Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upArray initialization Bug or Expected? #845
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
process-bot
Mar 16, 2017
Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!
Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.
process-bot
commented
Mar 16, 2017
|
Thanks for the issue! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it! Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jvoigtlaender
Mar 16, 2017
Contributor
Expected. Elm is a functional language. Values (like someArray) are immutable.
|
Expected. Elm is a functional language. Values (like someArray) are immutable. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
jvoigtlaender
Mar 16, 2017
Contributor
Lists are not any more or less manipulable than arrays in Elm. In your example, the length of tasks is still 2 after the append call.
|
Lists are not any more or less manipulable than arrays in Elm. In your example, the length of tasks is still 2 after the append call. |
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
|
Don't you want to close the issue now? |
DavidWhit commentedMar 16, 2017
•
edited
Edited 1 time
-
DavidWhit
edited Mar 16, 2017 (most recent)
Windows 7
Elm REPL 0.18
hmm ok; but then
For the above
Thanks, Dave