Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redesign website to show existing solution first and petition on the side #17

Open
equivalent opened this issue Nov 29, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@equivalent
Copy link
Owner

equivalent commented Nov 29, 2018

since on 29.11.2018 one of the major players in Serverless world started to support native Ruby (AWS Lambda)

I think the serverless-ruby.org website should serve more as an informative website to show existing solutions + petition on the side, rather than petition as the main website purpose

Reasons

Back in March there was few hacky solutions to do FaaS now there is starting to be several solid ways for Ruby developer to do FaaS.

Once AWS introduce something, other providers will try to catch up quickly (e.g. Microsoft functions )

I still want to keep the petition but main topic of the website will be some resources with nice icons to technologies at the top and petition on the side.

Plan:

  • keep the petition but don't make it main theme of the website
  • landing page will point to existing solutions with better descriptions and links to guides
  • maybe even discussion forum ( 🤔 would you like this ? )
@andreasklinger
Copy link

become the primary resource for best practices when it comes to serverless ruby

eg i wouldnt know which framework to use to not wreck my loading times etc

@khalilgharbaoui
Copy link

Have a collection of basic and advanced serverless ruby solutions. ready to customize and deploy.

@metacritical
Copy link

Since ruby is now supported on AWS, checkout Jets/Rails Also i think now the Serverless-ruby website should have serverless tutorials on Rack, Rails , Sinatra etc ...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants