New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support parallelism with multi-threaded model #751

Closed
abnud1 opened this Issue Nov 12, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@abnud1

abnud1 commented Nov 12, 2016

Right now core have Tasks and Processes which support concurrency (interleaving) but not parallelism.

Given that JS developers have web workers, I think elm should have an API for multithreading.

I know that web workers only got supported recently and shared web workers are still not supported in IE/Edge and Safari but this shouldn't stop Elm from adding parallelism.

If not via multithreading then some other model for parallelism ?

@process-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@process-bot

process-bot Nov 12, 2016

Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

process-bot commented Nov 12, 2016

Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

@jvoigtlaender

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@jvoigtlaender

jvoigtlaender Nov 12, 2016

Contributor

Questions/discussion like this are not the purpose if this issue tracker. Please ask on the mailing list instead.

http://elm-lang.org/community

Contributor

jvoigtlaender commented Nov 12, 2016

Questions/discussion like this are not the purpose if this issue tracker. Please ask on the mailing list instead.

http://elm-lang.org/community

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment