Aberrant hippocampal Ca2+ microwaves following synapsin-dependent adeno-associated viral expression of Ca2+ indicators

Genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) such as GCaMP are invaluable tools in neuroscience to monitor neuronal activity using optical imaging. The viral transduction of GECIs is commonly used to target expression to specific brain regions, can be conveniently used with any mouse strain of interest without the need for prior crossing with a GECI mouse line, and avoids potential hazards due to the chronic expression of GECIs during development. A key requirement for monitoring neuronal activity with an indicator is that the indicator itself minimally affects activity. Here, using common adeno-associated viral (AAV) transduction procedures, we describe spatially confined aberrant Ca2+ microwaves slowly travelling through the hippocampus following expression of GCaMP6, GCaMP7, or R-CaMP1.07 driven by the synapsin promoter with AAV-dependent gene transfer in a titre-dependent fashion. Ca2+ microwaves developed in hippocampal CA1 and CA3, but not dentate gyrus nor neocortex, were typically first observed at 4 wk after viral transduction, and persisted up to at least 8 wk. The phenomenon was robust and observed across laboratories with various experimenters and setups. Our results indicate that aberrant hippocampal Ca2+ microwaves depend on the promoter and viral titre of the GECI, density of expression, as well as the targeted brain region. We used an alternative viral transduction method of GCaMP which avoids this artefact. The results show that commonly used Ca2+-indicator AAV transduction procedures can produce artefactual Ca2+ responses. Our aim is to raise awareness in the field of these artefactual transduction-induced Ca2+ microwaves, and we provide a potential solution.


Introduction
There has been an explosion in the use of imaging techniques to record neuronal activity over the past 30 y, starting with the introduction of organic calcium indicators to measure neuronal population activity (Yuste and Katz, 1991) and accelerated by rapid advances in the development of genetically encoded Ca 2+ indicators (GECIs) (Miyawaki et al., 1997).Specific advantages of neuronal Ca 2+ imaging with GECIs lie in the ability of chronic cellular scale recordings of sizeable, densely labelled neuronal or glial populations with subtype specificity, without having to perturb the cell membrane or add a synthetic chemical to the brain (Grienberger and Konnerth, 2012;Rose et al., 2014;Semyanov et al., 2020).
Commonly used GECIs such as the GCaMP family have been continually improved since their initial development (Nakai et al., 2001), offering high signal-to-noise ratio, sensitivity, and response kinetics such that they can detect single-action potentials in vivo.This allows the reporting of cellular activity as well as the activity of sub-compartments such as the dendritic arbour (Chen et al., 2013;Dana et al., 2019;Zhang et al., 2023).Typically, GCaMP is expressed using transgenic animals or adenoassociated viral (AAV) transduction techniques (Tian et al., 2012; also see Grødem et al., 2023).The use of transgenic animals has the advantage of not requiring AAV transduction, thus reducing surgery load for animals and likelihood of indicator overexpression.In contrast, AAV GECI transduction is straightforward (breeding/crossing not required), can be targeted to virtually any brain region, and typically offers enhanced fluorescence (due to higher expression levels).Furthermore, AAV transduction avoids potential hazards due to chronic GECI expression during development.
While offering unprecedented new insights into cellular-scale neuronal network dynamics, it has also been reported that GECI expression in neurons can result in unwanted side effects.Depending on the expression approach, neurons have shown reduced dendritic branching and impairment in cell health, leading to cytotoxicity and cell death (Gasterstädt et al., 2020;Resendez et al., 2016).Furthermore, increased Ca 2+ buffering due to the addition of Ca 2+ indicators has been associated with alterations in intracellular Ca 2+ dynamics (Grienberger and Konnerth, 2012;McMahon and Jackson, 2018).In addition, chronic expression of GCaMP can lead to accumulation in the nucleus and changes in gene expression (Yang et al., 2018).Again, depending on the specific expression approach, GCaMP variant, and experimental time course, such changes may alter cellular physiology and excitability.For example, increased firing rates have been observed in hippocampal neurons expressing GCaMP5G from CaMKIIa-Cre; PC::G5-tdT mice, and epileptiform activity in neocortex in some GCaMP6-expressing transgenic mice (Gee et al., 2014;Steinmetz et al., 2017).
Here, we describe microscale Ca 2+ waves that are highly confined in space and progress slowly through the hippocampus following local GCaMP or R-CaMP viral transduction.Such aberrant hippocampal waves were typically first observed 4 wk following injection of commercially available AAVs expressing GCaMP6, GCaMP7, or R-CaMP1.07 under the synapsin promoter.The phenomenon occurred upon GECI transduction in CA1 and CA3, but not in dentate gyrus (DG) nor neocortex, was robustly observed across laboratories with various experimenters and setups, and highlights the necessity of careful use of transduction methods and control measures.Reducing the transduction titre diminished the likelihood of aberrant hippocampal Ca 2+ waves, and an alternative viral transduction method employing sparser and Cre-dependent GCaMP6s expression in principal cells avoided the aberrant Ca 2+ waves.Furthermore, in three transgenic GCaMP mouse lines (thy1-GCaMP6s or 6f; Vglut1-IRES2-Cre-D × Ai162(TIT2L-GC6s-ICL-tTA2)), aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves were never observed.The aim of this article is to raise awareness in the field of artefactual transduction-induced Ca 2+ waves and encourage others to carefully evaluate their Ca 2+ indicator expression approach before embarking on chronic in vivo calcium imaging of the hippocampus.

Aberrant Ca 2+ microwave progression through the hippocampus
Based on published protocols, we injected AAV1 particles (pAAV.Syn.GCaMP6s.WPRE.SV40, Addgene #100843, titre 1 × 10¹³ vg/ml) into the hippocampus (total injection volume: 500 nl undiluted [1:1] virus solution) of C57BL/6 wildtype animals (6 weeks old) and performed in vivo two-photon imaging to record cellular activity at 2, 4, and 6-8 wk post-injection (p.i.) (Figure 1a).Viral transduction resulted in GCaMP6s expression throughout the hippocampal CA1, CA3, and DG areas under the imaging window (Figure 1b).As expected, the expression was primarily restricted to the ipsilateral hippocampus, with some labelling of projection pathways also in the contralateral hippocampus.There was no evidence of gross transduction-related morphological changes to the hippocampus (see Figure 1b), with no changes in CA1 pyramidal cell layer thickness or CA1 thickness (pyramidal layer thickness: 49 ± 12.5 µm ipsilateral and 50.3 ± 11.1 µm contralateral, n = 4, Student's t-test p=0.89;CA1 thickness: 553.3 ± 14 µm ipsilateral and 555.8 ± 62 µm contralateral, n = 4, Student's t-test p=0.94;48 ± 13 wk p.i. at the time of perfusion).At 4 wk after injection, a time point commonly used for imaging cellular activity, we observed distinctive aberrant microscale Ca 2+ waves that travelled through CA1 recruiting neighbouring cells (Figure 1c and d, Video 1, n = 4 mice).Ca 2+ microwaves were maintained up to 6-8 wk after AAV injections (Figure 1e, n = 4 mice).In wildtype mice, these Ca 2+ microwaves were not observed at an earlier time point (2 wk p.i.; p<0.05 using Kruskal-Wallis H-test for comparison between the three time points).The properties of the Ca 2+ microwaves depended on the hippocampal region and exact recording location.For instance, although the Ca 2+ waves were consistently observed in CA1, the spatial dimensions of the Ca 2+ microwaves were broader in the stratum oriens compared with stratum pyramidale of CA1 (Videos 2 [str.pyr.] and Video 3 [str.oriens]), which likely reflects concomitant neuropil activation.We next examined whether the CA1 network is particularly prone to the generation of such waves and whether they show regional specificity.Upon viral GCaMP6s transduction under synapsin, Ca 2+ waves were observed in both CA1 (n = 4/4; Videos 1-5) and CA3 (n = 1/1; Video 6), but interestingly, not in the DG (n = 3 mice, 4, 8, and 10 wk p.i., 40 min total recording time per mouse).In contrast to hippocampus, synapsin-dependent GCaMP6s expression restricted to the neocortex (V1 or somatosensory cortices) did not result in cortical Ca 2+ waves in our hands (Figure 1f, n > 20 mice).

Aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves in disease models
The observed Ca 2+ microwaves were distinct from local seizure activity (no rhythmicity, no typical ictal evolution, no postictal depression) (Masala et al., 2023;Muldoon et al., 2015;Wenzel et al., 2017;Wenzel et al., 2019a) and spreading depolarization/depression phenomena (no concentric expansion, no post-wave neural depression).However, the occurrence of these artificial events may be confused as aberrant activity related to a pathology, especially when studying pathologies with known cellular and network hyperexcitability.For example, we initially found the aberrant hippocampal Ca 2+ microwaves in the Scn2a A263V model of genetic epilepsy; however, these Ca 2+ waves in CA1 of heterozygous animals (5/5 mice) were in general similar to those detected in wildtype animals at 4 wk p.i.In the Scn2a A263V model, in one case (1/5 animals), Ca 2+ waves were observed even at 2 wk p.i. (Video 4).Furthermore, hippocampal transduction of jGCaMP7f under synapsin (Addgene #104488, AAV9 particles, original titre 2.5 × 10¹³ vg/ml, total injection volume 1000 nl [1:2 dilution]) in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (PV-Cre::APPswe/PS1dE9) also resulted in Ca 2+ microwaves (n = 3/6 mice).Together, these experiments show that common AAV injection procedures of GECIs under the synapsin promoter lead to artefactual hippocampal Ca 2+ microwaves in wildtype mice and genetic mouse models of disease.
The incidence of aberrant hippocampal Ca 2+ microwaves was robust, observed at the four different institutes each using variations of commonly used, published viral transduction procedures and standard two-photon Ca 2+ imaging protocols (Table 1; see 'Materials and methods' for more details).Importantly, aside from the targeted region, the viral titre was important as halving the original AAV1.syn.GCaMP6m viral titre decreased the number of animals that developed aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves from 80% of animals (4/5, original titre, 1 × 10¹³ vg/ml) to 43% of animals (3/7, 50% reduced titre, 0.5 × 10 13 vg/ml) (see Table 1).To statistically test the involvement of expression level, we used a generalized linear model.For injections into CA1 in the hippocampus (n = 28), a multivariate logistic GLM (Ca 2+ wave ~ dilution + p.i. wk) found both dilution and p.i. weeks were significantly related to Ca 2+ wave incidence (model deviation above null = 7.5; dilution: z score = 2.18, p<0.05; p.i. wk: z score = 2.22, p<0.05).
To examine how robust the Ca 2+ microwaves properties were, we compared properties across the different laboratories following expression of GCaMP6m and GCaMP6s variants.The occurrence rate of the aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves was similar across the different institutes (Figure 2a).Ca 2+ microwaves were spatially confined (diameter range of 200-300 µm), moved across the field of view (FOV) with slow progression speeds (speed range of 5-25 µm/s) (Figure 2b), and displayed no rhythmicity but rather plateaulike Ca 2+ activity.No statistical differences were observed in Ca 2+ microwave properties between the different institutes, suggesting that these values provide a reasonable range.In addition, the Ca 2+ microwaves were not restricted to a single GECI variant or version, with Ca 2+ waves observed following expression of GCaMP6m (n = 4), GCaMP6s (n = 5), and GCaMP7f (n = 3), as well as R-CaMP1.07 (n = 1) (Figure 2c and Table 1).
In summary, upon synapsin-promoterdependent AAV Ca 2+ indicator expression, depending on the time of expression and viral transduction titre, Ca 2+ microwaves were specifically observed in the CA1 and CA3 subregions of the hippocampus.For CA1, the Ca 2+ microwaves were observed across laboratories and countries and animal models using common transduction procedures (for an overview, see Table 1).

Discussion
Here we report titre-and expression-time-dependent aberrant hippocampal Ca 2+ microwaves in CA1 and CA3 regions following viral expression of GCaMP or R-CaMP1.07 under the synapsin promoter.These aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves robustly occurred and were observed in four different institutes each using a common viral transduction approach and standard two-photon Ca 2+ imaging protocols.
Ca 2+ microwaves were typically first detected at ~4 wk, rarely also at 2 wk, after injection.Thus, there may be a time window when Ca 2+ activity could be recorded in the absence of this artefactual phenomenon.However, we would still hesitate to use this specific approach for hippocampal imaging experiments as, although unknown from our data, more subtle alterations may occur prior to visible onset of aberrant activity.Furthermore, at sites more distal to the injection site with lower expression levels, Ca 2+ microwaves may not be observed; however, it may very well be that Ca 2+ microwaves in regions with higher expression will affect fine-scaled neuronal population dynamics in primarily unaffected neighbouring regions.
The presence of Ca 2+ microwaves was not restricted to a single GCaMP variant or version, and was observed using either GCaMP6m, GCaMP6s, or GCaMP7f.The phenomenon was also observed upon transduction of R-CaMP1.07,indicating that these aberrant hippocampal waves are not restricted to GCaMP indicators, but rather present a general phenomenon following Ca 2+ -indicator transduction.Notably, the viral transduction titre was a key factor as reducing the viral transduction titre from 1 × 10 13 vc/ml (500 nl or 1000 nl of a 1:1 undiluted virus solution) to 5 × 10 12 vc/ml (1000 nl 1:2 solution, single injection) decreased, albeit did not yet prevent, the occurrence of Ca 2+ microwaves.In the literature, hippocampal GCaMP transduction procedures in mice typically include one to several separate nearby injections, with a total volume of transduced undiluted virus ranging from 60 nl to 500 nl (Cai Table 1.Viruses used for the expression of genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs).Viral titre is from Addgene documentation and was used at original concentration (dilution of 1:1) or at a dilution of 1:2.Syn.Flex.GCaMP6s and CamKII0.4.Cre were co-injected and therefore diluted to 1:2.Two-photon Ca 2+ imaging was performed from 2 wk after injection in the hippocampus (CA1, CA3, or DG) or neocortex (Ctx).Ca 2+ microwave incidence was determined from the number of animals exhibiting Ca 2+ microwaves at the specified time point and region.et al., 2016;Jimenez et al., 2020;Keinath et al., 2022;Pettit et al., 2022;Radvansky et al., 2021;Skocek et al., 2018;Szabo et al., 2022;Weisenburger et al., 2019;Wirtshafter and Disterhoft, 2022;Zaremba et al., 2017).In other studies, syn-GCaMP virus was diluted prior to injection (up to 1:10) (Jimenez et al., 2020;Zong et al., 2022), resulting in varied transduction volumes up to 1500 nl.In our hands, a reduced viral titre of 5 × 10 12 vc/ml in a 1000 nl injection volume still resulted in aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves.Thus, viral transduction titres per volume well below this number and diluted transduction solutions are advisable for syn-GCaMP expression in the hippocampus if AAV syn-Ca 2+ -indicator transduction is desired for a planned in vivo hippocampal imaging experiment.
If possible, alternate viral GCaMP expression approaches should be chosen.As a possible alternative, similar to previous reports using dual AAV injections or AAV in Cre-driver mouse lines (Farrell et al., 2020;Grosmark et al., 2021;Mineur et al., 2022;Rolotti et al., 2022;Terada et al., 2022), we find that Cre-dependent AAV GCaMP expression (IEECR/UoB) in pyramidal neurons does not cause aberrant hippocampal Ca 2+ microwaves.Moreover, we have not observed this aberrant phenomenon in transgenic thy1-GCaMP6s or 6f mice (JAX strain 025776 or 024276) (Masala et al., 2023;Rupprecht et al., 2023;Wenzel et al., 2019b), nor in Vglut1-IRES2-Cre-D × Ai162(TIT2L-GC6s-ICL-tTA2)-D mice (JAX strains 037512, 031562).It goes beyond the scope and available resources in our laboratories to further identify which viral GCaMP transduction approaches avoid the reported phenomenon.It seems likely that the underlying mechanisms for this artefact comprise transduction titre and time period of GCaMP or R-CaMP1.07 expression, region specificity, and density of expression.Importantly, although our data suggest some regions and AAV constructs seem more prone to generate artefactual Ca 2+ waves under certain conditions, this does not mean that Ca 2+ waves cannot be generated in other regions or with other constructs or promoters.It remains unclear whether the observed phenomenon is restricted to Ca 2+ indicator viral expression in mice or whether it extends to different animal models as well.In this regard, a previous report did not observe Ca 2+ -waves in rats following synapsin-dependent GCaMP6m expression, although notably, imaging was performed under isoflurane anaesthesia (Sosulina et al., 2021).Furthermore, disentangling the exact cellular mechanisms of the phenomenon from technical aspects is difficult as, for example, the mere change in the transduction procedure will affect GECI expression level.For instance, although Ca 2+ waves were not observed following conditional expression of GCaMP with CaMKII.Cre, which may suggest a requirement for interneuronal expression, it may also simply reflect differences in final GCaMP expression density and levels between the two transduction procedures.
In the context of this study, the phenomenon of Ca 2+ microwaves is possibly related to the expression of exogenous Ca 2+ buffer and the resulting effects on Ca 2+ dynamics and gene expression (McMahon and Jackson, 2018;Rose et al., 2014;Yang et al., 2018), which may be why our findings extended across genetically encoded Ca 2+ indicators.Beyond clearly being abnormal, the exact nature of the observed Ca 2+ microwaves remains unclear and may reflect Ca 2+ influx during action potential firing or possibly Ca 2+ release from internal stores.In a limited dataset, we tried to detect the Ca 2+ microwaves by hippocampal LFP recordings (insulated tungsten wire, diameter ~110 µm).We could not identify a specific signature, for example, ictal activity or LFP depression, which may correspond to these Ca 2+ microwaves.The shortcoming of these LFP recordings is that we could not simultaneously perform hippocampal two-photon microscopy, and thus, it is uncertain whether the Ca 2+ microwaves indeed occurred in proximity to our electrode.We did not evaluate the effect of Ca 2+ microwaves on physiological activity.Based on the data presented here, it appears reasonable to hypothesize that such waves obscure if not interfere with physiological activity, for example, with hippocampal place cell activity.However, the primary purpose of this article was to inform the community about an artefact that can be avoided using alternative approaches.
In summary, this report shows that common AAV hippocampal injection procedures of Ca 2+ indicators may lead to aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves in wildtype mice and genetic mouse models of disease, particularly if high-titre virus loads are used.The aim of this article is not to discredit Ca 2+ indicators expressed under the synapsin promoter, a tool that we greatly appreciate ourselves, but to sensitize the field to artefactual transduction-induced aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves.The underlying mechanisms, some of which we have described above, are likely multifaceted.This article seeks to inform and alert others to carefully evaluate their Ca 2+ indicator expression approach for in vivo Ca 2+ imaging of the hippocampus, which is becoming increasingly popular.There is certainly a much greater number of safe alternate hippocampal Ca 2+ indicator viral expression approaches than has been reported here, and we encourage others to report on viral Ca 2+ indicator transduction safety profiles.Indeed, others have also encountered these artefactual events as recent social media posts attest (Application Specialist Team, 2023).With more indicators of brain cell activity becoming available (Ca 2+ indicators and others including voltage indicators) as well as routes for viral delivery (Grødem et al., 2023), the open and timely reporting of transduction safety profiles will reduce unnecessary animal experiments and save laboratory resources and time in future investigations into hippocampal function in health and disease.

Virus injections
For in vivo two-photon imaging experiments, GECIs were virally transduced using injection of an AAV (see Tables 1 and 2).At the time of injection, mice ranged in age from 5 to 79 wk.There was no significant relationship between the age of the animal and the incidence nor frequency of Ca 2+ microwaves during this period (linear regression fit to the Ca 2+ wave frequency against age was not significant: intercept = 1.37, slope = -0.007,p=0.62, n = 14; and generalized linear model relating Ca 2+ wave incidence ~ age was not significant: z score = 0.19, deviance above null = 0.04, p=0.85, n = 24).

At IEECR/University of Bonn
Mice (~6 wk of age) received ketoprofen (Gabrilen, Mibe; 5 mg/kg body weight [b.w.]; injection volume 0.1 ml/10 g b.w., subcutaneously [s.c.]) for analgesia and anti-inflammatory treatment 30 min prior to induction of anaesthesia.Then, mice were anaesthetized with 2-3% isoflurane in an oxygen/ air mixture (25/75%) and then placed in a stereotactic frame.Eyes were covered with eye-ointment (Bepanthen, Bayer) to prevent drying, and body temperature was maintained at 37°C using a regulated heating plate (TCAT-2LV, Physitemp) and a rectal thermal probe.After hair removal and superficial disinfection, a drop of 10% lidocaine was used to locally anaesthetize the area.After 3-5 min, a flap of skin was removed about 1 cm² around the middle of the skull.Residual soft tissue was then removed from the skull with a scraper and 3% H 2 O2/NaCl solution.After complete drying, cranial sutures served as landmarks for the determination of injection sites.For virus injection, a burr hole was carefully drilled through the skull using a dental drill, avoiding excessive heating and injury to the meninges by intermittent cooling with sterile PBS.Coordinates were, for CA1, anterioposterior (AP) measured from bregma 1.9 mm, lateral (L) specified from midline 1.6 mm, dorsoventral (DV) from the surface of the skull 1.6 mm; for DG, AP 2.4 mm; L 1.6 mm; ×3 injections at DV 2.7, 2.5, and 2.1 mm.Virus particles (see Table 1) were slowly injected (20-100 nl/min).To prevent reflux of the injected fluid upon cannula retraction, it was left in place until 5 min post-injection and then carefully lifted.

At DZNE
A more detailed procedure was described previously (Fuhrmann et al., 2015;Poll et al., 2020).Briefly, mice (6-78 wk) were anaesthetized with i.p. injection of ketamine (0.13 mg/g) and xylazine (0.01 mg/g), head-fixed using a head holder (MA-6N, Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) and placed into a motorized stereotactic frame (Luigs-Neumann, Ratingen, Germany).Body temperature was constantly controlled by a self-regulating heating pad (Fine Science Tools, Heidelberg, Germany).After skin incision and removal of the pericranium, the position of the injection 34 G cannula was determined in relation to bregma.A 0.5 mm hole was drilled through the skull (Ideal Micro Drill, World Precision

At Columbia University
A more detailed procedure was described previously (Wenzel et al., 2017;Wenzel et al., 2019a).

At University of Zurich
A more detailed procedure was described previously (Rupprecht et al., 2023).Briefly, mice (18 wk) were anaesthetized using isoflurane (5% in O 2 for induction, 1-2% for maintenance during surgery) and provided with analgesia (Metacam 5 mg/kg b.w., s.c.).Body temperature was maintained at 35-37°C using a heating pad.An incision was made into the skin after local application of lidocaine.
Viral particles (see Table 1) were injected into CA1 (coordinates AP -2.0 mm, ML -1.5 mm from bregma, DV -1.3) using a glass pipette with a manually driven syringe at a rate of approximately 50 nl/ min.The injection pipette was left in place for further 5 min before being slowly retracted.

In vivo imaging window implantation procedure
Cranial window surgery was performed to allow imaging from the dorsal hippocampal CA1/CA3 region or neocortex.

At IEECR, University of Bonn
Thirty minutes prior to induction of anaesthesia, buprenorphine was administered for analgesia (Buprenovet, Bayer; 0.05 mg/kg b.w.; injection volume 0.1 ml/20 g b.w., intraperitoneally [i.p.]).Furthermore, dexamethasone (Dexa, Jenapharm; 0.1 mg/20 g b.w.; injection volume 0.1 ml/20 g b.w., i.p.), and ketoprofen (Gabrilen, Mibe; 5 mg/kg b.w.; injection volume 0.1 ml/10 g b.w., s.c.) were applied to counteract inflammation, swelling, and pain.Mice were anaesthetized with 2-3% isoflurane in an oxygen/air mixture (25/75%) and then placed in a stereotactic frame.Eyes were covered with eye-ointment (Bepanthen, Bayer), and body temperature was maintained at 37°C by closed-loop regulation through a warming pad (TCAT-2LV, Physitemp) and a rectal thermal probe.Throughout the course of the surgical procedure, the isoflurane dose was successively reduced to about 1-1.5% at a gas flow rate of ~0.5 ml/min.A circular craniotomy (Ø ~ 3 mm) was established above the right hemisphere/hippocampus within the central opening (Ø ~ 7 mm) of the head plate using a dental drill.Cortical tissue was carefully aspirated until the alveolar fibres above CA1 could be visually identified.
A custom-made silicon cone (top Ø 3 mm, bottom Ø 2 mm, depth 1.5 mm, RTV 615, Momentive) attached to a cover glass (Ø 5 mm, thickness 0.17 mm) was inserted and fixed with dental cement around the edges of the cover glass (see Masala et al., 2023).Postoperatively, all mice received analgetic treatment by administration of buprenorphine twice daily (Buprenovet, Bayer; 0.05 mg/ kg b.w.; injection volume 0.1 ml/20 g b.w., i.p.) and ketoprofen once daily (Gabrilen, Mibe; 5 mg/kg b.w.; injection volume 0.1 ml/10 g b.w., s.c.) for three consecutive days post-surgery.Throughout this time, animals were carefully monitored twice daily.Animals typically recovered from surgery within 24-48 hr, showing normal activity and no signs of pain or distress.

At Columbia University
For neocortical imaging, directly following virus injection, the craniotomy was covered with a thin glass cover slip (3 × 3 mm, No. 0, Warner Instruments), which was fixed in place with a slim meniscus of silicon around the edge of the glass cover and finally cemented on the skull using small amounts of dental cement around the edge.For hippocampal imaging, a small area of cortex (around 1.5 × 1.5 mm) above the left CA1 was removed by gentle suction down to the external capsule, as described previously (Dombeck et al., 2010;Wenzel et al., 2019b).The site was repeatedly rinsed with sterile saline until no further bleeding could be observed.Then, a small UV-sterilized miniature glass plug (1.5 × 1.5 mm, BK7 glass, obtained from BMV Optical), glued to the centre of a thin glass coverslip (3 × 3 mm, No. 0, Warner Instruments) with UV-sensitive glue, was carefully lowered onto the external capsule until the edges of the attached glass cover touched the skull surrounding the craniotomy.Finally, the plug was fixed in place with a slim meniscus of silicon around the edge of the glass cover and by applying small amounts of dental cement around the edge of the glass cover.

At University of Zurich
A more detailed procedure was described previously (Rupprecht et al., 2023).Briefly, 2 wk after virus injection, the hippocampal window was implanted.Two layers of light-curing adhesive (iBond Total Etch, Kulzer) were applied to the exposed skull, followed by a ring of dental cement (Charisma, Kulzer).A 3-mm-diameter ring was drilled into the skull, centred at the previous injection site.The cortex in the exposed region was carefully aspirated using a vacuum pump until the stripes of the corpus callosum became visible.The corpus callosum was left intact.A cylindrical metal cannula (diameter 3 mm, height 1.2-1.3mm) attached with dental cement to a coverslip (diameter 3 mm) was carefully inserted into the cavity.The hippocampal window was fixed in place using UV-curable dental cement (Tetric EvoFlow, Ivoclar).

Two-photon Ca 2+ imaging
A variety of standard commercially available two-photon systems were used at the different institutes to record the Ca 2+ microwaves.

At IEECR, University of Bonn
A commercially available two-photon microscope was used (A1 MP, Nikon), equipped with a ×16 water-immersion objective (N.A. = 0.8, WD = 3 mm, CFI75 LWD 16X W, Nikon), and controlled using NIS-Elements software (Nikon).GCaMP6s was excited at 940 nm using a Ti:sapphire laser system (~60 fs laser pulse width; Chameleon Vision-S, Coherent).Emitted photons were collected using gated GaAsP photomultipliers (H11706-40, Hamamatsu).Several individual tif series were recorded by resonant scanning at a frame rate of 15 Hz for a total 20-40 min per imaging session.

At Columbia University
Neural population activity was recorded using a commercially available two-photon microscope (Bruker; Billerica, MA) and a Ti:sapphire laser (Chameleon Ultra II; Coherent) at 940 nm through a ×25 objective (Olympus, water immersion, N.A. 1.05).Resonant galvanometer scanning and image acquisition (frame rate 30.206fps, 512 × 512 pixels) were controlled using Prairie View Imaging software.

At University of Zurich
Neuronal population activity was recorded using a custom-built two-photon microscope (see Rupprecht et al., 2023).Briefly light from a femtosecond-pulsed laser (MaiTai, Spectra Physics; tuned to 960 nm; power below objective 40-45 mW) was used to scan the sample below a ×16 objective (Nikon, water immersion, NA 0.8).Image acquisition and scanning (frame rate 30.88 Hz, 622 × 512 pixels) were controlled using custom-written software (Chen et al., 2013).

Analysis of aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves
To remove motion artefacts, recorded movies were registered using a Lucas-Kanade model (Greenberg and Kerr, 2009) or the ImageJ plugin moco (available through the Yuste web page or https:// github.com/NTCColumbia/moco,copy archived by NTCColumbia, 2016; Dubbs et al., 2016), or in the case of R-CaMP the NoRMCorre algorithm (Pnevmatikakis and Giovannucci, 2017).
We determined the diameter of the calcium waves in a semi-automated fashion from the raw tif series.Using ImageJ software, we first drew an orthogonal line across the largest aspect of each calcium wave progressing through the FOV, which resulted in a fluorescent histogram for each wave.Using custom code (MATLAB R2020b), we further analysed all histograms for each mouse and imaging time point.First, we applied a gentle smoothing, max-normalized each histogram, and max-aligned all histograms of a given imaging session.Then, after excluding the 10% lowest fluorescent values, the width of each calcium wave and a mean value were calculated for each time point/imaging session.Finally, the resulting pixel values were converted to micrometer, based on the respective objective (@ 512 × 512 pixels and ×1 zoom: Nikon ×16, NA 0.8, 3 mm WD: 1.579 µm/pixel; Olympus ×25, NA 1.05 2 mm WD: 0.92 µm/pixel).The speed of the Ca 2+ microwaves was calculated from the duration and path length of the events visually identified and manually tracked in the FOV.

Histochemistry
To verify successful viral transduction and window position, animals were deeply anaesthetized with ketamine (80 mg/kg b.w.) and xylazine (15 mg/kg b.w.) at the end of the respective experiment.After confirming a sufficient depth of anaesthesia, mice were heart-perfused with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS.Animals were decapitated and the brain removed and stored in 4% PFA in PBS solution for 24 hr.Then, 50-100-µm-thick coronal slices of the hippocampus were cut on a vibratome (Leica).For nuclear staining, brain slices were kept for 10 min in a 1:1000 DAPI solution at room temperature.Brain slices were mounted and the green and blue channel successively imaged under an epi-fluorescence or spinning disc microscope (Visitron VisiScope).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Development of Ca 2+ microwaves travelling through hippocampus following GCaMP transduction.(a) Experimental protocol to examine CA1 neuronal activity using two-photon imaging following adeno-associated viral (AAV) transduction of genetically encoded Ca 2+ indicators.(b) Immunohistochemical sections following the last imaging session.GCaMP6s (AAV1.syn.GCaMP6s.SV40, Addgene #100843) expression throughout the ipsilateral hippocampus and projection pathways in the contralateral hippocampus.(c) Two-photon Ca 2+ imaging of field of view (FOV) in CA1 at 4 wk post-injection (p.i.) showing aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves (see also Video 1).Magnified inset shows three coloured neuronal subgroups (blue, orange, magenta) based on their spatial vicinity from a total population of 100 identified neurons (green).Right: time series of two-photon Ca 2+ imaging FOVs showing two Ca 2+ microwaves, the first at 0 s, the second appearing at 6 s (asterisk).The second wave progresses through FOV over dozens of seconds.(d) Raster plot of individual neuronal Ca 2+ activity (ΔF/F, 1 min moving window, traces max-normalized per neuron) from neighbouring subgroups (colours correspond to c).Asterisk (same as in c): a Ca 2+ microwave advances through neighbouring neuronal subgroups.(e) Occurrence rate (mean ± 95% CI) of aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves with increasing expression time, following viral transduction of AAV1.syn.GCaMP6s.SV40 in mature C57BL/6 wildtype animals (n=4).n.d.= none detected.(f) Two-photon Ca 2+ imaging FOV in the visual cortex at 6 wk p.i. (left) with normal sparse spontaneous Ca 2+ activity and no detected Ca 2+ microwaves (right; raster plot of ΔF/F, 1 min moving window, traces max-normalized per neuron).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves are consistent across laboratories and genetically encoded calcium indicator (GECI) variant.(a) Boxplot (median ± quartiles and range) of the occurrence rate of aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves in CA1 at the different institutes at 6-8 wk after injection of GCaMP6s or GCaMP6m (number of animals in parenthesis).(b) Boxplots (median ± quartiles and range) of Ca 2+ microwave diameters (left) and progression speed (right) in CA1 from each animal recorded across institutes.Inset: histogram of fluorescent intensity taken across each Ca 2+ -wave within an animal.Green line is the average, areas outside dashed lines mark 10% lowest fluorescence values, which were excluded from analysis.(c) Boxlot (median ± quartiles and range) of the occurrence rate of aberrant Ca 2+ microwaves in CA1 following injection with commonly used GECIs (number of animals in parenthesis; see Table 1).(d) Two-photon Ca 2+ imaging field of view (FOV) (left) in hippocampal CA1 following dual injection approach for conditional GCaMP6s expression (6 wk post-injection [p.i.]) with normal sparse spontaneous Ca 2+ activity and no detection of Ca 2+ microwaves (right; raster plot of ΔF/F, 1 min moving window, traces max-normalized per neuron).

Table 2 .
Viral constructs used.Instruments, Berlin, Germany).Stereotactic coordinates were taken from Franklin and Paxinos, 2008 (The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, Third Edition, Academic Press).Virus (see Table1) was injected in two loci with the following CA1 coordinates: AP 1.95 mm; L 1.5 mm; DV 1.15 mm at a speed of 100 nl/min.