Permalink
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.1d1 20130915//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1d1"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">elife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">eLife</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">eLife</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>eLife</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="electronic">2050-084X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">03116</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="display-channel"><subject>Research article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Cell biology</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Dynamic recruitment of the curvature-sensitive protein ArhGAP44 to nanoscale membrane deformations limits exploratory filopodia initiation in neurons</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-13461"><name><surname>Galic</surname><given-names>Milos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1">*</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="pa1">†</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="par-1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con1"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-13462"><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>Feng-Chiao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="pa2">‡</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con2"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-13463"><name><surname>Collins</surname><given-names>Sean R</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-12508"><name><surname>Matis</surname><given-names>Maja</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="pa3">§</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con5"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-13464"><name><surname>Bandara</surname><given-names>Samuel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="pa4">¶</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con3"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-11971"><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>Tobias</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor2">*</xref><xref ref-type="other" rid="par-2"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="par-3"/><xref ref-type="other" rid="par-4"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="con6"/><xref ref-type="fn" rid="conf1"/></contrib><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution content-type="dept">Department of Chemical and Systems Biology</institution>, <institution>Stanford University</institution>, <addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Stanford</named-content></addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution content-type="dept">Department of Pathology</institution>, <institution>Stanford University</institution>, <addr-line><named-content content-type="city">Stanford</named-content></addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff></contrib-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Polleux</surname><given-names>Franck</given-names></name><role>Reviewing editor</role><aff><institution>Columbia University</institution>, <country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><label>*</label>For correspondence: <email>galic@uni-muenster.de</email> (MG);</corresp><corresp id="cor2"><email>tobias1@stanford.edu</email> (TM)</corresp><fn fn-type="present-address" id="pa1"><label>†</label><p>Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany</p></fn><fn fn-type="present-address" id="pa2"><label>‡</label><p>Institute of Molecular Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan</p></fn><fn fn-type="present-address" id="pa3"><label>§</label><p>Institute for Neuro and Developmental Biology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany</p></fn><fn fn-type="present-address" id="pa4"><label>¶</label><p>Department of Systems Biology, Harvard University, Boston, United States</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>3</volume><elocation-id>e03116</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>04</month><year>2014</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>11</month><year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright © 2014, Galic et al</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Galic et al</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><license-p>This article is distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License</ext-link>, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="elife03116.pdf"/><abstract><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.001</object-id><p>In the vertebrate central nervous system, exploratory filopodia transiently form on dendritic branches to sample the neuronal environment and initiate new trans-neuronal contacts. While much is known about the molecules that control filopodia extension and subsequent maturation into functional synapses, the mechanisms that regulate initiation of these dynamic, actin-rich structures have remained elusive. Here, we find that filopodia initiation is suppressed by recruitment of ArhGAP44 to actin-patches that seed filopodia. Recruitment is mediated by binding of a membrane curvature-sensing ArhGAP44 N-BAR domain to plasma membrane sections that were deformed inward by acto-myosin mediated contractile forces. A GAP domain in ArhGAP44 triggers local Rac-GTP hydrolysis, thus reducing actin polymerization required for filopodia formation. Additionally, ArhGAP44 expression increases during neuronal development, concurrent with a decrease in the rate of filopodia formation. Together, our data reveals a local auto-regulatory mechanism that limits initiation of filopodia via protein recruitment to nanoscale membrane deformations.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.001">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.001</ext-link></p></abstract><abstract abstract-type="executive-summary"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.002</object-id><title>eLife digest</title><p>Our brains contain a vast network of many billions of cells that communicate with, and are connected to, each other. Each brain cell, or neuron, can form connections with as many as 10,000 other neurons—and signals pass from one neuron to the next at sites known as synapses.</p><p>A neuron's surface has numerous finger-like protrusions known as filopodia that are important for sensing the environment around the cells. Filopodia are highly changeable and constantly extend and retract as the filaments that support them—which are made up of a protein called actin—grow and shrink back. Neurons use their filopodia to explore and seek out other neurons in the brain, and when they make contact with the right neuron, it leads to the formation of a synapse. However, how filopodial extensions begin to grow—and what stops a neuron from forming too many filopodia—is not fully understood.</p><p>Galic et al. now show that a protein called ArhGAP44 limits the formation of new filopodia in neurons. The ArhGAP44 protein is recruited to patches of the surface membrane that have a lot of actin and that curve inwards. ArhGAP44 then locally inhibits other proteins that are normally required to extend the actin filaments and drive the growth of filopodia out from the surface of the cell.</p><p>Galic et al. also show that more ArhGAP44 is produced with age—levels are low in embryos and high in adults—and this increase in the amount of protein correlates with a decrease in the number of filopodia formed. When Galic et al. engineered rat neurons to produce more of the ArhGAP44 protein, fewer filopodia formed on the surface of the neurons. Decreasing the amount of this protein had the opposite effect. Moreover, ArhGAP44 was shown to mainly stop new filopodia from forming and had little effect on existing filopodia. Together, these findings suggest that ArhGAP44 may help neurons transition from a dynamic exploratory mode to a mature, more static, state; this is a characteristic of the development of the nervous system.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.002">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.002</ext-link></p></abstract><kwd-group kwd-group-type="author-keywords"><title>Author keywords</title><kwd>actin</kwd><kwd>membrane curvature</kwd><kwd>neuron</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group kwd-group-type="research-organism"><title>Research organism</title><kwd>rat</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group id="par-1"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001659</institution-id><institution>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>EXC 1003</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Galic</surname><given-names>Milos</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="par-2"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution content-type="university">National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>MH064801</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>Tobias</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="par-3"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution content-type="university">National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>MH095087</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>Tobias</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group id="par-4"><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002</institution-id><institution content-type="university">National Institutes of Health</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>GM063702</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>Tobias</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><funding-statement>The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.</funding-statement></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>elife-xml-version</meta-name><meta-value>2.0</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta specific-use="meta-only"><meta-name>Author impact statement</meta-name><meta-value>Local inward plasma membrane deformations caused by actomyosin-dependent contraction trigger the dynamic recruitment of a curvature-sensitive actin-regulatory protein, which represents a receptor-independent auto-regulatory mechanism to control local actin polymerization dynamics at the plasma membrane.</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec sec-type="intro" id="s1"><title>Introduction</title><p>During the development of the central nervous system, neuronal progenitor cells proliferate, migrate, and finally differentiate into functional units to form a multi-cellular neuronal network (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Ayala et al., 2007</xref>). In culture, differentiation of individual neurons occurs in a stereotypic pattern starting with the formation of an axon, followed by the creation of an elaborate dendritic tree and culminating with the initiation and maturation of trans-neuronal synaptic contacts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Dotti et al., 1988</xref>). The formation of synaptic connections is often facilitated by dynamic exploratory filopodia that extend out of thicker dendritic branches to sample the environment and thereby increase the probability that selective pre-to-postsynaptic connections are established (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Ziv and Smith, 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Marrs et al., 2001</xref>). Exploratory filopodia are dynamic finger-like membrane structures containing actin cables formed out of actin patches along the dendritic shaft (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Lau et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Matus, 2000</xref>). Extension of filopodia is driven by local activation of formins, Ena/VASP proteins, small GTPases, and likely other steps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Krugmann et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Lebrand et al., 2004</xref>). Intriguingly, the frequency of filopodia formation dramatically drops once high synapse density is established (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Ziv and Smith, 1996</xref>), suggesting that the initiation of these structures is controlled by opposing negative regulators. However, the identity of these inhibitors has remained elusive.</p><p>Here, we provide evidence that ArhGAP44 limits the initiation of exploratory dendritic filopodia. Consistent with previous reports, we observe that formation of actin patches precedes filopodia extension. Notably, we find that within actin patches Myosin II-mediated pulling on plasma membrane (PM)-associated actin cables induces highly curved membrane sections that trigger ArhGAP44 recruitment. The resulting enrichment of ArhGAP44 then reduces local actin polymerization due to the Rac GAP activity of ArhGAP44, preventing the formation of filopodia. ArhGAP44 expression increases as the neuronal network is established and the frequency of exploratory filopodia formation is diminished, suggesting that ArhGAP44 may facilitate the transition of neurons from a dynamic exploratory mode to a mature more static state, a hallmark of nervous system development.</p></sec><sec sec-type="results" id="s2"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>ArhGAP44 is predominantly expressed in the brain and increases with age</title><p>Formation of filopodia depends on proteins that regulate polymerization of actin filaments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Krugmann et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Lebrand et al., 2004</xref>). To identify new regulators of exploratory dendritic filopodia formation, we performed a literature search and identified 286 genes that were previously associated either directly or indirectly with actin reorganization. We then clustered these genes according to expression pattern using published microarray data and found 89 of the 286 genes to be expressed predominantly in neuronal tissues (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1A</xref> and ‘Materials and methods’ and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SD1-data">Supplementary file 1</xref>). As we were interested in regulators of actin dynamics selective for the brain, we ranked these 89 genes for high expression in the brain compared to the spinal cord and tested the validity of the ranking using a set of control genes expressed only in one of the respective tissues (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1B</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="tbl1">Table 1</xref> and ‘Materials and methods’). Among the five actin regulators with the highest brain vs spinal cord ratio, we found ArhGAP44 (also known as Rich2 or Nadrin2), a membrane-curvature-sensing GTPase Activating Protein (GAP) selective for the small Rho GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Richnau and Aspenstrom, 2001</xref>). In previous studies, ArhGAP44 has been associated with the maintenance of apical microvilli in polarized epithelial cells as well as postsynaptic maturation and vesicle release (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Rollason et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib44">Nahm et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib50">Raynaud et al., 2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib51">2014</xref>). Considering the role of Rho GTPases during filopodia formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Krugmann et al., 2001</xref>), we decided to further investigate the role of ArhGAP44 in developing neurons.<table-wrap id="tbl1" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.003</object-id><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>Reference genes expressed predominantly in the adult brain or in the spinal cord</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.003">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.003</ext-link></p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th>Gene</th><th>Adult brain</th><th>Spinal cord</th><th>Ratio</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>PMP22<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn1">*</xref></td><td>720.55</td><td>2516.35</td><td>0.286347</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Snipes et al., 1992</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>MPZ<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn1">*</xref></td><td>5.5</td><td>181.5</td><td>0.030303</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Su et al., 1993</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>BSN<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn2">†</xref></td><td>56.7</td><td>3.45</td><td>16.43478</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">tom Dieck et al., 1998</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>GRIA2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn2">†</xref></td><td>355.1</td><td>11.55</td><td>30.74459</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Martin et al., 1993</xref>)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tblfn1"><label>*</label><p>enriched in the spinal cord.</p></fn><fn id="tblfn2"><label>†</label><p>enriched in the adult brain.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></p><p>To validate the microarray expression pattern of ArhGAP44, we first isolated various organs and brain regions and probed protein levels with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44. Consistent with previous work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Richnau and Aspenstrom, 2001</xref>), western blot analysis showed expression of ArhGAP44 in the brain while being below detection level in all other tested organs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2A</xref>). Within the brain, immunoblotting directed against ArhGAP44 showed increased protein levels in the frontal cortex and olfactory bulb (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref>). The same expression pattern was found in sagittal brain sections stained against ArhGAP44 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2B</xref>).<fig-group><fig id="fig1" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.004</object-id><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><title>The brain-enriched ArhGAP44 regulates exploratory dendritic filopodia formation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Microarray data for ArhGAP44 across 74 tissue samples show predominant expression in neuronal tissues (red box). Immunoblot to the right shows ArhGAP44 expressed in the brain while being below detection level in other tissues. Note that individual tissue samples are likely composed of a variety of different cell types. (<bold>B</bold>) Total extracts of individual brain regions probed with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44 (top) and tubulin (bottom). (<bold>C</bold>) Expression of ArhGAP44 in cultured hippocampal neurons. Total extracts of individual neuronal samples were isolated at DIV3, DIV10, and DIV17 and probed with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44 (top), the synaptic proteins PSD95 and Bassoon (middle lanes), and tubulin (bottom). (<bold>D</bold>) Scanning electron micrographs of cultured neurons. Dendritic surface structures are classified based on morphology as convoluted nodes (red), elongated protrusion without contact (light gray), or stubby protrusions that contact adjacent neurites (dark gray). Analysis is shown for DIV3 (n = 10 neurons, 2 independent experiments), DIV10 (n = 10 neurons, 2 independent experiments), and DIV17 (n = 9 neurons, 2 independent experiments). (<bold>E</bold>) Overexpression of ArhGAP44 decreases filopodia density. Representative examples of neurons (green) stained with anti-MAP2 antibody (red) are shown. Analysis of filopodia density upon overexpression of control (black; n = 67 neurons, 3 independent experiments), ArhGAP44(wt) (dark blue; n = 73 neurons, 3 independent experiments), and mutant ArhGAP44(R291M) (light blue; n = 53 neurons, 3 independent experiments) is shown below. (<bold>F</bold>) Rac-GAP activity of individual ArhGAP44 mutants. Note that ArhGAP44(R291M) shows higher GTP-Rac1 hydrolysis than control. (<bold>G</bold>) Knockdown of ArhGAP44 increases filopodia density. Analysis of filopodia density upon expression of control (black; n = 67 neurons, 3 independent experiments), control siRNA (gray; n = 67 neurons, 3 independent experiments), and knockdown of ArhGAP44 (siRNA #1, light yellow; n = 83 neurons; siRNA #2, dark yellow; n = 85 neurons; both 3 independent experiments) is shown below. (<bold>H</bold>) Control western blot analysis testing the effectiveness of individual siRNA pools. Scale bars (<bold>D</bold>), 1 µm; (<bold>E</bold> and <bold>F</bold>), 20 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.004">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.004</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116f001"/></fig><fig id="fig1s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.005</object-id><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Cluster analysis of putative actin-regulating genes.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Identification of neuron-enriched putative regulators of actin dynamics. 286 genes identified in a NCBI data-search (see ‘Materials and methods’) were clustered according to expression pattern across 74 different tissue samples. A group of 89 genes enriched in neuronal tissue is highlighted in red. (<bold>B</bold>) ArhGAP44 is enriched in the whole brain but not the spinal cord. The 89 genes identified to be enriched in neuronal tissues were sorted according to their relative whole brain vs. spinal cord expression ratio. Reference genes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tbl1">Table 1</xref>) expressed selectively in Schwann cells (green) or the brain (red) is shown below the ranked list.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.005">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.005</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs001"/></fig><fig id="fig1s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.006</object-id><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Ponceau loading control of various tissues and ArhGAP44 protein expression in the brain.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Loading control of tissues used in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref>. Same amounts of total protein were loaded into the different lanes. Note the non-uniform protein composition. (<bold>B</bold>) ArhGAP44 is enriched in the cerebral cortex and olfactory bulb. Adult rat brain was sectioned and stained with DAPI (blue) and an antibody directed against ArhGAP44 (yellow).</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.006">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.006</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs002"/></fig><fig id="fig1s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.007</object-id><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 expression increases over time.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) ArhGAP44 is expressed in the adult but not the fetal human brain. The 89 genes previously identified to be enriched in neuronal tissues were sorted for strong expression in the adult brain vs. fetal brain. Reference genes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tbl2">Table 2</xref>) expressed during neuronal migration (green), trans-synaptic contact formation (yellow), and synapse maturation (red) are shown along the x-axis. Note that ArhGAP44 (red) is expressed 20-fold higher in the adult compared to the fetal brain. (<bold>B</bold>) Expression levels of ArhGAP44 in the prefrontal cortex increase with age. Individual samples from rat prefrontal cortex were fixed at the age of 6, 18, 24, 34, and 39 months and stained against ArhGAP44. Scale bar (<bold>B</bold>), 20 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.007">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.007</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs003"/></fig><fig id="fig1s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.008</object-id><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title>Neuronal complexity increases over time.</title><p>Scanning Electron Micrographs of neurons fixed at DIV3 (n = 10 images, 2 independent experiments), DIV10 (n = 10 images, 2 independent experiments), and DIV17 (n = 9 images, 2 independent experiments) as well as quantification of total dendrite length are shown. Scale bar, 20 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.008">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.008</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs004"/></fig><fig id="fig1s5" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.009</object-id><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 5.</label><caption><title>Electron micrographs of neurons.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Dendritic surface analysis. Neurons were imaged at low resolution and individual neurons were identified. The proximal 100 µm of dendritic arbors were then imaged at high resolution (boxes #1–#7) and surface structures in high resolution images were then grouped as nodes, elongated protrusions, and stubby protrusions. Note in image #6 (red box) protrusion emerging from the dendritic surface. (<bold>B</bold>) Examples of nodes that form on the dendritic surface. Scanning electron micrographs of neurons that were fixed on DIV11. Individual nodes are highlighted in yellow. Scale bar, 500 nm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.009">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.009</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs005"/></fig><fig id="fig1s6" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.010</object-id><label>Figure 1—figure supplement 6.</label><caption><title>Overexpression phenotypes of ArhGAP44 in cultured neurons.</title><p>Cells were transfected with control plasmid, ArhGAP44(wt) and ArhGAP44(291), respectively, and cell morphology was assessed 12 hr (n = 161 neurons, 3 independent experiments), 24 hr (n = 112 neurons, 3 independent experiments), and 48 hr (n = 160 neurons, 3 independent experiments) after transfection. Neurons were classified based on cell morphology showing no effect (white), reduced protrusion density (red), and varicosity formation (black). Scale bar, 10 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.010">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.010</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs006"/></fig></fig-group></p><p>We then explored the expression of ArhGAP44 in the brain during development and found ArhGAP44 among the genes with the highest adult-to-fetal ratio (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3</xref>, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="tbl2">Table 2</xref> and ‘Materials and methods’). To validate the observed increase in ArhGAP44 expression with age, we measured protein levels in rat primary hippocampal neurons by western blot, using samples isolated during neurite extension (3 days in vitro, i.e., DIV3), the peak of exploratory filopodia formation (DIV10), and after initial synaptic contacts were formed (DIV17). Consistent with the micro-array data, ArhGAP44 protein levels increased with time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1C</xref>).<table-wrap id="tbl2" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.011</object-id><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p>Reference genes expressed predominantly in the adult or in the fetal brain</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.011">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.011</ext-link></p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th>Gene</th><th>Adult brain</th><th>Fetal brain</th><th>Ratio</th><th>Reference</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>RELN<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn3">*</xref></td><td>34.85</td><td>93.35</td><td>0.373326</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">D'Arcangelo et al., 1995</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>DCX<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn3">*</xref></td><td>10.55</td><td>2577</td><td>0.004094</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">des Portes et al., 1998</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>NRXN1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn3">*</xref></td><td>72.1</td><td>143.15</td><td>0.503667</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Ushkaryov et al., 1992</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>NLGN1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn3">*</xref></td><td>7.5</td><td>24.7</td><td>0.303644</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Ichtchenko et al., 1995</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>CAMK2B<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn4">†</xref></td><td>818.15</td><td>321.25</td><td>2.54677</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Omkumar et al., 1996</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>MUNC13<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn4">†</xref></td><td>26.3</td><td>9.75</td><td>2.697436</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Betz et al., 1998</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>MECP2<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn4">†</xref></td><td>818.15</td><td>321.25</td><td>2.54677</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Amir et al., 1999</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>PSD95<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn4">†</xref></td><td>362.1</td><td>12.7</td><td>28.51181</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Kornau et al., 1995</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td>PACSIN1<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="tblfn4">†</xref></td><td>90.8</td><td>20.1</td><td>4.517413</td><td>(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Qualmann et al., 1999</xref>)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="tblfn3"><label>*</label><p>enriched in the fetal brain.</p></fn><fn id="tblfn4"><label>†</label><p>enriched in the adult brain.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></p><p>As N-BAR domains present in ArhGAP44 and other proteins can bind to inward-curved plasma membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Galic et al., 2012</xref>), we used high-resolution Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy to examine potential changes to local neuronal membrane curvature during maturation. As expected, we observed an increase in overall neuronal complexity with time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s4">Figure 1—figure supplement 4</xref>). High magnification micrographs further showed convoluted membrane sections (i.e., convoluted nodes) along the dendrite at DIV10 that may reflect such local regions of high curvature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1—figure supplement 5</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>ArhGAP44 negatively regulates filopodia density</title><p>To determine the function of ArhGAP44 in neurons, we transfected primary rat hippocampal neurons. Compared to control cells, overexpression of ArhGAP44 caused a significant reduction in the density of dendritic filopodia at DIV12 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>, dark blue). Prolonged expression increased the fraction of cells forming varicosities, likely due to increased RhoGAP activity associated with elevated ArhGAP44 levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s6">Figure 1—figure supplement 6</xref>). To decrease the GAP activity of ArhGAP44, we substituted a conserved arginine in the catalytic cleft with a methionine, which was shown to reduce but not eliminate the enzymatic activity of GAP proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib43">Muller et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib22">Graham et al., 1999</xref>). Consistent with partial activity, expression of the ArhGAP44(R291M) mutant reduced but did not abolish GTP hydrolysis of the small GTPase Rac1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>), showed a milder loss in filopodia density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>, light blue), and delayed the onset of varicosity formation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s6">Figure 1—figure supplement 6</xref>).</p><p>To further validate the observed effect on filopodia density, neurons were transfected with siRNA directed against ArhGAP44. Markedly, knockdown of ArhGAP44 augmented the density of dendritic filopodia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>, yellow). Control experiments using a second siRNA pool directed against a different region of ArhGAP44 mRNA confirmed the phenotype, thus showing that siRNA knockdown and overexpression of ArhGAP44 have opposing effects. Both siRNAs were effective since protein levels of ArhGAP44 were significantly reduced in cells co-transfected with either one of the siRNA pools directed against ArhGAP44 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1H</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>ArhGAP44 negatively regulates de novo filopodia formation</title><p>As dendritic filopodia frequently extend, reorient, and collapse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Ziv and Smith, 1996</xref>), filopodia density reflects the product of de novo formation frequency and stabilization rate. To determine which of these parameters are controlled by ArhGAP44, we performed time-lapse imaging of dendritic filopodia dynamics (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2—figure supplement 1</xref>). Compared to control, neither knockdown of ArhGAP44 nor expression of ArhGAP44(R291M) showed significant changes in the density of static protrusions that persisted longer than 10 min (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2A</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video1">Video 1</xref>) In contrast, expression of ArhGAP44(R291M) reduced (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>, blue and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video2">Video 2</xref>), whereas knockdown of ArhGAP44 increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>, yellow and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video3">Video 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video4">Video 4</xref>) the formation of dynamic protrusions. Most of these newly formed protrusions were short-lived, while stabilization of extending protrusions or collapse of previously static protrusions was observed only infrequently (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2—figure supplement 2B</xref>). Together, these results argue that ArhGAP44 primarily limits filopodia formation with little effect on the stabilization of existing filopodia.<fig-group><fig id="fig2" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.012</object-id><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><title>Knockdown of ArhGAP44 and overexpression of Rac both increase de novo filopodia formation.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Color-coded overlay of image-series. Note increased protrusion dynamics upon knockdown of ArhGAP44. (<bold>B</bold> and <bold>C</bold>) ArhGAP44 negatively regulates de novo protrusions. Analysis of protrusion dynamics in neurons transfected with control (black; n = 85 protrusions, 10 neurons, 3 independent experiments), ArhGAP44(R291M) (blue; n = 106 protrusions, 11 neurons, 3 independent experiments), and upon knockdown of ArhGAP44 (yellow; siRNA #1 = 131 protrusions, 12 neurons, 3 independent experiments; siRNA #2 = 215 protrusions, 15 neurons, 3 independent experiments). Compared to controls, overexpression of ArhGAP44(R291M) reduces while knockdown of ArhGAP44 increases formation of transient protrusion (<bold>B</bold>). Both increase node formation (<bold>C</bold>). (<bold>D</bold>) Color-coded overlay of image-series. Note increased protrusion dynamics upon overexpression of Rac1. (<bold>E</bold> and <bold>F</bold>) Co-expression of Rac1 reverses ArhGAP44-dependent reduction in protrusion dynamics. Compared to control (black; n = 85 protrusions, 10 neurons, 3 independent experiments), overexpression of Rac1 (red, n = 123 protrusions, 9 neurons, 3 independent experiments) increases the formation of transient protrusion (<bold>E</bold>) and nodes (<bold>F</bold>). For both parameters, co-expression of Rac1 with ArhGAP44(R291M) (purple, n = 126 protrusions, 12 neurons, 3 independent experiments) can compensate for the reduction observed for ArhGAP44(R291M) alone (blue, n = 106 protrusions, 11 neurons, 3 independent experiments). Scale bars (<bold>A</bold> and <bold>D</bold>), 1 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.012">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.012</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116f002"/></fig><fig id="fig2s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.013</object-id><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Filopodia analysis tool and GTPase overexpression control.</title><p>Analysis method used to measure filopodia kinetics. A set of images (left column) was binarized (middle column) and individual images were super-imposed to create a color-coded overlay of the image-series (right image). Scale bar, 1 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.013">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.013</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs007"/></fig><fig id="fig2s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.014</object-id><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Examples of prototypic dendritic protrusions.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Protrusions that persist throughout the acquisition interval were considered static. (<bold>B</bold>) Dynamic protrusions were divided into three groups: protrusions that extend and retract during acquisition (top panel); protrusions that extend and remain extended for at least 3 min (middle panel); and protrusions that persisted for at least 3 min before collapsing (bottom panel). Scale bars (<bold>A</bold> and <bold>B</bold>), 2 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.014">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.014</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs008"/></fig><fig id="fig2s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.015</object-id><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Examples of dendritic nodes.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Nodes are identified as thickened regions in the dendritic shaft. A section of the dendrite with a node but no filopodia (red arrow) and a node with a filopodium (white arrow) are shown enlarged. (<bold>B</bold>) Dendritic nodes (red arrow) are often observed without a subsequent extension of a filopodia. Scale bars (<bold>A</bold>), 20 µm; (<bold>B</bold>), 2 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.015">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.015</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs009"/></fig><fig id="fig2s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.016</object-id><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title>Acquisition interval of 60 s is sufficient to detect dynamic protrusions but not all nodes.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Time lapse of a dendritic branch from which a protrusion (red) emerges and collapses. Note that not all nodes (yellow arrows) can be identified when using a 60 s interval (e.g., compare columns 2 and 4). (<bold>B</bold>) The majority of protrusions emerge from nodes. Quantification of percentage of filopodia that emerge from nodes using acquisition intervals of 60 s (black; 45 nodes form 11 neurons, 3 independent experiments) and 15 s (red; 75 nodes form 12 neurons, 3 independent experiments), respectively. Note that the fraction of protrusions emerging from nodes increases with shorter intervals as nodes can be short-lived. Scale bar (<bold>A</bold>), 2 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.016">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.016</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs010"/></fig><fig id="fig2s5" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.017</object-id><label>Figure 2—figure supplement 5.</label><caption><title>The ArhGAP44 knockdown phenotype is phenocopied by the small GTPase Rac1 but not Cdc42.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) ArhGAP44 is a RhoGAP with dual selectivity for Rac1 and Cdc42. GTPase pull-down assay show hydrolysis of GTP-Cdc42 (green) and GTP-Rac1 (red) by ArhGAP44. (<bold>B</bold>) Overexpression of Rac1 but not of Cdc42 increases protrusion density. Neurons were transfected with the wild type form of human Rac1 and Cdc42. Note that only Rac1(red) increased protrusion density. (<bold>C</bold>) Rac1 but not Cdc42 reverse ArhGAP44(R291M)-dependent slow-down in protrusion dynamics. Neurons were transfected either with a control plasmid (black, n = 18 neurons, 3 independent experiments), Cdc42 (green, n = 15 neurons, 3 independent experiments), Rac1 (red, n = 13 neurons, 3 independent experiments), ArhGAP44(R291M) (blue, n = 18 neurons, 3 independent experiments), or co-transfected with ArhGAP44(R291M) together with Cdc42 (green-blue, n = 11 neurons, 3 independent experiments) or Rac1 (violet, n = 13 neurons, 3 independent experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Overexpression of Rac1 but not of Cdc42 triggered node formation observed upon knockdown of ArhGAP44. Time-lapse images of neurons co-transfected with a siRNA directed against ArhGAP44 together with a fluorescence marker (top), expressing wild-type Rac1 (second panel), expressing wild-type Cdc42 (third panel), and expressing control plasmid (bottom). Note that ectopic nodes are formed from which filopodia emerge upon knockdown of ArhGAP44 and overexpression of Rac1 but not after expression of Cdc42. Scale bars (<bold>D</bold>, left panels), 20 µm; (<bold>D</bold>, right panels), 2 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.017">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.017</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs011"/></fig></fig-group><media id="video1" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v001.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.018</object-id><label>Video 1.</label><caption><title>Example of a stable dendritic protrusion.</title><p>Neuron was transfected with a fluorescence marker at DIV11 and imaged 24 hr later. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 720× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.018">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.018</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video2" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v002.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.019</object-id><label>Video 2.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44(R291M) transfection causes increased dendritic node and reduced protrusion formation.</title><p>Neuron was transfected with ArhGAP44(R291M) at DIV11 and imaged 24 hr later. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.019">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.019</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video3" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v003.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.020</object-id><label>Video 3.</label><caption><title>Knockdown of ArhGAP44 increases dendritic node and protrusion formation.</title><p>Neuron was co-transfected with diced RNA directed against ArhGAP44 and a cytosolic reference at DIV7 and imaged at DIV12. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.020">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.020</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video4" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v004.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.021</object-id><label>Video 4.</label><caption><title>Knockdown of ArhGAP44 increases dendritic node formation.</title><p>Neuron was co-transfected with diced RNA directed against ArhGAP44 and a cytosolic reference at DIV7 and imaged at DIV12. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.021">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.021</ext-link></p></caption></media></p><p>For both, overexpression and knockdown of ArhGAP44, we further observed an increase in the number of transiently formed nodes along dendritic arbors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2C</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s3">Figure 2—figure supplement 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video2 video3 video4 video5">Videos 2–5</xref>). Intriguingly, we find that the majority (83% ± 7%) of de novo protrusions extended from such node-like structures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s4">Figure 2—figure supplement 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video6">Video 6</xref>). We thus consider these nodal structures to represent nascent filopodia sites, where filopodia formation is either initiated or aborted. Given their spacing and their presence at the same time in culture, they likely correlate with the convoluted nodes along dendrites seen in electron microscopy studies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>).<media id="video5" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v005.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.022</object-id><label>Video 5.</label><caption><title>Example of dendritic node formation.</title><p>Neuron was transfected with a fluorescence marker at DIV11 and imaged 24hr later. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.022">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.022</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video6" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v006.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.023</object-id><label>Video 6.</label><caption><title>Knockdown of ArhGAP44 triggers formation of protrusion from dendritic nodes.</title><p>Neuron was co-transfected with RNA directed against ArhGAP44 and a cytosolic reference at DIV7 and imaged at DIV12. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.023">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.023</ext-link></p></caption></media></p><p>Consistent with previous reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Richnau and Aspenstrom, 2001</xref>), we find that the GAP domain of ArhGAP44 inhibits GTPase activity of Rac and Cdc42 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2—figure supplement 5A</xref>). We thus aimed to investigate to which extent the two possible targets of ArhGAP44 contribute to filopodia formation. We find that overexpression of wild-type Rac (human Rac1) but not Cdc42 phenocopied protrusion density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2—figure supplement 5B</xref>) as well as protrusion kinetics (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2—figure supplement 5C</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video7 video8 video9 video10">Videos 7–10</xref>) observed upon knockdown of ArhGAP44. Similar to knockdown of ArhGAP44, Rac1 overexpression increased protrusion dynamics and node formation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2D–F</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2—figure supplement 5D</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video7 video8">Videos 7,8</xref>). These observations are consistent with previous work showing Rac activity associated with increased actin patch formation and filopodia dynamics in axons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Spillane et al., 2012</xref>) and dendrites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Korobova and Svitkina, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Cheadle and Biederer, 2012</xref>). We thus considered that ArhGAP44 might act by inhibiting Rac to limit initiation of exploratory filopodia formation.<media id="video7" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v007.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.024</object-id><label>Video 7.</label><caption><title>Rac1 overexpression causes abnormal dendritic node and protrusion formation.</title><p>Neuron was transfected with Rac1(wt) at DIV11 and imaged 24 hr later. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.024">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.024</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video8" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v008.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.025</object-id><label>Video 8.</label><caption><title>Rac1 overexpression causes abnormal dendritic node and protrusion formation.</title><p>Neuron was transfected with Rac1(wt) at DIV11 and imaged 24 hr later. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.025">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.025</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video9" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v009.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.026</object-id><label>Video 9.</label><caption><title>Cdc42 overexpression causes abnormal dendritic protrusion formation.</title><p>Neuron was transfected with Cdc42(wt) at DIV11 and imaged 24 hr later. Note the elongation of a preexisting dendritic protrusion. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.026">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.026</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video10" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v010.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.027</object-id><label>Video 10.</label><caption><title>Cdc42 overexpression causes abnormal dendritic protrusion formation.</title><p>Neuron was transfected with Cdc42(wt) at DIV11 and imaged 24 hr later. Note the elongated filopodia emerging from the dendrite. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.027">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.027</ext-link></p></caption></media></p><p>To test this hypothesis, we performed a synthetic compensation experiment, co-expressing Rac1 with ArhGAP44(R291M). Although the resulting protrusions were shorter than control filopodia, co-expression of ArhGAP44(R291M) together with Rac1 reversed the observed decrease in the frequency of protrusion formation and node formation caused by expression of ArhGAP44(R291M) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E,F</xref> purple and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video11">Video 11</xref>).<media id="video11" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v011.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.028</object-id><label>Video 11.</label><caption><title>Rac1 synthetically rescues ArhGAP44(R291M)-dependent reduction in protrusion formation.</title><p>Neuron was co-transfected with Rac1(wt) and ArhGAP44(R291M) at DIV11 and imaged 24 hr later. Individual frames were taken every 60 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 360× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.028">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.028</ext-link></p></caption></media></p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>ArhGAP44 localizes to patches that precede filopodia extension</title><p>To analyze the subcellular protein localization, we cultured hippocampal neurons and stained against endogenous ArhGAP44. We found ArhGAP44 to be absent from the nucleus and present in patches along dendrites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1 fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplements 1 and 2A</xref>). We then expressed fluorescently tagged ArhGAP44 in cultured neurons. Like the endogenous protein, fluorescently tagged ArhGAP44 was excluded from the nucleus, distributed uniformly through the cytosol, and formed distinct ArhGAP44 patches along dendrites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2B,C</xref>), arguing that the fluorescent tag did not interfere with its localization.</p><p>To investigate the molecular mechanism that caused ArhGAP44 patch formation, we compared the subcellular localization of various deletion mutants of ArhGAP44 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>). ArhGAP44 contains an N-BAR domain that has been reported to bind to positively (i.e., inward) curved lipid membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Peter et al., 2004</xref>). Full-length protein and the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 both enriched in patches along dendritic arbors, while deletion of the amino-terminal amphipathic helix (ΔN-BAR), a critical sequence motif for binding and stabilization of curved membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib48">Peter et al., 2004</xref>), showed no enrichment over a cytosolic reference (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3B</xref>). Intriguingly, none of the ArhGAP44 constructs enriched in extended filopodia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3C</xref>). Time-lapse imaging showed that filopodia often emerged from ArhGAP44 patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>). We considered that ArhGAP44 patches might reflect the convoluted, node-like dendritic membrane sections we previously observed in electron micrographs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref>) and fluorescence images (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s3">Figure 2—figure supplement 3A</xref>). Consistently, measurement of individual membrane folds within nodes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2D</xref>) showed sufficient deformation to trigger curvature-dependent protein recruitment to the plasma membrane (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib6">Bhatia et al., 2009</xref>). Together with the previous overexpression and knockdown experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A,B</xref>), the transient localization of ArhGAP44 to patches but not to extended filopodia argues that ArhGAP44 limits initiation rather than elongation of newly formed filopodia.<fig-group><fig id="fig3" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.029</object-id><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 recruitment to dendritic nodes precedes filopodia extension.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) ArhGAP44 protein structure and deletion mutants. ArhGAP44 is composed of an amino-terminal curvature-sensing N-BAR domain (AA 1–254), followed by the RhoGAP domain (AA 255–445) and a stretch of ∼350 amino acids (AA 445–818) with no annotated domain structure. Full length (left, dark red), the isolated N-BAR domain (middle, red), and the N-BAR domain lacking the initial 18 amino acids (right, white) were tested. (<bold>B</bold>) Enrichment of full length (dark red; 25 patches, 12 neurons, 3 independent experiments) and the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red, n = 34 patches, 11 neurons, 3 independent experiments) in dendritic patches. No enrichment is observed for the N-BAR domain lacking the first 18AA that encode an amphipathic helix critical for curvature sensing (white; 20 patches, 11 neurons, 3 independent experiments). Note, ArhGAP44(R291M) was used to reduce the compromised cell health caused by overexpression of equal levels of active wild-type protein. (<bold>C</bold>) No enrichment of full length (dark red; 26 filopodia, 14 neurons, 3 independent experiments), the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red, n = 40 filopodia, 13 neurons, 3 independent experiments), or the N-BAR domain lacking the first 18AA (white; 22 patches, 10 neurons, 3 independent experiments) in dendritic filopodia. (<bold>D</bold>) Filopodia emerge from ArhGAP44-rich patches. Scale bars (<bold>B</bold>, <bold>C</bold>, <bold>D</bold>), 1 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.029">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.029</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116f003"/></fig><fig id="fig3s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.030</object-id><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 antibody controls.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Western blot of whole rat brain with antibody directed against ArhGAP44(818AA) (unspecific bands are visible). (<bold>B</bold>) Increase immunostaining directed against ArhGAP44 after overexpression of ArhGAP44. Primary hippocampal neurons were transfected with a fluorescently tagged ArhGAP44(R291M) and fixed 24 hr later. Quantification of fluorescence intensity of non-transfected neurons (black, n = 20 cells, 2 independent experiments) and neurons transfected with ArhGAP44 (red, n = 12 cells, 2 independent experiments) after staining with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44 is shown below. (<bold>C</bold>) Control experiment showing reduced immunostaining of ArhGAP44 after knockdown of ArhGAP44. Primary hippocampal neurons were transfected at DIV10 with diced RNA directed against ArhGAP44 and a fluorescence reference (empty pEYFP plasmid) and fixed 48 hr later. Relative fluorescence intensity was measuerd in dendritic stretches and normalized to the adjacent background (arrows). Quantification of fluorescence intensity after staining with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44 of cells transfected with control siRNA (black, n = 16 cells, 2 independent experiments) and siRNA directed against ArhGAP44 (red, n = 18 cells, 2 independent experiments) is shown below. Scale bars (<bold>B</bold> and <bold>C</bold>), 20 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.030">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.030</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs012"/></fig><fig id="fig3s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.031</object-id><label>Figure 3—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 localization in neurons.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Immunostaining directed against endogenous ArhGAP44 in cultured neurons (top). Primary hippocampal neurons were cultured for 11 days and stained with antibodies directed against ArhGAP44. ArhGAP44 is absent from the nucleus and enriched in distinct patches along the dendritic shaft (red arrows). (<bold>B</bold>) Overexpressed ArhGAP44 is absent from the nucleus and enriched at distinct patches along the dendritic arbors (bottom). Primary hippocampal neurons were transfected with ArhGAP44(R291M) (red) and a cytosolic reference (green) at DIV10, and imaged 24 hr after transfection. ArhGAP44(R291M) is absent from the nucleus (bottom panels), but present at distinct patches along the dendrite (top panels, red arrow). (<bold>C</bold>) Overexpression of the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 for 48 hr causes bright protein aggregates that are distinct from ArhGAP44 patches. Colocalization analysis (right panels) indicates that expression of ArhGAP44 for extended time causes formation of bright protein aggregates (yellow, n = 24 aggregates, 9 neurons, 2 independent experiments) that do not co-localize with actin patches (white, 34 actin patches form 25 neurons; 3 independent experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Nodes that form along the dendrite surface display highly curved membrane sections. Average diameter of individual membrane ruffles in nodes is shown next to it. Scale bars (<bold>A</bold> and <bold>B</bold>), 20 µm; (<bold>C</bold>), 2 µm; (<bold>D</bold>), 500 nm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.031">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.031</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs013"/></fig></fig-group></p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Myosin-dependent contraction of PM-associated actin filaments induces membrane curvature and ArhGAP44 recruitment</title><p>Next, we aimed to investigate what caused the convoluted membrane surface at dendritic nodes. Consistent with previous reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Lau et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Spillane et al., 2012</xref>), ratio-imaging of the filamentous actin marker f-tractin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Johnson and Schell, 2009</xref>) to a cytosolic reference showed formation of actin patches that preceded extension of exploratory filopodia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1A</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video12">Video 12</xref>). This was the case in 89% ± 6% of all filopodia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4—figure supplement 1B</xref>). To directly test whether actin patches cause convoluted node-like PM subsections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s2">Figure 3—figure supplement 2D</xref>), we performed correlative light and electron microscopy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s2">Figure 4—figure supplement 2</xref>). Consistent with a role of actin in node-formation, we find that actin intensity in nodes was significantly higher compared to adjacent dendritic sections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>). We then expressed f-tractin together with the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 and found significant enrichment of f-tractin in ArhGAP44 patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4B</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s3">Figure 4—figure supplement 3</xref>), arguing that ArhGAP44 and actin localize to the same structure. Consistently, the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 enriched in dendritic actin-patches by 80% ± 8% compared to adjacent dendritic regions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s3">Figure 4—figure supplement 3B</xref>). To test for Myosin II-dependent contractile forces in ArhGAP44 patches, we co-expressed the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 and non-muscle Myosin Heavy Chain IIB (NMHC-2B) and found a significant enrichment of NMHC-2B in ArhGAP44 patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4C</xref>). Together, this suggests that myosin-dependent contraction of actin patches triggers inward membrane deformations within nodes to which ArhGAP44 is enriched. Consistently, we find increased staining for the phosphorylated form of myosin light chain (pMLC), a marker for active Myosin II (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib60">Tan et al., 1992</xref>), in dendritic actin patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>).<media id="video12" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v012.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.032</object-id><label>Video 12.</label><caption><title>Actin enriches at patches that precede exploratory filopodia initiation.</title><p>Neurons were transfected with a marker for filamentous actin (f-tractin, red) and a cytosolic reference (green). Note the formation of actin patches prior to filopodia formation (white boxes). Individual frames were taken every 5 s. Video is 50× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.032">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.032</ext-link></p></caption></media><fig-group><fig id="fig4" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.033</object-id><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 is recruited to convoluted dendritic PM sections enriched in polymerized actin and myosin.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Correlative fluorescence and scanning electron microscopy shows actin enrichment in convoluted nodes that form along dendritic arbors. Quantification of the relative fluorescent intensity of phalloidin in individual nodes compared to adjacent dendritic sections is shown to the right. (<bold>B</bold>) F-tractin and ArhGAP44 co-localize. Neuron was transfected with the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red), f-tractin (blue), and a cytosolic reference (green). A magnified section (white box) and quantification of relative f-tractin intensity in ArhGAP44 patches are shown next to it (34 patches form 25 neurons; 3 independent experiments). (<bold>C</bold>) NMHC-2B and ArhGAP44 co-localize. Neurons were transfected with the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red), NMHC-2B (blue), and a cytosolic reference (green). Quantification of relative NMHC-2B intensity in ArhGAP44 patches is shown next to it (n = 20 patches form 13 neurons; 3 independent experiments). (<bold>D</bold>) Phosphorylated regulatory myosin light chain (green) is enriched in dendritic actin patches (red). Scale bars (<bold>A</bold>, <bold>C</bold>, <bold>D</bold>), 5 µm; (<bold>B</bold>), 10 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.033">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.033</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116f004"/></fig><fig id="fig4s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.034</object-id><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Time-lapse of exploratory dendritic filopodia emerging from actin patches.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Neurons were transfected at DIV10 with the filamentous actin marker f-tractin (red) together with a cytosolic reference (green) and imaged 24 hr later. Red arrows indicate relative accumulation of f-tractin compared to a cytosolic reference at nodes that form before filopodia initiation and persist after filopodia collapse. (<bold>B</bold>) Filopodia emerge from pre-existing actin patches. Quantification using an acquisition interval of 15 s show that 89% ± 6% of filopodia emerge from actin patches (24 patches form 10 neurons; 3 independent experiments). Scale bar (<bold>A</bold>), 1 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.034">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.034</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs014"/></fig><fig id="fig4s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.035</object-id><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>Workflow to identify individual neurons for correlative SEM/IF microscopy.</title><p>Example of pattern used for navigation on the glass slide is shown at the top. Gold deposit can be detected on the SEM using the back-scatter or inlens detector as well as in immunofluorescence. Scale bar, 10 mm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.035">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.035</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs015"/></fig><fig id="fig4s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.036</object-id><label>Figure 4—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 is enriched at actin patches.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Neurons were fixed and stained with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44(red) and phalloidin (green). Note that the antibody directed against ArhGAP44 is enriched in phalloidin-rich patches. (<bold>B</bold>) The isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 is enriched in dendritic actin-patches. Neurons were transfected with the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44, a marker for filamentous actin (f-tractin) and a cytosolic reference. The average enrichment of the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 over a cytosolic reference in dendritic actin patches is 80% ± 8% (34 patches form 25 neurons; 3 independent experiments). Scale bar, 2 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.036">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.036</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs016"/></fig></fig-group></p><p>To test the hypothesis that ArhGAP44 enrichment relies on acto-myosin-dependent pulling forces to the PM, we altered either actin integrity or myosin-dependent actin contraction. Notably, both treatments led to a significant reduction of ArhGAP44 concentration in actin patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A,B</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s1">Figure 5—figure supplement 1</xref>), suggesting that Myosin II-dependent forces within dendritic actin patches trigger local inward deformation of the PM, mediating a recruitment of curvature-sensing protein ArhGAP44. Notably, we find ArhGAP44 to be also enriched at inward plasma membrane deformation created by retracting lamellipodia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5—figure supplement 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video13">Video 13</xref>), as well as in response to membrane bending by artificial nanocone structures (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3 fig5s4">Figure 5—figure supplements 3,4</xref>; and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video14 video15">Videos 14,15</xref>), arguing that inward membrane deformation is sufficient for binding of ArhGAP44 to the plasma membrane.<fig-group><fig id="fig5" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.037</object-id><label>Figure 5.</label><caption><title>Myosin dependent recruitment of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 to actin patches.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Inhibition of acto-myosin dependent forces decreases relative concentration of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 in actin patches. Neurons were transfected with the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red), f-tractin (blue), and a cytosolic reference (green). Neuron is shown before (left panels) and after addition of the MLCK inhibitor ML-7 (right panels). (<bold>B</bold>) Cumulative distribution and average values of the relative intensity of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 to a cytosolic reference in actin patches are shown before (black) and after (red) addition of CytoD (n = 49 patches; 12 cells, 3 independent experiments), LatA, (n = 27 patches; 10 cells, 3 independent experiments), ML-7 (n = 118 patches; 15 cells, 3 independent experiments), or the vehicle DMSO (n = 62 patches; 12 cells, 3 independent experiments). Scale bar, 5 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.037">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.037</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116f005"/></fig><fig id="fig5s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.038</object-id><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Inhibition of actin polymerization decreases relative concentration of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 but does not completely dissolve actin patches.</title><p>Neurons were transfected with the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red), f-tractin (blue), and a cytosolic reference (green), and imaged 24 hr later. Note that actin patches persist treatment with CytoD (red arrow). Scale bar, 5 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.038">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.038</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs017"/></fig><fig id="fig5s2" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.039</object-id><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 2.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 is recruited to collapsing artificial lamellipodia in neurons.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Rapamycin-induced dimerization assay. Neurons were quadruple-transfected with a membrane-anchored FRB, a fluorescently labeled FKBP that was associated with the Rac-GEF TIAM, a cytosolic reference, and the fluorescently labelled N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44. Addition of rapamycin triggered dimerization of FRB and FKBP, which led to a rapid translocation of TIAM to the plasma membrane. Enrichment of TIAM at the plasma membrane augmented local Rac activity and actin dynamics. (<bold>B</bold>) Neurons quadruple-transfected with the constructs before and after addition of rapamycin. Note the formation of ectopic actin-rich structures. (<bold>C</bold>) Time lapse images show enrichment of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 at retracting actin-rich structures. Cells were quadruple-transfected with Lyn-FRB, CFP-FKBP-TIAM, YFP-ArhGAP44(N-BAR), and the empty mCherry plasmid as a cytosolic reference. Note the enrichment of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 at the collapsing lamellipodia. (<bold>D</bold>) Kymograph of ArhGAP44(N-BAR) (top panel) and the cytosolic reference mCherry (middle panel) show relative enrichment of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 at a retracting actin-rich structures (bottom panel). (<bold>B</bold>), 10 µm; (<bold>C</bold>), 2 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.039">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.039</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs018"/></fig><fig id="fig5s3" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.040</object-id><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 3.</label><caption><title>Artificial membrane deformations recruit ArhGAP44 to the plasma membrane.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Inward membrane deformation by acto-myosin-dependent contraction of membrane-associated actin cables (top panel) is mimicked by artificially applied external forces via cone-shaped nanostructures (bottom panel). (<bold>B</bold>) Brightfield image of glass slide where cone-shaped nanostructures (i.e., nanocones) were deposited in 3-µm wide stripes. Nanocones are depicted as small triangular structures at the bottom of the image. (<bold>C</bold>) Atomic force microscope images of the surface of such cone-shapes nanostructures. (<bold>D</bold> and <bold>E</bold>) Control experiment showing cells cultured on stripes of nanocones transfected with a cytosolic marker (<bold>D</bold>) and with a membrane marker (<bold>E</bold>). (<bold>F</bold>) Control experiments testing for correlation between ArhGAP44(R291M) and membrane (CFP-CAAX) puncta over individual nanocones. Since positions and amplitudes of the respective puncta show low correlation, an increase in total membrane cannot account for the formation of YFP-ArhGAP44(R291M) puncta (<bold>G</bold>) Control experiments testing for a possible local actin polymerization induced by nanocones. Cells expressing the actin marker Ruby-LifeAct (left) together with CFP-ArhGAP44(R291M) (right) over nanocones. Individual LifeAct and ArhGAP44(R291M) puncta show no significant correlation. This is consistent with the hypothesis that nanocone-induced membrane deformation and not binding to local actin structures is responsible for the observed N-BAR translocation. (<bold>H</bold>) Control experiment testing for co-localization of ArhGAP44(R291M) with itself. Scale bars (<bold>B</bold>, <bold>D</bold>, <bold>E</bold>), 3 µm; (<bold>C</bold>), 5 µm; (<bold>F</bold>–<bold>H</bold>), 1 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.040">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.040</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs019"/></fig><fig id="fig5s4" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.041</object-id><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 4.</label><caption><title>N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 enriched at nanocone-induced dendritic plasma membrane deformations in neurons.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold> and <bold>B</bold>) The curvature-sensitive N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 is enriched to nanocone-induced membrane deformation at the basal membrane. Neurons were cultured on a glass-slide patterned with nanocones and transfected with the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44. Note in (<bold>B</bold>) that puncta are present only on the dendritic stretch to the left that is in contact with nanocones but not in the section of the dendrite to the right that is not touching the nanomaterial. (<bold>C</bold>) Neurons cultured on a glass-slide patterned with stripes of nanocones and transfected with the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44. Quantification of N-BAR puncta on glass (black, n = 17 neurons, 2 independent experiments) and on nanocones (red, n = neurons, 2 independent experiments) is shown below. Scale bars (<bold>A</bold> and <bold>B</bold>), 10 µm; (<bold>C</bold>), 50 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.041">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.041</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs020"/></fig><fig id="fig5s5" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.042</object-id><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 5.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 is enriched at dendritic tips.</title><p>Primary hippocampal neurons were transfected with a fluorescently tagged N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red), a marker for filamentous actin (blue), and a cytosolic reference (green) at DIV6 and imaged 24 hr later. Red arrows depict dendritic tips. Quantification of fluorescence intensity show a relative enrichment of the isolated N-BAR domain over a cytosolic reference at actin-rich structures at the tip of dendrites (n = 14 dendritic tips from 10 neurons; 2 independent experiments). Scale bar, 5 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.042">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.042</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs021"/></fig><fig id="fig5s6" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.043</object-id><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 6.</label><caption><title>ArhGAP44 is enriched at dendritic spines.</title><p>Primary hippocampal neurons were transfected with fluorescently tagged ArhGAP44 (red), a marker for filamentous actin (blue), and a cytosolic reference (green) at DIV16 and imaged 24 hr later. Quantification of fluorescence intensity show a relative enrichment of the full-length ArhGAP44(R291M) (dark red) and for the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red) over a cytosolic reference at spine-shaped, actin-rich dendritic structures (n = 21 structures form 13 neurons for ArhGAP44(R291) and 24 structures from 12 neurons for the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44; both from 2 independent experiments). Scale bar, 1 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.043">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.043</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs022"/></fig><fig id="fig5s7" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.044</object-id><label>Figure 5—figure supplement 7.</label><caption><title>Knockdown of ArhGAP44 alters protrusion morphology and dynamics in aged neurons.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Increased filopodia dynamics after knockdown of ArhGAP44. Primary hippocampal neurons were transfected at DIV14 with diced RNA directed against ArhGAP44 (or a control) and a fluorescence marker and imaged 72 hr later. Note the increase in node and filopodia formation (red arrows) upon knockdown of ArhGAP44. (<bold>B</bold>) Reduction of spine-shaped protrusions upon knockdown of ArhGAP44 (n = control, 18 neurons; siRNA ArhGAP44 (diced pool #1), 20 neurons; siRNA ArhGAP44 (diced pool #2), 23 neurons; both from 2 independent experiments). Scale bar, 2 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.044">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.044</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs023"/></fig></fig-group><media id="video13" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v013.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.045</object-id><label>Video 13.</label><caption><title>Enrichment of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 at retracting actin-rich structures in neurons.</title><p>Neuron was transfected with Lyn-FRB, CFP-FKBP-Tiam1 (blue), the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 (red), and a cytosolic reference (green) at DIV11. Images show formation and retraction of artificial lamelipodia-like structures that formed along the dendritic shaft upon rapamycin-triggered recruitment of the Rac GEF Tiam1 to the plasma membrane. Individual frames were taken every 15 s. Scale bar is 2 μm. Video is 120× real-time.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.045">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.045</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video14" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v014.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.046</object-id><label>Video 14.</label><caption><title>Enrichment of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 at basal membrane sections indented by nanocones.</title><p>3D rotation of neuron plated on nanocone-coated glass slide and transfected with the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44. Note the punctate enrichment at the basal membrane below the soma. Scale bar is 10 μm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.046">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.046</ext-link></p></caption></media><media id="video15" content-type="glencoe play-in-place height-250 width-310" xlink:href="elife03116v015.avi" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="avi"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.047</object-id><label>Video 15.</label><caption><title>Enrichment of the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 at the dendritic section that is in contact with nanocones.</title><p>3D rotation of neuron plated on nanocone-coated glass slide and transfected with the N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44. Note the punctate enrichment at the top where the dendrite is touching the nanocone surface. Scale bar is 10 μm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.047">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.047</ext-link></p></caption></media></p><p>Finally, we investigated whether ArhGAP44 is also enriched to other actin-rich structures in neurons. We find the N-BAR domain enriched at the end of dendrites (dendritic tips; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s5">Figure 5—figure supplement 5</xref>), as well as in spine-shaped dendritic protrusions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s6">Figure 5—figure supplement 6</xref>). Knockdown of ArhGAP44 in aged neurons facilitates re-emergence of exploratory dendritic protrusions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s7">Figure 5—figure supplement 7</xref>). Thus, considering that ArhGAP44 expression increases with time, this suggests that ArhGAP44 may facilitate the transition of neurons from a dynamic exploratory mode to a mature more static state.</p></sec></sec><sec sec-type="discussion" id="s3"><title>Discussion</title><p>Our study shows that recruitment of ArhGAP44 to actin patches, which seed exploratory filopodia along dendritic branches, is mediated by Myosin II-dependent contraction of membrane-associated actin cables. These actin patches have been shown to serve as precursors for the formation of filopodia in axons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Lau et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Spillane et al., 2012</xref>) and dendrites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Korobova and Svitkina, 2010</xref>). Studies in non-neuronal cells showed that individual actin filaments within the actin cortex form bundles prior to filopodia elongation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib59">Svitkina et al., 2003</xref>). Consistently, electron micrographs of neurons showed that these filopodial actin bundles are embedded in the underlying dendritic actin meshwork (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib34">Korobova and Svitkina, 2010</xref>). It has been proposed that once enough actin filaments are bundled to generate the force required to protrude the PM, the resulting outward membrane deformation triggers recruitment of actin bundling/Cdc42 activating proteins, which then further increase the polymerization rate within the extending filopodia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Krugmann et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib12">Disanza et al., 2006</xref>). Given the localization of Myosin II in actin patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4D</xref>), it is reasonable to conjecture that Myosin II-dependent contraction of individual actin filaments within actin patches provides structural integrity to counter the force generated by the extending filopodia. However, considering that individual actin filaments within a bundle are oriented with the barbed end to the PM, Myosin II-dependent contraction also exerts an inward directed pull forces that curve the PM inward which triggers increased recruitment of ArhGAP44. We propose that the highly convoluted membrane topography associated with actin patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4A</xref>) reflect such Myosin II-dependent contraction of membrane-associated actin cables, at which ArhGAP44 becomes enriched in a curvature-dependent manner. In support of this hypothesis, we find not only that inward membrane deformation is sufficient for ArhGAP44 and N-BAR domain recruitment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3 fig5s4">Figure 5—figure supplements 3 and 4</xref>), but that deletion of ArhGAP44 curvature-sensitivity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A,B</xref>) or reducing action-myosin-dependent contractile forces (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>) both prevented ArhGAP44 enrichment.</p><p>A second major finding of our study is that recruitment of ArhGAP44 to plasma membrane deformations in nodes (i.e., acto-myosin patches) limits initiation of exploratory filopodia. We show that ArhGAP44 can hydrolize the small GTPase Rac and Cdc42 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2—figure supplement 5</xref>). Thus, a likely function of local ArhGAP44 at actin patches is to suppress GTPase-mediated local actin polymerization. We propose that ArhGAP44 is limiting Rac-dependent formation of actin patches, which provide the structural integrity required for filopodia to protrude outwards (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). This is consistent with previous reports in neurons, showing that dynamic rearrangements within actin patches relies on Rac activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib2">Andersen et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib56">Spillane et al., 2012</xref>), and that elevated Rac levels increase filopodia dynamics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib39">Luo et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib45">Nakayama et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib65">Zhang and Macara, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib7">Cheadle and Biederer, 2012</xref>). In support of this notion, we find Rac1 localized at actin patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1A</xref>) and show that artificial decrease of ArhGAP44 concentration at actin patches either by reducing overall ArhGAP44 levels by knockdown (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref>) or by preventing ArhGAP44-recruitment to actin patches via inhibition of acto-myosin contraction (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1B</xref>, see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib54">Ryu et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib24">Hodges et al., 2011</xref>]) both increased the number of exploratory filopodia.<fig-group><fig id="fig6" position="float"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.048</object-id><label>Figure 6.</label><caption><title>Proposed model of ArhGAP44-dependent regulation of exploratory dendritic filopodia initiation.</title><p>Scanning electron micrographs of dendritic protrusions with and without filopodial protrusions aligned in a hypothetical time-line. Proposed model that myosin-dependent contractions in actin patches triggers local plasma membrane indentations (i.e., node formation) with curved membranes to which ArhGAP44 is recruited (frame 4–6, red). Increased local ArhGAP44 concentration limits Rac1-dependent actin polymerization and weakens or dissociates the node. Low ArhGAP44 concentration at nodes allows filopodia initiation that relies on Cdc42 and other factors (frame 7–11, gray). Scale bar, 500 nm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.048">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.048</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116f006"/></fig><fig id="fig6s1" position="float" specific-use="child-fig"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.049</object-id><label>Figure 6—figure supplement 1.</label><caption><title>Control experiments supporting the proposed model.</title><p>(<bold>A</bold>) Rac1 is enriched in dendritic actin patches. Neurons were fixed at DIV12 and stained with an antibody directed against Rac1 (green) and phalloidin (red). (<bold>B</bold>) Inhibition of myosin light chain kinase increases filopodia density. Filopodia density on neurons was measured before (black) and 120 min after (red) the addition of the MLCK inhibitor ML-7 (n = 21 neurons, 3 independent experiments). Scale bars (<bold>A</bold> and <bold>B</bold>), 10 µm.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.049">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.049</ext-link></p></caption><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="elife03116fs024"/></fig></fig-group></p><p>Cdc42 acts as an activator of Irsp53 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Kast et al., 2014</xref>), promoting IRSp53-dependent enrichment and clustering of VASP and other factors to drive actin assembly in elongating filopodia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib13">Disanza et al., 2013</xref>). Consistently, knockdown of Cdc42 substantially reduces filopodia formation in neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib21">Garvalov et al., 2007</xref>). Intriguingly, overexpression of Cdc42 is not sufficient to initiate filopodia formation in neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2—figure supplement 5</xref>, see also [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib25">Hotulainen et al., 2009</xref>]) or in other cell lines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Kast et al., 2014</xref>). This has led to the hypothesis that elongation of filopodia is a combinatorial process requiring multiple factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib32">Kast et al., 2014</xref>). We propose that signal integration at actin patches controls this decision of filopodia elongation. Considering that actin-patch formation occurs before filopodia elongation, this argues for a 2-step process where Rac1-induced patch formation (and ArhGAP44-dependent regulation thereof) precedes Cdc42-induced filopodia elongation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). However, since ArhGAP44 shows dual specificity for Rac1 and Cdc42, both steps will be limited by recruitment by ArhGAP44 to actin patches.</p><p>Taken together, we propose that ArhGAP44 mediates a localized negative feedback that becomes upregulated as neurons mature to reduce the frequency with which neurons initiate new exploratory filopodia. Considering that acto-myosin initiated PM deformation is a ubiquitous process and that a high number of curvature-sensing proteins are known to modify actin dynamics, this suggests that the local feedback mechanism for ArhGAP44 described in our study likely exemplifies a more general principle for receptor-independent signaling whereby signal transduction is initiated by the transient recruitment of regulatory proteins to actin- and force-dependent nanoscale PM indentations.</p></sec><sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s4"><title>Materials and methods</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Clustering of microarray data</title><p>A set of 286 genes relating to the actin cytoskeleton and GTPase signaling was identified with a search on the NCBI Gene database with the query ‘actin AND GTPase AND human[orgn]’. The Human U133A/GNF1H Gene Atlas data set (gnf1h-gcrma unaveraged) was downloaded from the <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://biogps.org">biogps.org</ext-link> website (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib58">Su et al., 2004</xref>) (only the U133A data were analyzed). The data were renormalized using the median intensity on each array. To generate a focused expression data set for actin- and GTPase-related genes, we extracted the data from all probe sets corresponding to the 286 genes described above. The data were then log-transformed, and the mean log-expression for each probe across all tissue types was subtracted to yield relative expression values. The values were then hierarchically clustered using the Cluster 3.0 software, with the Pearson correlation distance, and average linkage.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Ranking and validating of microarray data</title><p>To test the validity of the brain vs spinal cord ranking in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1B</xref>, we characterized genes known to be expressed exclusively in the brain or in the spinal cord (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tbl1">Table 1</xref> and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib55">Snipes et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib41">Martin et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib57">Su et al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib61">tom Dieck et al., 1998</xref>]). We found for the Schwann cell-specific genes MPZ and PMP22 an adult brain/spinal cord ratio smaller than 0.3 while the brain enriched presynaptic vesicle fusion protein Bassoon (BSN), and the postsynaptic AMPA receptor 2 (GRIA2) both showed an adult brain/spinal cord ratio greater than 15. Of the 89 neuron-enriched genes identified in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s1">Figure 1—figure supplement 1B</xref> the top five hits were: the RhoGEF Kalirin that was shown to contribute to EphB receptor-dependent spine maturation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib47">Penzes et al., 2003</xref>), the synaptic vesicle-associated protein Amphiphysin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib11">David et al., 1996</xref>), the small GTPase K-Ras that translocates from the PM to the Golgi complex, and early/recycling endosomes in response to neuronal activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib18">Fivaz and Meyer, 2005</xref>), the microtubule tip-tracking protein EB3 that is a modulator of spine morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Jaworski et al., 2009</xref>), and ArhGAP44.</p><p>To test the validity of the ranking for genes critical for specific steps during neuronal developmental in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3A</xref>, we characterized where genes known to be involved in various aspects of neuronal maturation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="tbl2">Table 2</xref> and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib62">Ushkaryov et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib9">D'Arcangelo et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib26">Ichtchenko et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib33">Kornau et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Omkumar et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib5">Betz et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib15">des Portes et al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1">Amir et al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib49">Qualmann et al., 1999</xref>]). We observed a clear separation of DCX and RELN, which are involved in neuronal migration, and NLGN1 and NRXN1, which initiate trans-synaptic contact, from MUNC13, MECP2, PSD95, and PACSIN1which all contribute to synapse function. Of the 89 neuron-enriched genes identified in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s3">Figure 1—figure supplement 3A</xref>, genes with the highest adult-to-fetal ratio included the microtubule tip-tracking protein EB3 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib28">Jaworski et al., 2009</xref>), the MAP kinase ERK1 as well as the MAP kinase kinase MEK1 which both control dendrite development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib8">Crino et al., 1998</xref>) and synaptic plasticity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib10">Dash et al., 1990</xref>), the Armadillo-like protein PKP4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib64">Wolf et al., 2006</xref>), the Lowe syndrome protein OCRL (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib3">Attree et al., 1992</xref>), and ArhGAP44.</p></sec><sec id="s4-3"><title>Western blot analysis of rat tissue samples</title><p>Tissue samples were isolated from female Wistar rat and suspended in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 1% Tween and protease inhibitors (Roche [Indianapolis, IN], 11873580001). Each sample was homogenized and absolute protein concentration was measured, using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific [Rockford, IL], 23225), and adjusted to equal levels for each sample. Next, 6× SDS was added, and the samples were heated to 90°C for 5 min. Finally, the samples were vortexed and loaded on a gel. 20 µg total protein was loaded for each sample in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref> and probed with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44 (Sigma-Aldrich [St. Louis, MO], HPA038814). No single protein was used as reference for comparison of ArhGAP44 expression level across organs, as the expression of conventional housekeeping proteins (e.g., tubulin or GAPDH) can vary between tissues by up to an order of magnitude (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s2">Figure 1—figure supplement 2A</xref> and <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://biogps.org/">http://biogps.org/#goto=genereport&id=37238</ext-link>). In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1B</xref> 20 µg total protein was loaded and probed with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44 as well as beta-tubulin (Sigma, T8578) as a reference. For detection, secondary antibodies from Invitrogen and SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Pierce [Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL], 34095) were used.</p></sec><sec id="s4-4"><title>Westernblot analysis of cultured neurons</title><p>Neurons were harvested at DIV3, DIV10, and DIV17 in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 1% Tween and protease inhibitors (Roche, 11873580001). Absolute protein concentration was immediately measured using the BCA Protein Assay kit (Thermo 23225) and adjusted to equal levels for each time point. Relative protein levels were probed using specific antibodies directed against ArhGAP44 (Abcam [Cambridge, MA], ab93627), the postsynaptic marker PSD95 (EMD Millipore [Billerica, MA], MAB1596), the presynaptic protein Bassoon (Abcam, 76065), and the loading control beta-tubulin (Sigma, T8578). For detection, we used secondary antibodies from Invitrogen and SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Pierce, 34095).</p></sec><sec id="s4-5"><title>Scanning electron micrographs of cultured neurons</title><p>Neurons were cultured on Poly-L-Lysine-coated glass coverslips and fixed using 2% Glutaraldehyde (8% stock-EM grade) and 4% p-Formaldehyde in NaCacodylate buffer pH 7.4 for 10 min. Neurons were rinsed with 0.1 M NaCacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) after primary fixation and post-fixed for 1 hr with aqueous 1% OsO<sub>4</sub>, washed briefly with water and dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series (50, 70, 90, and 100% [twice] for 20 min each) before critical point drying with liquid CO<sub>2</sub> in a Tousimis 815B (Tousimis, Rockville, MD, USA). Samples were mounted on colloidal Graphite on 15-mm aluminum stubs (Ted Pella, Redding, CA, USA) and sputter-coated with 70A of Au/Pd using a Denton Desk 11 Sputter Coater. Visualization of samples was performed with a Zeiss Sigma FESEM (Zeiss Microscopy LLC, Thornwood, NY) operated at 2–3 kV, working distance 4–6 mm and an in-lens SE detector under high vacuum conditions. Images were captured in TIFF format.</p></sec><sec id="s4-6"><title>Quantification of protrusion types via scanning electron micrographs</title><p>Neurons were cultured on glass slides for various periods of time (3, 10, and 17 days), fixed and prepared for SEM as described above. Using low resolution (1000× magnification), individual neurons were identified (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1—figure supplement 5A</xref>, left panel). Starting from the soma, initial segments of the dendritic arbors were imaged at high resolution (10,000×), and individual protrusions were classified based on morphology (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1—figure supplement 5A</xref>, right panel). Only the proximal 50–60 μm of the dendritic arbors that can clearly be associated to a particular neuron were analyzed. Examples of dendritic nodes are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1—figure supplement 5B</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4-7"><title>Culturing and immunostaining of primary hippocamal neurons</title><p>Rat hippocampal neurons were prepared as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib17">Fink et al., 2003</xref>). Neurons were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. For live imaging, neurons were plated in chambers (Lab-Tek 155383; Thermo, Rockford, IL) using NBM (Neurobasal Medium, Gibco [Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA], 21103-049), supplemented with SM1 (StemCell Technologies [Vancouver, Canada], 05711), Pen/Strep (Gibco, 15070-063) and 20 mM HEPES (Gibco, 15630). For immunostaining, cells were fixed in PBS (Gibco, 10010-023) containing 4% Formaldehyde (Ted Pella, 18505) and 120 mM sucrose, stained, and imaged. ArhGAP44 antibody was from Sigma (1:150, HPA038814), MAP2 antibody was from Chemicon (1:1000, AB 5622; Chemicon, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA), pMLC antibody was from Cell Signaling (1:200, 3671S; Cell Signalling Technology, Danvers, MA), and Rac1 antibody was from Cytoskeleton (1:200, ARC03; Cytoskeleton, Denver, CO).</p></sec><sec id="s4-8"><title>Fluorescence microscopy</title><p>All experiments were performed on a spinning disc confocal microscope. CFP, YFP, and mCherry excitations were obtained by a 442-nm helium cadmium laser (100 mM; Kimmon Electrics, Centennial, CO), a 514-nm argon laser (300 mW; Melles Griot, Carlsbad, CA), and a 594-nm solid-state laser (80 mW; CNI Laser, Changchun, China), respectively. Images were captured using an EMCCD camera (QuantEM 512SC [Photometrics, Tucson, AZ]), driven by Micromanager mounted on the side port of an inverted microscope (model IX-71; Olympus, Center Valley, PA).</p></sec><sec id="s4-9"><title>Analysis of filopodia density</title><p>Primary cultured rat hippocampal neurons were transfected 7 days after plating with siRNA directed against ArhGAP44 together with a fluorescent marker and fixed at DIV12. Fluorescently tagged ArhGAP44(R291M) was transfected at DIV11 and fixed at DIV12. For each condition, the sample was fixed and individual neurons were imaged. Filopodia density was measured manually, analyzing only the proximal 100 µm of each dendrite. For each condition tested, >20 cells were used.</p></sec><sec id="s4-10"><title>Rac1 activation assay</title><p>HeLa cells were grown in DMEM (high glucose) supplemented with 10% FCS and Pen/Strep until they reached 80% confluency and then transfected either with CFP-ArhGAP44(wt), CFP-ArhGAP44(R291M), or empty CFP plasmid (control) using LF2000 according to the manufacturer's protocol for 4 hr in DMEM in the absence of FCS and Pen/Strep. Cells were then serum starved for 18 hr. For all conditions, live cell fluorescence 18 hr post transfection showed transfection efficiency of >80%. Cells were stimulated with 50 ng/ml EGF for 5 min. Next, cells were scratched and protein levels were measured and adjusted for all samples to equal levels. Of each sample 900 µl were used for pulldown and 100 µl for loading control. GTP levels were probed using Rac1 Activation Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs [San Diego, CA], STA-404) according to the manufacturer's protocol. In brief, GTP-bound Rac was eluted from cell lysates using PAK PBD agarose beads and detected by western blot using α-Rac1 (Cell Biolabs, 240106) antibody. Relative intensities were compared to loading controls.</p></sec><sec id="s4-11"><title>Generation of diced siRNA pools</title><p>The protocol used to synthesize siRNA has been previously reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib38">Liou et al., 2005</xref>). Specific primers for ArhGAP44 were automatically designed and used to amplify from a cDNA library an approximate 600-bp PCR fragment of the 3′ region of the coding sequence. A second amplification was performed with a set of nested primers bearing a T7 promoter sequence on their 5′ extension. Nested PCR products were transcribed in vitro (T7 MEGA script kit; Ambion, Austin, TX) and the resulting double-stranded RNAs were annealed and processed with 30 units per reaction of human recombinant Dicer (Invitrogen) for 15 hr at 37°C. The 21mer siRNAs were separated from incompletely digested fragments using a succession of isopropanol precipitations and filtration on glass fiber plates (Nunc, Rochester, NY).</p></sec><sec id="s4-12"><title>Filopodia dynamics analysis</title><p>Neurons were imaged for 10 min every 60 s using a 63× objective. Changes in filopodia dynamics were assessed manually using ImageJ. In detail, dynamic protrusions (i.e., nodes and dynamic filopodia) were counted and normalized to filopodia that remained over the course of the acquisition (i.e., static filopodia). Dynamics was visualized using the Temporal Color-Code designed by Kota Miura (<ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://fiji.sc/wiki/index.php/Temporal-Color_Code">http://fiji.sc/wiki/index.php/Temporal-Color_Code</ext-link>).</p></sec><sec id="s4-13"><title>Ratiometric images of fluorescence intensity in dendritic nodes and actin patches</title><p>The software used for ratio-metric imaging has been previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib16">Tsai and Meyer, 2012</xref>). In brief, a low-pass Gaussian filter was first applied to all images to suppress the noise while retaining the details of the fluorescent signals. Background subtraction was subsequently performed by (the value of each pixel)—(the mean value of the background within 40 μm of that pixel). To determine relative intracellular ArhGAP44 levels, ratio images were created dividing ArhGAP44 fluorescence over the cytosolic fluorescence.</p></sec><sec id="s4-14"><title>Analysis of relative protein concentration in dendritic patches</title><p>To measure the relative protein concentration at patches, average fluorescent intensities of the protein of interest (POI) and the cytosolic reference were measured in the patch and in the adjacent dendritic stretch. The background (BG) was determined separately for both channels using the average of four sectors outside the cell adjacent to the region of interest. The relative intensity of POI’s was determined as [(POI<sub>Patch</sub> − POI<sub>BG</sub>)/(Cytosol<sub>Patch</sub> − Cytosol<sub>BG</sub>)]/[(POI<sub>Dendrite</sub> − POI<sub>BG</sub>)/(Cytosol<sub>Dendrite</sub> − Cytosol<sub>BG</sub>)].</p></sec><sec id="s4-15"><title>Correlative IF/SEM image analysis</title><p>A micro-pattern was generated on glass slides and coated over night with PLL (0.1 mg/ml). Neurons were plated for 11 days and then fixed as described above for the FESEM analysis. Using the micro-pattern as reference points, individual neurons were then labeled with fluorescently tagged phalloidin and imaged on a 63× objective with a 1.5 Optovar. Cells were then sputter-coated with 70A of Au/Pd using a Denton Desk 11 Sputter Coater. Using the backscatter detector, individual micro-patterns were identified and used to navigate and identify individual previously imaged neurons as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s2">Figure 4—figure supplement 2</xref>. SEM Images were then taken at 10,000× magnification and aligned with the immunofluorescent images. Finally, individual nodes were identified using the SEM images, and the average fluorescent intensity of phalloidin was measured in nodes and the adjacent dendritic stretches.</p></sec><sec id="s4-16"><title>Constructs and drugs</title><p>Full-length and the N-BAR domain constructs of ArhGAP44, F-tractin, NMHC-2B (Addgene Plasmid No. 11348), Rac1 and Cdc42 were previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib63">Wei and Adelstein, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib23">Heo and Meyer, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib31">Johnson and Schell, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Galic et al., 2012</xref>). The point mutation in ArhGAP44(R291M) was introduced using the site-specific mutagenesis kit (200518; Stratagene, Cedar Creek, TX). All constructs were sequenced prior to use. ML-7 (sc-200557; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used at 10 µM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>) and 50 µM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6s1">Figure 6—figure supplement 1B</xref>). Latrunculin A (428026; Cal Biochem, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) was used at 4 µM. Cytochalasin D (PHZ1063; Invitrogen) was used at 5 µM.</p></sec><sec id="s4-17"><title>Dug-induced changes in ArhGAP44 intensity</title><p>For individual neurons, z-stacks were acquired before and 20–30 min after addition of drugs. For the analysis, a maximal projection was made and individual actin patches (= sites along the dendrite where the actin/cytosol ratio was >200% above the average ratio) were identified. Using a mask, the ArhGAP44/cytosol intensity within the actin patches was determined and normalized to ArhGAP44/cytosol ratio in the dendritic shaft.</p></sec><sec id="s4-18"><title>FKBP-Tiam1 assay</title><p>Dynamic translocation of Tiam1 with the FRB-FKB system in non-neuronal cells has been previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib27">Inoue et al., 2005</xref>). Here, we cultured hippocampal neurons were quadruple-transfected with Lyn-FRB, CFP-FKBP-Tiam1 the YFP-tagged N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 and the cytosolic reference mCherry using Lipofectamine 2000 (according to manufacturer's protocol). 24 hr later, individual cells were imaged before and after addition of 100 nM rapamycin (B0560; Sigma–Aldrich) with a 63× objective and a 1.5× Optovar module.</p></sec><sec id="s4-19"><title>Nanocone assay</title><p>Nanocone production has been previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib30">Jeong et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib19">Galic et al., 2012</xref>). In brief, a 35–50 nm thin film of tin was deposited by heat evaporation on a glass coverslip at room temperature. The glass with the deposited tin was then exposed to a nitrogen gas environment with a low concentration of oxygen (about 1 part per million) at 350°C for 90 min. The annealing to the glass and the formation of the replicate nanocone shapes occurred during this heating step. In order to make the nanocone structures transparent, the glass coverslip with nanocones was further heated to a temperature 400°C for 3 hr in air. Labtek chambers were then mounted with nanocoated glass slides as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib29">Jeong and Galic, 2014</xref>), and neurons were subsequently cultured, transfected on DIV10, and imaged alive 24 hr later. 3D rotation (<xref ref-type="other" rid="video14 video15">Videos 14,15</xref>) of confocal stacks was done in ImageJ.</p></sec><sec id="s4-20"><title>Atomic force microscopy</title><p>AFM images of nanocones were done in tapping mode using commercial cantilevers on a JPK Nanowizard II instrument. Height analysis was performed using JPK image processing software.</p></sec><sec id="s4-21"><title>Statistics</title><p>p-values in all figures depict pair-wise comparisons and were evaluated using the Student's <italic>t</italic> test, with two tails and two-sample unequal variance. Error bars in all images represent SEM of the mean value. **p < 0.01.</p></sec></sec></body><back><ack id="ack"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors thank Dr S Jeong for help with the fabrication of the glass-pattern, Dr L M Joubert from the Stanford Cell Sciences Imaging Facility for help with electron-microscopy, P Seleschik and A Ricker for help with atomic force microscopy, members of the Klämbt and Püschel labs for technical assistance, and members of the Meyer lab for helpful comments and critical discussions.</p></ack><sec sec-type="additional-information"><title>Additional information</title><fn-group content-type="competing-interest"><title>Competing interests</title><fn fn-type="conflict" id="conf1"><p>The authors declare that no competing interests exist.</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="author-contribution"><title>Author contributions</title><fn fn-type="con" id="con1"><p>MG, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con2"><p>F-CT, Developed essential image analysis tools, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con3"><p>SB, Developed essential image analysis tools, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con4"><p>SRC, Developed essential computational analysis tools, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con5"><p>MM, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article</p></fn><fn fn-type="con" id="con6"><p>TM, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article</p></fn></fn-group><fn-group content-type="ethics-information"><title>Ethics</title><fn fn-type="other"><p>Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#9998) at Stanford University.</p></fn></fn-group></sec><sec sec-type="supplementary-material"><title>Additional files</title><supplementary-material id="SD1-data"><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.050</object-id><label>Supplementary file 1.</label><caption><p>Names and relative expression levels of 286 putative actin regulators. List depicting the expression levels of genes identified in the NCBI search in various tissues of the Human U133A/GNF1H Gene Atlas data set (gnf1h-gcrma unaveraged). Note that values are log-transformed.</p><p><bold>DOI:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.7554/eLife.03116.050">http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.03116.050</ext-link></p></caption><media xlink:href="elife03116s001.docx" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="docx"/></supplementary-material><sec sec-type="datasets"><title>Major dataset</title><p>The following previously published dataset was used:</p><p><related-object content-type="existing-dataset" id="dataro1"><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>AI</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Wiltshire</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Batalov</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Lapp</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Ching</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name>, <name><surname>Block</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name>, <etal/>, <year>2004</year><x>, </x><source>A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes</source><x>, </x><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.biogps.org">www.biogps.org</ext-link><x>, </x><comment>Freely accessible at <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.biogps.org/">www.biogps.org/</ext-link>.</comment></related-object></p></sec></sec><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="bib1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amir</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Van den Veyver</surname><given-names>IB</given-names></name><name><surname>Wan</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Tran</surname><given-names>CQ</given-names></name><name><surname>Francke</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Zoghbi</surname><given-names>HY</given-names></name></person-group><year>1999</year><article-title>Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2</article-title><source>Nature Genetics</source><volume>23</volume><fpage>185</fpage><lpage>188</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/13810</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Andersen</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Resseguie</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Brenman</surname><given-names>JE</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><article-title>Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alters structural plasticity and cytoskeletal dynamics in <italic>Drosophila</italic></article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>25</volume><fpage>8878</fpage><lpage>8888</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2005-05.2005</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Attree</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Olivos</surname><given-names>IM</given-names></name><name><surname>Okabe</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Bailey</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names>RA</given-names></name><name><surname>McInnes</surname><given-names>RR</given-names></name><name><surname>Nussbaum</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name></person-group><year>1992</year><article-title>The Lowe's oculocerebrorenal syndrome gene encodes a protein highly homologous to inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>358</volume><fpage>239</fpage><lpage>242</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/358239a0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ayala</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Shu</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>LH</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><article-title>Trekking across the brain: the journey of neuronal migration</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>128</volume><fpage>29</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.021</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Betz</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ashery</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Rickmann</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Augustin</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Neher</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Südhof</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name><name><surname>Rettig</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Brose</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><article-title>Munc13-1 is a presynaptic phorbol ester receptor that enhances neurotransmitter release</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>123</fpage><lpage>136</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80520-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhatia</surname><given-names>VK</given-names></name><name><surname>Madsen</surname><given-names>KL</given-names></name><name><surname>Bolinger</surname><given-names>PY</given-names></name><name><surname>Kunding</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hedegård</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Gether</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Stamou</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Amphipathic motifs in BAR domains are essential for membrane curvature sensing</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>28</volume><fpage>3303</fpage><lpage>3314</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/emboj.2009.261</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheadle</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Biederer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>The novel synaptogenic protein Farp1 links postsynaptic cytoskeletal dynamics and transsynaptic organization</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>199</volume><fpage>985</fpage><lpage>1001</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201205041</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Crino</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Khodakhah</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Becker</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Ginsberg</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hemby</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Eberwine</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><article-title>Presence and phosphorylation of transcription factors in developing dendrites</article-title><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA</source><volume>95</volume><fpage>2313</fpage><lpage>2318</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.95.5.2313</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>D'Arcangelo</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Miao</surname><given-names>GG</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Soares</surname><given-names>HD</given-names></name><name><surname>Morgan</surname><given-names>JI</given-names></name><name><surname>Curran</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>1995</year><article-title>A protein related to extracellular matrix proteins deleted in the mouse mutant reeler</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>374</volume><fpage>719</fpage><lpage>723</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/374719a0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dash</surname><given-names>PK</given-names></name><name><surname>Hochner</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Kandel</surname><given-names>ER</given-names></name></person-group><year>1990</year><article-title>Injection of the cAMP-responsive element into the nucleus of Aplysia sensory neurons blocks long-term facilitation</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>345</volume><fpage>718</fpage><lpage>721</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/345718a0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>David</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>McPherson</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Mundigl</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>de Camilli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year>1996</year><article-title>A role of amphiphysin in synaptic vesicle endocytosis suggested by its binding to dynamin in nerve terminals</article-title><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA</source><volume>93</volume><fpage>331</fpage><lpage>335</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.93.1.331</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Disanza</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bisi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Winterhoff</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Milanesi</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Ushakov</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Kast</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Marighetti</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Romet-Lemonne</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name><name><surname>Nickel</surname><given-names>W</given-names></name><name><surname>Linkner</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Waterschoot</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Ampè</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Cortellino</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Palamidessi</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dominguez</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Carlier</surname><given-names>MF</given-names></name><name><surname>Faix</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Scita</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>CDC42 switches IRSp53 from inhibition of actin growth to elongation by clustering of VASP</article-title><source>The EMBO Journal</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>2735</fpage><lpage>2750</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/emboj.2013.208</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Disanza</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Mantoani</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hertzog</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Gerboth</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Frittoli</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Steffen</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Berhoerster</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kreienkamp</surname><given-names>HJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Milanesi</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Fiore</surname><given-names>PP</given-names></name><name><surname>Ciliberto</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Stradal</surname><given-names>TE</given-names></name><name><surname>Scita</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>Regulation of cell shape by Cdc42 is mediated by the synergic actin-bundling activity of the Eps8-IRSp53 complex</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1337</fpage><lpage>1347</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb1502</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dotti</surname><given-names>CG</given-names></name><name><surname>Sullivan</surname><given-names>CA</given-names></name><name><surname>Banker</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name></person-group><year>1988</year><article-title>The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1454</fpage><lpage>1468</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>des Portes</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Pinard</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Billuart</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Vinet</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Koulakoff</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Carrié</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Gelot</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dupuis</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Motte</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Berwald-Netter</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Catala</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kahn</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Beldjord</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Chelly</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><article-title>A novel CNS gene required for neuronal migration and involved in X-linked subcortical laminar heterotopia and lissencephaly syndrome</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>92</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80898-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fink</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Bayer</surname><given-names>KU</given-names></name><name><surname>Myers</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrell</surname><given-names>JE</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Schulman</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2003</year><article-title>Selective regulation of neurite extension and synapse formation by the beta but not the alpha isoform of CaMKII</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>39</volume><fpage>283</fpage><lpage>297</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00428-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fivaz</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><article-title>Reversible intracellular translocation of KRas but not HRas in hippocampal neurons regulated by Ca2+/calmodulin</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>170</volume><fpage>429</fpage><lpage>441</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.200409157</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Galic</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>FC</given-names></name><name><surname>Joubert</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>YI</given-names></name><name><surname>Hahn</surname><given-names>KM</given-names></name><name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>External push and internal pull forces recruit curvature-sensing N-BAR domain proteins to the plasma membrane</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>14</volume><fpage>874</fpage><lpage>881</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb2533</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib21"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garvalov</surname><given-names>BK</given-names></name><name><surname>Flynn</surname><given-names>KC</given-names></name><name><surname>Neukirchen</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyn</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Teusch</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Brakebusch</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Bamburg</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Bradke</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><article-title>Cdc42 regulates cofilin during the establishment of neuronal polarity</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>27</volume><fpage>13117</fpage><lpage>13129</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3322-07.2007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib22"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Graham</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name><name><surname>Eccleston</surname><given-names>JF</given-names></name><name><surname>Lowe</surname><given-names>PN</given-names></name></person-group><year>1999</year><article-title>The conserved arginine in rho-GTPase-activating protein is essential for efficient catalysis but not for complex formation with Rho.GDP and aluminum fluoride</article-title><source>Biochemistry</source><volume>38</volume><fpage>985</fpage><lpage>991</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/bi9821770</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heo</surname><given-names>WD</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2003</year><article-title>Switch-of-function mutants based on morphology classification of Ras superfamily small GTPases</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>113</volume><fpage>315</fpage><lpage>328</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00315-5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hodges</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Newell-Litwa</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Asmussen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Vicente-Manzanares</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Horwitz</surname><given-names>AR</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><article-title>Myosin IIb activity and phosphorylation status determines dendritic spine and post-synaptic density morphology</article-title><source>PLOS ONE</source><volume>6</volume><fpage>e24149</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0024149</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hotulainen</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Llano</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Smirnov</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tanhuanpää</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Faix</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Rivera</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Lappalainen</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Defining mechanisms of actin polymerization and depolymerization during dendritic spine morphogenesis</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>185</volume><fpage>323</fpage><lpage>339</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.200809046</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ichtchenko</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Hata</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Nguyen</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Ullrich</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Missler</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Moomaw</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Südhof</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name></person-group><year>1995</year><article-title>Neuroligin 1: a splice site-specific ligand for beta-neurexins</article-title><source>Cell</source><volume>81</volume><fpage>435</fpage><lpage>443</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0092-8674(95)90396-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Inoue</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Heo</surname><given-names>WD</given-names></name><name><surname>Grimley</surname><given-names>JS</given-names></name><name><surname>Wandless</surname><given-names>TJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><article-title>An inducible translocation strategy to rapidly activate and inhibit small GTPase signaling pathways</article-title><source>Nature Methods</source><volume>2</volume><fpage>415</fpage><lpage>418</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth763</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jaworski</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kapitein</surname><given-names>LC</given-names></name><name><surname>Gouveia</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Dortland</surname><given-names>BR</given-names></name><name><surname>Wulf</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name><name><surname>Grigoriev</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Camera</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Spangler</surname><given-names>SA</given-names></name><name><surname>Di Stefano</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Demmers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Krugers</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Defilippi</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Akhmanova</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Hoogenraad</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Dynamic microtubules regulate dendritic spine morphology and synaptic plasticity</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>100</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Galic</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><article-title>Nanocones to study initial steps of endocytosis</article-title><source>Methods in Molecular Biology</source><volume>1174</volume><fpage>275</fpage><lpage>284</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-4939-0944-5_19</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeong</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>McDowell</surname><given-names>MT</given-names></name><name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year><article-title>Low-temperature self-catalytic growth of tin oxide nanocones over large areas</article-title><source>ACS Nano</source><volume>5</volume><fpage>5800</fpage><lpage>5807</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/nn2015216</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>HW</given-names></name><name><surname>Schell</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>Neuronal IP3 3-kinase is an F-actin-bundling protein: role in dendritic targeting and regulation of spine morphology</article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>5166</fpage><lpage>5180</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.E09-01-0083</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib32"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kast</surname><given-names>DJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Disanza</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Boczkowska</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Madasu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Scita</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Svitkina</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Dominguez</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><article-title>Mechanism of IRSp53 inhibition and combinatorial activation by Cdc42 and downstream effectors</article-title><source>Nature Structural & Molecular Biology</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>413</fpage><lpage>422</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nsmb.2781</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kornau</surname><given-names>HC</given-names></name><name><surname>Schenker</surname><given-names>LT</given-names></name><name><surname>Kennedy</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Seeburg</surname><given-names>PH</given-names></name></person-group><year>1995</year><article-title>Domain interaction between NMDA receptor subunits and the postsynaptic density protein PSD-95</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>269</volume><fpage>1737</fpage><lpage>1740</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.7569905</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Korobova</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Svitkina</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><article-title>Molecular architecture of synaptic actin cytoskeleton in hippocampal neurons reveals a mechanism of dendritic spine morphogenesis</article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>21</volume><fpage>165</fpage><lpage>176</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.E09-07-0596</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Krugmann</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jordens</surname><given-names>I</given-names></name><name><surname>Gevaert</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Driessens</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Vandekerckhove</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Hall</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year>2001</year><article-title>Cdc42 induces filopodia by promoting the formation of an IRSp53:Mena complex</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>1645</fpage><lpage>1655</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00506-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lau</surname><given-names>PM</given-names></name><name><surname>Zucker</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name><name><surname>Bentley</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><year>1999</year><article-title>Induction of filopodia by direct local elevation of intracellular calcium ion concentration</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>145</volume><fpage>1265</fpage><lpage>1275</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.145.6.1265</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lebrand</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Dent</surname><given-names>EW</given-names></name><name><surname>Strasser</surname><given-names>GA</given-names></name><name><surname>Lanier</surname><given-names>LM</given-names></name><name><surname>Krause</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Svitkina</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Borisy</surname><given-names>GG</given-names></name><name><surname>Gertler</surname><given-names>FB</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><article-title>Critical role of Ena/VASP proteins for filopodia formation in neurons and in function downstream of netrin-1</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>42</volume><fpage>37</fpage><lpage>49</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00108-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liou</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>ML</given-names></name><name><surname>Heo</surname><given-names>WD</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Myers</surname><given-names>JW</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrell</surname><given-names>JE</given-names><suffix>Jr</suffix></name><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2005</year><article-title>STIM is a Ca2+ sensor essential for Ca2+-store-depletion-triggered Ca2+ influx</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>15</volume><fpage>1235</fpage><lpage>1241</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.055</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Hensch</surname><given-names>TK</given-names></name><name><surname>Ackerman</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Barbel</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname><given-names>LY</given-names></name><name><surname>Jan</surname><given-names>YN</given-names></name></person-group><year>1996</year><article-title>Differential effects of the Rac GTPase on Purkinje cell axons and dendritic trunks and spines</article-title><source>Nature</source><volume>379</volume><fpage>837</fpage><lpage>840</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/379837a0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marrs</surname><given-names>GS</given-names></name><name><surname>Green</surname><given-names>SH</given-names></name><name><surname>Dailey</surname><given-names>ME</given-names></name></person-group><year>2001</year><article-title>Rapid formation and remodeling of postsynaptic densities in developing dendrites</article-title><source>Nature Neuroscience</source><volume>4</volume><fpage>1006</fpage><lpage>1013</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn717</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>LJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Blackstone</surname><given-names>CD</given-names></name><name><surname>Levey</surname><given-names>AI</given-names></name><name><surname>Huganir</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name><name><surname>Price</surname><given-names>DL</given-names></name></person-group><year>1993</year><article-title>AMPA glutamate receptor subunits are differentially distributed in rat brain</article-title><source>Neuroscience</source><volume>53</volume><fpage>327</fpage><lpage>358</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0306-4522(93)90199-P</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Matus</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name></person-group><year>2000</year><article-title>Actin-based plasticity in dendritic spines</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>290</volume><fpage>754</fpage><lpage>758</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.290.5492.754</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>RT</given-names></name><name><surname>Honnert</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Reinhard</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bähler</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>1997</year><article-title>The rat myosin myr 5 is a GTPase-activating protein for Rho in vivo: essential role of arginine 1695</article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>2039</fpage><lpage>2053</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.8.10.2039</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nahm</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Long</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Paik</surname><given-names>SK</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Bae</surname><given-names>YC</given-names></name><name><surname>Broadie</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><year>2010</year><article-title>The Cdc42-selective GAP Rich regulates postsynaptic development and retrograde BMP transsynaptic signaling</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>191</volume><fpage>661</fpage><lpage>675</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.201007086</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nakayama</surname><given-names>AY</given-names></name><name><surname>Harms</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year>2000</year><article-title>Small GTPases Rac and Rho in the maintenance of dendritic spines and branches in hippocampal pyramidal neurons</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>20</volume><fpage>5329</fpage><lpage>5338</lpage></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Omkumar</surname><given-names>RV</given-names></name><name><surname>Kiely</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Rosenstein</surname><given-names>AJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Min</surname><given-names>KT</given-names></name><name><surname>Kennedy</surname><given-names>MB</given-names></name></person-group><year>1996</year><article-title>Identification of a phosphorylation site for calcium/calmodulindependent protein kinase II in the NR2B subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>271</volume><fpage>31670</fpage><lpage>31678</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.271.49.31670</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Penzes</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Beeser</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Chernoff</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Schiller</surname><given-names>MR</given-names></name><name><surname>Eipper</surname><given-names>BA</given-names></name><name><surname>Mains</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Huganir</surname><given-names>RL</given-names></name></person-group><year>2003</year><article-title>Rapid induction of dendritic spine morphogenesis by trans-synaptic ephrinB-EphB receptor activation of the Rho-GEF kalirin</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>37</volume><fpage>263</fpage><lpage>274</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01168-6</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Peter</surname><given-names>BJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kent</surname><given-names>HM</given-names></name><name><surname>Mills</surname><given-names>IG</given-names></name><name><surname>Vallis</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Butler</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Evans</surname><given-names>PR</given-names></name><name><surname>McMahon</surname><given-names>HT</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><article-title>BAR domains as sensors of membrane curvature: the amphiphysin BAR structure</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>303</volume><fpage>495</fpage><lpage>499</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1092586</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qualmann</surname><given-names>B</given-names></name><name><surname>Roos</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>DiGregorio</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Kelly</surname><given-names>RB</given-names></name></person-group><year>1999</year><article-title>Syndapin I, a synaptic dynamin-binding protein that associates with the neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein</article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>10</volume><fpage>501</fpage><lpage>513</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.10.2.501</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raynaud</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Janossy</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Dahl</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertaso</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Perroy</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Varrault</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Vidal</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Worley</surname><given-names>PF</given-names></name><name><surname>Boeckers</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bockaert</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Marin</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Fagni</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Homburger</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><article-title>Shank3-Rich2 interaction regulates AMPA receptor recycling and synaptic long-term potentiation</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>33</volume><fpage>9699</fpage><lpage>9715</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2725-12.2013</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Raynaud</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Moutin</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmidt</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Dahl</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Bertaso</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name><name><surname>Boeckers</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Homburger</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Fagni</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><article-title>Rho-GTPase-activating protein interacting with Cdc-42-interacting protein 4 homolog 2 (Rich2): a new Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) GTPase-activating protein that controls dendritic spine morphogenesis</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>289</volume><fpage>2600</fpage><lpage>2609</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M113.534636</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Richnau</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Aspenström</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><year>2001</year><article-title>Rich, a rho GTPase-activating protein domain-containing protein involved in signaling by Cdc42 and Rac1</article-title><source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source><volume>276</volume><fpage>35060</fpage><lpage>35070</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.M103540200</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rollason</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Korolchuk</surname><given-names>V</given-names></name><name><surname>Hamilton</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Jepson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Banting</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year>2009</year><article-title>A CD317/tetherin-RICH2 complex plays a critical role in the organization of the subapical actin cytoskeleton in polarized epithelial cells</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>184</volume><fpage>721</fpage><lpage>736</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.200804154</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ryu</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>TP</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>DC</given-names></name><name><surname>Burette</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Weinberg</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>YT</given-names></name><name><surname>Sheng</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>A critical role for myosin IIb in dendritic spine morphology and synaptic function</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>49</volume><fpage>175</fpage><lpage>182</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.017</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib55"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Snipes</surname><given-names>GJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Suter</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Welcher</surname><given-names>AA</given-names></name><name><surname>Shooter</surname><given-names>EM</given-names></name></person-group><year>1992</year><article-title>Characterization of a novel peripheral nervous system myelin protein (PMP-22/SR13)</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>117</volume><fpage>225</fpage><lpage>238</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.117.1.225</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spillane</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Ketschek</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Donnelly</surname><given-names>CJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Pacheco</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Twiss</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Gallo</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Nerve growth factor-induced formation of axonal filopodia and collateral branches involves the intra-axonal synthesis of regulators of the actin-nucleating Arp2/3 complex</article-title><source>The Journal of Neuroscience</source><volume>32</volume><fpage>17671</fpage><lpage>17689</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1079-12.2012</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>Y</given-names></name><name><surname>Brooks</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Lepercq</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Trofatter</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name><name><surname>Ravetch</surname><given-names>JV</given-names></name><name><surname>Lebo</surname><given-names>RV</given-names></name></person-group><year>1993</year><article-title>Myelin protein zero gene mutated in Charcot-Marie-tooth type 1B patients</article-title><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA</source><volume>90</volume><fpage>10856</fpage><lpage>10860</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.90.22.10856</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Su</surname><given-names>AI</given-names></name><name><surname>Wiltshire</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><name><surname>Batalov</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Lapp</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Ching</surname><given-names>KA</given-names></name><name><surname>Block</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Soden</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Hayakawa</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Kreiman</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Cooke</surname><given-names>MP</given-names></name><name><surname>Walker</surname><given-names>JR</given-names></name><name><surname>Hogenesch</surname><given-names>JB</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><article-title>A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes</article-title><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA</source><volume>101</volume><fpage>6062</fpage><lpage>6067</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0400782101</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Svitkina</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Bulanova</surname><given-names>EA</given-names></name><name><surname>Chaga</surname><given-names>OY</given-names></name><name><surname>Vignjevic</surname><given-names>DM</given-names></name><name><surname>Kojima</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Vasiliev</surname><given-names>JM</given-names></name><name><surname>Borisy</surname><given-names>GG</given-names></name></person-group><year>2003</year><article-title>Mechanism of filopodia initiation by reorganization of a dendritic network</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>160</volume><fpage>409</fpage><lpage>421</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.200210174</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tan</surname><given-names>JL</given-names></name><name><surname>Ravid</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Spudich</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><year>1992</year><article-title>Control of nonmuscle myosins by phosphorylation</article-title><source>Annual Review of Biochemistry</source><volume>61</volume><fpage>721</fpage><lpage>759</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.bi.61.070192.003445</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>tom Dieck</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Sanmartí-Vila</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Langnaese</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Richter</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Kindler</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Soyke</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Wex</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Smalla</surname><given-names>KH</given-names></name><name><surname>Kämpf</surname><given-names>U</given-names></name><name><surname>Fränzer</surname><given-names>JT</given-names></name><name><surname>Stumm</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Garner</surname><given-names>CC</given-names></name><name><surname>Gundelfinger</surname><given-names>ED</given-names></name></person-group><year>1998</year><article-title>Bassoon, a novel zinc-finger CAG/glutamine-repeat protein selectively localized at the active zone of presynaptic nerve terminals</article-title><source>The Journal of Cell Biology</source><volume>142</volume><fpage>499</fpage><lpage>509</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1083/jcb.142.2.499</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsai</surname><given-names>FC</given-names></name><name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><article-title>Ca2+ pulses control local cycles of lamellipodia retraction and adhesion along the front of migrating cells</article-title><source>Current Biology</source><volume>22</volume><fpage>837</fpage><lpage>842</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.037</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib62"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ushkaryov</surname><given-names>YA</given-names></name><name><surname>Petrenko</surname><given-names>AG</given-names></name><name><surname>Geppert</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Sudhof</surname><given-names>TC</given-names></name></person-group><year>1992</year><article-title>Neurexins: synaptic cell surface proteins related to the alpha-latrotoxin receptor and laminin</article-title><source>Science</source><volume>257</volume><fpage>50</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1621094</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>Q</given-names></name><name><surname>Adelstein</surname><given-names>RS</given-names></name></person-group><year>2000</year><article-title>Conditional expression of a truncated fragment of nonmuscle myosin II-A alters cell shape but not cytokinesis in HeLa cells</article-title><source>Molecular Biology of the Cell</source><volume>11</volume><fpage>3617</fpage><lpage>3627</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1091/mbc.11.10.3617</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wolf</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Keil</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Gotzl</surname><given-names>O</given-names></name><name><surname>Mun</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Schwarze</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Lederer</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hüttelmaier</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Hatzfeld</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>The armadillo protein p0071 regulates Rho signalling during cytokinesis</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>1432</fpage><lpage>1440</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb1504</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Macara</surname><given-names>IG</given-names></name></person-group><year>2006</year><article-title>The polarity protein PAR-3 and TIAM1 cooperate in dendritic spine morphogenesis</article-title><source>Nature Cell Biology</source><volume>8</volume><fpage>227</fpage><lpage>237</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncb1368</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="bib66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ziv</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name><name><surname>Smith</surname><given-names>SJ</given-names></name></person-group><year>1996</year><article-title>Evidence for a role of dendritic filopodia in synaptogenesis and spine formation</article-title><source>Neuron</source><volume>17</volume><fpage>91</fpage><lpage>102</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80283-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back><sub-article article-type="article-commentary" id="SA1"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.051</article-id><title-group><article-title>Decision letter</article-title></title-group><contrib-group content-type="section"><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name><surname>Polleux</surname><given-names>Franck</given-names></name><role>Reviewing editor</role><aff><institution>Columbia University</institution>, <country>United States</country></aff></contrib></contrib-group></front-stub><body><boxed-text><p>eLife posts the editorial decision letter and author response on a selection of the published articles (subject to the approval of the authors). An edited version of the letter sent to the authors after peer review is shown, indicating the substantive concerns or comments; minor concerns are not usually shown. Reviewers have the opportunity to discuss the decision before the letter is sent (see <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://elifesciences.org/review-process">review process</ext-link>). Similarly, the author response typically shows only responses to the major concerns raised by the reviewers.</p></boxed-text><p>[Editors’ note: this article was originally rejected after discussions between the reviewers, but the manuscript was accepted after revisions and re-review.]</p><p>Thank you for choosing to send your work entitled “Dynamic Recruitment of Nadrin2 to Nanoscale Membrane Deformations Limits Exploratory Filopodia Initiation in Neurons” for consideration at <italic>eLife</italic>. Your full submission has been evaluated by Richard Losick (Senior editor), a Reviewing editor, and 2 peer reviewers, and the decision was reached after discussions between the reviewers.</p><p>After careful examination of the results and multiple consultations, the reviewers and the Reviewing editor decided that the results did not reach the level of significance claimed by the authors and despite tackling an interesting problem, the main interpretations would require a lot more work to meet our publication standard. The reviewers’ comments follow for your consideration.</p><p><italic>Reviewer #1</italic>:</p><p>The authors analyze here the Rac1 GAP and BAR-domain containing protein Nadrin2, which they identified as an actin regulatory protein enriched in brain vs spinal cord and that they show to be enriched in cortex. Overexpression and knock-down studies demonstrate that this protein is a negative regulator of dendritic filopodia number. The GAP activity contributes to this function, but is not required. Analyzing filopodia dynamics, live imaging data upon knock-down and in overexpressing neurons support that this protein causes newly formed filopodia to be unstable. Nadrin2 localizes to actin rich dendritic patches (which are nicely analyzed using correlative scanning EM/immunostaining), and imaging of the less active Nadrin2 GAP mutant supports that filopodia can emerge from these dendritic Nadrin2 patches. Interestingly, Nadrin2 appears to be recruited dynamically and in a myosin light chain kinase-dependent manner to these actin patches, which also contain Rac1. The model that emerges from these results is that myosin-actin interactions at dendritic membranes cause membrane indentations to form, which recruit Nadrin2 via its BAR domain to dynamically regulate Rac1 and restrict filopodia formation. This provides evidence that stable filopodia require not only positive signals to form but also the removal of negative regulators such as Nadrin2, which is an interesting concept. Several key experimental questions need to be addressed, however, to further strengthen this study.</p><p>1) How frequently do filopodia emerge from Nadrin2-positive patches? Are filopodia more likely to emerge from these patches than from Nadrin-2 negative dendritic shaft areas? This information will allow to assess how important a player Nadrin2 is in the control of filopodia formation. If most emerging filopodia do not contain Nadrin2, this protein is only relevant to control a subset of these protrusions.</p><p>2) Does overexpression or loss of Nadrin2 impact the number of dendritic spines? This is important to assess the biological role of Nadrin2-mediated filopodia formation.</p><p>3) Can the authors show more directly that Nadrin2 is recruited to membranes in a curvature-dependent manner?</p><p>4) <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> only shows that Rac1 overexpression promotes the formation of transient filopodia independent of Nadrin2. The statement that “Nadrin2 limits Rac-dependent de novo filopodia formation” is not supported by these data.</p><p>5) Knock-down neurons should be stained for Nadrin2 to confirm antibody specificity in immunostaining.</p><p>6) The tissue distribution blot in Figure1 needs to be repeated for better signals.</p><p>Reviewer #2:</p><p>The paper identifies Nadrin2 as brain-enriched regulator of filopodia outgrowth in neuronal dendrites, as overexpression of the wt strongly suppresses filopodial number. More refined manipulations of Nadrin2 have a number of more moderate effects: it shows a mild (50%) enrichment in actin patches along the dendrite compared to GFP, and its knockdown prompts an increase in the number of quickly collapsing protrusions and a 20% increase in steady state filopodia density. Its recruitment to patches is shown to depend on its N-BAR domain, suggesting it is recruited to the membrane curvature observed in detail by SEM in these patches. Pharmacological inhibition of Myosin II or application of LatA or CytoD acutely reduced Nadrin2 at the patches, suggesting that the status of actin and myosin in the patches is also involved in Nadrin2 targeting. The model is that Nadrin2 recruitment suppresses Rac1 activity important for filopodial extension, and this model is supported by weaker phenotypes of a Nadrin2 mutant that retains only weak Rac1 GAP activity.</p><p>The paper presents a new model for suppression of protrusion formation, and postulates a role for the membrane curvature seen in the filopodial birthplaces. These observations highlight previously overlooked aspects of neuronal process formation. The combination of live-cell imaging and correlative SEM is potentially quite powerful. However, the live-cell approaches are not used to test the Nadrin2 model very directly, and though the phenotype is compelling, overall I find the explanation offered by the model only weakly supported by the available data.</p><p>My major concerns are as follows:</p><p>1) The authors overuse the terms “transient” and “dynamic” to describe the Nadrin2 enrichment at patches. For example, “A major finding of our study is that transient recruitment of Nadrin2 to actin patches...”… “deletion of Nadrin2 curvature-sensitivity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A</xref>) as well as limiting action-myosin dependent contractile forces (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>) both prevented dynamic Nadrin2 recruitment.” “both treatments led to a significant reduction of Nadrin2 recruitment”</p><p>In fact, the time course of recruitment is never analyzed in the paper. There is only one <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure (3C)</xref> that shows any transience. No treatment was analyzed in a manner that would have assessed the dynamic nature of the recruitment. Perhaps the decreased but remaining colocalization is just as transient but weak, or more short-lived but just as pronounced. Regarding myosin, the ML7 results (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5A</xref>) seem to suggest only that retention, not recruitment, of Nadrin2 are mediated by myosin II. It seems that examining the time course of accumulating Nadrin2 with respect to the time of filopodial extension would be required to evaluate the model. A more specific test would be to compare the time course of active Rac1 in the patch with Nadrin2 levels. Similarly, the curvature aspect could be addressed in detail specifically by timelapsing the N-BAR construct during extension.</p><p>2) The authors state “the transient localization of Nadrin2 to patches but not to extended filopodia argues that Nadrin2 limits initiation rather than elongation of newly formed filopodia.”</p><p>Why doesn't this argue equally well that recruitment of Nadrin2 initiates outgrowth? Loss of Nadrin in an elongating filopodium would seem to indicate that it might in fact suppress elongation, not initiation. With the few examples available for viewing, initiation seems to occur before loss of Nadrin. Clearly, an additional step of mechanism would be required to explain the overexpression and knockdown phenotypes, but I think it is too facile to say the live imaging supports this model.</p><p>3) The authors state “Our experiments identified the small GTPase Rac as the principal target of Nadrin2 within actin patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1">Figure 2–figure supplement 1B</xref>).”</p><p>The indicated figure does not demonstrate this at all. The assumption is that Nadrin2 acts through Rac1 only, not Cdc42, but the alternative (interaction with Cdc42) is not tested. Can this really be dismissed out of hand? <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref> tests the relative levels of GTP-Rac1, but does not test whether Nadrin2 or its mutant alter levels of other potential targets (e.g. Cdc42).</p><p>A related but unstated presumption is that the dynamic assays of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> predict total protrusion number, and expressing Cdc42 would provide a test of that as effect of its overexpression is opposite to Rac1. Does Cdc42 overexpression alter the dynamic measures in a way opposite to Rac1? Does it decrease the number of nodes?</p><p>Presumably, dynamics were not measured following Nadrin2(wt) overexpression because there are so few filopodia left, but shouldn't the Rac1+Nadrin2(wt) case be examined, since Nadrin2(wt) should suppress the Rac1 phenotype? That is the claim in the model of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5B</xref>, left column.</p><p>4) Surprisingly, the movies do not make a great case for this paper, and in fact in my mind raise more questions than they answer. Technically, the intensity levels fluctuate substantially, making me wonder whether small or thin structures such as nascent filopodia or nodes could really be identified with confidence. One troubling example is in the upper right panel, going from frame 1 to 2. The structure seemingly of most interest is the node or protrusion in the middle of the process (under “n2”), which appears to pop into existence. But the entire image brightens in this panel, making it unclear whether to trust the relative intensity of the node. Related to that type of phenomenon, some of the fluctuation is apparently due to an inconsistent z span; e.g. in Movie 1, the overexpression of Nadrin2 panel clearly shows the middle one of the processes fade out and then return, as it was insufficiently spanned by the planes of the z sectioning. In the upper right panel, that particular node could just have been captured more completely in bounds of the z stack rather than appear or brighten in reality.</p><p>In terms of observations, it doesn't seem as though the control example in movie 1 demonstrates any protrusion formation at all. Am I missing something? Based on the quantification in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2A'</xref>, there should be just as many forming and collapsing processes as there are processes that persist through the movie, but I don't see this at all. At the very least, I'd say that readers will need some help: formation, collapse, and unclassified changes should probably be pointed out with markers of some sort.</p><p>Raw data (movies) of the Rac1 and Rac1+Nadrin2(R291M) experiments would be good to see.</p><p>More raw data (stills or movies) from the key experiments in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3A and 3B</xref> is needed.</p><p>5) In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref>, the accumulation of a set of SEM images into a numbered series of panels portrayed as “stages” is unnecessary and misleading-there is no evidence presented here or cited that the stages correspond to a growth sequence. There is a near-total lack of information about how these images were assessed or quantified, and what constituted a node or a protrusion or any other feature.</p></body></sub-article><sub-article article-type="reply" id="SA2"><front-stub><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7554/eLife.03116.052</article-id><title-group><article-title>Author response</article-title></title-group></front-stub><body><p>We have substantially expanded description and analysis of filopodia initiation from dendritic nodes, showing now in detail morphological rearrangements and kinetic behavior of ArhGAP44 and actin at such sites. We also included in the revised version of the manuscript experiments to investigate a possible regulation of Cdc42 by ArhGAP44 during exploratory dendritic filpodia initiation. These experiments further validate the proposed model that ArhGAP44 targets Rac1 in actin-patches that precede exploratory filopodia formation. To directly demonstrate that inward membrane deformation is sufficient for ArhGAP44 recruitment, we artificially indented the plasma membrane in living neurons using cone-shaped nanostructures (nanocones) as well as a chemical inducer of actin dynamics (a dimerization system we developed to rapidly pull a Rac GEF from the cyctosol to the plasma membrane). Finally, we also included experiments to test for a possible function of ArhGAP44 at other actin-rich neuronal structures, such as dendritic spines and growth cones.</p><p>Together, the added studies further strengthened the validity of our major finding that ArhGAP44 acts in a localized negative feedback that allows neurons to tune the frequency with which new exploratory filopodia are initiated.</p><p>Comment on changed protein name: in compliance with the official protein nomenclature, we are using in the revised version of the manuscript the protein symbol ArhGAP44 instead of Nadrin2.</p><p>Reviewer #1: <italic>[…] Several key experimental questions need to be addressed, however, to further strengthen this study</italic>.</p><p><italic>1) How frequently do filopodia emerge from Nadrin2-positive patches? Are filopodia more likely to emerge from these patches than from Nadrin-2 negative dendritic shaft areas? This information will allow to assess how important a player Nadrin2 is in the control of filopodia formation. If most emerging filopodia do not contain Nadrin2, this protein is only relevant to control a subset of these protrusions</italic>.</p><p>In the revised version we now investigate the origins of dendritic protrusions in more detail. The following three experiments were added:</p><p>We show that 83% ± 7% of all protrusions emerge from dendritic nodes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s4">Figure 2–figure supplement 4B</xref>).</p><p>We show that 89% ± 6% of all protrusions emerge from actin-rich patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4–figure supplement 1C</xref>). This further strengthens the argument that dendritic nodes visible by light microscopy and electron microscopy are local actin patches in dendrites.</p><p>100% of dendritic actin patches show enrichment for ArhGAP44. The average enrichment of ArhGAP44 in dendritic actin-patches is 80% ± 8% over a cytosolic reference (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s3">Figure 4–figure supplement 3B</xref>).</p><p>Together, these added experiments argue that the majority of dendritic protrusions are emerging from dendritic nodes that have convoluted membrane invaginations and that show a relative increase for both, actin and ArhGAP44 concentration.</p><p><italic>2) Does overexpression or loss of Nadrin2 impact the number of dendritic spines? This is important to assess the biological role of Nadrin2-mediated filopodia formation</italic>.</p><p>To further explore the function of ArhGAP44 in aged neurons, we added the following two experiments to the revised manuscript:</p><p>Full-length and the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 both enrich in dendritic spines in neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s6">Figure 5–figure supplement 6</xref>).</p><p>Knockdown of ArhGAP44 in aged neurons (DIV17) increased the fraction of dynamic filopodia-shaped vs. spine-shaped dendritic protrusions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s7">Figure 5–figure supplement 7</xref>).</p><p>We did not include this data in the initial submission, as we felt that it does not strengthen the core findings of this manuscript that is focused on the initiation of exploratory filopodia from dendrites.</p><p><italic>3) Can the authors show more directly that Nadrin2 is recruited to membranes in a curvature-dependent manner</italic>?</p><p>Yes, we can. We have previously established an assay that relies on cone-shaped nano-scale structures (nanocones) to deform the plasma membrane (PM) in live cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib4">Ayala et al., 2007</xref>): When cultured on nanocones, adherent cell transiently deform the basal PM. This creates local sites with positively curved PMs of up to 50nm diameter that allows investigating the functional consequences of nano-scale membrane deformation under physiological conditions in live cells. In the revised version we added the following experiments:</p><p>We show that the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 forms puncta selectively above nanocone-induced membrane-deformation in the basal PM of primary hippocampal neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s4">Figure 5–figure supplement 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video14 video15">Videos 14, 15</xref>).</p><p>We show that enrichment of ArhGAP44 over nanocone-induced PM-deformations does not correlate with enrichment of the PM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3">Figure 5–figure supplement 3F</xref>) or of actin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3">Figure 5–figure supplement 3G</xref>).</p><p>Together, these experiments argue that nanocones locally deform the PM and that the resulting local high PM-curvature is sufficient for ArhGAP44 enrichment in neurons.</p><p><italic>4)</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2"><italic>Figure 2</italic></xref> <italic>only shows that Rac1 overexpression promotes the formation of transient filopodia independent of Nadrin2. The statement that “Nadrin2 limits Rac-dependent de novo filopodia formation” is not supported by these data</italic>.</p><p>We thank the referee for pointing out that the title of the figure legend is misleading. We have rephrased the figure title to: ´Knockdown of ArhGAP44 and overexpression of Rac1 both increase de novo filopodia formation´.</p><p><italic>5) Knock-down neurons should be stained for Nadrin2 to confirm antibody specificity in immunostaining</italic>.</p><p>The following two experiments were added to confirm the antibody specificity:</p><p>Overexpression control: Neurons transfected with ArhGAP44(R291M) for 24h, fixed and stained with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44 show a >8-fold increase in fluorescence intensity compared to non-transfected cells (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3–figure supplement 1B</xref>).</p><p>Knockdown control: When stained with an antibody directed against ArhGAP44, neurons transfected with siRNA directed against ArhGAP44 show reduced fluorescence intensity compared to cells transfected with a control siRNA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3s1">Figure 3–figure supplement 1C</xref>).</p><p><italic>6) The tissue distribution blot in Figure1 needs to be repeated for better signals</italic>.</p><p>The blot shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1A</xref> has been replaced.</p><p>Reviewer #2: <italic>My major concerns are as follows</italic>:</p><p><italic>1) The authors overuse the terms “transient” and “dynamic” to describe the Nadrin2 enrichment at patches. For example, “A major finding of our study is that transient recruitment of Nadrin2 to actin patches...”…“deletion of Nadrin2 curvature-sensitivity (</italic><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><italic>Figure 3A</italic></xref><italic>) as well as limiting action-myosin dependent contractile forces (</italic><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5"><italic>Figure 5A</italic></xref><italic>) both prevented dynamic Nadrin2 recruitment.”… “both treatments led to a significant reduction of Nadrin2 recruitment</italic>”</p><p><italic>In fact, the time course of recruitment is never analyzed in the paper. There is only one</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><italic>Figure (3C)</italic></xref> <italic>that shows any transience. No treatment was analyzed in a manner that would have assessed the dynamic nature of the recruitment. Perhaps the decreased but remaining colocalization is just as transient but weak, or more short-lived but just as pronounced. Regarding myosin, the ML7 results (</italic><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5"><italic>Figure 5A</italic></xref><italic>) seem to suggest only that retention, not recruitment, of Nadrin2 are mediated by myosin II. It seems that examining the time course of accumulating Nadrin2 with respect to the time of filopodial extension would be required to evaluate the model. A more specific test would be to compare the time course of active Rac1 in the patch with Nadrin2 levels. Similarly, the curvature aspect could be addressed in detail specifically by timelapsing the N-BAR construct during extension</italic>.</p><p>(A) Overuse of the terms ‘transient’ and ‘dynamic’. We have substantially reduced the use of both terms in the text, using them now only 2 times in the whole manuscript to describe ArhGAP44.</p><p>(B) Curvature-aspect of protein recruitment. In the revised version of the manuscript, we added a series of experiments to investigate the curvature-dependence of ArhGAP44 enrichment (see also Referee #1, point 3):</p><p>We show that the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 forms puncta selectively above nanocone-induced membrane-deformation in the basal PM of primary hippocampal neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s4">Figure 5–figure supplement 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video14 video15">Videos 14, 15</xref>).</p><p>We show that enrichment of ArhGAP44 over nanocone-induced PM-deformations does not correlate with enrichment of the plasma membrane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3">Figure 5–figure supplement 3F</xref>) or of actin (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s3">Figure 5–figure supplement 3G</xref>).</p><p>These experiments provide evidence that inward plasma membrane deformation is sufficient for enrichment of ArhGAP44 to inward deformed plasma membranes in neurons.</p><p>(C) Time course of ArhGAP44 enrichment. The following four experiments were added: ArhGAP44 is recruited to contracting structures: We added a synthetic approach that we developed earlier, where we used a small molecule to rapidly recruit a Rac GEF to the PM and activate Rac in order to increase actin polymerization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5s2">Figure 5–figure supplement 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video13">Video 13</xref>). In this approach, we observe enrichment of the isolated N-BAR domain of ArhGAP44 at retracting actin-rich structures induced along the dendritic shaft. Together with the experiment where we inhibit MLCK using ML-7 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) and show that recruitment of ArhGAP44 requires myosin contraction, this argues that the increase in local ArhGAP44 concentration is caused by increased formation of acto-myosin-dependent inward membrane deformation.</p><p>Kinetic analysis of actin and ArhGAP44 during filopodia initiation. The following experiments were added: we find that 83% ± 7% of all protrusion emerge from dendritic nodes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s3">Figure 2–figure supplement 3B</xref>), that 89% ± 6% of all protrusions emerge from actin patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s1">Figure 4–figure supplement 1B</xref>), and that ArhGAP44 is enriched in 100% of actin patches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4s3">Figure 4–figure supplement 3B</xref>). These experiments argue that the majority of dendritic protrusions are emerging from dendritic nodes that are enriched both in actin and in ArhGAP44.</p><p>Together, these added experiments further strengthen the statement that ArhGAP44 is recruited to contracting actin patches within nodes that precede filopodia elongation.</p><p>(D) Retention vs. Recruitment. We propose that ArhGAP44 diffuses trough the cytosol by Brownian movement, and that enrichment of ArhGAP44 at nodes is caused by binding of the protein to inward membrane deformations that transiently form at such sites due to myosin-dependent contraction of membrane-associated actin cables. Binding of N-BAR domain proteins (such as ArhGAP44) has been shown to depend (i) on increased electrostatic interactions between negatively charged lipid head groups in curved membranes and positively charged amino acids of the banana-shaped protein dimer facing the membrane, and (ii) the insertion of an amphipatic helix present in all N-BAR domain proteins into membrane-imperfections that predominantly occur in curved lipid bilayers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib14">Dotti et al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib66">Ziv & Smith, 1996</xref>). Enrichment of N-BAR domain proteins at curved membranes is thus believed to be due to an increase in binding affinity that may result molecularly from a reduced off-rate and possibly an increased on-rate. As the term ‘recruitment’ does not imply active directed transport (it is often used to describe a diffusion mediated retention at local sites), we feel that it is appropriate to use this term since it describes the observed dynamic increase in local concentration of ArhGAP44 when new actin patches are formed.</p><p><italic>2) The authors state “the transient localization of Nadrin2 to patches but not to extended filopodia argues that Nadrin2 limits initiation rather than elongation of newly formed filopodia</italic>.”</p><p><italic>Why doesn't this argue equally well that recruitment of Nadrin2 initiates outgrowth? Loss of Nadrin in an elongating filopodium would seem to indicate that it might in fact suppress elongation, not initiation. With the few examples available for viewing, initiation seems to occur before loss of Nadrin. Clearly, an additional step of mechanism would be required to explain the overexpression and knockdown phenotypes, but I think it is too facile to say the live imaging supports this model</italic>.</p><p>We agree with the referee that it is a valid question whether ArhGAP44 functions more as an inhibitor of filopodia initiation vs. an inhibitor of filopodia elongation/outgrowth: We considered that an inhibitor of filopodia elongation/outgrowth would be expected to localize together with positive regulators of actin dynamics (e.g. MENA or IRSp53) at the tip of extending filopodia where actin-polymerization in growing filopodia occurs. In contrast, an inhibitor of filopodia initiation would be expected to be present at the ´birthplace´ of filopodia, and to dissociate once elongation/outgrowth begins. The localization of ArhGAP44 all across actin patches, which our data argues is caused by acto-myosin dependent inward curved plasma membrane deformation, suggests that it reduces Rac and Cdc42 activity globally across the patch which we think explains the lower frequency of filopodia extension. The dissociation from extending filopodia (with outward membrane deformation) can best be explained by the change in curvature (all negative) in the extending membrane tubes. Based on the selectivity of N-BAR domain proteins to positively curved membranes, we therefore think that our data is consistent with a role of ArhGAP44 in regulating filopodia initiation. In the revised version of the manuscript we discuss this now in the text.</p><p>As an added note: the possibility that ArhGAP44 may have additional functions in nodes (e.g. inhibit filopodia initiation AND elongation/outgrowth) will be discussed in more detail below in point 4.</p><p><italic>3) The authors state “Our experiments identified the small GTPase Rac as the principal target of Nadrin2 within actin patches (</italic><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s1"><italic>Figure 2–figure supplement 1B</italic></xref><italic>).” The indicated figure does not demonstrate this at all</italic>.</p><p>We agree. The statement has been replaced.</p><p><italic>4) The assumption is that Nadrin2 acts through Rac1 only, not Cdc42, but the alternative (interaction with Cdc42) is not tested. Can this really be dismissed out of hand?</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1"><italic>Figure 1E</italic></xref> <italic>tests the relative levels of GTP-Rac1, but does not test whether Nadrin2 or its mutant alter levels of other potential targets (e.g. Cdc42)</italic>.</p><p><italic>A related but unstated presumption is that the dynamic assays of</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2"><italic>Figure 2</italic></xref> <italic>predict total protrusion number, and expressing Cdc42 would provide a test of that as effect of its overexpression is opposite to Rac1. Does Cdc42 overexpression alter the dynamic measures in a way opposite to Rac1? Does it decrease the number of nodes</italic>?</p><p>This is an excellent question. Considering the dual specificity of ArhGAP44 to Rac1 and Cdc42 (as we cite in the paper), ArhGAP44 also likely has an added function in regulating Cdc42 during filopodia initiation (it is well established that Cdc42 is critically involved in filopodia formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib40">Marrs et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib42">Matus, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib36">Lau et al., 1999</xref>)). In the revised version, we have added 3 experiments as well as raw material to characterize the potential interplay between ArhGAP44 and Cdc42:</p><p>ArhGAP44 can hydrolyze GTP-Cdc42: Consistent with previous reports, we find hydrolysis of GFP-Cdc42 by ArhGAP44 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5A</xref>).</p><p>Overexpression of Rac1(wt) but not of Cdc42(wt) phenocopies protrusion dynamics upon knockdown of ArhGAP44: We have previously shown that knockdown of ArhGAP44 increases density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1G</xref>, yellow) and dynamics (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>, yellow) of dendritic protrusions, while overexpression of ArhGAP44 reduces protrusion density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1E</xref>, blue) and protrusion dynamics (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2B</xref>, blue). As ArhGAP44 is a RhoGAP, overexpression of the small GTPase that is targeted by ArhGAP44 should phenocopy the knockdown of ArhGAP44. We previously showed that overexpression of Rac1(wt) increases density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5B</xref>, red) and dynamics (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>, red) of dendritic protrusions, and rescues reduced protrusion dynamics upon overexpression of ArhGAP44 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2E</xref>, purple). For Cdc42, we showed in the initial submission that overexpression of Cdc42(wt) did not increase protrusion density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5B</xref>, green). We have now added experiments that show that overexpression of Cdc42(wt) has no effect on protrusion dynamics, and does not rescues reduced protrusion dynamics upon overexpression of ArhGAP44(R291M) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5C</xref>). The latter suggests that Rac regulation is more important but does not exclude an additional regulatory role of Cdc42.</p><p>Overexpression of Rac1(wt) but not of Cdc42(wt) phenocopies protrusion morphology upon knockdown of ArhGAP44: In the revised version of the manuscript, we added raw material showing that overexpression of Rac1 but not of Cdc42 phenocopied the ArhGAP44 knockdown causing the formation of dynamic dendritic nodes and filopodia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5D</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video3 video4">Videos 3, 4</xref>, 6–10). Again, this suggest for a more important role of Rac but does not exclude an added regulation of ArhGAP44 on Cdc42.</p><p>Together, while these results argue for ArhGAP44-dependent regulation of Rac1 in actin patches, we agree with the referee that a discussion about the function of Cdc42 has been missing in the initial manuscript. Following discussion on the role of Cdc42 have been added to the text: Cdc42 acts as an activator of Irsp53 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Lebrand et al., 2004</xref>), promoting IRSp53-dependent enrichment and clustering of VASP and other factors to drive actin assembly in elongating filopodia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib35">Krugmann et al., 2001</xref>). Consistently, knockdown of Cdc42 substantially reduces filopodia formation in neurons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib52">Richnau & Aspenstrom, 2001</xref>). Intriguingly, overexpression of Cdc42 is not sufficient to initiate filopodia formation in neurons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5</xref>, see also (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib53">Rollason et al., 2009</xref>)) or in other cell lines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Lebrand et al., 2004</xref>). This has led to the hypothesis that elongation of filopodia is a combinatorial process requiring multiple factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib37">Lebrand et al., 2004</xref>). We propose that signal integration at actin patches controls this decision of filopodia elongation. Considering that actin-patch formation occurs before filopodia elongation, this argues for a 2-step process where Rac1-induced patch formation (and ArhGAP44-dependent regulation thereof) precedes Cdc42-induced filopodia elongation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). However, since ArhGAP44 shows dual specificity for Rac1 and Cdc42, both steps will be limited by recruitment by ArhGAP44 to actin patches.</p><p><italic>5) Presumably, dynamics were not measured following Nadrin2(wt) overexpression because there are so few filopodia left, but shouldn't the Rac1+Nadrin2(wt) case be examined, since Nadrin2(wt) should suppress the Rac1 phenotype? That is the claim in the model of</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5"><italic>Figure 5B</italic></xref><italic>, left column</italic>.</p><p>Expression of ArhGAP44(wt) rapidly triggers varicosity formation and cell death (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s6">Figure 1–figure supplement 6</xref>), likely due to excessive levels of the enzyme. Consequentially, either enzymatic efficiency or expression levels need to be reduced to study ArhGAP44 function in neurons. Since western blot analysis and live cell experiments show that ArhGAP44(R291M) is less potent than ArhGAP44(wt) but still active (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1F</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s6">Figure 1–figure supplement 6</xref>), we decided to use ArhGAP44(R291M) for the synthetic rescue experiments. In contrast to a system that would rely on reduced expression of ArhGAP44(wt), this approach has the additional advantage of providing a strong fluorescence signal that is critical to identify transfected cells and study sub-cellular protein localization.</p><p><italic>6) Surprisingly, the movies do not make a great case for this paper, and in fact in my mind raise more questions than they answer. Technically, the intensity levels fluctuate substantially, making me wonder whether small or thin structures such as nascent filopodia or nodes could really be identified with confidence. One troubling example is in the upper right panel, going from frame 1 to 2. The structure seemingly of most interest is the node or protrusion in the middle of the process (under “n2”), which appears to pop into existence. But the entire image brightens in this panel, making it unclear whether to trust the relative intensity of the node. Related to that type of phenomenon, some of the fluctuation is apparently due to an inconsistent z span; e.g. in Movie 1, the overexpression of Nadrin2 panel clearly shows the middle one of the processes fade out and then return, as it was insufficiently spanned by the planes of the z sectioning. In the upper right panel, that particular node could just have been captured more completely in bounds of the z stack rather than appear or brighten in reality</italic>.</p><p><italic>In terms of observations, it doesn't seem as though the control example in movie 1 demonstrates any protrusion formation at all. Am I missing something? Based on the quantification in</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2"><italic>Figure 2A'</italic></xref><italic>, there should be just as many forming and collapsing processes as there are processes that persist through the movie, but I don't see this at all. At the very least, I'd say that readers will need some help: formation, collapse, and unclassified changes should probably be pointed out with markers of some sort</italic>.</p><p><italic>Raw data (movies) of the Rac1 and Rac1+Nadrin2(R291M) experiments would be good to see</italic>.</p><p><italic>More raw data (stills or movies) from the key experiments in</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><italic>Figure 3A and 3B</italic></xref> <italic>is needed</italic>.</p><p>(A) Added raw material: We agree with the reviewer that addition of more raw data would be helpful to (i) explain what types of dendritic protrusions exist, and (ii) show how these protrusions are affected by overexpression and knockdown of ArhGAP44 or the small GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42. To better explain and illustrate the main findings of the analysis shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the following 11 raw data movies and 3 figure supplements have been added:</p><p>To illustrate different types of protrusions formed on dendrites, and better explain the analysis used in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>:</p><p>Timelapse examples of static and dynamic protrusion types characterized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s2">Figure 2–figure supplement 2A and B</xref>).</p><p>Raw data movie showing stable dendritic filopodia (<xref ref-type="other" rid="video1">Video 1</xref>, filopodia lasts for >40 minutes).</p><p>Raw data showing formation of dynamic dendritic nodes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s3">Figure 2-figure supplement 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video5">Video 5</xref>).</p><p>To illustrate the findings of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2B and 2C</xref>:</p><p>Raw data movie showing increased dendritic node and reduced protrusion formation upon ArhGAP44(R291M) overexpression (<xref ref-type="other" rid="video2">Videos 2</xref>).</p><p>Raw data showing increased dendritic node and protrusion formation upon knockdown of ArhGAP44 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5D</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video3 video4">Videos 3, 4</xref>).</p><p>Raw data movie showing dendritic protrusion emerging from dendritic nodes upon knockdown of ArhGAP44 (<xref ref-type="other" rid="video6">Video 6</xref>).</p><p>To illustrate the findings of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figures 2E and 2F</xref>:</p><p>Raw data examples showing abnormal dendritic node and filopodia formation upon Rac1 overexpression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5D</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video7 video8">Videos 7, 8</xref>).</p><p>Raw data examples showing abnormal dendritic filopodia formation upon Cdc42 overexpression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s5">Figure 2–figure supplement 5D</xref> and <xref ref-type="other" rid="video9 video10">Videos 9, 10</xref>).</p><p>Raw data movie showing synthetic rescue of ArhGAP44(R291M)-dependent reduction in filopodia formation by co-overexpression of Rac1(wt) (<xref ref-type="other" rid="video11">Video 11</xref>).</p><p>(B) Protrusions ‘pop into existence’? As the referee correctly state, we only observe structures in the illuminated plane of the confocal microscope. This means that dynamic dendritic sections that move in z-direction during the 10 minute long acquisition period may cause filopodia to leave the confocal plane. To investigate the frequency and origins of protrusions that ‘pop into existence, the following experiments were added:</p><p>Timelapse analysis of filopodia formation using a shorter acquisition interval: As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s4">Figure 2–figure supplement 4B</xref>, 57% ± 8% of all filopodia elongate from nodes, while the remaining filopodia appear to emerge directly from the dendritic shaft (i.e. ‘pop into existence’) using an acquisition interval of 60 seconds (between frames). However, when the acquisition interval was reduced from 60 seconds to 15 seconds (i.e. between frames), the fraction of filopodia emerging from nodes increased to 83% ± 7%.</p><p>Time series showing dendritic filopodia emerging from node (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s4">Figure 2–figure supplement 4A</xref>). This example shows that the acquisition interval of 60 seconds is sufficient to detect protrusions, but may in some cases miss nodes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2s4">Figure 2–figure supplement 4A</xref>, compare columns 2 and 4).</p><p>These added experiments provide evidence that the majority of filopodia that ‘pop into existence’ are reflective of filopodia emerging from dendritic nodes that were to short-lived to be captured using a 60-second interval. We consider the remaining 17% of filopodia that ‘pop into existence’ to be a mixure of (i) filopodia emerging from nodes in less than 15 seconds (i.e. between frames), (ii) filopodia emerging directly from the dendritic shaft, or, more likely, (iii) filopodia that appear due to changes in the focal plane of the dendritic tree.</p><p><italic>7) In</italic> <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3"><italic>Figure 3D</italic></xref><italic>, the accumulation of a set of SEM images into a numbered series of panels portrayed as “stages” is unnecessary and misleading-there is no evidence presented here or cited that the stages correspond to a growth sequence. There is a near-total lack of information about how these images were assessed or quantified, and what constituted a node or a protrusion or any other feature</italic>.</p><p>The reviewer raised a valid point. As the sequence of electron micrographs that was previous shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3D</xref> is an interpretation of data, it has now been integrated in the proposed model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). To better describe how the images in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1D</xref> were quantified, the following supplemental figure panels and methods section have been added:</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1–figure supplement 5</xref> illustrates how dendritic protrusions were quantified in scanning electron micrographs.</p><p>New chapter in the Material and methods section: Quantification of Protrusion Types using Scanning Electron Micrographs. Neurons were cultured on glass slides for various periods of time (3, 10 and 17 days), fixed and prepared for SEM as described above. Using low resolution (1000x magnification), individual neurons were identified (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1–figure supplement 5A</xref>, left panel). Starting from the soma, initial segments of the dendritic arbors were imaged at high resolution (10’000x), and individual protrusions were classified based on morphology (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1–figure supplement 5</xref>, right panel). Only the proximal 50-60 μm of the dendritic arbors that can clearly be associated to a particular neuron were analyzed. Examples of dendritic nodes are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1s5">Figure 1–figure supplement 5B</xref>.</p></body></sub-article></article> |