Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 28 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upIn documentation, note on equality on regular expressions #848
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
This comment has been minimized.
Show comment
Hide comment
process-bot
Mar 28, 2017
Thanks for the pull request! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it!
Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind.
process-bot
commented
Mar 28, 2017
|
Thanks for the pull request! Make sure it satisfies this checklist. My human colleagues will appreciate it! Here is what to expect next, and if anyone wants to comment, keep these things in mind. |
evancz
added
the
docs
label
Jul 16, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
jvoigtlaender commentedMar 28, 2017
Equality (
==) does not work properly onRegexes, but this is not currently warned against in the documentation.See an example issue https://github.com/elm-lang/core/issues/839 where this came up.
This pull request expands an existing note on types for which
==should not be used, to include mention ofRegex.