Skip to content
This repository

Cannot observe changes to nested properties on array using @each #541

Closed
robharper opened this Issue February 27, 2012 · 34 comments
Rob Harper

Adding an observer on a nested property of objects within a collection does not reliably fire. I've created a test case that could be added to ember-runtime/tests/mixins/array_test.js that illustrates this. Observing a nested property on the EachProxy itself appears to work fine. However, observing the property using @each.nest.isDone does not.

In the following test, count1 is incremented to 1, count2 is not:

test('modifying nested contents of an object in an array should call @each observers', function() {
  var ary = new TestArray([
      Em.Object.create({ nest: Em.Object.create({ isDone: false}) }),
      Em.Object.create({ nest: Em.Object.create({ isDone: false}) }),
      Em.Object.create({ nest: Em.Object.create({ isDone: false}) }),
      Em.Object.create({ nest: Em.Object.create({ isDone: false}) })
    ]);

  var get = Ember.get, set = Ember.set;
  var count1 = 0, count2 = 0;

  // Works
  var each = get(ary, '@each');
  Ember.addObserver(each, 'nest.isDone', function() { count1++; });

  // Doesn't work
  Ember.addObserver(ary, '@each.nest.isDone', function() { count2++; });

  count1 = count2 = 0;
  var item = ary.objectAt(2);
  get(item, 'nest').set('isDone', true);

  equal(count1, 1, '@each.nest.isDone should have notified - observing @each array');
  equal(count2, 1, '@each.nest.isDone should have notified - observing chain containing @each');
});
Peter Wagenet
Owner

@each is only supported one level deep. It would be nice to allow more, but I don't know how difficult this would be technically. I'll let @wycats or @tomdale chime in on this.

Yehuda Katz
Owner

I don't think that's actually true... It uses the normal chain infrastructure and should work arbitrarily many levels deep.

Peter Wagenet
Owner

@wycats This sounds like a bug then. I've never seen it work more than one level deep.

Tom Dale
Owner

Agreed, this sounds like a bug. I believe this was working at some point. Thank you for the unit test.

Christopher Swasey

So I've been puzzling through this. It seems to boil down to EachProxy handling setting up the observers internally when you call addObserver with itself as the root. When as part of a chained path, however, the ChainNode plucks the top-level keyname off of the EachProxy, and goes on its merry way, and the EachProxy never gets involved. Basically, there are two levels of arrays at play.

watching '@each.nest.@each.isDone' DOES work, in this instance.

Christopher Swasey

Forgot to clarify that when the ChainNode plucks the keyname off the EachProxy, it's getting an EachArray, hence the need for nesting the @ each observers.

Kris Selden
Owner

The way chains work is each chain node has a corresponding chainWatcher that watches the key on the node's parent's value(), in order for this to work the chain needs to stop at @each and setup the chainWatcher with the remaining path.

I'm considering special casing @ character to just mean this.

Peter Wagenet
Owner

@kselden, does your simplify-properties branch touch on this at all?

Peter Wagenet
Owner

Looks like this is still an issue.

Kris Selden
Owner

chains do not chain through properties that produce arrays, this requires some changes I stated above, no I haven't done any work on it. It also is problematic @each itself changes when the array does.

Tony Pitale

I've hacked around this, for anyone that is facing this issue (especially when using ember-data associations), by adding a property on one side of the association that checks the property in the other end of the association (in my case, isLoaded) and then using that after the @each. As I said, this is a hack. But until 1.1, it works for me.

Piotr Sarnacki

@tpitale: could you show an example of such hack? I'm not sure what you mean by adding a property on other side of association.

@kselden @wagenet: I encountered something similar recently, but frankly I'm not sure if this is the same bug, could you take a look at this fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/uErrd/4/ ?

Tony Pitale

@drogus given the original example, there would be a nestIsDone property for the path nest.isDone. So you could observe @each.nestIsDone.

Michael

would really love to see this in 1.0 not 1.1 :+1:

Peter Wagenet
Owner

@mspisars Me too, but I don't want to block 1.0 on things that are difficult to fix and non-essential.

Jakub Arnold

last activity 4 months ago ... :+1:

Peter Wagenet
Owner

@mspisars, @darthdeus I would love to see it in 1.0 too. The issue is not about desire, it's about ability.

phammer

:+1: for 1.0: would be really useful to have this working.

Peter

:+1: for 1.0

Peter Wagenet
Owner

Public Service Announcement: +1s do not provide development resources where they are lacking.

We've already agreed that we'd love to have this feature but it's very much non-trivial to support. It's certainly not something we'll block 1.0 on.

Christopher Swasey

Agreed with @wagenet these are non-trivial code paths that touch mission critical parts of ember.

HWest
HWest commented May 15, 2013

Any updates on this? We have been trying to use this for a web app that's about to be used by a major Hotel chain and none of the workarounds seem to work. The only workable solution at this point is to redesign this part of the interface to make it simpler which is a shame.
Any information would be greatly appreciated and thanks for all your great work.

Jo Liss
joliss commented May 15, 2013

It's a surprisingly hard problem. Part of the issue is that even if you implemented it or worked around it, updating a dependent array (which seems to be be the most common use case) would take O(n**2) time, which is a big problem even for fairly small datasets. To get it to be O(n), we'd need smarter array primitives to compose dependent arrays. There has been some work on this by Peter and others, and people are definitely interested in pushing it forward, but I wouldn't hold my breath.

Related: #1288, #2711.

For now I'd recommend generating the dependent arrays on the server, basically as "computed relationships".

Tim Evans

Here's another fiddle demonstrating this issue: http://jsfiddle.net/3bGN4/268.

meelash

Example workaround, demonstrating nested @each:

https://gist.github.com/meelash/5785328

Dan de Havilland

If this is on the backburner, it would be helpful to note this behaviour in the API docs (maybe I missed it?) as it took me a while to find this ticket.

Krutius

@dandehavilland Exactly! It should definitly be noted here: 'http://emberjs.com/guides/object-model/computed-properties-and-aggregate-data/'. "@each.goo.bar" is still not working, i've needed days to find this out.

kingpin2k

But technically you can view nested properties, just not nested collections of properties, right?

works - flagpole and flag are singular

    schools.@each.flagpole.@each.flag

but should be

    schools.@each.flagpole.flag

** doesn't work - flags is a collection**

    schools.@each.flags.@each.flag 
Jo Liss

@kingpin2k No, I don't believe any of those work. They won't update correctly.

[Edit: maybe I'm wrong]

kingpin2k

@joliss here's a jsbin showing it. http://jsbin.com/IXalezO/11/edit

Peter Wagenet
Owner

@kselden is this something you're likely to work on any time soon?

Peter Wagenet wagenet closed this November 08, 2013
Peter Wagenet
Owner

This is documented as not working. It would be great to add, but it's obviously difficult / not high enough a priority. If someone wants to work on it, we'd be happy to review a PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.