Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Image Page Manipulation #284

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Apr 19, 2016
Merged

Image Page Manipulation #284

merged 8 commits into from Apr 19, 2016

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Apr 15, 2016

This adds support for manipulating the virtual canvas of Images using object accessors (that call underlying C functions MagickImageGetPage and MagickImageSetPage). Both 4-tuple and individual item accessors are added.

It also fixes a previous limitation in the unit tests. The only testable difference between the Merge and Mosaic methods of merging layers is how they handle images with negative page offsets. This feature adds support for testing that difference, so the unit tests have been updated accordingly.

@coveralls
Copy link

@coveralls coveralls commented Apr 15, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 85.444% when pulling b4b8017 on nixscripter:feature/image-page-manipulation into ddb549f on dahlia:master.

@dahlia
Copy link
Collaborator

@dahlia dahlia commented Apr 16, 2016

Thanks for your effort! Could you add a changelog about this? See also docs/changes.rst file.

@coveralls
Copy link

@coveralls coveralls commented Apr 19, 2016

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 85.352% when pulling aa50c2f on nixscripter:feature/image-page-manipulation into ddb549f on dahlia:master.

@dahlia dahlia merged commit 780229c into emcconville:master Apr 19, 2016
2 checks passed
2 checks passed
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details
coverage/coveralls Coverage increased (+0.07%) to 85.352%
Details
@dahlia
Copy link
Collaborator

@dahlia dahlia commented Apr 19, 2016

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants