Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create EIP-4361: Sign-In with Ethereum #4361

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 17, 2021
Merged

Conversation

wyc
Copy link
Contributor

@wyc wyc commented Oct 11, 2021

This is the draft PR for Sign-In with Ethereum. Development is happening in the open on community calls.

Latest updates about the project can be found at https://login.xyz

TODO:

  • Add links to first mentions of RFC/EIP specifications
  • Complete WIP sections
  • Fix failing CI build
  • Continue discussion and incorporate feedback

EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@awoie awoie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this is still a draft, it is feels a bit weird that folks have already approved this. @wyc Is this going to be merged once all issues in the community calls get addressed?

@wyc
Copy link
Contributor Author

wyc commented Oct 14, 2021

@awoie the PR is indeed in draft state, and therefore can't be merged right now. I appreciate everyone who signaled their support for it so far! We will discuss pretty important matters in the public community calls and attempt full resolution of any concerns prior to merge, but also we are on a timeline for delivery so this must be balanced too.

Full details: https://login.xyz

@wyc
Copy link
Contributor Author

wyc commented Oct 14, 2021

Hi, I have opened a thread here to continue all discussion: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/eip-4361-sign-in-with-ethereum/7263/2

@ethereum ethereum deleted a comment Oct 15, 2021
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@wyc wyc marked this pull request as ready for review November 18, 2021 20:34
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <57262657+SamWilsn@users.noreply.github.com>
@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Nov 23, 2021

All tests passed; auto-merging...

(pass) eip-4361.md

classification
updateEIP
  • passed!

@MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

MicahZoltu commented Nov 24, 2021

Reminder to everyone: PR comments should mostly be limited to feedback required to get the EIP merged as a draft. Discussions about the specification itself should go in the discussions-to link found in the EIP header.

sbihel and others added 2 commits November 26, 2021 13:39
Also remove trailing whitespaces
- RFC 4501 `dnsauthority` -> RFC 3986 `authority`.
- Add SHOULD guideline for wallet implementers to check for simple
  phishing attacks.
- Credits to @SamWilsn.
@wyc
Copy link
Contributor Author

wyc commented Dec 1, 2021

Hi @MicahZoltu, I believe we are ready for review and merge here. Thank you for your patience.

@MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

I only handle Core EIPs. @axic or @lightclient are the ones who handle ERCs.

EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
EIPS/eip-4361.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- EIP URIs changed to relative paths
- Paragraph from motivation section moved to `discussions-to`
- Discussion & Acknowledgements section moved to `discussions-to`
- Forwards Compatibility section moved under Rationale section
- Additional Resources section moved to `discussions-to`
@wyc
Copy link
Contributor Author

wyc commented Dec 9, 2021

@lightclient thank you for your keen eye, in my latest commit I hope to have addressed all the points you brought up. Ready for another review when you're ready. Please let me know if you'd prefer that I squash everything into a single commit.

@wyc
Copy link
Contributor Author

wyc commented Dec 14, 2021

Hi @lightclient, following up on this PR. Please let me know if there are any further necessary changes. I appreciate your review to date!

Copy link
Member

@lightclient lightclient left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your patience and for addressing that feedback. LGTM.

@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu closed this Dec 17, 2021
@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu reopened this Dec 17, 2021
@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu closed this Dec 17, 2021
@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu reopened this Dec 17, 2021
@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu merged commit 84b969d into ethereum:master Dec 17, 2021
@ethereum ethereum deleted a comment Dec 20, 2021
PhABC pushed a commit to PhABC/EIPs that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2022
* Create EIP-4361: Sign-In with Ethereum

* Update discussion link to ethereum-magicians.org

* Little fixes to the grammar and examples

* Out of Scope Section, Updates to Language

- Adds an out of scope section
- Updates the language around domain-binding verification for wallets

* Add links to RFCs and EIPs

* Fix broken TBD link

* Fix typos and trailing spaces

* Resolve remaining WIP items

Also addresses formatting issues from the CI.

* updated additional resources and forwards compatibility

* Clarify the definition of `\n` in `statement`

Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <57262657+SamWilsn@users.noreply.github.com>

* Fix chain ID placement in examples

Also remove trailing whitespaces

* Improvements to grammar and security guidelines

- RFC 4501 `dnsauthority` -> RFC 3986 `authority`.
- Add SHOULD guideline for wallet implementers to check for simple
  phishing attacks.
- Credits to @SamWilsn.

* Improve Conformance to EIP-1

- EIP URIs changed to relative paths
- Paragraph from motivation section moved to `discussions-to`
- Discussion & Acknowledgements section moved to `discussions-to`
- Forwards Compatibility section moved under Rationale section
- Additional Resources section moved to `discussions-to`

Co-authored-by: Simon Bihel <simon.bihel@spruceid.com>
Co-authored-by: Gregory Rocco <gregoryrocco1226@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Wilson <57262657+SamWilsn@users.noreply.github.com>
@sbihel sbihel deleted the eip-4361 branch April 29, 2024 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.