An implementation of
printf using c++11's variadic templates. It was inspired
by some of the "safe printf" examples that I've seen. But none of them attempted
to actually implement the
printf fully with all of its quirks. This code is
(an attempt) to do that.
An advantage of this, is that we can support ANY type being passed to a format,
even complex objects. For example, when
CXX11_PRINTF_EXTENSIONS is enabled
"%?" means "call
to_string on the argument and print the result" This uses
ADL, so it will find the version that you specify in your namespaces, or use
std::to_string as a fallback. If no
to_string is found, it uses the internal
one which asserts.
NOTE: floating point is not implemented, as it is complex to do correctly, but is on the TODO list.
Usage is similar to
snprintf, but more robust. Instead of a buffer/size pair
being passed as a parameter, you pass a context object which has two functions
and a data member:
// writes a single character to the output of your choosing void write(char ch); // writes a string of characters to the output of your choosing void write(const char *p, size_t n); // called when formatting is complete, useful for ensuring NUL termination void done(); // increment this every time we write is called, this is what printf will // return. size_t written = 0;
A simple example of the usage of the library is as follows:
char buf; cxx11::buffer_writer ctx(buf, sizeof(buf)); cxx11::Printf(ctx, "[hello %*s %d]", 10, "world", 123); // buffer now contains "[hello world 123]"
The context uses duck typing, so any object that meets the critera will suffice, but there are several examples in Formatters.h
Additionally, while the context based interface is very flexible and can accomidate essentially any destination stream or buffer. This implementation also includes more familiar interfaces:
int cxx11::sprintf(std::ostream &os, const char *format, const Ts &... ts);
int cxx11::sprintf(char *str, size_t size, const char *format, const Ts &... ts);
int cxx11::printf(const char *format, const Ts &... ts);
All of which work in the expected ways without the need to manually manage the concept of "contexts".
Performance so far, when optimizations are at -O3 is comparable to glibc's printf. Here is the included test program's output on my machine:
hello world, A, -123, 00001234 0x7ffe75bd6ff8 0000004294967292 ffffffff 0000000000002322 hello world, A, -123, 00001234 0x7ffe75bd6ff8 0000004294967292 ffffffff 0000000000002322 First Took: 383955 µs to execute. Second Took: 382404 µs to execute.
I am sure however, that there is room for some optimizations too :-)