Skip to content

Conversation

@acoglio
Copy link
Member

@acoglio acoglio commented Apr 27, 2019

According to eqs. (177) and (178), the elements of the sequence are selected
with the notation ...[...]. While eq. (180) uses that notation for x[0],
eq. (184) was using a subscript notation x_0, x_1, and x_i. This commit turns
these into x[0], x[1], and x[i].

This changes
old
to
new

According to eqs. (177) and (178), the elements of the sequence are selected
with the notation ...[...]. While eq. (180) uses that notation for x[0],
eq. (184) was using a subscript notation x_0, x_1, and x_i. This commit turns
these into x[0], x[1], and x[i].
@nicksavers nicksavers merged commit 53edd02 into ethereum:master Apr 29, 2019
@acoglio acoglio deleted the seq-comp branch May 2, 2019 00:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants