New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add (,) to package website documentation somehow #826

Closed
stoivo opened this Issue Jan 28, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@stoivo

stoivo commented Jan 28, 2017

I had a short chat in slack about adding (,) to the core doc even when it is a part of compiler. I saw the , and I did't know what is is doing so I search http://package.elm-lang.org/packages/elm-lang/core/latest since that one defined (::) witch looks simular, only sombols.

It is mention http://elm-lang.org/docs/syntax#applying-functions, this is the only place where I found a mention.

@process-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@process-bot

process-bot Jan 28, 2017

Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

process-bot commented Jan 28, 2017

Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

@jvoigtlaender jvoigtlaender added the docs label Jan 28, 2017

@evancz evancz changed the title from Question about doc to Add (,) to package website documentation somehow Mar 10, 2017

@evancz

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@evancz

evancz May 22, 2018

Member

It seems like this feature is neat, but also confusing and not overall worth the trouble. So this feature will be replaced by Tuple.pair : a -> b -> (a, b) in a future release, and that will appear in the package documentation like any normal function. Thank you for reporting your experience!

Member

evancz commented May 22, 2018

It seems like this feature is neat, but also confusing and not overall worth the trouble. So this feature will be replaced by Tuple.pair : a -> b -> (a, b) in a future release, and that will appear in the package documentation like any normal function. Thank you for reporting your experience!

@evancz evancz closed this May 22, 2018

@stoivo

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@stoivo

stoivo May 23, 2018

Thanks, sound good.

stoivo commented May 23, 2018

Thanks, sound good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment