent pathways downstream of the Wnd/DLK MAPKKK regulate synaptic structure, axonal transport, and injury signaling</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience: the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>12764</fpage><lpage>12778</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5160-12.2013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kurachi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Komiya</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Tashiro</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>1999</year><article-title>Biophysical properties of stable microtubules in neurites revealed by optical techniques</article-title><source>Cell Structure and Function</source><volume>24</volume><fpage>405</fpage><lpage>412</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1247/csf.24.405</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kural</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Nonet</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Selvin</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>FIONA on <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Biochemistry</source><volume>48</volume><fpage>4663</fpage><lpage>4665</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi8023477</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lesnick</surname><given-names>TG</given-names></name><name><surname>Maraganore</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Isacson</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Axon guidance and synaptic maintenance: preclinical markers for neurodegenerative disease and therapeutics</article-title><source>Trends in Neurosciences</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>142</fpage><lpage>149</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tins.2008.11.006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><article-title>Molecular genetics of neuronal migration disorders</article-title><source>Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>171</fpage><lpage>178</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11910-010-0176-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahoney</surname><given-names>TR</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Itoh</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hadwiger</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Vincent</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>ZW</given-names></name><name><surname>Fukuda</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nonet</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>Regulation of synaptic transmission by RAB-3 and RAB-27 in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>2617</fpage><lpage>2625</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.E05-12-1170</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>McIntire</surname><given-names>SL</given-names></name><name><surname>Reimer</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Schuske</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Edwards</surname><given-names>RH</given-names></name><name><surname>Jorgensen</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year>1997</year><article-title>Identification and characterization of the vesicular GABA transporter</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>389</volume><fpage>870</fpage><lpage>876</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/39908</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mello</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Kramer</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Stinchcomb</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Ambros</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><year>1991</year><article-title>Efficient gene transfer in <italic>C.elegans</italic>: extrachromosomal maintenance and integration of transforming sequences</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>3959</fpage><lpage>3970</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Mushika</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ichii</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeichi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><article-title>Anchorage of microtubule minus ends to adherens junctions regulates epithelial cell-cell contacts</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>135</volume><fpage>948</fpage><lpage>959</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.040</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43a"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mitani</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Driscoll</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Chalfie</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>1993</year><article-title>Combinatorial control of touch receptor neuron expression in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Development</source><volume>119</volume><fpage>773</fpage><lpage>783</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Boudreau</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>FP</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Chin-Sang</surname><given-names>ID</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>The <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic> Eph receptor activates NCK and N-WASP, and inhibits Ena/VASP to regulate growth cone dynamics during axon guidance</article-title><source>PLOS Genetics</source><volume>82</volume><fpage>e1002513</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1002513</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakata</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Abrams</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Grill</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Goncharov</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Chisholm</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><article-title>Regulation of a DLK-1 and p38 MAP kinase pathway by the ubiquitin ligase RPM-1 is required for presynaptic development</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>120</volume><fpage>407</fpage><lpage>420</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.017</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Newey</surname><given-names>SE</given-names></name><name><surname>Velamoor</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Govek</surname><given-names>EE</given-names></name><name><surname>Van Aelst</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><article-title>Rho GTPases, dendritic structure, and mental retardation</article-title><source>Journal of Neurobiology</source><volume>64</volume><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/neu.20153</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>O’Dell</surname><given-names>CM</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wallace</surname><given-names>GT</given-names></name><name><surname>Ray</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Banik</surname><given-names>NL</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Understanding the basic mechanisms underlying seizures in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and possible therapeutic targets: a review</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience Research</source><volume>90</volume><fpage>913</fpage><lpage>924</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jnr.22829</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pielage</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Fetter</surname><given-names>RD</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlton</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Sedat</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>GW</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><article-title>A presynaptic giant ankyrin stabilizes the NMJ through regulation of presynaptic microtubules and transsynaptic cell adhesion</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>58</volume><fpage>195</fpage><lpage>209</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.017</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pielarski</surname><given-names>KN</given-names></name><name><surname>van Stegen</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Andreyeva</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Nieweg</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Jungling</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Redies</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Gottmann</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>Asymmetric N-cadherin expression results in synapse dysfunction, synapse elimination, and axon retraction in cultured mouse neurons</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>81</volume><fpage>e54105</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0054105</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Praitis</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Casey</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Collar</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Austin</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year>2001</year><article-title>Creation of low-copy integrated transgenic lines in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>157</volume><fpage>1217</fpage><lpage>1226</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prasad</surname><given-names>BC</given-names></name><name><surname>Clark</surname><given-names>SG</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>Wnt signaling establishes anteroposterior neuronal polarity and requires retromer in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>Development</source><volume>133</volume><fpage>1757</fpage><lpage>1766</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.02357</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rongo</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Whitfield</surname><given-names>CW</given-names></name><name><surname>Rodal</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kaplan</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><article-title>LIN-10 is a shared component of the polarized protein localization pathways in neurons and epithelia</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>94</volume><fpage>751</fpage><lpage>759</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81734-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schaefer</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hadwiger</surname><given-names>GD</given-names></name><name><surname>Nonet</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group><year>2000</year><article-title>rpm-1, a conserved neuronal gene that regulates targeting and synaptogenesis in <italic>C. elegans</italic></article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>345</fpage><lpage>356</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ramot</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>BE</given-names></name><name><surname>Berry</surname><given-names>TL</given-names><suffix>Jnr</suffix></name><name><surname>Carnell</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Goodman</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><article-title>The Parallel Worm Tracker: a platform for measuring average speed and drug-induced paralysis in nematodes</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>3</volume><fpage>e2208</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0002208</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shin</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name><name><surname>Cho</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Beirowski</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Milbrandt</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavalli</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>DiAntonio</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Dual leucine zipper kinase is required for retrograde injury signaling and axonal regeneration</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>74</volume><fpage>1015</fpage><lpage>1022</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2012.04.028</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Kirkpatrick</surname><given-names>LL</given-names></name><name><surname>Schilling</surname><given-names>AB</given-names></name><name><surname>Helseth</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Chabot</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Keillor</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>GV</given-names></name><name><surname>Brady</surname><given-names>ST</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>Transglutaminase and polyamination of tubulin: posttranslational modification for stabilizing axonal microtubules</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>78</volume><fpage>109</fpage><lpage>123</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2013.01.036</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Subramanian</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapoor</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Building complexity: insights into self-organized assembly of microtubule-based architectures</article-title><source>Developmental Cell</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>874</fpage><lpage>885</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2012.10.011</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tanaka</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Nagae</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Takeichi</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Nezha/CAMSAP3 and CAMSAP2 cooperate in epithelial-specific organization of noncentrosomal microtubules</article-title><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</source><volume>109</volume><fpage>20029</fpage><lpage>20034</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1218017109</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tedeschi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradke</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>The DLK signalling pathway–a double-edged sword in neural development and regeneration</article-title><source>EMBO Reports</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>605</fpage><lpage>614</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/embor.2013.64</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Topalidou</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Keller</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalebic</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Somhegyi</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Politi</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Heppenstall</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>DH</given-names></name><name><surname>Chalfie</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Genetically separable functions of the MEC-17 tubulin acetyltransferase affect microtubule organization</article-title><source>Current Biology: CB</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>1057</fpage><lpage>1065</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.066</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tulgren</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>ST</given-names></name><name><surname>Rapp</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Gurney</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Grill</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><article-title>PPM-1, a PP2Calpha/beta phosphatase, regulates axon termination and synapse formation in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic></article-title><source>Genetics</source><volume>189</volume><fpage>1297</fpage><lpage>1307</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.111.134791</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>van Zundert</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Alvarez</surname><given-names>FJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Yevenes</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Carcamo</surname><given-names>JG</given-names></name><name><surname>Vera</surname><given-names>JC</given-names></name><name><surname>Aguayo</surname><given-names>LG</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><article-title>Glycine receptors involved in synaptic transmission are selectively regulated by the cytoskeleton in mouse spinal neurons</article-title><source>Journal of Neurophysiology</source><volume>87</volume><fpage>640</fpage><lpage>644</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiong</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Ewanek</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Diantonio</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Collins</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><article-title>Protein turnover of the Wallenda/DLK kinase regulates a retrograde response to axonal injury</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>191</volume><fpage>211</fpage><lpage>223</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201006039</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yamamoto</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Yoshimura</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kitada</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Nakahara</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Seiwa</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Ueki</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Shimoda</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Ishige</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Watanabe</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Asou</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>A new monoclonal antibody, A3B10, specific for astrocyte-lineage cells recognizes calmodulin-regulated spectrin-associated protein 1 (Camsap1)</article-title><source>Journal of Neuroscience Research</source><volume>87</volume><fpage>503</fpage><lpage>513</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jnr.21853</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Regulation of DLK-1 kinase activity by calcium-mediated dissociation from an inhibitory isoform</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>76</volume><fpage>534</fpage><lpage>548</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Synapses and dendritic spines as pathogenic targets in Alzheimer’s disease</article-title><source>Neural Plasticity</source><volume>2012</volume><fpage>247150</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2012/247150</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Arnadottir</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Keller</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Caldwell</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Yao</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chalfie</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><article-title>MEC-2 is recruited to the putative mechanosensory complex in <italic>C. elegans</italic> touch receptor neurons through its stomatin-like domain</article-title><source>Current Biology: CB</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>1888</fpage><lpage>1896</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2004.10.030</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib68"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>CS</given-names></name><name><surname>Overstreet-Wadiche</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><article-title>Integration of adult generated neurons during epileptogenesis</article-title><source>Epilepsia</source><volume>49</volume><supplement>Suppl 5</supplement><fpage>3</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01632.x</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhen</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Bamber</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year>2000</year><article-title>Regulation of presynaptic terminal organization by C. elegans RPM-1, a putative guanine nucleotide exchanger with a RING-H2 finger domain</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>26</volume><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>343</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Schaefer</surname><given-names>AM</given-names></name><name><surname>Nonet</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><article-title>Regulation of <italic>C. elegans</italic> presynaptic differentiation and neurite branching via a novel signaling pathway initiated by SAM-10</article-title><source>Development</source><volume>138</volume><fpage>87</fpage><lpage>96</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.055350</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="article-commentary" id="SA1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Hobert</surname><given-names>Oliver</given-names></name><role>Reviewing editor</role><aff><institution>Columbia University</institution>, <country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text><p>eLife posts the editorial decision letter and author response on a selection of the published articles (subject to the approval of the authors). An edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the substantive concerns or comments; minor concerns are not usually shown. Reviewers have the opportunity to discuss the decision before the letter is sent (see <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://elife.elifesciences.org/review-process">review process</ext-link>). Similarly, the author response typically shows only responses to the major concerns raised by the reviewers.</p></boxed-text><p>Thank you for sending your work entitled “The <italic>C. elegans</italic> microtubule minus-end binding homolog PTRN-1 stabilizes synapses and neurites” for consideration at <italic>eLife</italic>. Your article has been favorably evaluated by a Senior editor, a member of our Board of Reviewing editors, and three reviewers.</p><p>The prevailing view is that the findings described in your paper are potentially interesting, but a number of significant concerns have been raised that we ask you to address in a revised version of the manuscript:</p><p>1) The Introduction states that “we report that genetic lesions in <italic>ptrn-1</italic>…require <italic>dlk-1</italic> for regenerative morphological changes in neurons.” Similar statements about regeneration are scattered throughout the manuscript. This paper doesn't contain any data on regeneration at all. This sentence, and others like it that discuss regeneration, should be rewritten to focus on maintenance. <italic>dlk-1</italic> has multiple functions in neurons-in regeneration, degeneration, synapses, etc. The emphasis on regeneration seems misplaced.</p><p>2) A strength of this work is that patronin was identified in a forward screen. This could provide important context about the landscape of genes that have similar phenotypes (if any). But the screen is not well described. It would be very helpful to know how many genomes were screened, how many genes were found, and what their identity is if known.</p><p>3) mCherry is reported to be prone to aggregation. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref> mCherry puncta can be observed. The basal level of mCherry puncta makes it difficult to interpret the puncta that are observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3E–H</xref>. These latter figures appear to have much higher protein expression, much higher exposure, or both. Perhaps this accounts for the puncta? Also, it is stated that the fusion protein is “functional”-does this mean it rescues the mutant when expressed at reasonable levels? These data should be shown. Finally, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref> is confusing for a separate reason-the mCherry appears to be localized to cell nuclei, but this is not stated in the legend or the Methods.</p><p>4) Patronin clearly functions in maintenance, but it also seems to function in development according to the data. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>, about a third of the collateral branch defects are developmental. This developmental role should be addressed in the manuscript.</p><p>5) The phenotype for patronin mutants in collateral branches is 60% wild type in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>, but 13% wild type in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>. This is a really big difference, despite a fairly high sample size. What might account for this?</p><p>6) The interpretation of the cholchicine experiment is incomplete. It is possible that the increased sensitivity of patronon mutants to the drug is because their microtubules are perturbed, as the manuscript suggests. But it is also possible, for example, that patronin mutants are more sensitive to sub-threshold amounts of perturbation. The acetylation experiments seek to link microtubule stability to <italic>dlk-1</italic>, but don't address patronin. Unless a direct experiment is done to link patronin to microtubule stability, this section needs to be revised.</p><p>7) The presentation of phenotypic data is often problematic. For example, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref> shows a bar graph depicting ‘individuals with PLM overextension (%)’. There are two PLMs per animal, so it is typical and preferred to report the penetrance based on scoring cells (percentage of affected PLMs) rather than scoring individuals with PLM defects. How is an animal with two defective PLMs scored compared to only one? The ‘individual’ method inflates the penetrance if most animals have only one defective PLM and makes it impossible to compare strains if the distribution of mutant PLMs is different. In particular, the penetrance of D-type motor neuron defects (6 DD + 13 VD) is likely much lower on a cell basis compared to an ‘individual’ basis. It would also be helpful for a broader audience to label the ALM, PVM and PLM neurons in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>8) The error bars on graphs depicting percentages of phenotypes are stated to represent standard deviation. It is unclear why a standard deviation is shown or how it was even calculated. For this type of data, the standard error of proportion would seem appropriate or a chi square analysis could be done to compare the penetrance of different strains. In particular, it is worth determining whether PTRN-1 and RPM-1 act in the same or separate pathways by comparing the penetrance of single and double mutants. However, it is unclear whether a sufficient number of animals were scored to determine whether the penetrance is different between the singles and double. In most cases, the samples sizes appear small, in part, because the n values are based on animals rather than cells.</p><p>9) It is difficult to see the details in many of the images. In particular, the quality of the images in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> is poor. It seems that maybe a NLS-GFP was used for the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> expression experiments; it is not hard to say whether it is nuclear or cytoplasmic. It would be nice to show that the PTRN-1-GFP puncta colocalize with MTs.</p><p>10) There are several typos and grammatical errors (e.g., <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1–figure supplement 2</xref>: individuals with defects is stated on both graphs, ‘Data’ is plural not singular). The authors often do not use proper <italic>C. elegans</italic> nomenclature, e.g., Ptrn-1 phenotypes instead of <italic>ptrn-1</italic> for gene and PTRN-1 for protein. There are many awkward or confusing phrases, e.g., Because the effects of colchicine treatment were additive in combination with <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants… The authors should contact the curators of wormbase to update the annotation of <italic>ptrn-1</italic>. At present, their <italic>ptrn-1b</italic> gene structure differs from wormbase version.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="SA2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.01637.017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><p><italic>1) The Introduction states that “we report that genetic lesions in</italic> ptrn-1<italic>...require</italic> dlk-1 <italic>for regenerative morphological changes in neurons.” Similar statements about regeneration are scattered throughout the manuscript. This paper doesn't contain any data on regeneration at all. This sentence, and others like it that discuss regeneration, should be rewritten to focus on maintenance.</italic> dlk-1 <italic>has multiple functions in neurons-in regeneration, degeneration, synapses, etc. The emphasis on regeneration seems misplaced</italic>.</p><p>We agree that the manuscript speaks more to neurite remodeling than regeneration. Since we have not used a regeneration paradigm, we have refocused the text on neurite remodeling.</p><p><italic>2) A strength of this work is that patronin was identified in a forward screen. This could provide important context about the landscape of genes that have similar phenotypes (if any). But the screen is not well described. It would be very helpful to know how many genomes were screened, how many genes were found, and what their identity is if known</italic>.</p><p>We have updated the manuscript to include additional information describing the screen, as requested. In short, we found four candidates in a screen of 1134 haploid genomes. The other three mutants identified in the screen remain uncharacterized.</p><p><italic>3) mCherry is reported to be prone to aggregation. In</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><italic>Figure 3B</italic></xref> <italic>mCherry puncta can be observed. The basal level of mCherry puncta makes it difficult to interpret the puncta that are observed in</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><italic>Figure 3E-H</italic></xref><italic>. These latter figures appear to have much higher protein expression, much higher exposure, or both. Perhaps this accounts for the puncta? Also, it is stated that the fusion protein is “functional”-does this mean it rescues the mutant when expressed at reasonable levels? These data should be shown. Finally,</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><italic>Figure 3B</italic></xref> <italic>is confusing for a separate reason-the mCherry appears to be localized to cell nuclei, but this is not stated in the legend or the Methods</italic>.</p><p>The reviewers found the presentation of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> confusing. To clarify we have split the original <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> into the new <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3 fig4">Figures 3 and 4</xref>, and additional images have been added to both figures. In the new <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, images are all from a transcriptional reporter that uses the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> promoter to drive expression of mCherry, which is indeed primarily nuclear localized.</p><p>In the original <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>, images 3E-3H were from a translational reporter that uses the <italic>ptrn-1</italic> promoter to drive expression of a functional PTRN-1-mCherry C-terminal fusion protein. To address concerns that puncta result from aggregation of mCherry, we added new images that use the <italic>mec-4</italic> promoter to drive expression of a GFP-PTRN-1 N-terminal fusion protein (4D-4G). Additionally, data showing fusion protein functionality under the native <italic>ptrn-1</italic> promoter have been added to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, and the Figure legend notes the location of this data.</p><p><italic>4) Patronin clearly functions in maintenance, but it also seems to function in development according to the data. In</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4"><italic>Figure 4B</italic></xref><italic>, about a third of the collateral branch defects are developmental. This developmental role should be addressed in the manuscript</italic>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref> (formerly 4B) shows that a fraction of collateral branch defects occur prior to the L1 time-point. We are unable to determine if aberrant neurite morphology seen in L1 animals is due to developmental defects or to early remodeling events. The data in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> (formerly <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) is now analyzed by cell rather than by animal (as requested in reviewer comment 5), and the potential developmental role for <italic>ptrn-1</italic> shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref> (formerly 4B) has been discussed in the manuscript.</p><p><italic>5) The phenotype for patronin mutants in collateral branches is 60% wild type in</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4"><italic>Figure 4B</italic></xref><italic>, but 13% wild type in</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5"><italic>Figure 5A</italic></xref><italic>. This is a really big difference, despite a fairly high sample size. What might account for this</italic>?</p><p>Several factors could account for the difference in collateral branching between the two figures. The figures feature different alleles js1286 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>) and tm5597 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>), were collected at different temperatures 22°C (4B) and 24°C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>), and one was collected using a synchronized population of animals at fixed time-points (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref>) while in the other animals were selected for analysis based on L4 morphology (5A). To address these concerns, we recollected the data for <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> (currently <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), using a temperature of 22°C. The current <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figures 5</xref> (formerly 4) &amp; 6 (formerly 5) are now displayed by cell rather than by animal. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref> (formerly 4B) now shows 79% wild type collateral branches and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6A</xref> (formerly 5A) shows 63% wild-type branches. Additionally, the figure legends have been updated to explicitly address the differences in how animals were selected for each analysis and in the alleles used.</p><p><italic>6) The interpretation of the cholchicine experiment is incomplete. It is possible that the increased sensitivity of patronon mutants to the drug is because their microtubules are perturbed, as the manuscript suggests. But it is also possible, for example, that patronin mutants are more sensitive to sub-threshold amounts of perturbation. The acetylation experiments seek to link microtubule stability to</italic> dlk-1<italic>, but don't address patronin. Unless a direct experiment is done to link patronin to microtubule stability, this section needs to be revised</italic>.</p><p>We updated the manuscript to acknowledge alternative interpretations of the colchicine experiment, and removed sentences that link <italic>ptrn-1</italic> to microtubule stability.</p><p><italic>7) The presentation of phenotypic data is often problematic. For example,</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1"><italic>Figure 1C</italic></xref> <italic>shows a bar graph depicting ‘individuals with PLM overextension (%)’. There are two PLMs per animal, so it is typical and preferred to report the penetrance based on scoring cells (percentage of affected PLMs) rather than scoring individuals with PLM defects. How is an animal with two defective PLMs scored compared to only one? The ‘individual’ method inflates the penetrance if most animals have only one defective PLM and makes it impossible to compare strains if the distribution of mutant PLMs is different. In particular, the penetrance of D-type motor neuron defects (6 DD + 13 VD) is likely much lower on a cell basis compared to an ‘individual’ basis. It would also be helpful for a broader audience to label the ALM, PVM and PLM neurons in</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1"><italic>Figure 1</italic></xref>.</p><p>We added a panel to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1–figure supplement 1</xref> showing the variance in penetrance of overextension is less than 10% in <italic>ptrn-1</italic> mutants. We have used a darker font for ALM, PVM and PLM labels in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref> and we labeled the neurons in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1–figure supplement 1</xref> as requested. We have updated <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> (formerly <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> (formerly <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) to report phenotypic data on a “by cell” basis. While we agree with the reviewer comment that penetrance of D-type motor neuron defects would be lower on a by-cell basis compared to an individual basis, we included the quantification of these defects as a figure supplement because our purpose in analyzing motor neurons is to report that we do find defects in other neurons (aside from mechanosensory neurons that represent the core of our analysis). The text of our manuscript does not refer to the penetrance of motor neuron defects and we are happy to remove <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1–figure supplement 1</xref> if this quantification remains a persistent reviewer concern.</p><p><italic>8) The error bars on graphs depicting percentages of phenotypes are stated to represent standard deviation. It is unclear why a standard deviation is shown or how it was even calculated. For this type of data, the standard error of proportion would seem appropriate or a chi square analysis could be done to compare the penetrance of different strains. In particular, it is worth determining whether PTRN-1 and RPM-1 act in the same or separate pathways by comparing the penetrance of single and double mutants. However, it is unclear whether a sufficient number of animals were scored to determine whether the penetrance is different between the singles and double. In most cases, the samples sizes appear small, in part, because the n values are based on animals rather than cells</italic>.</p><p>The error bars on graphs depicting percentages of phenotypes have been changed to Standard Error of Proportion (SEP) as requested. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5 fig6">Figures 5 and 6</xref> have been analyzed based on a by-cell basis rather than by animal as suggested.</p><p><italic>9) It is difficult to see the details in many of the images. In particular, the quality of the images in</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><italic>Figure 3</italic></xref> <italic>is poor. It seems that maybe a NLS-GFP was used for the</italic> ptrn-1 <italic>expression experiments; it is not hard to say whether it is nuclear or cytoplasmic. It would be nice to show that the PTRN-1-GFP puncta colocalize with MTs</italic>.</p><p>Images from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> have been enlarged and higher magnification images have been used in place of the previous subpanels. Although the transcriptional fusion is not to an NLS-cherry, the mCherry does localize primarily to nuclei in this transgene. Given that the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> reporter is a transcriptional reporter, the subcellular localization is not relevant to interpretation of the figure – the signal is simply a means to identify the cell type expressing the reporter.</p><p>Additional images have also been added to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, which documents localization of a functional PTRN-1-mCherry fusion protein. In addition, we have added co-localization data showing co-localization between GFP-PTRN-1 and MEC-7 (beta tubulin) in mechanosensory neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4H-I</xref>).</p><p><italic>10) There are several typos and grammatical errors (e.g.,</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2"><italic>Figure 1</italic>–<italic>figure supplement 2</italic></xref><italic>: individuals with defects is stated on both graphs, ‘Data’ is plural not singular). The authors often do not use proper</italic> C. elegans <italic>nomenclature, e.g., Ptrn-1 phenotypes instead of</italic> ptrn-1 <italic>for gene and PTRN-1 for protein. There are many awkward or confusing phrases, e.g., Because the effects of colchicine treatment were additive in combination with</italic> ptrn-1 <italic>mutants… The authors should contact the curators of wormbase to update the annotation of</italic> ptrn-1<italic>. At present, their</italic> ptrn-1b <italic>gene structure differs from wormbase version</italic>.</p><p>Typos: We have revised the listed typos, grammatical errors and awkward phrases, and attempted to revise similar errors and other statements that might be viewed as awkward.</p><p>Nomenclature: We are abiding to the <italic>C. elegans</italic> nomenclature published in Horvitz HR, Brenner S, Hodgkin J, Herman RK. (1979). A uniform genetic nomenclature for the nematode <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>. Molecular and General Genetics. 175 (2): 129-33. Thus, we are using italics (<italic>ptrn-1)</italic> when referring to the gene, Capitals (PTRN-1) when referring to the protein, and first letter only capitalized (Ptrn-1) to refer to phenotype.</p><p>Gene structure: In the case of <italic>ptrn-1</italic>, Wormbase is not dependable, accurate or static. Thus, we are not basing our figure on current wormbase nomenclature since it will likely change again. When we submitted in November, Wormbase showed 3 isoforms (1 of which was purely computational and erroneous, and a second that was based on an unreliable compound EST). On Jan 13, 2014, the Wormbase annotation is different and now includes both <italic>ptrn-1</italic> isoforms we have documented, but still includes two questionable isoforms. We have made Wormbase aware of the errors and now provide the sequence of the two isoforms as supplemental data. We would be happy to submit these to Genbank if <italic>eLife</italic> requests, but given the RNA-seq data in Wormbase, these forms can be deduced easily from RNA-seq and EST data.</p></body></sub-article></article>