Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fuzzy dark matter #61

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from
Closed

fuzzy dark matter #61

wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

@suniverse
Copy link

@suniverse suniverse commented Jun 8, 2019

Add module to evolve fuzzy dark matter as well as test problems.

Xinyu Li and others added 22 commits Nov 20, 2016
…new refinement criteria

--HG--
branch : Fuzzy Dark Matter
--HG--
branch : Fuzzy Dark Matter
--HG--
branch : Fuzzy Dark Matter
…nement criteria

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
…ment. Correct bugs in velocity divergence refinement.

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
… scale refinement using NumberofFlaggedCells, remove MaximumCurrentLevel

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
…ed to SecondOrderB and only change density interpolation in the Grid_InterpolateBoundaryFromParent.C

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
…w only updates velocity with acceleration and other artificial viscosity terms

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
…ve for sqrt of density

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
@gregbryan gregbryan self-requested a review Jun 10, 2019
src/enzo/Grid_DepositBaryons.C Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
src/enzo/Grid_DepositBaryons.C Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
run/CosmologySimulation/dm_only/dm_only.enzo Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
src/enzo/Grid_ComputeTimeStep.C Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
src/enzo/FDMCollapse.C Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
@jwise77
Copy link
Contributor

@jwise77 jwise77 commented Jun 10, 2019

The following files should be stripped (rewriting history, see this link) from the repository because they are generated by the compilation process.

src/enzo/DEPEND
src/enzo/Make.config.override
bin/enzo
src/P-GroupFinder/DEPEND
src/anyl/DEPEND
src/enzo/out.make.DEPEND
src/enzohop/DEPEND
src/inits/DEPEND
src/ring/DEPEND

Loading

src/enzo/Grid_FDMCollapse.C Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
src/enzo/FDMCollapse.C Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
for (int i=0; i<size; i++){
d[i] = repsi[i]*repsi[i]+impsi[i]*impsi[i];
/*
// add a few dissipation, dens acts as absorbing layer, only work for FDMCollapse !!
Copy link
Contributor

@aemerick aemerick Jun 10, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this commented section be switched to a flag checking if the simulation problem type is FDMCollapse vs. Cosmology?

Loading

src/enzo/LightBosonInitialize.C Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
src/enzo/LightBosonInitialize.C Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
src/enzo/Make.mach.CCA-cluster Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
src/enzo/QuantumGetUnits.C Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
src/enzo/select_fft.F90 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Loading
@jwise77
Copy link
Contributor

@jwise77 jwise77 commented Jun 13, 2019

Any progress on stripping the unnecessary files? Also pinging @gregbryan

Loading

@suniverse
Copy link
Author

@suniverse suniverse commented Jun 13, 2019

@jwise77 Would you please tell me how to do the stripping? Have no clue

Loading

@gregbryan
Copy link
Contributor

@gregbryan gregbryan commented Jun 13, 2019

I'm working on it right now, and will post what I did.

Loading

@gregbryan
Copy link
Contributor

@gregbryan gregbryan commented Jun 19, 2019

I ended up having a lot of trouble stripping out some of the changes (particularly since this was not my repo) -- rather than continue to fight filter-branch, I just created a fresh PR (#82). I think this one should be closed and that reviewed (it includes all changes made and suggested here).

Loading

@gregbryan
Copy link
Contributor

@gregbryan gregbryan commented Jun 25, 2019

This request is being decline in favor of PR #82 which contains the same code but without the unnecessary files (and other issues).

Loading

@gregbryan gregbryan closed this Jun 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants