JavaScript Other
Switch branches/tags
Nothing to show
Clone or download
Latest commit e7e0b7a Apr 2, 2018

Ember runloop handbook

by Eoin Kelly

Creative Commons License

Table of contents


If you spot any of the (sadly inevitable) errors you would be doing me a great favour by opening an issue :-).


You can get started with Ember application development without understanding the runloop. However at some point you will want to dig in and understand it properly so you can use it skillfully. It is my sincere hope that this handbook can be your guide.

We are about to take a deep dive into the Ember.js runloop. Together we will answer these questions:

  1. Why does Ember have this runloop thing?
  2. What is the runloop?
  3. How can we use it skillfully?

This is not reference documentation - the Ember API docs have that nicely covered. This isn't even the "I'm an experienced dev, just give me the concepts in a succinct way" documentation - the Official Ember Run-loop guide has that covered. This is a longer, more detailed look at the runloop.

Naming is hard

As you learn more about the Ember runloop you will come to understand that, well, it just isn't very loopish. The name is a bit unfortunate as it implies that there is a single instance of the runloop sitting somewhere in memory looping endlessly running things. As we will see soon this is not true.

In alternate universes the runloop might have been named:

  • Ember Work Queues
  • Ember Coordinated Work Algorithm
  • Ember Job Scheduler
  • Runelope (a large friendly creature that lives in your Javascript VM and manages the work Ember does in response to events)

OK some of those names are really terrible (except Runelope of course, that one is pure gold and should be immediately pushed to Ember master). Naming is a hard problem and hindsight is 20/20. The runloop is what we have so that is what we will call it but try not to infer too much about its action from its name.

Why do we have a runloop?

On our journey to understand the runloop we must first understand the environment it lives in and the problems it is trying to solve. Lets set the scene by refreshing a few fundementals about how Javascript runs. (If you are an experienced Javascript developer you may want to just skip this part)

Our story begins with when the browser sends a request to the server and the server sends HTML back as a response.

The browser then parses this HTML response. Every time it finds a script it executes it immediately(*) Lets call this the setup phase. This setup phase happens well before the user sees any content or gets a chance to interact with the DOM. Once a script is finished executing the browser never runs it again.

(*) Things like defer tweak this somewhat but this is a useful simplification.

The browser does most of its communication with Javascript by sending "events". Usually these are created in response to some action from one of:

  1. The user e.g. moves their mouse (mousemove)
  2. The network e.g. an asset has been loaded on the page (load)
  3. Internal timers e.g. a particular timer has completed

However there are a few events that the browser generates itself to tell Javascript about some important event in the lifecycle of the page. The most widely used of these is DOMContentLoaded which tells Javascript that the HTML has been fully parsed and the DOM (the memory structure the browser builds by parsing the HTML) is complete. This is significant for Javascript because it does most of its setup work in response to this event.

Javascript is lazy but well prepared! During the setup phase, Javascript prepared its work space (or mise en place if you prefer) - it created the objects it would now need to respond to orders (events) from the browser and also told the browser in detail what events it cares about e.g.

Hey browser, wake me up and run this function I'm giving you whenever the user clicks on an element with an id attribute of do-stuff.

The description above makes it look like the browser is the one giving all the orders but the browser is a team player and has a few things it can do to help Javascript get the job done:

  1. Timers. Javascript can use the browser like an alarm clock:

    Javascript: Hey browser, wake me up and run this function I'm giving you in 5 seconds please.

  2. Talking to other systems. If Javascript needs to send or receive data to other computers it asks the browser to do it:

    Javascript: Hey browser, I want to get whatever data is at please.

    Browser: Sure thing but it might take a while. What do you want me to do when it comes back?

    Javascript: I have two functions ready to go (one for a successful data fetch and one for a failure) so just wake me up and run the appropriate one when you finish.

    Browser: cool.

We usually refer to this talking to other systems stuff as Web APIs e.g.

  • XHR (AJAX) requests
  • Web workers
  • etc.

Javascript can use these services of the browser both during the setup phase and afterwards. For example part of the Javascript response to a "click" event on a certain element might be to retrieve some data from the network and also schedule a timer to do some future work.

We now know enough to see the pattern of how javascript and the browser interact and to understand the two phases:

  1. In the short setup phase the browser runs each script it finds on the page from start to finish. Javascript uses this as time to do some preparation for next phase.
  2. Javascript spends most of its life responding to events. Many events come from the user but Javascript can also schedule events for itself by using the many services (web APIs) that the browser provides.

A solid understanding of this stuff is required to understand the runloop so if you are unclear about any of this and want to dig a little deeper I recommend a wonderful video by Philip Roberts at Scotland JS that goes into the Javascript event loop in more detail. It is a short watch and includes a few "aha!"-inducing diagrams.

Enter the Ember!

Things we already know

Since Ember is Javascript we already know quite a bit about how Ember works:

  • Apart from when the code is first found, all Ember framework and application code is run in response to "events" from the browser.
  • The DOMContentLoaded event is significant in the life of an Ember app. It tells Ember that it now has a full DOM to play with. Ember will do most of its "setup work" (registering for event listeners etc.) in response to this event.
  • Your Ember app can schedule its own events by asking the browser to do some work on its behalf (e.g. AJAX requests) or simply by asking the browser to be its alarm clock (e.g. setTimeout)

Where does the framework end and my app begin

How does your Ember application relate to the Ember framework? The machinery for responding to events is part of Ember framework itself but it does not have a meaningful response without your application code.

For example if the user is on /#/blog/posts and clicks a link to go to /#/authors/shelly the Ember framework will receive the click event but it won't be able to do anything meaningful with it without:

  1. A Router map to tell it how to understand the URL
  2. The Route objects themselves e.g. BlogRoute, PostsRoute, AuthorsRoute
  3. The models, controllers, views that all play a part in putting new data on the screen

What events does Ember listen to?

The Ember docs have a list of events Ember listens for by default which I have repeated here:

  1. touchStart
  2. touchMove
  3. touchEnd
  4. touchCancel
  5. keyDown
  6. keyUp
  7. keyPress
  8. mouseDown
  9. mouseUp
  10. contextMenu
  11. click
  12. doubleClick
  13. mouseMove
  14. mouseEnter
  15. mouseLeave
  16. submit
  17. change
  18. focusIn
  19. focusOut
  20. input
  21. dragStart
  22. drag
  23. dragEnter
  24. dragLeave
  25. dragOver
  26. dragEnd
  27. drop

These are the entry points into our code. Whenever Ember code runs after the setup phase, it is in response to an event from this list.

How ember listens for events

This is a good resource for refreshing your understanding of how DOM events work. To get the most of the following discussion you should be familiar with how the browser propagates events and what the phrases "capturing phase" and "bubbling phase" mean.

Ember registers listeners for these events similarly to how we might do it ourselves with jQuery i.e.

  • Ember attaches all its listeneners to a single element in the DOM.
  • This element is usually <body>. If you specify a rootElement then that will be used instead.
  • Ember attaches its listeners to the "bubbling" phase.

Example: A simplistic approach

The pattern of how Javascript (Ember) works is periods of intense activity in response to some event followed by idleness until the next event happens. Lets dig a little deeper into these periods of intense activity.

We already know that the first code to get run in response to an event is the listener function that Ember registered with the browser. What happens after that?

Lets consider some code from an imaginary simple Javascript app:,js,console,output

This code manages the "Mark all completed" button in the UI.

Click the button a few times and notice the console output. Notice that there are some patterns to the tasks performed:

  1. Updating the model
  2. Updating the DOM (rendering)

and that the do work as you find it approach that this app takes causes these different types of work to be interleaved.

The code in this app is obviously very incomplete and I'm sure you can see many ways it could be improved. However there are some problems that might not be obvious at first, problems that you will only start to notice when the app grows in complexity. To understand these lets look at what it is not doing:

  1. It is not coordinating its access of the DOM. Every time the app updates the DOM the browser does a layout and paint. These are very expensive operations especially on mobile devices.
  2. It has no way of telling us when DOM updating is finished. We can certainly hook into the click handler for the "Mark all completed" button but what if had started some asynchronous work like updating the server? If this app was more realistic it would be very difficult to know where we should add code that would be run when all DOM updates had finished.
  3. It is not controlling when objects get deleted. Currently our app is so trivial that this is not a problem but imagine if we had hundreds of todo items and complex processing of each one i.e. processing each todo item created a lot of temporary objects in memory. After a while the browser will decide that enough is enough and that it needs to "clean up" these objects and make their memory available again i.e. it will run garbage collection. Since our app cannot run while GC is happening the user may notice a pause.

Together these problems mean our simplistic Todo app will have serious scaling problems.

Enter the runloop

We have identified some problems caused by an uncoordinated approach to doing work. How does Ember solve them?

Instead of doing work as it finds it, Ember schedules the work on an internal set of queues. By default Ember has six queues:

// ["sync", "actions", "routerTransitions", "render", "afterRender", "destroy"]

Each queue corresponds to a "phase of work" identified by the Ember core team. This set of queues and the code that manages them is the Ember runloop.

You can see a summary of the purpose of each queue in the Runloop Guide but here we are going to focus on the queues themselves.

How it works

First lets get some terminology sorted:

  • A job on a queue is just a plain ol' Javascript callback function.
  • Running a job is simply executing that function.

How Ember handles events:

  1. A browser event happens and Ember's registered listener for that event is triggered.
  2. Early on in its response to the event, Ember opens a set of queues and starts accepting jobs.
  3. As Ember works its way through your application code, it continues to schedule jobs on the queues.
  4. Near the end of its response to the event Ember closes the queue-set and starts running jobs on the queues. Scheduled jobs can themselves still add jobs to the queues even though we have closed them to other code.
  5. The Runloop Guide has an excellent visualisation of how jobs are run but in brief:
    1. Scan the queues array, starting at the first until you find a job. Finish if all queues are empty.
    2. Run the job (aka execute the callback function)
    3. Go to step 1

Lets consider some subtle consequences of this simple algorithm:

  • Ember does a full queue scan after each job - it does not attempt to finish a full queue before checking for earlier work.

  • Ember will only get to jobs on a queue if all the previous queues are empty.

  • Ember cannot guarantee that, for example, all sync queue tasks will be complete before any actions tasks are attempted because jobs on any queue after sync might add jobs to the sync queue. Ember will however do its best to do work in the desired order. It is not practical for your app to schedule all work before any is performed so this flexibility is necessary.

  • At first glance it may seem that the runloop has two distinct phases

    1. Schedule work
    2. Perform the work

    but this is subtly incorrect. Functions that have been scheduled on a runloop queue can themselves schedule functions on any queue in the same runloop. It is true that once the runloop starts executing the queues that code outside the queues cannot schedule new jobs. In a sense the initial set of jobs that are scheduled are a "starter set" of work and Ember commits to doing it and also doing any jobs that result from those jobs - Ember is a pretty great employee to have working for you!

Something that is not obvious from that description is that there is no "singleton" runloop. This is confusing because documentation (including this guide) uses the phrase "the runloop" to refer to the whole system but it is important to note that there is not a single instance of the runloop in memory (unlike the Ember container which is a singleton). There is no "the" runloop, instead there can be multiple instances of "a" runloop. It is true that Ember will usually only create one runloop per DOM event but this is not always the case. For example:

  • When you use (see below) you will be creating your own runloop that may go through its full lifecycle while the runloop that Ember uses is still accepting jobs.
  • Usually an Ember application will boot within a single runloop but if you enable the Ember Inspector then many more runloops happen at boot time.

Another consequence of the runloop not being a singleton is that it does not function as a "global gateway" to DOM access for the Ember app. It is not correct to say that the runloop is the "gatekeeper" to all DOM access in Ember, rather that "coordinated DOM access" is a pleasant (and deliberate!) side-effect of organising all the work done in response to an event.. As mentioned above, multiple runloops can exist simultaneously so there is no guarantee that all DOM access will happen at one time.

How often do runloops happen?

From what I have observed, Ember typically runs one runloop in response to each DOM event that it handles.

Visualising the runloop for yourself

This repo also contains the noisy runloop kit which is trivial demo app and a copy of Ember that I have patched to be very noisy about what its runloop does. You can add features to the demo app and see how the actions the runloop takes in response in the console. You can also use the included version of Ember in your own project to visualise what is happening there. Obviously you should only include this in development because it will slow the runloop down a lot.

Enough with the mousemove already!

When you start getting the runloop to log its work you will quickly get overwhelmed by its running in response to mouse events that happen very frequently on desktop browsers e.g. mousemove. Below is an initializer for Ember that will stop it listening to certain events. You probably want to add this to whatever Ember app you are trying to visualise the runloop for unless you are actually using mousemove, mouseenter, mouseleave in your app.

 * Tell Ember to stop listening for certain events. These events are very
 * frequent so they make it harder to visualise what the runloop is doing. Feel
 * free to adjust this list by adding/removing events. The full list of events
 * that Ember listens for by default is at

  name: 'Stop listening for overly noisy mouse events',

  initialize: function(container, application) {
    var events = container.lookup('event_dispatcher:main').events;
    delete events.mousemove;
    delete events.mouseenter;
    delete events.mouseleave;

What are autoruns?

Calls to any of

  • run.schedule
  • run.scheduleOnce
  • run.once

have the property that they will approximate a runloop for you if one does not already exist. These automatically (implicitly) created runloops are called autoruns.

Lets consider an example of a click handler:

  console.log('Doing things...');'actions', this, function() {
    // Do more things
  });'afterRender', this, function() {
    // Yet more things

When you call schedule Ember notices that there is not a currently open runloop so it opens one and schedules it to close on the next turn of the JS event loop.

Here is some pseudocode to describe what happens:

  // 1. autoruns do not change the execution of arbitrary code in a callback.
  //    This code is still run when this callback is executed and will not be
  //    scheduled on an autorun.
  console.log('Doing things...');'actions', this, function() {
    // 2. schedule notices that there is no currently available runloop so it
    //    creates one. It schedules it to close and flush queues on the next
    //    turn of the JS event loop.
    if (! {;
      nextTick(function() {

      }, 0);

    // 3. There is now a runloop available so schedule adds its item to the
    //    given queue'actions', this, function() {
      // Do more things


  // 4. scheduleOnce sees the autorun created by schedule above as an available
  //    runloop and adds its item to the given queue.'afterRender', this, function() {
    // Yet more things


Although autoruns are convenient you should not rely on them because:

  1. The current JS frame is allowed to end before the run loop is flushed, which sometimes means the browser will take the opportunity to do other things, like garbage collection.
  2. Only calls to run.schedule, run.scheduleOnce and run.once are wrapped in autoruns. All other code in your callback will happen outside Ember. This can lead to unexpected and confusing behavior.

How is runloop behaviour different when testing?

We know that

  • run.schedule
  • run.scheduleOnce
  • run.once

create a new runloop if one does not exist and that these automatically (implicitly) created runloops are called autoruns.

If Ember.testing is set then this "automatic runloop approximation creation" behaviour is disabled. In fact when Ember.testing is set these three functions will throw an error if you run them at a time when there is not an existing runloop available.

The reasons for this are:

  1. Autoruns are Embers way of not punishing you in production if you forget to open a runloop before you schedule callbacks on it. While this is useful in production, these are still issues you should fix and are revealed as such in testing mode to help you find and fix them.
  2. Some of Ember's test helpers are promises that wait for the run loop to empty before resolving. If your application has code that runs outside a runloop, these will resolve too early and gives erroneous test failures which can be very difficult to find. Disabling autoruns help you identify these scenarios and helps both your testing and your application!

How do I use the runloop?

The Ember runloop API docs are the canonical resource on what each function does. This section will provide a high-level overview of how the API works to make it easier to categorise it in your head and put it to use.

In the API we have:

  • 1 way of running a given callback in a new runloop
  • 1 way of adding a callback to the currently open runloop
  • 2 ways to add a callback to the current runloop and ensure that it is only added once.
  • 2 ways to add a callback to some future runloop
  • 2 ways of doing rate control on a callback. These control how often a callback is called (it will get its own runloop each time)
  • 1 way of cancelling work scheduled for a future runloop or rate control
  • 2 functions provide a low-level alternative to
  • 1 convenience function for forcing bindings to settle
Function Which runloop? Which queue? Creates new runloop? Notices Ember.testing? Runs callback in current JS event loop turn? always-new actions Always No Yes always-new actions Always No No always-new actions Always No No current actions If required No Yes current actions If required No No current chosen by param If required Yes Yes current chosen by param If required Yes Yes current actions If required Yes No future actions If required Yes No future actions If required Yes No NA NA Never No NA NA NA Never No NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA


  • future = some runloop in the future
  • The default queue in Ember is actions
  • NA = not applicable

A note about future work

There are two functions in the runloop API that let us schedule "future work":


Each of these API functions is a way of expressing when you would like work (a callback function) to happen. The guarantee provided by the runloop is that it will also manage the other work that results from running that function. It does not guarantee anything else!

The key points:

  • Ember keeps an internal queue of "future work" in the form of an array of timestamp and function pairs e.g. [(timestamp, fn), (timestamp, fn) ... ]
  • It uses this queue to manage work you have asked it to do on some runloop that is not the current one.
  • Each of the API functions above is a different way of adding a (timestamp, callback) pair to this array.
  • Ember does not know exactly when it will get a chance to execute this future work (Javascript might be busy doing something else).
  • Each time it checks the timers queue it executes all the functions whose timestamps are in the past so the future work API functions are creative in their creation of timestamps to achieve what they want.
  • When Ember does find some pairs on the future work queue that should be executed it creates a new runloop (using and schedules each function onto the actions queue.


  • When you give a function to one of the future work API functions you cannot know which runloop it will run in!
    • It may share a runloop with other future work functions.
    • It will only share with other functions from the future work queue
      • it will not share a runloop with other Ember code or anything you explicitly pass to yourself.
  • You can only directly schedule future work onto the actions queue. If you need to run something on a different queue of that future runloop you will need to schedule it from that actions queue callback.
  • Future work APIs let you specify some future runloop but not exactly which one.

A note about rate control

Ember provides two flavors of rate control.

    • Ignore a callback if the previous call to it was within a given time period
    • Used to guarantee a minimum time between calls to a particular callback

These functions are useful becuase they allow us to control when the given callback is not run. When it is actually run, these functions use so these functions can be thought of as " with some extra controls about when the function should be run"


It can take a while to get our heads around the subtleties of the runloop. In exchange we get the performance and scaling benefits that the runloop provides. I hope that you now feel more equipped to use the runloop skillfully.

Happy hacking.



The primary documentation for the Ember runloop is Official Ember Run-loop guide and the Ember API docs

These are other sources I studied in compiling this guide:

Other resources on the Runloop