You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
it seems that the last row is the OR for "extent" as a continuous variable, but in the table, extent is considered as a factor but the OR is not displayed.
If I changed “extent” to a factor, it can be corrected. But how can I do when I want to do it as a continuous variable? cont_cut seems not work in finalfit().
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Many thanks for this. Apologies I didn't get a notification when this was posted.
It's kind of a bug, yes, in that a continuous variable with very few distinct values is being passed to a regression model. This would often be treated as a factor (see extent.factor).
A fix for this has been pushed with version 1.0.55.
Hi! Can this be extended to or_plot() as well (adding a cont_cut arg)? My finalfit and or_plot are showing incohesive results, most likely because of this reason which causes one of my cont variables to be treated as factor.
I also want to know the updates.
cont_cut now is available in finalfit(), but it doesn't work in glmuni() or glmmulti(). That means we cannot get right results from a poisson model
The results are:
<style> </style>it seems that the last row is the OR for "extent" as a continuous variable, but in the table, extent is considered as a factor but the OR is not displayed.
If I changed “extent” to a factor, it can be corrected. But how can I do when I want to do it as a continuous variable? cont_cut seems not work in finalfit().
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: