Sascha Kiefer esskar

esskar opened pull request esskar/Serialize.Linq#58
@esskar
allow factory settings to be passed when serializing
1 commit with 22 additions and 24 deletions
@esskar
  • @esskar 67229e2
    allow factory settings to be passed when serializing
esskar commented on pull request esskar/Serialize.Linq#55
@esskar

Your tests for internals still fail!

esskar commented on issue esskar/Serialize.Linq#54
@esskar

I am not sure if i want to support private fields, because they are private! Have to think about it!

@esskar
Collection serialization expression 'contains'
esskar commented on issue esskar/Serialize.Linq#56
@esskar

Thanks for that. I fixed it. See Unit Test for your Issue: https://github.com/esskar/Serialize.Linq/blob/master/src/Serialize.Linq.Tests/Issues/Iss…

esskar deleted branch develop at esskar/Serialize.Linq
@esskar
esskar merged pull request esskar/Serialize.Linq#57
@esskar
fix issue #56
1 commit with 71 additions and 2 deletions
@esskar
Issue serializing collections inside expressions
esskar commented on issue esskar/Serialize.Linq#53
@esskar

You cannot use array's and list's together; it is not the fault of Serialize.Linq, it is how the DataContractor works. Now, you have to specify on …

esskar opened pull request esskar/Serialize.Linq#57
@esskar
fix issue #56
1 commit with 71 additions and 2 deletions
@esskar
@esskar
Implement inner joins #186
esskar commented on issue TonicArtos/SuperSLiM#110
@esskar

What's the develop branch?

@esskar
@esskar
serialization issues
esskar merged pull request esskar/Serialize.Linq#51
@esskar
Develop
2 commits with 180 additions and 3 deletions
esskar commented on issue esskar/Serialize.Linq#50
@esskar

Hi, contains are not shown, but the values are there. if you navigate into the expression three, you will see that the values are actually bound. i…

esskar opened pull request esskar/Serialize.Linq#51
@esskar
Develop
2 commits with 180 additions and 3 deletions
@esskar
esskar commented on issue esskar/Serialize.Linq#50
@esskar

Before I explain, i have a question: what is your expected output after deserialization?

@esskar
Bug detected in LinearSLM