/core

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

0.18: Have `Tuple` as part of default imports? #745

Closed
jvoigtlaender opened this Issue Nov 1, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@jvoigtlaender @evancz
@jvoigtlaender
Contributor

jvoigtlaender commented Nov 1, 2016

Like List, Maybe etc. It seems odd and inconsistent with those cases that one explicitly has to write import Tuple to be able to use Tuple.first (whereas e.g. List.reverse can be used without writing import List).
@evancz

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@evancz

evancz Nov 1, 2016

Member

Yeah, I was thinking about that. I'd prefer to have this discussion on elm-dev and get feedback deeper than +1 from folks. Perhaps there are no downsides, but I'd like to see folks try to think of them at least!
Member

evancz commented Nov 1, 2016

Yeah, I was thinking about that. I'd prefer to have this discussion on elm-dev and get feedback deeper than +1 from folks. Perhaps there are no downsides, but I'd like to see folks try to think of them at least!

@evancz evancz closed this Nov 1, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment