Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fuzzy dark matter #61

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

@suniverse
Copy link

commented Jun 8, 2019

Add module to evolve fuzzy dark matter as well as test problems.

Xinyu Li and others added some commits Nov 20, 2016

Xinyu Li
Add Fuzzy Dark Matter solver and test problem, modify time step, and …
…new refinement criteria

--HG--
branch : Fuzzy Dark Matter
Xinyu Li
Modify the parameter for the FDM test problem
--HG--
branch : Fuzzy Dark Matter
Xinyu Li
Closed branch Fuzzy Dark Matter
--HG--
branch : Fuzzy Dark Matter
Xinyu Li
add fuzzy dark matter solver, test problem, modify time step and refi…
…nement criteria

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
Xinyu Li
Limit the velocity divergence refinement to below Jean’s scale refine…
…ment. Correct bugs in velocity divergence refinement.

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
Xinyu Li
Modify the method to limit the velocity refinement level below Jean’s…
… scale refinement using NumberofFlaggedCells, remove MaximumCurrentLevel

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
Xinyu Li
Add Artificial Viscosity to FDM solver; modified interpolation is mov…
…ed to SecondOrderB and only change density interpolation in the Grid_InterpolateBoundaryFromParent.C

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
Xinyu Li
move computation of quantum pressure to a single function, ZeusFDM no…
…w only updates velocity with acceleration and other artificial viscosity terms

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
Xinyu Li
clean some code and change a better name to refine 2nd order derivati…
…ve for sqrt of density

--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
Xinyu Li
delete some commented lines compared with last version
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
Xinyu Li
RK-4 Schrondinger Solver, Add new problems
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
Xinyu Li
Add new files
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
baryons added
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
May 2019
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
May 2019
--HG--
branch : fuzzy_dark_matter
xinyu
xinyu
xinyu

@gregbryan gregbryan self-requested a review Jun 10, 2019

Show resolved Hide resolved src/enzo/FDMCollapse.C Outdated
@jwise77

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 10, 2019

The following files should be stripped (rewriting history, see this link) from the repository because they are generated by the compilation process.

src/enzo/DEPEND
src/enzo/Make.config.override
bin/enzo
src/P-GroupFinder/DEPEND
src/anyl/DEPEND
src/enzo/out.make.DEPEND
src/enzohop/DEPEND
src/inits/DEPEND
src/ring/DEPEND
Show resolved Hide resolved src/enzo/Grid_FDMCollapse.C Outdated
Show resolved Hide resolved src/enzo/FDMCollapse.C Outdated
for (int i=0; i<size; i++){
d[i] = repsi[i]*repsi[i]+impsi[i]*impsi[i];
/*
// add a few dissipation, dens acts as absorbing layer, only work for FDMCollapse !!

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
@aemerick

aemerick Jun 10, 2019

Contributor

Should this commented section be switched to a flag checking if the simulation problem type is FDMCollapse vs. Cosmology?

Show resolved Hide resolved src/enzo/select_fft.F90 Outdated
xinyu
@jwise77

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 13, 2019

Any progress on stripping the unnecessary files? Also pinging @gregbryan

@suniverse

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

commented Jun 13, 2019

@jwise77 Would you please tell me how to do the stripping? Have no clue

@gregbryan

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 13, 2019

I'm working on it right now, and will post what I did.

@gregbryan

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 19, 2019

I ended up having a lot of trouble stripping out some of the changes (particularly since this was not my repo) -- rather than continue to fight filter-branch, I just created a fresh PR (#82). I think this one should be closed and that reviewed (it includes all changes made and suggested here).

@gregbryan

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

commented Jun 25, 2019

This request is being decline in favor of PR #82 which contains the same code but without the unnecessary files (and other issues).

@gregbryan gregbryan closed this Jun 25, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.