Docs: Wrap `Buffer()` in backticks in `no-buffer-constructor` rule description #10084
Conversation
aladdin-add
changed the title
aladdin-add
merged commit 72ed3db
into
eslint:master
4 of 5 checks passed
4 of 5 checks passed
This was referenced Mar 16, 2018
This was referenced Mar 16, 2018
This was referenced Mar 16, 2018
This was referenced Mar 16, 2018
This was referenced Mar 22, 2018
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to item)
[x] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofixing to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Wraps
Buffer()in backticks in theno-buffer-constructorrule descriptionAdds further consistency to already backtick'd code in rule docs and descriptions:
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Nope, just thanks, and have a great day😄