-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 293
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New IA implementation #267
Comments
|
@nate-double-u: good first pass. Here are some suggestions for the "sitemap" (which isn't really a sitemap -- maybe we should call it "Permalink structure"):
|
Good question. I think I will move them under the versioning. Also, what about pages like /docs/v3.4/triage(/issues), or /docs/v3.4/upgrades? Should they be removed from under versioning? I expect that the process of opening a ticket won't change from version to version. Upgrades is a list of X.Y to X.Z upgrades, so is mostly duplicated content. |
|
While we go through this process we should consider standardizing "-" vs "_" in links. |
|
So in a nutshell, based on the reading of the docs I’ve done this week (05/09), here’s what I’m feeling needs to be done:
All of this is open to discussion, of course. |
|
I had initially tried to organize the IA into an Evaluation, Addition, Fix, and Features model; would a Concepts, Tasks, Tutorials, and Reference model (like on the k8s.io/docs pages) be a better model to go with given what we've got already built out? |
|
Sorry for the noise, but as this is a discussion about new pages and where and how to fit them in, I thought this would be a better place to discuss an Observability section. From: #374: An Observability section has been suggested during the conversations around the v3.5 release:
originally posted by @lilic in #280
Originally posted by @gyuho in #280 (comment) |
|
This may fit in well with the new Tutorials page/section. |
|
[edit] removing comment to refactor into issues like the above comments |
|
There's some discussion of possible IA rework in #309 (comment): Maybe
Which makes me think that Hmm, we have too many entries below /docs/v3.5. |
|
@nate-double-u: is the original Jira ticket (associated with #65) still open? If not (or maybe regardless), opening a new ticket requesting an IA assessment and new IA proposal might make sense. WDYT? /cc @celestehorgan |
Reference: #110, #65
Permalink Structure
etcd" page #395Overview (/docs/v3.5/rfc/v3api/)#364Demo(/docs/v3.5/demo) (Rework into Tutorials section) Consider reworking "Demos" page into "Tutorials" #402Download and build(docs/v3.5/dl-build) (Refactor into Quickstart and Installation) Rename docs/next/dl-build to install #319Reporting bugs(/docs/v3.5/reporting_bugs) Create Contributor Guide #400Platforms‡ (/docs/v3.5/platforms) (Convert Platforms/Amazon Web Services page into a blog post #396, Convert "Platforms/Container Linux withsystemd" page into a blog post #397, Convert "Platforms/FreeBSD" page into a blog post #398, Convert @marifse's Platforms/IBM PR into a blog post #399)Triage(/docs/v3.5/triage)Issue Triage Guidelines(/docs/v3.5/triage/issues) Create Contributor Guide #400Legend
Bold: new pages
Italic: moved pages (new location)
Strike through: moved or removed pages (old location)⋮ (vertical ellipsis): one or more unlisted pages
Notes
Other:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: