Parallel processing of quickly and slowly mobilized reserve vesicles in hippocampal synapses

Vesicles within presynaptic terminals are thought to be segregated into a variety of readily releasable and reserve pools. The nature of the pools and trafficking between them is not well understood, but pools that are slow to mobilize when synapses are active are often assumed to feed pools that are mobilized more quickly, in a series. However, electrophysiological studies of synaptic transmission have suggested instead a parallel organization where vesicles within slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools would separately feed independent reluctant- and fast-releasing subdivisions of the readily releasable pool. Here, we use FM-dyes to confirm the existence of multiple reserve pools at hippocampal synapses and a parallel organization that prevents intermixing between the pools, even when stimulation is intense enough to drive exocytosis at the maximum rate. The experiments additionally demonstrate extensive heterogeneity among synapses in the relative sizes of the slowly and quickly mobilized reserve pools, which suggests equivalent heterogeneity in the numbers of reluctant and fast-releasing readily releasable vesicles that may be relevant for understanding information processing and storage.


Introduction
Chemical synapses exhibit striking dynamic changes in connection strength during repetitive use.
The changes are termed short-term plasticity or frequency dynamics, and are thought to play an important role in how information is processed (Tsodyks and Markram, 1997;Abbott and Regehr, 2004;Buonomano and Maass, 2009).Multiple presynaptic vesicle trafficking mechanisms are involved, but the identity of the mechanisms, how they interact, and the implications for biological computation are not understood (Neher, 2015).
Most attempts at a detailed understanding begin with the premise that presynaptic vesicles are segregated into multiple pools, including at least one readily releasable pool and one reserve pool.Readily releasable vesicles are thought to be docked to release sites embedded within the active zone of the plasma membrane of synaptic terminals, whereas reserves reside in the interior.
Nevertheless, pools are typically not defined by morphological criteria but instead by the timing of mobilization, which is a general term for the full sequence of events that must occur before vesicles undergo exocytosis; for reserve vesicles, mobilization would include docking to release sites, biochemical priming, and catalysis of exocytosis.
Based on timing criteria, the readily releasable pool has been divided into fastand slow-releasing subdivisions at a wide variety of synapse types; slow-releasing readily releasable vesicles are often termed reluctant (Wu and Borst, 1999;Sakaba and Neher, 2001;Moulder and Mennerick, 2005).
Reserve pools are less studied, but have likewise been divided into quickly and slowly mobilized pools at some synapse types (Neves and Lagnado, 1999;Rizzoli and Betz, 2005;Denker et al., 2011).
A widespread premise has been that the pools are connected in a series where vesicles are transferred from slowly to quickly mobilized pools as diagrammed in Figure 1A (Pieribone et al., 1995;Hilfiker et al., 1999;Denker and Rizzoli, 2010;Rothman et al., 2016;Miki et al., 2016;Doussau et al., 2017;Milovanovic et al., 2018).If so, reluctant vesicles might be docked to the same type of release site as fast-releasing vesicles, but in an immature priming state that could then transition to the mature, fast-releasing state.We refer to models with this premise as homogeneous release site models (e.g., Lin et al., 2022).
However, a growing body of evidence suggests that reluctant vesicles are not immature, but are instead fully primed at release sites that are inherently inefficient at catalyzing exocytosis.First, to our knowledge, none of the homogeneous release site models proposed so far can account for a series of electrophysiological experiments at calyx of Held synapses where: (1) the reluctant subdivision was only minimally depleted during moderate stimulation that exhausted the fastreleasing subdivision; and (2) abruptly increasing the stimulation intensity then drove exocytosis of the remaining reluctant vesicles directly, without first transitioning to a fast-releasing state (Mahfooz et al., 2016 andFigure5-figure supplement 1 of Raja et al., 2019).And second, recent optical imaging and molecular studies have confirmed substantial differences between release sites within the same active zone at a wide variety of synapse types (Hu et al., 2013;Müller et al., 2015;Böhme et al., 2016;Akbergenova et al., 2018;Maschi and Klyachko, 2020;Li et al., 2021;Karlocai et al., 2021;Gou et al., 2022).
To account for the observations, one of the starting premises of our working model is that fast-releasing and reluctant subdivisions of the readily releasable pool operate in parallel, which could be as in Figure 1B if based solely on the studies referenced so far.Figure 1C depicts a different possibility, tested here, where quickly and slowly mobilized reserve pools are likewise arranged in parallel, and independently supply vesicles to corresponding fast-releasing and reluctant subdivisions of the readily releasable pool.
No such fully parallel arrangement has been proposed previously, at least not explicitly.However, an additional premise of our working model -based on separate studies, not related to distinctions between subdivisions of the readily releasable pool -is that each readily releasable vesicle is physically tethered to a short chain of reserve vesicles, which serve as replacements after the readily releasable vesicle undergoes exocytosis (Figure 1D; Gabriel et al., 2011;see Wesseling et al., 2019 for supporting ultrastructural evidence).
If so, reserve vesicles chained to reluctant readily releasable vesicles would advance to the release site more slowly during continuous stimulation than reserve vesicles chained to fastreleasing vesicles because the reluctant vesicles would undergo exocytosis less frequently.As a direct consequence, reserves chained to reluctant vesicles would be mobilized more slowly and would behave as if constituting a slowly mobilized pool.Reserves chained to fast-releasing vesicles would be mobilized more quickly, and would be processed in parallel.In sum, the combination of two unrelated evidence-based premises of our working model predict the fully parallel arrangement outlined in Figure 1C.
Key for testing this idea: Distinctions between reserve pools would only emerge when the frequency of stimulation is low enough that individual reluctant vesicles remain within the readily releasable pool for extended periods of time before undergoing exocytosis.The reasoning is described in the Results section, where needed to explain the design of key experiments.
Here we begin by confirming that reserve vesicles at hippocampal synapses are segregated into multiple pools that can be distinguished by the timing of mobilization during low frequency stimulation.We then show that quickly and slowly mobilized reserves do not intermix, even when the frequency of stimulation is high, confirming that the two types are processed in parallel.The result provides a simplifying new constraint on the dynamics of vesicle recycling within presynaptic terminals.

Results
We originally developed our working model to account for results from both primary cell culture and ex vivo slices (Stevens and Wesseling, 1999b;Garcia-Perez et al., 2008;Gabriel et al., 2011;Mahfooz et al., 2016;Raja et al., 2019).We chose to use cell cultures for testing the prediction that quickly and slowly mobilized reserve pools are processed in parallel because cultures are better suited for staining and destaining synaptic vesicles with FM-dyes, which can be used to distinguish between reserve pools as shown below.
In a first set of experiments, diagrammed atop Figure 2, we began by staining vesicles within presynaptic terminals with of electrical stimulation ( ) during extracellular bath application of FM4-64.We then removed the FM4-64 and washed with Advasep-7 or Captisol, which are closely related -cyclodextrins that facilitate dye clearance from membranes (Kay et al., 1999).
The stain followed by wash procedure is thought to leave dye within nearly all of the vesicles that can recycle, and eliminate dye bound to non-vesicular membrane that would cause background fluorescence (Betz et al., 1992;Ryan and Smith, 1995;Chi et al., 2001;Gaffield and Betz, 2006).The vesicles then retain the dye until undergoing exocytosis, after which they likely destain completely as the dye is washed away into the extracellular space (Figure 2 The time courses that we measured while stimulating at were not compatible with single pool models or with models with multiple pools where vesicles intermix freely.That is, models where vesicles mix freely would predict that destaining at any point in time would be a constant fraction of the amount of stain still present at that time, meaning: where ( )∕ is the rate of change in fluorescence intensity at time , ( ) is the fluorescence intensity at the same time, and -the rate of fractional destaining -is constant over time.
The rate of fractional destaining was not constant, however, but decreased greatly over the .To quantify this, we estimated the rate at a variety of time points by dividing the rate of fluorescent decay ( ( )∕ ) over short intervals (slopes of the magenta lines in Figure 2B) by the corresponding fluorescence intensities ( ( )) at the beginning of the intervals (green dots , which is by a factor of .± 0.1; i.e., fractional destaining was .-fold greater at the beginning of the train than at the end. Further analysis showed that the decrease in fractional destaining was not caused by technical errors related to baseline fluorescence loss seen in some preparations, or by flaws in the premise that the final train fully destains all recycling vesicles.Specifically, correcting for the baseline fluorescence loss increased the estimate of the decrease in fractional destaining to a factor of .± 0.4 (Figure 2C, right panel) because the correction decreased the estimate of fractional destaining for later intervals (e.g., minutes -) by more than for earlier intervals (e.g., minutes -. ).
Likewise, correcting for any error in the premise that the final train eliminated dye from all recycling vesicles could increase the factor even more, although any correction of this sort would be small.
A higher resolution analysis showed that deviations from Eqn 1 occurred at almost all individual ROIs, despite variation between individuals in the details (Figure 2 Statistically significant deviations of < 0.05 were detected for > % of individuals ( of ) in a non-parametric analysis of the residuals (Figure 2D); see Figure 2E for the analogous analysis at the level of preparations.
Even so, the fluorescence signal within some ROIs likely arose from multiple synapses.To confirm that the decrease in fractional destaining seen in populations was caused by decreases at individual synapses, we conducted additional experiments on lower density cultures where individual punctae that are clearly separated from neighbors are thought to correspond to single synapses (Darcy et al., 2006).
Deviations from models where vesicles mix freely were clearly apparent at many of the punctae.
For example, each of the punctae indicated by magenta arrows in Figure 3A  ∼ % of punctae were excluded from the analysis because the linear fit of the baseline was > ± .%/ .The criterion was included to match the analysis of standard cultures, but disproportionately excluded individuals with low signal/noise, which might correspond to synapses that were lightly stained because of small vesicle clusters (Schikorski and Stevens, 1997).However: (1) equivalent decreases in fractional destaining were clearly apparent at many lightly stained punctae (Figure 3 Comparison of models with one reserve pool (left) and with two parallel reserve pools (right) that feed separate subdivisions of the readily releasable pool; wide arrows signify fast-releasing and narrow arrows signify reluctant.For both models, the fraction of vesicles within the readily releasable pools (RRPs) that are stained decreases over time of stimulation, accounting for the decrease in the absolute amount of destaining for each unit of time.However, with a single reserve pool, the ratio of stained fast-releasing to stained reluctant vesicles never changes, and, as a consequence, the fractional destaining at any point in time does not change.In contrast, with two reserves, vesicle mobilization in path a is faster than in path b, causing path a to become exhausted sooner.As a consequence, the ratio of stained fast-releasing to stained reluctant vesicles decreases over time, resulting in decreased fractional destaining.
(3) an analysis of residuals after fitting with Eqn 2 as in Figure 2D-E continued to yield statistically significant deviations in % of the most lightly stained quintile (i.e., of the least stained).
Taken together, the results argue strongly against the specific concern that decreases in fractional destaining seen in the population measurements in

No recovery of fractional destaining during rest intervals
A key point is that mixing between the reserve pools would have to be slow during stimulation, if it occurs at all.Otherwise, mixing would have caused the stained vesicles in quickly and slowly mobilized reserve pools to equilibrate over the of stimulation, preventing the decreases in fractional destaining.
To test this, we loaded standard cultures with FM4-64 as above, then stimulated at for only , which was enough to decrease fractional destaining to an intermediate level (compare 2 nd to 4 th bars of Figure 2C).We then allowed the synapses to rest for , , or before resuming stimulation, followed by nearly complete destaining at , as diagrammed atop Figure 4A.
Fractional destaining during the second train continued to be decreased after the rest intervals, with no indication of recovery, confirming that the decreases in fractional destaining induced by stimulation are long-lasting, at least on the time scale of minutes (Figure 4B,C).The result is consistent with the hypothesis tested below that vesicles are stored in multiple parallel reserve pools, but does not, by itself, rule out a wide variety of alternatives.

Evidence against selective depletion of dye from readily releasable pools
One alternative to multiple reserve pools was the possibility that the decrease in fractional destaining during stimulation was caused by selective dye loss from readily releasable pools.Selective dye loss from readily releasable pools without multiple reserve pools seemed unlikely because spontaneous mixing between readily releasable and reserve pools is thought to occur on the order of one minute (Murthy and Stevens, 1999), which is fast compared to the destaining time course during stimulation (i.e., Figure 2B).In addition, readily releasable pools consist of an average of only -vesicles per synapse whereas the reserve pool or pools is/are thought to consist ofvesicles (Murthy et al., 2001;Harata et al., 2001).Thus, readily releasable pools would only make up -% of the total recycling pool, which is substantially less than the weighting value of .for the faster of the two component exponentials in

Evidence against explanations that do not involve multiple reserve pools
Next we rule out alternative explanations for the long-lasting decreases in fractional destaining that do not involve pools at all.

Long-term presynaptic depression:
In principle, low frequency stimulation can induce long-term depression in presynaptic function that might cause fractional destaining to decrease even if there were only a single reserve pool.However, no long-term presynaptic depression was seen during stimulation when synaptic vesicle exocytosis was measured using vGlut1-synaptopHluorin fluorescence instead of FM4-64 (Figure 6).
The absence of long-term depression in vGlut1-synaptopHluorin fluorescence is compatible with the decrease in fractional destaining measured with FM4-64 because, unlike FM4-64, synap-topHluorin does not disassociate from vesicle membranes after exocytosis and therefore tracks presynaptic function through multiple rounds of exo/endocytosis (Miesenböck, 2012).Instead, the result argues against long-term presynaptic depression as a cause for the decrease in fractional destaining measured with FM4-64.We note, however, that the result does not contradict previous reports of presynaptic long-term depression where induction required postsynaptic depolarization (Goda and Stevens, 1996) because postsynaptic depolarization was likely prevented in the present study by glutamate receptor antagonists.

Long-lasting switch to kiss and run:
Alternatively, fractional destaining might decrease if endocytosis switched from the standard mode to a faster kiss-and-run mode, which sometimes is too fast to allow complete clearance of FM4-64 from the membrane of individual vesicles, at least in the absence of a -cyclodextrin (Klingauf et al., 1998).This explanation seemed unlikely because the switch in timing of endocytosis would have to persist for minutes during rest intervals to account for the results in Figure 4 and The results in this section all support the hypothesis that the decrease in fractional destaining seen during long trains of stimulation is caused by selective depletion of a quickly mobilized pool of reserve vesicles by ruling out alternative explanations.Remaining doubt is addressed next with affirmative evidence for the existence of multiple reserve pools.

Faster destaining when staining is induced with low frequency stimulation
We began by reasoning that vesicles reconstituted from recycled membrane during stimulation would have to be predominantly targeted back to the quickly mobilized reserve pool.Otherwise, targeting to the slowly mobilized reserve pool would have displaced already stained vesicles from the slowly to the quickly mobilized reserve pool, which would have prevented the decreases in fractional destaining seen above.To test this, we stained vesicles during stimulation with or pulses at or pulses at in interleaved experiments.We then compared fractional destaining during subsequent stimulation, as diagrammed in Figure 8A.
Fractional destaining was greater when vesicle recycling had been driven by stimulation during the staining phase (compare bar c to a and b in Figure 8B), as expected if a larger fraction of the stained vesicles were targeted to a quickly mobilized reserve pool.Follow-on experiments then showed that pulses at and at stained synapses to equivalent levels (Figure 8-Figure Supplement 2), indicating that the greater fractional destaining seen after selectively staining vesicles that recycle during stimulation was not because fewer vesicles had been stained.These results suggest that vesicles reconstituted from membrane that is recycled during ongoing stimulation are targeted predominantly to a quickly mobilized reserve pool.In contrast, vesicles reconstituted during stimulation are targeted to both quickly and slowly mobilized reserve pools.

Two color staining of separate reserve pools distinguished by mobilization timing
The information allowed us to design a method to stain quickly and slowly mobilized reserve pools with distinct colors, and then track the mobilization separately (diagram atop Figure 9).To achieve this, we first stained all recycling vesicles with FM4-64 (red) using the standard of stimulation, then partly destained with stimulation for .We reasoned that for would nearly completely destain any quickly mobilized reserve pool because it was enough to drive fractional destaining to close to the minimum value (e.g., Figure 2C).We then partly re-stained the stained with green dye would be similar to the number, stained in red, remaining from the first staining phase.Finally, we destained first with stimulation to measure fractional destaining; and then with stimulation to fully destain both quickly and slowly mobilized reserves as usual.
As predicted, the green stain applied during stimulation destained > -fold faster than the red stain applied during the initial stimulation (Figure 9A).The results were reversed when vesicles were stained first with green at and second with red at (Figure 9B).Although not essential for the interpretation, Figure 9C confirms that the number of stained vesicles at the start of the destaining phase of the experiment was similar for the two colors.
These results show that reserve synaptic vesicles are segregated into at least two pools that can be distinguished by the timing of mobilization during stimulation.The one remaining caveat is that the results so far do not rule out last-in/first-out models where reserve vesicles are stored in a single pool with constituents that inter-mix slowly, if at all, during stimulation (Rizzoli

Parallel mobilization
The results above did not determine whether quickly and slowly mobilized reserves are processed in series or in parallel.To distinguish between serial and parallel, we begin by showing that decreases in fractional destaining seen when stimulation is are absent when stimulation is (Figure 10A; compare bars b-d in Figure 10C).The finding is predicted by parallel models described by the scheme in Figure 1C -which includes our working model -because previous experiments have shown that the rate-limiting step in vesicle mobilization quickly shifts upstream from exocytosis of vesicles within the readily releasable pool to recruitment of reserve vesicles (see

Box 2).
The result does not, by itself, rule out serial models where the absence of decreases in fractional destaining is explained by mixing mechanisms that are activated during stimulation (Hilfiker et al., 1999).However, of stimulation had no impact on the timing of destaining when subsequent stimulation was (Figure 10B; compare bars f, g to bars b, c in Figure 10C).The absence of a large impact was striking because fractional destaining would have been decreased by a factor of ∼ if measured instead during stimulation (e.g., Figure 7).This result shows that the mixing mechanisms would have to be potent enough to fully mix quickly and slowly mobilized reserves within seconds of the onset of stimulation.Otherwise, the time course of destaining during stimulation would have been shifted rightwards when initiated after trains that had already selectively destained the quickly mobilized reserve vesicles, which was not observed (Figure 10D).To our knowledge, no mixing mechanisms that operate quickly enough have been proposed.
Nevertheless, to test for a mixing mechanism in a way that avoids assumptions about timing, we first: (1) confirmed that the large decrease in fractional destaining seen during 10 min of 1 Hz stimulation persists for at least during subsequent rest intervals (Figure 11A

Mixing continues to be slow/absent near body temperature
The experiments above were conducted at room temperature and there is evidence that vesicles in the interiors of synaptic terminals are more motile at body temperature (Westphal et al., 2008;Kamin et al., 2010;Lee et al., 2012;Park et al., 2012).It is not known if the motility is related to ratelimiting steps in synaptic vesicle trafficking that would influence the timing of mobilization.However, the decrease in fractional destaining during stimulation (Figure 12A), and the absence of mixing during rest intervals (Figure 12 The results of current study do provide new support for our working model because: (1) the opposite conclusion -that reserves are processed in series as widely assumed -would have caused us to discard the model; and (2) no competing parallel model has yet been proposed.We emphasize, however, that the main conclusion that quickly and slowly mobilized reserve vesicles are processed in parallel does not depend on either of the lines of evidence that motivated our working model, or on the model itself, and the evidence against serial models would continue to be equally strong even if doubts arose about the previous conclusions.

Absence of mixing
Notably, our working model contains a slow undocking mechanism operating continuously at ∼ ∕ that would have been consistent with slow mixing between quickly and slowly mobilized reserves if the undocked chains of vesicles were to mix freely (Gabriel et al., 2011)

Relationship to a deep reserve
The present results do not rule out the possibility that other types of synapses additionally or instead harbor a variety of reserve pools that are connected in series (Neves and Lagnado, 1999;Richards et al., 2003).And indeed, the present results only pertain to vesicles mobilized during of stimulation, whereas many vesicles within hippocampal presynaptic terminals are mobilized much more slowly, if at all during this time (Harata et al., 2001).We refer to the vesicles that are not mobilized in the time frame of minutes as the deep reserve.One possibility is that deep reserve vesicles do mix slowly with one or both of the quickly and slowly mobilized reserves identified above (Denker et al., 2011).This might account for the timing information in Rey et al. (2015) where vesicles that were recycled more recently were mobilized more quickly over ′ s of minutes.However, very slow mixing taking ′ s of minutes between the quickly and slowly mobilize reserve pools identified above cannot be ruled out either.

Relation to multiple classes of vesicles
The experiments in the present study were designed to measure vesicle exocytosis involved in action potential evoked release, whereas transmitter released spontaneously is thought to be stored in a different class of vesicles (Kavalali, 2015).
The present results are consistent with the possibility that the decision about whether a recycling vesicle will become reluctant or fast-releasing upon entering the readily releasable pool is made earlier, at the time of entry into the reserve pool.Alternatively, the parallel mobilization of slow and fast reserves might be analogous to current ideas about parallel cycling of vesicles involved in spontaneous release, which would then require multiple classes of vesicles (Raingo et al., 2012).However, adding the concept of multiple classes of vesicles could not replace the requirement for multiple classes of release sites because, otherwise, the readily releasable pool would eventually fill with reluctantly releasable vesicles during low frequency stimulation, causing long-lasting depression, which was not seen (Figure 6); long-lasting depression is ruled out in a second way in Figure 8 and Figure 9 where destaining was faster -not slower -when the staining phase of the experiments included long trains of stimulation.

Multiplexed frequency filtering
Finally, our working model explains slowly mobilized reserves as a logical consequence of multiple classes of release sites, with no functional significance of their own.However, we anticipate that the variation among synapses in to store substantially more information than mechanisms that always affect synaptic connection strength evident during low frequency use (Bartol et al., 2015).Notably, we previously observed extensive variation between calyx of Held synapses in the ratio of fast-releasing to reluctant readily releasable vesicles, which, when taken together with the present results, suggests that mechanisms for modulating multiplexing might be available at a wide range of synapse types (Mahfooz et al., 2016).

Relation to asynchronous release
The multiplexed frequency filtering hypothesis depends critically on the premise that exocytosis of reluctantly releasable vesicles is tightly synchronized to action potentials, and at least one study concluded that this is not the case at developing calyx of Held synapses (Sakaba and Neher, 2001).
However, our own experiments indicated that reluctant vesicle exocytosis at calyx of Held is tightly synchronized to action potentials at later ages (Mahfooz et al., 2016).And, raising the temperature to in the hippocampal cell culture preparation used here eliminates asynchronous release                 a key factor because of the flexibility provided by the three release site parameters.Finally, we reasoned that previously docked tethering units would need to have the capacity to re-dock to the same release site.Otherwise: Either a large number of dye-stained vesicles would be trapped within synaptic terminals during long trains of low frequency stimulation; or quickly and slowly mobilized reserves would mix on the time course of minutes.A large number of trapped vesicles is ruled out in Figure 2A and elsewhere, and mixing is ruled out in Figure 4 and Figure 9, and elsewhere.FM-dye destaining curves (Appendix 1 Figure 1) could be well fit by including as few as two types of release sites, but at least three types were required to match additionally the shortterm depression seen in synaptic strength during stimulation (Appendix 1 Figure 2).after (e).Unlike for Panel A the remaining signal was subtracted, and both time courses were re-normalized so that the baseline was . .The plot shows that the two time courses were similar, indicating that of additional rest did not alter the time course of destaining.(C) Overlay of destaining time courses during the first, second and third trains showing that the time course was essentially the same under all conditions.using the Wilcoxon rank sum method.Rejection of adequacy of fit was statistically significant for > % of individual ROIs, and typically highly significant for ROIs where signal/noise was good; the statistical significance for the individual analyzed here was < − 47.

Time (min)
-Figure Supplement 1).Because of this, the time course of bulk destaining during subsequent stimulation is likely a straightforward measure of mobilization of the vesicles that are stained and avoids complications caused by ongoing pool replenishment that are inherent to electrophysiology and synaptopHluorin imaging techniques.To asses the timing during low frequency stimulation, we monitored destaining while The time courses were quantified as the median fluorescence intensity of punctal regions of interest (ROIs; see Figure 2-Figure Supplement 3) after subtracting the signal remaining after the final train; the measurement is denoted ∕ (0) in Figure 2B.Destaining time courses were only accepted for subsequent analysis when baseline fluorescence loss was ≤ .%/ , but the time courses were not corrected for the small amount that occurred in some experiments; baseline loss could have been caused by multiple factors including spontaneous exocytosis, but likely not by photobleaching (Figure 2-Figure Supplement 4).
-Figure Supplement 6; see also Waters and Smith, 2002).That is, measurement noise prevented applying the analysis in Figure 2B-C to some of the individuals.However, Eqn 1 is mathematically equivalent to the single exponential decay: is the fluorescence intensity at the start.And, the best fitting version of Eqn 2 for each individual could be compared to the full time course of each, acquired during the full of stimulation; the best fitting version was obtained by allowing to vary freely between the individuals (see Methods and Materials).Systematic quantification of deviations from the best fit -termed residuals -allowed a higher resolution analysis because the full time courses consisted of more data points than the short intervals used to calculate fractional destaining in Figure 2C, making them less sensitive to measurement noise (see Figure 2-Figure Supplement 7 for methodology).
-Figure Supplement 1); (2) fractional destaining of the mean time course of the excluded punctae decreased by an equivalent amount during stimulation (Figure 3C, yellow circles); and

Figure 2
might have been caused by variation among individuals rather than decreases at individual synapses.Most individual ROIs, isolated punctae, and the collective behavior of populations could be fit with the weighted sum of two exponentials (Figure 2-Figure Supplement 8), although weighted sums of three or more exponentials and a variety of other functions could not be excluded.The result is consistent with models containing two or more reserve pools where the decreases in fractional destaining during stimulation would be caused by selective decrease in the number of stained vesicles in reserve pools that are mobilized quickly, leaving the remaining dye predominantly trapped in vesicles that are mobilized slowly.Box 1 illustrates this point with a scheme where the reserve pools operate in parallel.Additional experiments described below were required to rule out a serial organization and other explanations that do not involve multiple reserve pools at all.

Figure 2 -
Figure Supplement 8. Nevertheless, to test the possibility that the faster component of destaining was caused by selective depletion of readily releasable pools, we stained synapses as above with FM4-64, but this time destained first with a train of pulses followed immediately by of stimulation (diagram atop Figure 5A).The pulses at is enough to exhaust the readily releasable pools at these synapses (Stevens and Williams, 2007; Garcia-Perez et al., 2008), but did not greatly alter fractional destaining measured during the subsequent stimulation (Figure 5B, compare blue circles to green rectangles).This result confirms that the decrease in fractional destaining seen during long trains of stimulation was not caused by selective depletion of dye from readily releasable pools.For these experiments, we included a second train after a rest interval of (diagram atop Figure 5A) to test if fractional destaining would recover during rest intervals after being driven to the minimum value.No recovery was seen (compare minutes -to minutesin Figure 5B, either panel).This result confirms the conclusion from Figure 4 that decreases in fractional destaining induced by long trains of stimulation and measured during subsequent trains do not reverse quickly during rest intervals, if at all.

Figure 5 .
Nevertheless, to test this, we conducted experiments similar to those documented in Figure2, except using the FM2-10 dye, which dissociates from membranes more quickly following exocytosis than FM4-64, allowing faster clearance(Klingauf et al., 1998).Despite the faster clearance, the decrease in fractional destaining of the bulk signal during stimulation was not altered (Figure7, compare blue circles to green rectangles).The result does not rule out changes in the timing of endocytosis, but does argue that clearance was fast enough throughout our experiments to allow complete clearance of FM-dyes, even if changes occurred.As a consequence, the result argues against changes in the timing of endocytosis as the cause of the decrease in fractional destaining seen above.Notably, the results are not directly comparable to earlier studies conducted in the absence of -cyclodextrins (see Figure2-Figure Supplement 1).
synapses with FM1-43 (green) by stimulating at , which would predominantly re-stain quickly mobilized reserves based on the results in Figure 8B.For the second staining phase, we chose a duration of , which was calculated from experiments in Figure 2 so that the number of vesicles Box 2. Different rate-limiting mechanisms at 1 vs 20 Hz During 20 Hz stimulation During 1 Hz stimulation Path a is exhausted leaving only path b. fractional destaining because vesicles in a and b undergo exocytosis at the same rate.Blue in Figure2B(RRP is full) Figure9(RRP is empty)Wide arrows signify fast-releasing and narrow arrows signify reluctant readily releasable vesicles.The absence of rundown in fractional destaining when stimulating is (right panel) is in-line with parallel models, as diagrammed above, because: (1) stimulation is intense enough to quickly drive both fast-releasing and reluctantly-releasing components of the readily releasable pool (RRP) to a near-empty steady state; after which, (2) exocytosis is rate-limited by the timing of recruitment of reserve vesicles to vacant space within the RRPs(Wesseling and Lo, 2002; Garcia-Perez and Wesseling, 2008; Garcia-Perez et al., 2008;Raja et al., 2019) instead of by mechanisms that determine probability of release of already releasable vesicles; and, finally (3) the timing of recruitment is the same for fast and reluctantly releasing subdivisions (Garcia-Perez andWesseling, 2008;Mahfooz et al., 2016; see Wesseling, 2019 for a discussion of discrepancies reported for other synapse types).
et al., 2010; see Figure 9-Figure Supplement 1).However, all serial models -including single pool last-in/first-out models -would require fast mixing either between or within reserve pools during stimulation to account for the results in Figure 8B and Figure 9. And, this is ruled out, below.
Figures 2 -10.In contrast, the parallel models described by Figure1Cand in Box 2 do predict the absence of recovery in fractional destaining because the mechanism that causes the decrease during stimulation -i.e., selective depletion of dye from the quickly mobilized reserve -would quickly become fully relevant again as soon as the readily releasable pool had been replenished (i.e., within tens of seconds; Stevens andWesseling, 1998).Taken together, the results demonstrate that quickly and slowly mobilized reserve pools are processed in parallel.
-Figure Supplement 1), were both preserved at .Moreover, the time course of destaining during of stimulation was well fit with the weighted sum of two exponentials (Figure 12B), like at room temperature, and the quickly mobilized component contributed the same % (compare to Figure 2-Figure Supplement 8).This result suggests that the contents of quickly and slowly mobilized reserve pools are not altered by increasing the temperature.Unsurprisingly, the time constants of the two components were both less than at room temperature, consistent with faster vesicular recruitment from reserve to readily releasable pools (Garcia-Perez et al., 2008).The temperature results are not directly relevant to whether quickly and slowly mobilized reserves are processed in series or parallel, but may be relevant to the ongoing debate about the relationship between reluctant readily releasable vesicles and asynchronous release because asynchronous release is eliminated at (Huson et al., 2019; see Discussion).Discussion Synaptic vesicle trafficking in presynaptic terminals is central to brain function and is an increasingly important target of anti-epilepsy medicines (Lyseng-Williamson, 2011).A more detailed understanding might generate insight into the first principles underlying biological computation, and might aid second generation drug discovery (García-Pérez et al., 2015).Here we show that quickly and slowly mobilized reserve pools of vesicles are present in hippocampal synapses, and that the two types are processed in parallel, rather than in series as previously assumed.The experiments were designed to test predictions that distinguish our working model from current concepts (Figure 1D).The model emerged from two separate lines of evidence.The first line argued against the concept that mass action of reserve vesicles influences the timing of vesicle recruitment to the readily releasable pool (Stevens and Wesseling, 1999b; Garcia-Perez et al., 2008; see Miki et al., 2020 for a recent complementary type of evidence), while simultaneously supporting the often-linked concept that depletion of reserve pools is one of the mechanisms that causes short-term synaptic depression during extensive stimulation (Gabriel et al., 2011).The second line supported the concept that fast-and reluctantly-releasing readily releasable vesicles differ because they are docked to distinct types of release sites rather than because they are at distinct stages of biochemical priming (Wesseling and Lo, 2002; Garcia-Perez and Wesseling, 2008; Mahfooz et al., 2016; Raja et al., 2019; see also Hu et al., 2013; Böhme et al., 2016; Akbergenova et al., 2018; Maschi and Klyachko, 2020; Li et al., 2021; Karlocai et al., 2021; Gou et al., 2022).

Figure 2 -
Figure Supplement 6 and Figure 3-Figure Supplement 2 will nevertheless be relevant for understanding biological computation.That is, inefficient release sites that engender reluctantly releasable components of the readily releasable pool would function as high-pass/low-cut frequency filters when transmitting information encoded within presynaptic spike trains, whereas efficient release sites engendering fast-releasing components would function as low-pass/high-cut filters(Mahfooz et al., 2016).The presence of multiple types of release sites might therefore endow individual synapses with a mechanism for selectively transmitting multiple types of frequency information, analogous to multiplexing in digital information technology.The variation among synapses in the time course of changes in fractional destaining observed here during low frequency stimulation suggests that individual synapses in vivo likely contain machinery for modulating multiplexing.If so, this machinery would have the capacity

(
Huson et al., 2019), but does not alter the size or decrease mobilization of the slowly mobilized reserve pool (compare Figure 12B to Figure 2-Figure Supplement 8).

Figure 1 .Figure 2 .
Figure 3 -median or individual ROI values were: divided by the mean value of the background

Figure 2 -
Figure 2-Figure supplement 7. Procedure for calculating residuals after fitting with a single exponential.

Figure 6 .Figure 7 .
Figure 5. FM4-64 destaining during of stimulation immediately following of stimulation.Decrease in fractional destaining over time in Panel B is similar to when the initial of stimulation is omitted -green rectangles are mean ± s.e.m. from Figure 2C -ruling out selective depletion of the readily releasable pool as the cause of the decrease.Rightmost three bars are after subtracting the baseline value measured either immediately before (minute − .-) or immediately after (minute -) or both immediately before and after (minute -and minute -)stimulation.The dashed magenta line is the value expected from models with a single reserve pool where fractional destaining is constant (* is < 0.05 and *** is < 0.001 compared to the measurement during the first .of stimulation; paired t-test).

Figure 8 -
Figure 8-Figure supplement 1. Full destaining time courses for experiments in Panel B.

Figure 8 -Figure 9 .
Figure 8-Figure supplement 2. Similar amount of staining induced by at vs

Figure 11 -Figure 11 -Figure 12 .
Figure 11-Figure supplement 1. Formal control for matching Panels A & B Figure 11-Figure supplement 2. Confirmation that fractional destaining is maximal during the interleaved train in Panel D

Figure 2 -Figure 2 -
Figure 2-Figure supplement 1. Synapses were stained withof electrical stimulation in the presence of FM4-64 or FM2-10, washed, and then destained with of stimulation in the presence or absence of Captisol as diagrammed above plot to the left.The plot to the right is the semi-log plot of the same destaining time course.This experiment shows that Captisol accelerated destaining of FM4-64, but no additional acceleration was seen when the dye was FM2-10, which dissociates from membranes -fold faster.The result indicates that FM4-64 is cleared completely from vesicular membrane after a single round of exocytosis in the presence of Captisol.

Figure 2 -Figure 2 -Figure 2 -Figure 2 -Figure 2 -
Figure 2-Figure supplement 3. Graphical user interface for semi-automatic ROI detection.A value for contrast for each 2X2 pixel region of each image was calculated by subtracting the mean value of surrounding pixels from the mean value of the pixels within the region.Regions were then sorted by the change in contrast during the experiment, and regions overlapping with regions with greater change in contrast were eliminated.A threshold for the minimum change in contrast for consideration as a region of interest (ROI) was then set subjectively using the upper horizontal scroll bar beneath the image within the graphical user interface.The image is the difference calculated by subtracting the mean of destained images from the mean of images before destaining.The software has the capability of selecting background regions automatically, but, for the present study, a background region was selected by hand (magenta box).The blue circles in the plot in the "Population Statistic" box are the median ROI values vs time, and the green line is background.(A) Without displaying locations of ROIs.(B) ROIs are demarcated by yellow boxes.

Figure 3 -Figure 3 -Figure 8 -
Figure 3-Figure supplement 1. Examples of destaining at lightly stained punctae.Image is identical to Figure 3, but a different set of punctae are indicated by arrows to illustrate destaining at synapses that were initially stained more lightly.Overall, staining intensity (Δ ∕ ) before destaining at was .± .for the examples selected here compared to .± .for the selected in Figure 3. (A) Mean of median time courses of the heaviest stained quintile of individual punctae from each of the same preparations documented in Figure 3; individuals for each preparation were from the entire data set, including punctae where the slope of baseline was > .%∕ .(B) Mean of median time courses of least heavily stained quintile.(C) Fractional destaining of the median time courses from the most and least heavily stained quintiles of each preparation (* is < 0.05 and ** is < 0.01, both compared to fractional destaining during the first two minutes of stimulation; signed-rank).

Figure 11 -Figure 12 -
Figure 11-Figure supplement 1.Control showing destaining during a train following a train is equivalent after delays of and .The control is relevant to Figure 11A-C where the goal was to compare destaining during trains following a -long train to following a -long train.When designing the experiment, it was not clear if the train (i.e., in Figure 11B) should be matched in time to the beginning or to the end of the -long train (in Figure 11A).Therefore, both types of experiments were conducted and were interleaved with each other and with the experiments documented in Figure 11A.(A) After a delay of ( = 6).(B) After no delay; the full time course is replotted from Figure 11B, but the inset here pertains only to the experiments summarized by the full time course whereas the inset of Figure 11B pertains to all experiments summarized here and in Panel A.

Siksou et al., 2007; Fernández-Busnadiego et al., 2010; Cole et al., 2016; Milovanovic et al., 2018).
However, the absence of mixing does not argue against the model (see Appendix 1) because chains of vesicles might be attached to a stable cytoskeletal scaffold that would be preserved after undocking, or might reside within a liquid phase gel that prevents intermixing (e.g., . Because of this, the model did not anticipate the complete absence of recovery in fractional destaining over -long rest intervals in Figure 4.