New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Array.map2 #767

Closed
miniBill opened this Issue Dec 1, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@miniBill

miniBill commented Dec 1, 2016

Can we get an Array.map2 function?
The signature would be (a -> b -> c) -> Array a -> Array b -> Array c

@process-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@process-bot

process-bot Dec 1, 2016

Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

process-bot commented Dec 1, 2016

Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

@rtfeldman

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@rtfeldman

rtfeldman Dec 4, 2016

Member

@miniBill This exists in http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/elm-community/array-extra/1.0.2/Array-Extra#map2 - so you can use it right now!

Whether it should be in core is a separate question, but there's a general notion of "go through community -extra packages and see if it makes sense to bring things into core" from time to time, so I don't think we need a separate issue to track this particular one as a special case. 🙂

Member

rtfeldman commented Dec 4, 2016

@miniBill This exists in http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/elm-community/array-extra/1.0.2/Array-Extra#map2 - so you can use it right now!

Whether it should be in core is a separate question, but there's a general notion of "go through community -extra packages and see if it makes sense to bring things into core" from time to time, so I don't think we need a separate issue to track this particular one as a special case. 🙂

@rtfeldman rtfeldman closed this Dec 4, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment