Use List.foldr in Task.sequence

[sgillis]

Using foldl instead of a recursive function prevents that we reach the maximum call stack size when sequencing a lot of tasks.

[jvoigtlaender]

But you are returning the results in the wrong order. That is, the result list will be reversed in comparison to the current implementation.

[jvoigtlaender]

But you are returning the results in the wrong order. That is, the result list will be reversed in comparison to the current implementation.

[jvoigtlaender]

Use List.foldr instead, and you will also get a non-recursive implementation (using JavaScript looping), but retain correct semantics.

[jvoigtlaender]

Use List.foldr instead, and you will also get a non-recursive implementation (using JavaScript looping), but retain correct semantics.

[turboMaCk]

This seems like iprovement to me. Original implementation does not use tail call. What is state of this?

[turboMaCk]

This seems like iprovement to me. Original implementation does not use tail call. What is state of this?

[evancz]

I ended up merging #881 because that's the one I saw first after List.foldr was reimplemented in Elm.

[evancz]

I ended up merging #881 because that's the one I saw first after List.foldr was reimplemented in Elm.