New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Time.timestamp does not seem to satisfy the semantics implied in documentation #75

Closed
jvoigtlaender opened this Issue Jan 1, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
1 participant
@jvoigtlaender

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jvoigtlaender

jvoigtlaender Jan 1, 2015

Contributor

Also, I think the current implementation makes it possible that in:

test : Signal (Time,Time)
test = timestamp (every second)

pairs occur as value on the signal whose first and second component differ, contrary to what one would expect from the documentations of Time.every and Time.timestamp.

See this thread: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elm-discuss/KzevSWc0gfU/UO5-BQozwEUJ

Contributor

jvoigtlaender commented Jan 1, 2015

Also, I think the current implementation makes it possible that in:

test : Signal (Time,Time)
test = timestamp (every second)

pairs occur as value on the signal whose first and second component differ, contrary to what one would expect from the documentations of Time.every and Time.timestamp.

See this thread: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elm-discuss/KzevSWc0gfU/UO5-BQozwEUJ

@jvoigtlaender

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jvoigtlaender

jvoigtlaender Jan 2, 2015

Contributor

The PR #76 also fixes the above issue concerning timestamp (every second) as well as a similar issue concerning interaction between timestamp and fps/fpsWhen.

Contributor

jvoigtlaender commented Jan 2, 2015

The PR #76 also fixes the above issue concerning timestamp (every second) as well as a similar issue concerning interaction between timestamp and fps/fpsWhen.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment