Remove multi-way if usage, and use = for record updates.

[laszlopandy]

@evancz
@JoeyEremondi

[evancz]

Looks good to me, thank you!

[evancz]

Looks good to me, thank you!

[hughfdjackson]

If this change is intended for use with 0.16 is in master, should we update the elm-version in elm-package.json?

I'm failing to get master to compile on the latest version available via http://elm-lang.org/install, which I believe to be 0.15.1.

[hughfdjackson]

If this change is intended for use with 0.16 is in master, should we update the elm-version in elm-package.json?

I'm failing to get master to compile on the latest version available via http://elm-lang.org/install, which I believe to be 0.15.1.

[laszlopandy]

Yes. This is true. But I believed that we don't need to bump until we
publish a new version of core to the package repository.

On Sunday, September 6, 2015, Hugh FD Jackson notifications@github.com
wrote:

If this change is intended for use with 0.16 is in master, should we
update the elm-version in elm-package.json?

I'm failing to get master to compile on the latest version available via
http://elm-lang.org/install, which I believe to be 0.15.1.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/elm-lang/core/pull/375#issuecomment-138008751.

[laszlopandy]

Yes. This is true. But I believed that we don't need to bump until we
publish a new version of core to the package repository.

On Sunday, September 6, 2015, Hugh FD Jackson notifications@github.com
wrote:

If this change is intended for use with 0.16 is in master, should we
update the elm-version in elm-package.json?

I'm failing to get master to compile on the latest version available via
http://elm-lang.org/install, which I believe to be 0.15.1.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/elm-lang/core/pull/375#issuecomment-138008751.

[hughfdjackson]

:) From the perspective of someone looking to submit a first PR, it would be time-saving if the elm-package.json file reflected the current requirements of master. Took a little head-scratching to realise I was using the wrong compiler version.

I'm happy to bump the version requirements in a PR if you and @evancz (et. al.) are on board with that.

[hughfdjackson]

:) From the perspective of someone looking to submit a first PR, it would be time-saving if the elm-package.json file reflected the current requirements of master. Took a little head-scratching to realise I was using the wrong compiler version.

I'm happy to bump the version requirements in a PR if you and @evancz (et. al.) are on board with that.

[laszlopandy]

Makes sense to me.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Hugh FD Jackson notifications@github.com
wrote:

:) From the perspective of someone looking to submit a first PR, it would
be time-saving if the elm-package.json file reflected the current
requirements of master. Took a little head-scratching to realise I was
using the wrong compiler version.

I'm happy to bump the version requirements in a PR if you and @evancz
https://github.com/evancz (et. al.) are on board with that.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/elm-lang/core/pull/375#issuecomment-138089058.

[laszlopandy]

Makes sense to me.

On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Hugh FD Jackson notifications@github.com
wrote:

:) From the perspective of someone looking to submit a first PR, it would
be time-saving if the elm-package.json file reflected the current
requirements of master. Took a little head-scratching to realise I was
using the wrong compiler version.

I'm happy to bump the version requirements in a PR if you and @evancz
https://github.com/evancz (et. al.) are on board with that.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
https://github.com/elm-lang/core/pull/375#issuecomment-138089058.