/TCP-32764

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cisco WRVS4400N #36

Closed
tomtok9 opened this Issue Jan 3, 2014 · 6 comments

Comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
4 participants
@tomtok9 @elvanderb @dualglass @robelix
@tomtok9

tomtok9 commented Jan 3, 2014

Cisco WRVS4400N

Firmware Version: V2.0.2.1-ETSI

NAMP Intense scan.
I cant see anything. I hope it helps.

2014-01-03_19h59_25
@elvanderb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@elvanderb

elvanderb Jan 3, 2014

Owner

thank you :)
Owner

elvanderb commented Jan 3, 2014

thank you :)

@elvanderb elvanderb closed this Jan 3, 2014

@dualglass

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@dualglass

dualglass Jan 3, 2014

I have this router it is vulnerable!

Also I incorrectly report it as a Linksys product. I went and checked and it is labeled as a Cisco product. Sorry about that.

dualglass commented Jan 3, 2014

I have this router it is vulnerable!

Also I incorrectly report it as a Linksys product. I went and checked and it is labeled as a Cisco product. Sorry about that.
@tomtok9

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tomtok9

tomtok9 Jan 3, 2014

As i remember there is a cisco and a linksys version of it but im not sure.
Yes i have seen your Report and i was a little scared because i have the same one.
But mine seems not to be vulnerable, now im a little bit confused.
It could be that i testet it wrong.
I just ran a Zenmap (nmap on Windows) intense scan with the result i postet.
I also testet a older Firmware 2.0.1.3 with the same result.

I checked the purchase date and I bought mine router back in jan 2011.

tomtok9 commented Jan 3, 2014

As i remember there is a cisco and a linksys version of it but im not sure.
Yes i have seen your Report and i was a little scared because i have the same one.
But mine seems not to be vulnerable, now im a little bit confused.
It could be that i testet it wrong.
I just ran a Zenmap (nmap on Windows) intense scan with the result i postet.
I also testet a older Firmware 2.0.1.3 with the same result.

I checked the purchase date and I bought mine router back in jan 2011.
@robelix

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@robelix

robelix Jan 4, 2014

Cisco WRVS4400N V2.0.1.3-ETSI

vulnerable. But at least only from LAN, not from WAN

robelix commented Jan 4, 2014

Cisco WRVS4400N V2.0.1.3-ETSI

vulnerable. But at least only from LAN, not from WAN
@tomtok9

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tomtok9

tomtok9 Jan 4, 2014

I testet it wrong yesterday, its vulnerable.
Only from lan like robelix said.

tomtok9 commented Jan 4, 2014

I testet it wrong yesterday, its vulnerable.
Only from lan like robelix said.
@elvanderb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@elvanderb

elvanderb Jan 4, 2014

Owner

OKOK, updated :)
Thank you all for taking the time to test this issue :)
Owner

elvanderb commented Jan 4, 2014

OKOK, updated :)
Thank you all for taking the time to test this issue :)

@dualglass dualglass referenced this issue Jan 4, 2014

Closed

Sorted vulnerable routers #52

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment