From 3061c6e39a40915a2b333378228917187423b2e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nick Johnson Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 12:24:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update faq.rst --- docs/faq.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/faq.rst b/docs/faq.rst index 3df63791..d9dd4cb2 100644 --- a/docs/faq.rst +++ b/docs/faq.rst @@ -110,4 +110,4 @@ Just like the current model, this “fee” would not go to the Ethereum Foundat Another very possible option creating some sort of dispute resolution process for names, to ensure the “principle of least surprise” but this is a controversial idea and there are no clear ideas on how this process could be achieved in a fair way without risks of centralization and abuse of power. -:: _here : https://github.com/ethereum/ens/blob/13f3aa431f1e90ace80c510251a906f018fc7cc1/contracts/HashRegistrarSimplified.sol#L263 +.. _here : https://github.com/ethereum/ens/blob/13f3aa431f1e90ace80c510251a906f018fc7cc1/contracts/HashRegistrarSimplified.sol#L263