New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: fix typos,wrong path,backticks #6663
Conversation
@molee1905, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the annotation information on this pull request, we identified @pedrottimark, @nzakas and @michaelficarra to be potential reviewers |
LGTM |
Thank you for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a jQuery Foundation project, if so we need you to sign our Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please visit http://contribute.jquery.org/CLA/ to sign. After you signed, the PR is checked again automatically after a minute. If there's still an issue, please reply here to let us know. If you've already signed our CLA, it's possible your git author information doesn't match your CLA signature (both your name and email have to match), for more information, check the status of your CLA check. |
@kborchers could you help us with CLA again please? |
LGTM. Thanks for PR. Waiting for CLA to be resolved before merging. |
@molee1905 I recently had a similar problem with CLA, maybe some tips there could help. |
@molee1905 you can't use your username as the name you sign the CLA with, it has to be an actual human name. |
Since we will be modifying the name check soon, I went ahead and added an exception to the signature and reran the check. Should be all set now and sorry for the delay. |
Thanks all !
The CLA just requires the name and email mach the name and email address in one's git config, dose not require an actual human name; in my config, the name and username both are molee1905, so there is no problem with the CLA's requirements. i'am not the only one to be labeled CLA: Error with correct operation according to the CLA's requirement , maybe, the rule to sign the CLA successfully should be described in more detail,and it will be better to change the way of manual verification. Hoping the change! |
Thanks @kborchers for your help! LGTM. Thanks for PR @molee1905 |
What issue does this pull request address?
docs fixed
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
fix typos,wrong path,backticks.
for example: in the rule no-undefined
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
no