specs for the steps_generator #76

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into
from

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@alexrothenberg
  • Also updated bundle to rails 3.0.0 and rspec 2.6.0
specs for the steps_generator
* Also updated bundle to rails 3.0.0 and rspec 2.6.0

bmabey added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2012

@bmabey

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@bmabey

bmabey Apr 8, 2012

Collaborator

Hi Alex, sorry I never saw/merged this pull request in. Since your patch no longer cleanly applies I tried making the changes again (see the commit link above) but it is erroring out with:

/Users/bmabey/Programming/ruby/email-spec/spec/generators/steps/steps_generator_spec.rb:8:in `block in <top (required)>': undefined method `destination' for #<Class:0x0000010389d538> (NoMethodError)
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:201:in `module_eval'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:201:in `subclass'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:187:in `describe'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/dsl.rb:18:in `describe'
    from /Users/bmabey/Programming/ruby/email-spec/spec/generators/steps/steps_generator_spec.rb:6:in `<top (required)>'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:235:in `load'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:235:in `block in load'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:225:in `block in load_dependency'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:596:in `new_constants_in'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:225:in `load_dependency'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:235:in `load'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:746:in `block in load_spec_files'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:746:in `map'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:746:in `load_spec_files'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:22:in `run'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:69:in `run'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun'
rake aborted!

I'm more than happy to merge this in if you can help me resolve this. Thanks!

Collaborator

bmabey commented Apr 8, 2012

Hi Alex, sorry I never saw/merged this pull request in. Since your patch no longer cleanly applies I tried making the changes again (see the commit link above) but it is erroring out with:

/Users/bmabey/Programming/ruby/email-spec/spec/generators/steps/steps_generator_spec.rb:8:in `block in <top (required)>': undefined method `destination' for #<Class:0x0000010389d538> (NoMethodError)
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:201:in `module_eval'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:201:in `subclass'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/example_group.rb:187:in `describe'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/dsl.rb:18:in `describe'
    from /Users/bmabey/Programming/ruby/email-spec/spec/generators/steps/steps_generator_spec.rb:6:in `<top (required)>'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:235:in `load'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:235:in `block in load'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:225:in `block in load_dependency'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:596:in `new_constants_in'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:225:in `load_dependency'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/activesupport-3.0.7/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:235:in `load'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:746:in `block in load_spec_files'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:746:in `map'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/configuration.rb:746:in `load_spec_files'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/command_line.rb:22:in `run'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:69:in `run'
    from /Users/bmabey/Developer/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290/gems/rspec-core-2.9.0/lib/rspec/core/runner.rb:10:in `block in autorun'
rake aborted!

I'm more than happy to merge this in if you can help me resolve this. Thanks!

@alexrothenberg

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment Hide comment
@alexrothenberg

alexrothenberg Apr 8, 2012

Closing this pull (but not the issue) as I submitted a new pull #99 that will merge off latest code.

Closing this pull (but not the issue) as I submitted a new pull #99 that will merge off latest code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment