/core

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare always with anonymous functions #650

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
from

Conversation

Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
4 participants
@willnwhite @process-bot @evancz @lukewestby
@willnwhite

willnwhite commented Jul 1, 2016

As writing an anonymous function like this is how you'd do it without always.
@process-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@process-bot

process-bot Jul 1, 2016

Thanks for the pull request! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

process-bot commented Jul 1, 2016

Thanks for the pull request! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!

Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.

@lukewestby lukewestby added the docs label Aug 20, 2016

@evancz

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@evancz

evancz Jan 23, 2017

Member

It's got something like this in the latest docs: https://github.com/elm-lang/core/blob/master/src/Basics.elm#L575-L585

Sorry for the delay. Suggestion makes sense though!
Member

evancz commented Jan 23, 2017

It's got something like this in the latest docs: https://github.com/elm-lang/core/blob/master/src/Basics.elm#L575-L585

Sorry for the delay. Suggestion makes sense though!

@evancz evancz closed this Jan 23, 2017

@willnwhite willnwhite deleted the willnwhite:patch-1 branch Jan 25, 2017

@willnwhite

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@willnwhite

willnwhite Jan 25, 2017

I have a theory this was left late because its meaning isn't clear without the file, which is in another tab. Can you attest to that?

willnwhite commented Jan 25, 2017 •
edited
Edited 1 time
  • @willnwhite willnwhite edited Jan 25, 2017 (most recent)

I have a theory this was left late because its meaning isn't clear without the file, which is in another tab. Can you attest to that?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment