Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upTime.timestamp does not seem to satisfy the semantics implied in documentation #75
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jvoigtlaender
Jan 1, 2015
Contributor
Also, I think the current implementation makes it possible that in:
test : Signal (Time,Time)
test = timestamp (every second)
pairs occur as value on the signal whose first and second component differ, contrary to what one would expect from the documentations of Time.every and Time.timestamp.
See this thread: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elm-discuss/KzevSWc0gfU/UO5-BQozwEUJ
|
Also, I think the current implementation makes it possible that in:
pairs occur as value on the signal whose first and second component differ, contrary to what one would expect from the documentations of See this thread: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elm-discuss/KzevSWc0gfU/UO5-BQozwEUJ |
jvoigtlaender
referenced this issue
Jan 2, 2015
Merged
Fix timestamp function and its interaction with every/fps/fpsWhen #76
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jvoigtlaender
Jan 2, 2015
Contributor
The PR #76 also fixes the above issue concerning timestamp (every second) as well as a similar issue concerning interaction between timestamp and fps/fpsWhen.
|
The PR #76 also fixes the above issue concerning |
jvoigtlaender commentedJan 1, 2015
See https://groups.google.com/d/msg/elm-discuss/AWx51F_WzUE/iKBdMM94JJoJ