New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed mention of (?) operator in documentation #122

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 20, 2015

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@TheSeamau5
Contributor

TheSeamau5 commented Jan 20, 2015

The documentation for Array.get says that the ? operator from the Maybe library makes Array.get easier to use when there isn't any such operator in the Maybe library

Removed mention of (?) operator in documentation
The documentation for `Array.get` says that it is easier to use the `?` operator from the `Maybe` library when there isn't any such operator in the `Maybe` library
@evancz

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@evancz

evancz Jan 20, 2015

Member

Thanks, that got renamed to withDefault to follow the guidelines about avoiding infix ops :)

Member

evancz commented Jan 20, 2015

Thanks, that got renamed to withDefault to follow the guidelines about avoiding infix ops :)

evancz pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2015

Merge pull request #122 from TheSeamau5/patch-1
Removed mention of (?) operator in documentation

@evancz evancz merged commit 4fd26bf into elm:master Jan 20, 2015

1 check passed

continuous-integration/travis-ci The Travis CI build passed
Details
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment