Plant phenomics assembly

[erlefloch]

Hi,
This is a first version of a plant phenomics assembly page, made thanks to the contributors presenting the different tools.
I would like to talk about it at IPPS next week.
Feel free to edit or comment,
Cheers
Erwan

[bedroesb]

Good first attempt!

General comment: internal RDMkit pages are linked to by just using the page name as you will see in my suggestions. Can you also look into tagging the tools you mention in the page with the page_id you propose here

[bedroesb]

PIPPA btw is part of the Belgian page and should get tagged in the front matter of the national markdown, I don't know for PHIS ;)

[erlefloch]

PIPPA btw is part of the Belgian page and should get tagged in the front matter of the national markdown, I don't know for PHIS ;)

do you mean, PHIS should be added to the tools and resources section on the French page ?

[erlefloch]

Thanks for your feedback @bedroesb and @korbinib !
I modified the text accordingly. I also updated the tool_and_resource_list sheet, and I added the info to link to MIAPPE training material in TeSS.

[bedroesb]

PIPPA btw is part of the Belgian page and should get tagged in the front matter of the national markdown, I don't know for PHIS ;)

do you mean, PHIS should be added to the tools and resources section on the French page ?

If not already done, yes! :)

[erlefloch]

hi everyone, sorry I messed up the review requests by clicking everywhere, sorry and don't pay attention :)

[bedroesb]

@erlefloch is PHIS not build to serve the French institutes like PIPPA, or am I wrong? Otherwise I would move it out of the main tools table to the country page metadata instead of linking towards it.

[bedroesb]

I also took PIPA out of the main tools table since it is already described on our national page

[erlefloch]

@erlefloch is PHIS not build to serve the French institutes like PIPPA, or am I wrong? Otherwise I would move it out of the main tools table to the country page metadata instead of linking towards it.

From what I understood, PHIS is the name of both the software and of an instance of it. The software itself can be deployed anywhere, for example I've seen recently here that it was in use in Netherlands

[bedroesb]

@erlefloch ok fair enough! For me it looks good now.

[bedroesb]

@korbinib This page would be presented this Monday and it would be nice if a first version could be merged. I don't know If you think your comments got implemented and this disserves your approval ? :) Later on you might want to apply your tricks to include the font in the SVG

[bedroesb]

@erlefloch I just clicked on the GitHub icon on the PHIS website, and it goes to Open SILEX. Maybe PHIS is a deployment of OpenSIlex? That one for sure seems to disserve a spot in the main tools table.

[korbinib]

@bedroesb @erlefloch Thank you!

[erlefloch]

@erlefloch I just clicked on the GitHub icon on the PHIS website, and it goes to Open SILEX. Maybe PHIS is a deployment of OpenSIlex? That one for sure seems to disserve a spot in the main tools table.

Yes probably ! @cpommier what was the relationship between OpenSILEX and PHIS again ?

[bedroesb]

I am intrested in the answer for sure ;) Will upload the tools to RDMkit as they are now

[cpommier]

HI, sorry for the delayed answer and thanks a lot for your high activity :)
Opensilex is the basis software, that can be implemented in several flavors: PHIS, SIXTINE, VitisOno, etc...
Then each of those flavors are deployed on different sites.
PHIS is a flavor dedicated to high throughput phenotyping, like PIPPA, but is getting used beyond France.
If I understand the logic well, we should put forward PHIS in the general tools section as it goes beyond France. Linking this to phis website, that links to opensilex github, seems ok to me. @Isabelle-inrae could you confirm that this is fine with you ?

[cpommier]

This has ben merged ? It is therefore live now ?

[bedroesb]

@cpommier when #994 is merged it will be live in the way you described! I just wonder if it wis worthed to mention Opensilex somewhere on RDMkit. I never heard of it.

[cpommier]

Thanks @bedroesb , I saw the tool assembly online :) !
I would go toward putting forward PHIS rather than OpenSilex to avoid confusion. But that's @Isabelle-inrae call.

[Isabelle-inrae]

Hi @bedroesb, I confirm @cpommier answer; I think it's better to put PHIS forward! Thanks

[bedroesb]

Thanks for responding!